World Court Orders Myanmar to Protect Rohingya from Genocide

Aung San Suu Kyi appears in court in case filed by Gambia against Myanmar alleging genocide against the Rohingya population, at the ICJ in The Hague, Netherlands December 11, 2019. (Reuters)
Aung San Suu Kyi appears in court in case filed by Gambia against Myanmar alleging genocide against the Rohingya population, at the ICJ in The Hague, Netherlands December 11, 2019. (Reuters)
TT

World Court Orders Myanmar to Protect Rohingya from Genocide

Aung San Suu Kyi appears in court in case filed by Gambia against Myanmar alleging genocide against the Rohingya population, at the ICJ in The Hague, Netherlands December 11, 2019. (Reuters)
Aung San Suu Kyi appears in court in case filed by Gambia against Myanmar alleging genocide against the Rohingya population, at the ICJ in The Hague, Netherlands December 11, 2019. (Reuters)

The International Court of Justice on Thursday ordered Myanmar to take urgent measures to protect its Rohingya population from genocide, a ruling cheered by refugees as their first major legal victory since being forced from their homes.

A lawsuit launched by Gambia in November at the United Nations' highest body for disputes between states accuses Myanmar of genocide against Rohingya in violation of a 1948 convention.

The court's final decision could take years, and Thursday's ruling dealt only with Gambia's request for preliminary measures. But in a unanimous ruling by the 17-judge panel, the court said the Rohingya face an ongoing threat and Myanmar must act to protect them.

Myanmar must "take all measures within its power to prevent all acts" prohibited under the 1948 Genocide Convention, and report back within four months, presiding Judge Abdulqawi Yusuf said, reading out a summary of the judgment.

Myanmar must use its influence over its military and other armed groups to prevent violence against the Rohingya "intended to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part".

Rohingya activists, who had come from all over the world to the Hague, reacted with joy to the unanimous ruling which also explicitly recognized their ethnic minority as a protected group under the Genocide Convention.

"That is something we have been fighting for a long time: to be recognized as humans the same as everyone else," Yasmin Ullah, a Canada-based Rohingya activist said, according to Reuters.

Majority Buddhist Myanmar generally refuses to describe the Muslim Rohingya as an ethnic group and refers to them as Bangladeshi migrants.

Myanmar's ministry of foreign affairs said in a statement late on Thursday it "takes note" of the decision.

"The unsubstantiated condemnation of Myanmar by some human rights actors has presented a distorted picture of the situation in Rakhine and affected Myanmar’s bilateral relations with several countries", it added.

More than 730,000 Rohingya fled Myanmar after a military-led crackdown in 2017, and were forced into squalid camps across the border in Bangladesh. UN investigators concluded that the military campaign had been executed with "genocidal intent".

In camps in Bangladesh where they have fled, Rohingya refugees hovered over mobile phones to watch the judgment.

"For the first time, we have got some justice," said Mohammed Nur, 34. "This is a big achievement for the entire Rohingya community."

Rohingya still living inside Myanmar contacted by phone said they hoped the ruling would force the country to improve their situation.

"We need protection," said Tin Aung, a Rohingya leader living in Myebon township in central Rakhine state, where Muslims have been confined to camps since violence in 2012.

A Myanmar government spokesman and two military spokesmen did not answer calls from Reuters seeking comment.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres welcomed the court order and "recalls that, pursuant to the Charter and to the Statute of the Court, decisions of the Court are binding and trusts that Myanmar will duly comply," U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said in a statement.

‘Triumph’

Gambia's justice minister, Abubacarr Tambadou, hailed the ruling as "a triumph for international justice".

Mainly Muslim Gambia brought the case despite being located halfway around the world, on the argument that all nations have a universal legal duty to prevent genocide. Tambadou, a former prosecutor at a UN tribunal over the Rwanda genocide, took up the issue on behalf of the 57-member OIC group of Muslim states.

The case was argued last month by some of the world's top human rights lawyers, with Myanmar's civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi personally attending hearings at The Hague to ask judges to dismiss it.

Moments before the court began reading its ruling, the Financial Times published an article by Suu Kyi, in which she said war crimes may have been committed against Rohingya Muslims but refugees had exaggerated abuses.

Although ICJ rulings are final and binding, countries have occasionally flouted them, and the court has no formal mechanism to enforce them.

"The ICJ order to Myanmar to take concrete steps to prevent the genocide of the Rohingya is a landmark step to stop further atrocities against one of the world’s most persecuted people,” said Param-Preet Singh, associate international justice director at Human Rights Watch. "Concerned governments and UN bodies should now weigh in to ensure that the order is enforced. …"

Yusuf, the presiding judge, said the court was not satisfied with Myanmar's own efforts "to facilitate the return of Rohingya refugees present in Bangladesh, to promote ethnic reconciliation, peace and stability in Rakhine State, and to make its military accountable for violations of international humanitarian and human rights law".

Myanmar will now have to regularly report on its efforts to protect the Rohingya from acts of genocide every six months until a final ruling in the case.



Israel Presses Washington to Amend War Plan

US President Donald Trump hosts Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Florida on Dec. 29, 2025 (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump hosts Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Florida on Dec. 29, 2025 (Reuters)
TT

Israel Presses Washington to Amend War Plan

US President Donald Trump hosts Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Florida on Dec. 29, 2025 (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump hosts Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Florida on Dec. 29, 2025 (Reuters)

Israeli political sources said the government is pushing back against key elements of a US proposal to end the war with Iran, describing the dispute as fundamental rather than technical.

They said three of the plan’s 15 clauses are at the heart of disagreements with the administration of US President Donald Trump.

Israel’s public broadcaster Kan 11, citing two sources familiar with the proposal, said the sticking points include vague language on the future of Iran’s ballistic missile program, the transfer of enriched uranium to the International Atomic Energy Agency, and sweeping relief from US and European sanctions.

Israel says talks with Washington are ongoing and that revisions to the draft remain possible. A source close to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the government aims to end the war within two weeks.

But Israeli Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir warned the security cabinet of a potential “collapse” of the army as it fights on multiple fronts. Other officials still fear Trump could impose a temporary ceasefire to open talks with Tehran.

Channel 12 quoted senior officials as saying Israel would be notified in advance of any US move toward negotiations, but its influence is currently limited.

A senior Israeli security official said Iran can sustain its current rate of fire for weeks, with enough launch platforms and personnel to stagger attacks over time. Israel’s security establishment has recommended continuing the war until Iran’s national infrastructure is struck.

“If we stop now, we will be close to our goals, but there is still more to complete,” an Israeli source said.

Channel 12 reported no signs of a breakthrough in US-Iran contacts. Instead, it cited indications of US military planning for a major strike on Tehran.

It said prospects for a deal are currently low, prompting the US Department of Defense to prepare options for what it described as a “decisive blow,” potentially involving ground operations and a wide bombing campaign if diplomacy stalls and the Strait of Hormuz remains closed.

Yedioth Ahronoth said Trump is offering incentives to draw Iran into talks while preparing for a powerful strike, describing the mixed messaging as a complex wartime deception.

An Israeli source confirmed reports by Axios and Channel 12, citing informed US officials, that Washington is weighing scenarios including taking control of Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil export hub, targeting Larak Island, reinforcing control over the Strait of Hormuz, seizing Abu Musa and other Gulf islands, or intercepting Iranian oil shipments east of the strait.

The sources said the US military has also prepared plans for ground operations inside Iran to secure highly enriched uranium at nuclear facilities, though the scenario is seen as complex and risky. An alternative would be large-scale airstrikes on those sites to deny Iran access to the material.

Israeli media said Zamir warned the cabinet of a possible army “collapse” due to multi-front fighting and shortages in personnel and resources.

At a daily briefing on Thursday, the military spokesperson said the army lacks 15,000 troops, including 8,000 combat soldiers.

Reports added that Zamir raised 10 “red flags” over the army’s condition and warned of escalating “Jewish terrorist attacks” by settlers in the occupied West Bank.

He said another battalion had been deployed there, while the army’s central command believes one more is needed to complete the mission.


Israel Army Confirms Struck Two Nuclear Sites in Iran

Emergency responders inspect the site of a residential building damaged by a strike, amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 27, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
Emergency responders inspect the site of a residential building damaged by a strike, amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 27, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
TT

Israel Army Confirms Struck Two Nuclear Sites in Iran

Emergency responders inspect the site of a residential building damaged by a strike, amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 27, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
Emergency responders inspect the site of a residential building damaged by a strike, amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 27, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters

The Israeli military confirmed it struck a heavy water reactor and a uranium processing plant in central Iran on Friday, as it targeted nuclear sites in the country.

"A short while ago, the Israeli Air Force... struck the heavy water plant in Arak, central Iran," the military said in a statement, describing the site as a "key plutonium production site for nuclear weapons".

Iranian media had earlier reported that US-Israeli strikes hit the Khondab heavy water complex, saying they caused no casualties or radiation leak from the site.

Work on the reactor on the outskirts of the village of Khondab began in the 2000s, but was halted under the terms of a now-abandoned 2015 nuclear deal struck between Iran and world powers.

The core of the reactor was removed and concrete was poured into it, rendering it inoperative.

The research reactor was officially intended to produce plutonium for medical research and the site includes a production plant for heavy water.

The Israeli military also confirmed it struck a uranium processing site in central Iran's Yazd on Friday, after the country’s atomic energy organization said US-Israeli strikes hit the facility.

"A short while ago, the Israeli Air Force... struck a uranium extraction plant located in Yazd, central Iran," the military said in a statement, describing the site as a "unique facility in Iran used for the production of raw materials required for the uranium enrichment process".

Iran's atomic energy organization said the strike on the plant "did not result in the release of any radioactive material."

Israel and the US accuse Iran of seeking to acquire nuclear weapons, while Tehran maintains that its program is for civilian purposes.

The heavy water plant in Arak was targeted by Israeli strikes during the 12-day war between Iran and Israel last June, during which the US also carried out bombings.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says the site was "damaged" during the attacks and "is assessed not to have been fully operational since that time."

But the agency said it has not had access to the site since May 2025.

The Middle East was plunged into war on February 28 when the US and Israel launched joint strikes on Iran, triggering retaliatory missile and drone attacks targeting Israel and several countries in the region.


US, Israel Unlikely to Achieve ‘Regime Change’ in Iran, Says Merz

 27 March 2026, Hesse, Frankfurt/Main: Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz speaks at the "FAZ" Congress. (dpa)
27 March 2026, Hesse, Frankfurt/Main: Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz speaks at the "FAZ" Congress. (dpa)
TT

US, Israel Unlikely to Achieve ‘Regime Change’ in Iran, Says Merz

 27 March 2026, Hesse, Frankfurt/Main: Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz speaks at the "FAZ" Congress. (dpa)
27 March 2026, Hesse, Frankfurt/Main: Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz speaks at the "FAZ" Congress. (dpa)

The US-Israeli war against Iran is unlikely to lead to "regime change", German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Friday, as the month-long conflict showed no signs of abating.

"Is regime change really the goal?" he said at a forum in Frankfurt organized by the FAZ newspaper.

"If that's the goal, I don't think you'll achieve it. It's mostly gone wrong" in past conflicts, he said, pointing to the Afghanistan war.

"I have serious doubts as to whether there is a strategy and whether that strategy is being successfully implemented," he added. "In that respect, it could take even longer."

Germany has pushed back at US President Donald Trump's criticisms of NATO members for failing to join the attacks on Iran, insisting that it is not their war.

Merz however said Friday he believed that Trump had accepted this stance.

He also said Germany would be open to helping provide military protection in the Strait of Hormuz, a key route for oil and gas, which has been nearly totally blocked, in the event of a ceasefire.

"This requires an international mandate, it requires approval from the German parliament and, prior to that, a cabinet decision. And we are far from that."