Abadi’s Remarks on War against ISIS Stir Debate in Iraq

Members of the Popular Mobilization Forces prepare to fight ISIS in an area west of Mosul in 2017. (Getty Images)
Members of the Popular Mobilization Forces prepare to fight ISIS in an area west of Mosul in 2017. (Getty Images)
TT

Abadi’s Remarks on War against ISIS Stir Debate in Iraq

Members of the Popular Mobilization Forces prepare to fight ISIS in an area west of Mosul in 2017. (Getty Images)
Members of the Popular Mobilization Forces prepare to fight ISIS in an area west of Mosul in 2017. (Getty Images)

Former Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi's remarks about the fight against the ISIS terrorist group have stirred controversy in the country and sparked a Sunni-Shiite debate.

Abadi, who was in office from 2014 to 2018 at the peak of the fight against the group, described Iraq as being ruled by gangs. He explained that the political agreement that led to the formation of the current government, headed by Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, included a request against criminalizing belonging to ISIS.

In televised remarks, he revealed that he and head of the Badr organization Hadi al-Ameri had refused to sign the agreement.

At the same time, however, Abadi defended the militias, who had come under attack by MP Haybat al-Halbousi. Abadi said Halbousi was criticizing the “militias that made him return home after the fight against ISIS.”

Initially, Shiite forces of the pro-Iran Coordination Framework criticized Abadi’s statements, saying he was seeking political gains ahead of local elections that will be held towards the end of the year.

Halbousi, of the Progress Party of parliament Speaker Mohammed al-Halbousi, slammed Abadi, saying he was never fit to serve as prime minister.

“Everyone recalls what the residents of these provinces had to endure after the security forces withdrew from them and ISIS seized full control,” he said in televised remarks.

People who wanted to escape from living under ISIS suffered after all exits from the mainly Sunni provinces were shut. This led to the kidnapping and the disappearance of thousands of civilians in those regions, he said.

Given his position as PM, Abadi was supposed to be held to account for these developments and the “sheer number of victims,” he went on to say.

After first denouncing the former PM, the Coordination Framework came to Abadi’s defense, questioning and rejecting Halbousi’s statements and saying it reserves the right to take legal action to “put an end to such petty lies.”

Abadi’s Nasr Coalition also said it reserves the right to take legal action against the lawmaker.

Meanwhile, the Progress Party parliamentary bloc slammed the former PM over his contentious statements.

“At a time when we are seeking to bolster security and stability in our country, strengthen unity among its people and shun all forms of extremism that is alien to our society, along returns such lamentable and shameful political rhetoric from figures who have adopted hate speech and resorted to harmful media statements,” it said.

It expressed its “categorical rejection” of Abadi’s remarks, adding: “We have not and will not forget all the dangerous crimes and human rights violations that took place during the operations to liberate regions from ISIS.”

It said: “Thousands of innocent people had gone missing or were arrested during the operations for committing no other crime than being held prisoner by terrorist groups” and for Baghdad turning them away when they sought safety.

It stressed that the “Iraqis remember the dark days in the liberated provinces.”

It recalled the images of displaced men, women and children amassing on the Bzaibiz bridge after Abadi issued orders to prevent their entry into Baghdad.

“The memory is full of other images and crimes, such as those committed in al-Razzaza, Baiji, al-Saqlawiyah, Samarra, Diyala, Salaheddine, Nineveh, al-Anbar, Kirkuk and Jurf al-Sakhir,” it continued.

It called on Abadi to cease making such divisive statements and to cease making claims against innocents, both dead or alive.



Sudan’s al-Burhan Orders Investigation Into Deadly Airstrike on Gold Mine

Sudan's army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan gestures to soldiers inside the presidential palace after the Sudanese army said it had taken control of the building, in the capital Khartoum, Sudan March 26, 2025. Sudan Transitional Sovereignty Council/Handout via REUTERS
Sudan's army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan gestures to soldiers inside the presidential palace after the Sudanese army said it had taken control of the building, in the capital Khartoum, Sudan March 26, 2025. Sudan Transitional Sovereignty Council/Handout via REUTERS
TT

Sudan’s al-Burhan Orders Investigation Into Deadly Airstrike on Gold Mine

Sudan's army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan gestures to soldiers inside the presidential palace after the Sudanese army said it had taken control of the building, in the capital Khartoum, Sudan March 26, 2025. Sudan Transitional Sovereignty Council/Handout via REUTERS
Sudan's army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan gestures to soldiers inside the presidential palace after the Sudanese army said it had taken control of the building, in the capital Khartoum, Sudan March 26, 2025. Sudan Transitional Sovereignty Council/Handout via REUTERS

Sudan's army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan has ordered a probe into what he called a "painful incident" near the Egyptian border, where an airstrike hit a gold mine two days earlier.

The estimated death toll from the airstrike has risen to more than 200 dead, with dozens wounded and missing.

Both the National Umma Party and the Darfur Victims Advocacy organization put the death toll at 200 and the number of injured at around 120.

The Emergency Lawyers, a rights group documenting abuses in the war between Sudan's army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), said the strike in the mountainous Jabal al-Uqaydat mining area on Saturday killed 72 people.

In a statement on Monday, Sudan's Transitional Sovereignty Council, which Burhan heads as army chief, said he had formed a fact-finding committee made up of prosecutors, judicial officials and security representatives "to investigate the circumstances of the incident" and "submit a report on the results.”

The council added that Sudanese and Egyptian authorities "had remained in contact" since the strike to determine what happened.

In a phone call with his Sudanese counterpart on Monday, Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty stressed the "mutual respect that binds the two brotherly nations,” including respect for each state's "territorial integrity and safety of its territory and borders.”


Syria Establishes ‘Capital Security Service’ to Bolster Damascus Security

Syria's Interior Minister Anas Khattab (C) inspects an area near the Four Seasons Hotel following two blasts in Damascus on July 7, 2026. (Photo by LOUAI BESHARA / AFP)
Syria's Interior Minister Anas Khattab (C) inspects an area near the Four Seasons Hotel following two blasts in Damascus on July 7, 2026. (Photo by LOUAI BESHARA / AFP)
TT

Syria Establishes ‘Capital Security Service’ to Bolster Damascus Security

Syria's Interior Minister Anas Khattab (C) inspects an area near the Four Seasons Hotel following two blasts in Damascus on July 7, 2026. (Photo by LOUAI BESHARA / AFP)
Syria's Interior Minister Anas Khattab (C) inspects an area near the Four Seasons Hotel following two blasts in Damascus on July 7, 2026. (Photo by LOUAI BESHARA / AFP)

Syria established a special security service apparatus for its capital, Damascus, in a bid to bolster security, uncover sleeper cells and thwart attempts to destabilize the city, a senior Syrian military official told Asharq Al-Awsat Tuesday.

The official told the daily that the Capital Security Service was established and Brig. Gen. Abdul Aziz Hilal al-Ahmad appointed as its chief to “bolster security in Damascus through a more targeted approach and uncover any sleeper cells seeking to undermine the capital’s security.”

The official said he did not believe Damascus faced any immediate threat, but warned that “sabotage cells” continued to seek to undermine security in the capital, driven by foreign agendas and ties. He also accused Israel and Iran of seeking to destabilize Syria by backing local sabotage groups operating across several provinces.

The official stressed that Damascus hosts foreign embassies, diplomatic missions and offices of international and United Nations agencies and organizations, making it a key center of state sovereignty. Any breach of the capital’s security would undermine the state’s credibility and authority, he said, adding that the new service was intended to thwart attempts to unsettle the city.

Brig. Gen. Abdul Aziz Hilal al-Ahmad previously headed internal security in Latakia province, where he led operations against armed groups and former military and security figures linked to Bashar al-Assad’s regime after taking office on May 25, 2025.

No official decree announcing al-Ahmad’s appointment has been issued, though security and military sources confirmed it to several media outlets, including Asharq Al-Awsat. On Saturday, the Interior Ministry named Brig. Gen. Nayef al-Ibrahim as his successor in Latakia.

Since the ouster of the former regime, Syria’s new authorities have worked to rebuild and modernize the security sector with regional and international support. However, repeated security incidents in Damascus over the past two years have underscored persistent instability and security gaps, with experts saying much work remains to prevent further bombings.

Wael Alwan, executive director of the Jusoor Center for Studies, told Asharq Al-Awsat that authorities were working to restore security and stability across Syria, but intelligence reports pointed to activity in Damascus by Iran-backed Hezbollah and affiliated local groups, as well as ISIS.

He said previous attacks by ISIS cells and remnants of the former regime appeared aimed more at generating media attention than striking strategic security, political or military targets, citing rocket fire toward the Mazzeh area and explosions during the French president’s visit.

Alwan said Iran-backed groups, ISIS and Israeli interference sought to portray Syria as unstable and its government as unable to maintain security, undermining recovery by deterring investment, curbing tourism and deepening economic and social pressures. He added that Iran stood to benefit from chaos, which could create opportunities for its allied militias and former regime loyalists to return, rebuild their networks and expand their influence.

Alwan said the establishment of the Capital Security Service reflected the government’s cautious approach and efforts to preempt security threats by strengthening surveillance and intelligence capabilities to track former regime loyalists, ISIS cells and Iran-backed operatives, and thwart attacks before they occur.

For his part, Syrian political and security researcher Diaa Qaddour told Asharq Al-Awsat that the appointment was part of a broader restructuring of security agencies following the ouster of the former regime, reflecting a focus on securing the capital against threats from ISIS and dormant Iran-linked cells to reinforce state authority and prevent chaos.


Baghdad Accuses Tehran, Washington of ‘Strangling’ the Iraqi Economy

The Prime Minister lays the foundation stone for the “Watan Initiative” in Nineveh on Monday (PM's Media Office)
The Prime Minister lays the foundation stone for the “Watan Initiative” in Nineveh on Monday (PM's Media Office)
TT

Baghdad Accuses Tehran, Washington of ‘Strangling’ the Iraqi Economy

The Prime Minister lays the foundation stone for the “Watan Initiative” in Nineveh on Monday (PM's Media Office)
The Prime Minister lays the foundation stone for the “Watan Initiative” in Nineveh on Monday (PM's Media Office)

Iraqi government spokesman Haider Al-Aboudi has accused both Iran and the United States of “strangling” Iraq’s economy by failing to grant exemptions that would allow Iraqi oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz.

In a television interview, Al-Aboudi said: “Iraq’s economy is living under the burden of a suffocating blockade, with a complete absence of any Iranian or American response to granting exemptions for oil exports.”

Al-Aboudi also launched a sharp attack on the government of former Prime Minister Mohammed Al-Sudani, accusing it of causing losses of nearly 36 trillion Iraqi dinars to the state treasury through its 2023 decision to reduce the exchange rate from 1,470 dinars per U.S. dollar to 1,320 dinars per dollar.

His remarks come as the current government seeks to counter criticism over its decision, announced last Tuesday, to devalue the dinar to 1,520 per dollar.

The decision to alter the exchange rate continues to generate significant debate as the government has failed to close the gap between the official rate of 1,520 dinars per dollar and the parallel market rate of 1,630 dinars. This discrepancy has contributed to substantial increases in the prices of many essential goods, including food items.

The exchange-rate issue has also sparked broad political reactions. Nouri Al-Maliki, leader of the State of Law Coalition, called in a post on X for citizens not to use the dollar exchange-rate adjustment as a pretext for stirring concern.

Despite measures introduced by the government to curb soaring prices, including injecting additional dollars into the market and offering construction materials to citizens through installment-payment schemes, prices have remained high. This has exposed the government to further public and political criticism.

Legal Challenge

Observers do not rule out the possibility that Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi could face legal scrutiny. Saud al-Saadi, head of the parliamentary Huqooq Bloc, has filed an official appeal before the Federal Supreme Court, challenging Cabinet Resolution No. 544 concerning the exchange rate of the US dollar against the Iraqi dinar.

Speaking to the press on Monday, al-Saadi said that the Court had received the appeal and informed him that an official hearing date would be scheduled at a later time.

Denial of Pursuing Currency Speculators

In a related development, Al-Aboudi stated that the prime minister had “categorically rejected any intervention by security agencies or the use of police measures to regulate the market.”

The denial came in response to an audio recording in which a citizen called the Interior Ministry’s complaints hotline and asked whether complaints or reports could be filed against exchange companies selling dollars at the parallel-market rate of 1,650 dinars, compared with the official rate of 1,520 dinars per dollar. A complaints official reportedly answered in the affirmative.

On Sunday evening, both the Security Media Cell and the Ministry of Defense quickly denied that the complaints official’s response reflected government policy.

In a statement, the Security Media Cell said that directives from Commander-in-Chief Ali al-Zaidi emphasized that the dollar exchange-rate issue is a financial and economic matter, not a security matter.

The statement stressed that exchange rates are governed by market mechanisms and the laws of supply and demand and fall under the jurisdiction of financial and monetary authorities, foremost among them the Central Bank of Iraq.

The statement further underscored that there are no instructions for security forces to intervene in market activity or influence exchange rates, noting that their role is limited to enforcing the law and carrying out judicial orders issued by competent authorities.

It added that any action taken against violators or individuals engaged in illegal foreign-currency transactions would be conducted in accordance with established legal and judicial procedures and in coordination with the Central Bank of Iraq, which is responsible for supervising financial and banking institutions, regulating exchange companies, monitoring compliance with relevant regulations, and taking the necessary administrative measures to safeguard financial transactions and support duly licensed firms.

The Security Media Cell called on citizens, merchants, exchange companies, and market participants to remain reassured and continue conducting their lawful financial and commercial activities normally.

The complaints official’s remarks had reportedly alarmed exchange companies, which often have to deal according to prevailing market rates rather than the official rate. Some industry workers said the comments actually contributed to driving exchange rates higher in the parallel market rather than lowering them.

Personal Conduct

As a result of the confusion and concern caused by the audio recording, the Interior Ministry issued a statement clarifying the circumstances surrounding the phone call made by a citizen to an employee of the Central Response and Control Directorate (911), who had been asked about dollar buying and selling rates at exchange companies.

The ministry stated that the employee’s response constituted “a personal action” and did not represent the ministry’s official position, as he was not authorized to provide information or statements on matters outside the scope of his assigned duties and responsibilities.

The ministry also confirmed that it had taken the necessary legal measures against the employee in accordance with applicable regulations and instructions, reaffirming its commitment to professional discipline within the public service.