Al-Mahdi to Asharq Al-Awsat: Bashir’s Supporters Ignited the War in Sudan

Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Al-Mahdi to Asharq Al-Awsat: Bashir’s Supporters Ignited the War in Sudan

Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi accused the critics of those who advocate ending the war of continuously holding onto it “out of fear of jeopardizing their interests.”

He said these critics are also looking to absolve themselves of responsibility for the war by attributing it to “the civil forces working on instituting structural reforms in the state.”

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, al-Mahdi revealed that the Sudanese civil forces are nearing the formation of a broad civil front working to end the war, composed of civil and political forces, resistance committees, professionals, and independent figures.

An agreement has been reached to establish a communication committee to carry out necessary talks for announcing the convening of a conference in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa.

Al-Mahdi explained that the ousted regime and its supporters “ignited the war and are working to perpetuate it, standing against any cessation of hostilities, all in an effort to return to power and open new avenues for corruption.”

“This is why they engineered and supported the October 25, 2021, coup and, subsequently, brought about the catastrophic event of the mid-April war, to obstruct any civil democratic transformation that goes against their interests,” added al-Mahdi.

He described the accusations leveled by the supporters of ousted former President Omar al-Bashir's regime against the civil forces as “treachery” and “illogical”.

He emphasized that those advocating for the continuation of the war are individuals whose interests have been harmed by its cessation, adding that “the supporters of the National Congress Party, and Islamists in general, along with the former figures in power are the ones who ignited the war and hope it continues.”

Al-Mahdi denied the existence of a major problem between the National Congress Party (the ruling party during Bashir’s era) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), saying instead that their real issue lies with the political forces advocating for reform.

They aim to preserve their questionable interests, maintain their empowerment, and continue the plundering of the country’s resources, he charged.

According to al-Mahdi, they intend to continue with their corrupt ways and that is why they ignited the war and insist on its continuation. This is why the remnants of the regime have attacked the civilian forces.

Moreover, he emphasized that the primary battle of the National Congress Party and its supporters “is not with the RSF.”

He accused the supporters of the ousted regime and their loyal military forces of “wasting vast sums of money, ranging from $6 billion - $9 billion annually.”

“Sudan produces between 120 and 200 tons of gold annually, but the state only receives about 20 to 30 tons from it, with the rest being lost through smuggling,” revealed al-Mahdi.

He explained that elements from the ousted regime want to preserve these interests. Their involvement in the October 25 coup aimed to obstruct the path to reforming the economic and military state institutions.

“They exacerbated the situation by igniting the senseless war and working to perpetuate it, all driven by their hostility toward the civil forces advocating for a civil democratic transition and institutional reform in the state,” he further explained.

Al-Mahdi firmly stated that “the possibility of establishing a new partnership between civilians and the military in the upcoming phase is unattainable.”

“They have acknowledged that they will not be a part of the political scene,” he commented.

He believed that the continuation of the war “threatens to push the country towards the abyss of a civil war, turning Sudan into a hotspot and a source of disasters in the world and the region.”

He emphasized that “the right path to end the war lies in amplifying the voice of Sudan's interests and isolating the claims of those who sparked the war and are benefiting from its continuation.”

He noted that the war “has caused immense suffering for civilians in Darfur, especially in its western regions, forcing many to seek refuge in neighboring countries under extremely tragic circumstances.”

“Those who remained in Khartoum also endure the harsh realities of life, with scarce means for survival,” he added.

Al-Mahdi further described the decision of the Human Rights Council to establish a fact-finding committee regarding violations in Sudan as “a commendable decision.”

At the same time, he emphasized that the consequences of the war are borne by civilians, and the military leaders continue their conflict without regard for the destruction of the country, the killing of civilians, and humanitarian workers.

This has resulted in Sudan being classified as the second most dangerous country for humanitarian workers, with 19 aid workers killed in a single year, according to a United Nations official.



Syria: SDF’s Mazloum Abdi Says Implementation of Integration Deal May Take Time

People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman
People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman
TT

Syria: SDF’s Mazloum Abdi Says Implementation of Integration Deal May Take Time

People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman
People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman

Mazloum Abdi, commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces, said the process of merging the SDF with Syrian government forces “may take some time,” despite expressing confidence in the eventual success of the agreement.

His remarks came after earlier comments in which he acknowledged differences with Damascus over the concept of “decentralization.”

Speaking at a tribal conference in the northeastern city of Hasakah on Tuesday, Abdi said the issue of integration would not be resolved quickly, but stressed that the agreement remains on track.

He said the deal reached last month stipulates that three Syrian army brigades will be created out of the SDF.

Abdi added that all SDF military units have withdrawn to their barracks in an effort to preserve stability and continue implementing the announced integration agreement with the Syrian state.

He also emphasized the need for armed forces to withdraw from the vicinity of the city of Ayn al-Arab (Kobani), to be replaced by security forces tasked with maintaining order.


Israeli Far-Right Minister to Push for ‘Migration’ of West Bank, Gaza Palestinians 

A Palestinian man checks leather belts as people prepare for Ramadan, in the old city of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 17,2026. (Reuters)
A Palestinian man checks leather belts as people prepare for Ramadan, in the old city of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 17,2026. (Reuters)
TT

Israeli Far-Right Minister to Push for ‘Migration’ of West Bank, Gaza Palestinians 

A Palestinian man checks leather belts as people prepare for Ramadan, in the old city of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 17,2026. (Reuters)
A Palestinian man checks leather belts as people prepare for Ramadan, in the old city of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 17,2026. (Reuters)

Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said he would pursue a policy of "encouraging the migration" of Palestinians from the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip, Israeli media reported Wednesday.

"We will eliminate the idea of an Arab terror state," said Smotrich, speaking at an event organized by his Religious Zionism Party late on Tuesday.

"We will finally, formally, and in practical terms nullify the cursed Oslo Accords and embark on a path toward sovereignty, while encouraging emigration from both Gaza and Judea and Samaria.

"There is no other long-term solution," added Smotrich, who himself lives in a settlement in the West Bank.

Since last week, Israel has approved a series of measures backed by far-right ministers to tighten control over the West Bank, including in areas administered by the Palestinian Authority under the Oslo Accords, in place since the 1990s.

The measures include a process to register land in the West Bank as "state property" and facilitate direct purchases of land by Jewish Israelis.

The measures have triggered widespread international outrage.

On Tuesday, the UN missions of 85 countries condemned the measures, which critics say amount to de facto annexation of the Palestinian territory.

"We strongly condemn unilateral Israeli decisions and measures aimed at expanding Israel's unlawful presence in the West Bank," they said in a statement.

"Such decisions are contrary to Israel's obligations under international law and must be immediately reversed.

"We underline in this regard our strong opposition to any form of annexation."

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Monday called on Israel to reverse its land registration policy, calling it "destabilizing" and "unlawful".

The West Bank would form the largest part of any future Palestinian state. Many on Israel's religious right view it as Israeli land.

Israeli NGOs have also raised the alarm over a settlement plan signed by the government which they say would mark the first expansion of Jerusalem's borders into the occupied West Bank since 1967.

The planned development, announced by Israel's Ministry of Construction and Housing, is formally a westward expansion of the Geva Binyamin, or Adam, settlement situated northeast of Jerusalem in the West Bank.

The current Israeli government has fast-tracked settlement expansion, approving a record 52 settlements in 2025.

Excluding Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem, more than 500,000 Israelis live in West Bank settlements and outposts, which are illegal under international law.


Maliki Can Withdraw as Candidacy as Iraq PM the Easy or Hard Way

Members of the Coordination Framework hold a meeting. (Iraqi News Agency)
Members of the Coordination Framework hold a meeting. (Iraqi News Agency)
TT

Maliki Can Withdraw as Candidacy as Iraq PM the Easy or Hard Way

Members of the Coordination Framework hold a meeting. (Iraqi News Agency)
Members of the Coordination Framework hold a meeting. (Iraqi News Agency)

Iraqi Former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki declined at the last minute to attend a meeting of the pro-Iran Coordination Framework on Monday night that was aimed at settling the crisis over his nomination as prime minister.

Instead of declaring that he was pulling out as candidate, as had been expected, Maliki informed his close circle that he is “following through with his nomination to the end,” trusted sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Iraq has come under intense pressure from the US to withdraw the nomination. In January, President Donald Trump warned Baghdad against picking Maliki as its PM, saying the United States would no longer help the country.

“Last time Maliki was in power, the Country descended into poverty and total chaos. That should not be allowed to happen again. Because of his insane policies and ideologies, if elected, the United States of America will no longer help Iraq,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Maliki also dismissed as “extortion and intimidation” talks of renewed US sanctions on Iraq, added the sources.

However, circles within the Coordination Framework have started to “despair” with the impasse over naming a new prime minister and are weighing the possibility of taking “difficult” choices, they revealed. Maliki has become a prisoner of his own nomination.

The Sunni Progress Party (Takadum) had voiced its reservations over Maliki’s nomination before Trump made his position clear and which has since weighed heavily on Iraq.

‘Indefinitely’

Maliki’s decision to skip the Framework’s meeting on Monday forced the coalition to postpone it “indefinitely”, exposing more differences inside the alliance that have been festering for months. The dispute over the post of prime minister is threatening to evolve into one that threatens the unity of the coalition itself.

Several sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Maliki had sent the Framework a written message on Monday night informing them that he will not attend the meeting because “he was aware that discussions will seek to pressure him to withdraw his candidacy.”

Maliki was the one to call for the meeting to convene in the first place, they revealed.

Reports have been rife in Iraq that Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish political leaderships have all received warnings that the US would take measure against Iraq if Maliki continued to insist on his nomination.

Former Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari told Dijlah TV that “Shiite parties” had received two new American messages reiterating the rejection of Maliki’s nomination.

Necessary choice

Maliki and the Framework are now at an impasse, with the latter hoping the former PM would take it upon himself to withdraw his candidacy in what a leading Shiite figure said would help protect the unity of the coalition.

Leading members of the coalition were hoping to give Maliki enough time to decide himself to withdraw, but as time stretches on, the coalition may take matters into its own hands and take “necessary” choices, said the figure.

Other sources revealed, however, that Maliki refuses to voluntarily withdraw from the race believing that this is a responsibility that should be shouldered by the Framework. This has effectively left the alliance with complex and limited choices to end the crisis.

Sources close to Maliki said he has made light of US threats to impose sanctions, saying that if they were to happen, Iraq will emerge on the other side stronger, citing other countries that came out stronger after enduring years of pressure.

Moreover, he is banking on an American change in position, saying mediators have volunteered to “polish his image before Trump and his team.” Members of Maliki’s State of Law coalition declined to comment on this information.

Sources inside the Framework said the coalition may “ultimately withdraw Maliki’s nomination if he becomes too much of a burden on an already weary alliance.”

Doing so may cost them a strong ally in Maliki and force the Framework to yield to Washington’s will, said the Shiite figure. “Maliki may come off as stubborn and strong, but he is wasting his realistic options at this critical political juncture,” it added.

The Framework is divided between a team that is banking on waiting to see how the US-Iran tensions will play out to resolve the crisis and on Maliki voluntarily withdrawing his nomination. The other team is calling for the coalition to resolve the crisis through an internal vote.

Leading Shiite figures told Asharq Al-Awsat that opponents of Maliki’s nomination in the coalition have no choice but to apply internal pressure inside the Framework, which is on the verge of collapse.