Washington Welcomes Iraqi Court Decision in US Citizen’s Murder Case

Stephen Troell and his wife in Iraq (Stephen Troell’s social media)
Stephen Troell and his wife in Iraq (Stephen Troell’s social media)
TT

Washington Welcomes Iraqi Court Decision in US Citizen’s Murder Case

Stephen Troell and his wife in Iraq (Stephen Troell’s social media)
Stephen Troell and his wife in Iraq (Stephen Troell’s social media)

The US State Department welcomed the Iraqi judiciary’s move to convict and sentence an Iranian and four Iraqis on charges of killing US citizen Stephen Troell, who was shot dead in a street in Baghdad in November 2022.

 

“We welcome the Iraqi court’s decision to convict and sentence multiple individuals on terrorism charges for their roles in the killing of US citizen Stephen Troell,” the office of State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said on Friday.

 

The statement added: “It is critical that all those responsible for the brutal, premeditated assassination of Mr. Troell face justice and accountability. We again extend our condolences to Mr. Troell’s family and hope this verdict brings them some measure of justice.”

 

The Iraqi judiciary issued a life imprisonment sentence against an officer of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) and four other Iraqis for their role in the case.

 

Troell was killed on November 7, 2022, by unknown gunmen while driving his car with his family near a market in Karrada in central Baghdad.

 

The killing was considered a clear message targeting the new government, which included most political parties affiliated with Iran.

 

But the Prime Minister, Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, ordered the Ministry of Interior to conduct a high-level investigation into the incident and to reach the perpetrators as quickly as possible.

 

According to the Ministry of the Interior, an intelligence work team followed up on the events. It investigated the incident for several days in different regions and places until it identified the perpetrators.

 

During the questioning, the perpetrators confessed to their crime, and the case was referred to the competent court.

 

The five men admitted that they intended to kidnap Troell for ransom and not to kill him.

 

The Ministry announced that the intelligence team is still looking for four other defendants.

 

Initially, the defendants' nationality was not clear, and preliminary information indicated that they were Iraqis belonging to multiple factions.

 

According to circulating information, the Iranian convict sentenced to life imprisonment, Mohammed Ali Reza, works as an advisor at an Iraqi security service and resides in Baghdad.

 

Earlier, an unknown armed faction called “Ahl al-Kahf” Brigades claimed responsibility for killing Troell.

 

According to the armed faction’s statement, he was killed “in retaliation for the assassination of Qassem Soleimani, commander of the Quds Force, and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, deputy head of the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF).”

 

However, the Iraqi authorities ignored such allegations since the factions that possess weapons and influence are often known.

 

The security situation has improved in Iraq since the Baghdad government announced its victory over ISIS in 2017, but political violence continues.

 

After the October 2019 protests, many anti-authority activists were subjected to a widespread campaign of assassinations, kidnappings, and threats.

 

Activists accuse pro-Iranian groups, whose presence is considered essential in Iraq. They feel dissatisfied that no one has been held accountable for those crimes, according to Agence France Presse.

 

In July 2020, the expert in extremist movements and civil society activist, Hisham al-Hashemi, was assassinated in front of his home in Baghdad.

 

Legal expert Ali al-Tamimi explained that appeals for rulings issued by the criminal court, whether they are sentences or life imprisonment, are mandatory under Article 245 of the Criminal Code.

 

Tamimi told Asharq Al-Awsat that the case would be referred to the court of appeals, and the concerned body would issue its decision by agreement, or majority, to approve the initial sentence or reduce the sentence or order new investigations.

 

He explained that after the decision becomes final, a retrial can be requested if there is new evidence.



HRW: Israeli Attack on Hodeidah Port Possible War Crime

The Israeli strikes destroyed 29 of the 41 oil storage tanks at Hodeida port (AFP)
The Israeli strikes destroyed 29 of the 41 oil storage tanks at Hodeida port (AFP)
TT

HRW: Israeli Attack on Hodeidah Port Possible War Crime

The Israeli strikes destroyed 29 of the 41 oil storage tanks at Hodeida port (AFP)
The Israeli strikes destroyed 29 of the 41 oil storage tanks at Hodeida port (AFP)

Human Rights Watch (HRW) said Tuesday that the Israeli airstrikes on Yemen’s Hodeidah port last month may amount to a war crime.

“The attacks appeared to cause disproportionate harm to civilians and civilian objects. Serious violations of the laws of war committed willfully, that is deliberately or recklessly, are war crimes,” HRW said in its report.

On July 20, Israel said its warplanes struck Houthi military targets near Hodeidah.

HRW said the airstrike took place a day after a Houthi drone hit Israel's Tel Aviv, killing one person and injuring four others, which also may constitute a war crime.

“The Israeli airstrikes, which killed at least six civilians and reportedly injured at least 80 others, hit at least 20 oil storage tanks and two shipping cranes in Hodeidah port in northwest Yemen, as well as a power plant in Hodeidah’s Salif district,” the organization said.

It added that the attacks appeared to cause disproportionate harm to civilians and civilian objects.

“The Israeli attacks on Hodeidah in response to the Houthis’ strike on Tel Aviv could have a lasting impact on millions of Yemenis in Houthi-controlled territories,” said Niku Jafarnia, Yemen and Bahrain researcher at Human Rights Watch. “Yemenis are already enduring widespread hunger after a decade-long conflict. These attacks will only exacerbate their suffering.”

Human Rights Watch interviewed 11 people about the Hodeidah attack, including a Houthi official in Yemen’s oil industry and four UN agency staff with knowledge of the port.

It also analyzed satellite imagery of the targeted locations and photographs of potential weapons remnants collected by the nongovernmental organization Mwatana for Human Rights.

The organization sent its preliminary findings to Israeli authorities on July 31 and to the Houthis on August 7, affirming that neither has replied.

Damages of Israeli Strikes

HRW found that Israeli forces damaged or destroyed at least 29 of the 41 oil storage tanks at Hodeidah port, as well as the only two cranes used for loading and unloading supplies from ships.

The airstrikes also destroyed oil tanks connected to the Hodeidah power plant, causing the power plant to stop operating for 12 hours.

According to HRW, the Hodeidah port is critical for delivering food and other necessities to the Yemeni population, who depend on imports.

About 70% of Yemen’s commercial imports and 80% of its humanitarian assistance passes through Hodeidah port, which United Nations Development Program (UNDP) Resident Representative Auke Lootsma said was “absolutely crucial to commercial and humanitarian activities.”

Rosemary DiCarlo, under-secretary-general for the UN Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, described the port as a “lifeline for millions of people” that should be “open and operating.”

A UN agency official said that about 3,400 people, all civilians, work at the port. The official said on July 30 that he had not “seen a single new vessel entering the port since the attack, which is an alarming indication” for humanitarian aid provision.

HRW then warned that other Yemeni ports lack the same capacity to manage imports, and the damage and destruction of the oil tanks, loading cranes, and broader damage to the port’s facilities would take significant funding and time to rebuild.

Humanitarian and Environmental Impacts

HRW analysis of satellite imagery found that the oil tanks burned for at least three days, posing environmental concerns.

Musaed Aklan, an environmental expert at the Sanaa Center, a Yemeni research group, said that “the toxic fumes resulting from the burning of thousands of tons of fuel ... undoubtedly pose a serious risk to public health.”

He said that oil leaks from the tanks into surrounding areas “risk contaminating nearby water sources, soil, beaches, and marine habitats.”

A World Food Program (WFP) official said that the organization lost 780,000 liters of fuel in the attack, which it was using to “support hospital generators” and water and sanitation infrastructure across Yemen.

HRW reminded that applicable laws of war prohibit deliberate, indiscriminate, or disproportionate attacks on civilians and civilian objects.

An attack not directed at a specific military objective is indiscriminate. “An attack is disproportionate if the expected civilian loss is excessive compared to the anticipated military gain of the attack,” it said.

HRW’s report concluded that no information has been made public indicating that weapons or military supplies were being stored at or delivered to the port, or that the oil and electricity were being diverted to the Houthi military, which would make the Israeli attack unlawfully indiscriminate.