Palestine Insists on Prosecuting Israel Before ICC

Red Crescent evacuating citizens from Jenin camp during an Israeli operation on July 4 (EPA)
Red Crescent evacuating citizens from Jenin camp during an Israeli operation on July 4 (EPA)
TT

Palestine Insists on Prosecuting Israel Before ICC

Red Crescent evacuating citizens from Jenin camp during an Israeli operation on July 4 (EPA)
Red Crescent evacuating citizens from Jenin camp during an Israeli operation on July 4 (EPA)

Palestine insists on resorting to the International Criminal Court (ICC) to pressure Israel, despite its dissatisfaction with the court's performance.

Palestinians accuse the ICC of bias and turning not humanitarian issues into political ones.

They are awaiting an advisory opinion from the ICC prosecutor, Karim Khan, whom they accuse of procrastinating the discussion of the Palestinian file.

Earlier, the Israeli security cabinet approved a series of measures to prevent the collapse of the Palestinian Authority (PA) while advancing its demand to cease its activities against Israel in the international legal-diplomatic arena.

However, the Palestinian Foreign Ministry confirmed it would proceed with the case.

The political advisor to the Foreign Minister, Ambassador Ahmed al-Deek, said the Palestinians reject the politicization of the international court, which is based in The Hague in the Netherlands.

He added that the Authority wants to ensure the court's commitment to the Rome Statute and the regulations governing its work.

Signed in 1998, The Rome Statute affirms "that the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole must not go unpunished and that their effective prosecution must be ensured by taking measures at the national level and by enhancing international cooperation."

It is determined to end impunity for the perpetrators of these crimes and thus contribute to preventing such crimes.

Deek told the Arab News Agency (ANA) that the court must step up and speed up its investigations regarding the crimes of the occupation and the files that were referred to the court.

He asserted that it remains unclear why the Court is investigating and issuing memorandums concerning the situation in Ukraine but remains silent regarding the violations and crimes in Palestine.

The Palestinians referred three files to the ICC concerning the attacks, killings, and assassinations in the Gaza Strip, the settlements in the West Bank and Jerusalem, and the Palestinian detainees.

The official asserted that all these issues include grave Israeli violations and crimes against international laws and the Rome Statute, noting that Palestine is a member of the Court's General Assembly, which consists of the group of signatories to the Rome Statute.

He added that the Palestinians may request at any moment, in cooperation with friendly Arab and Islamic countries, to hold a meeting of the General Assembly so that the court assumes its responsibilities towards crimes committed against the Palestinian people.

Head of the Gaza-based International Commission to Support Palestinians' Rights Salah Abdalati believes Palestinians should have resorted to the international court sooner.

He accused the new public prosecutor of seeking to please the West, led by the US and Israel.

The expert recalled that within a week, the Prosecutor went to Ukraine to investigate the war and issued an arrest warrant against Russian President Vladimir Putin in less than a year, although Russia and Ukraine are not party to the Rome Accord.

The legal advisor, Nafez al-Madhoun, believes that Israel and some major countries influence the ICC judges.

He told the Arab News Agency that the Palestinian Authority must, without hesitation or fear, resort to the international court for justice for Palestinian victims who have suffered over the past years from repression and occupation measures that amount to genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.

Madhoun noted that Israel fears the International Criminal Court, even if its leaders' statements show otherwise.



Lebanon Parliament Adjourns for Consultations after Failing to Elect Aoun in First Round

The Lebanese Parliament building a day before a session to elect the Lebanese president, in Beirut, Lebanon, 08 January 2025. (EPA)
The Lebanese Parliament building a day before a session to elect the Lebanese president, in Beirut, Lebanon, 08 January 2025. (EPA)
TT

Lebanon Parliament Adjourns for Consultations after Failing to Elect Aoun in First Round

The Lebanese Parliament building a day before a session to elect the Lebanese president, in Beirut, Lebanon, 08 January 2025. (EPA)
The Lebanese Parliament building a day before a session to elect the Lebanese president, in Beirut, Lebanon, 08 January 2025. (EPA)

Lebanon's parliament speaker Nabih Berri adjourned a session held on Thursday to elect a president for two hours of consultations, after a first round of voting failed to produce enough votes for Lebanese army commander Joseph Aoun.
Aoun needs 86 votes to be elected but received 71. Two political sources said he was likely to cross the 86-vote threshold in a second session on Thursday.

Lawmakers began the session amid expectations it could see Aoun elected as president following a vacancy of more than two years.
The 128-lawmaker chamber, which has failed to reach consensus a dozen times amid tensions between the Iran-backed Hezbollah movement and its opponents, started discussions at 11:00 am (0900 GMT).
Aoun, no relation to the former president, is widely seen as the preferred candidate of the United States, whose assistance Lebanon will need as it seeks to rebuild after a 14-month conflict between Israel and Hezbollah.
Hezbollah previously backed another candidate, Suleiman Franjieh, the leader of Marada movement with close ties to former Syrian President Bashar Assad.
However, on Wednesday, Franjieh announced he had withdrawn from the race and endorsed Aoun, apparently clearing the way for the army chief.
Lebanon’s fractious sectarian power-sharing system is prone to deadlock, both for political and procedural reasons. The small, crisis-battered Mediterranean country has been through several extended presidential vacancies, with the longest lasting nearly 2 1/2 years between May 2014 and October 2016. It ended when former President Michel Aoun was elected.
As a sitting army commander, Joseph Aoun is technically barred from becoming president by Lebanon's constitution. The ban has been waived before, but it means that Aoun faces additional procedural hurdles.
Under normal circumstances, a presidential candidate in Lebanon can be elected by a two-thirds majority of the 128-member house in the first round of voting, or by a simple majority in a subsequent round.
But because of the constitutional issues surrounding his election, Aoun would need a two-thirds majority even in the second round.
Other contenders include Jihad Azour, a former finance minister who is now the director of the Middle East and Central Asia Department at the International Monetary Fund; and Elias al-Baysari, the acting head of Lebanon’s General Security agency.
A president is needed to appoint a permanent prime minister and cabinet. The caretaker government that has run Lebanon for the last two years has reduced powers because it was not appointed by a sitting president.
The next government will face daunting challenges apart from implementing the ceasefire agreement that ended the Israel-Hezbollah war and seeking funds for reconstruction.
Lebanon is six years into an economic and financial crisis that decimated the country's currency and wiped out the savings of many Lebanese. The cash-strapped state electricity company provides only a few hours of power a day.
The country's leaders reached a preliminary agreement with the IMF for a bail-out package in 2022 but have made limited progress on reforms required to clinch the deal.