‘Mysterious’ Attack Carried out on Iraqi Base, US Ruled out as Culprit

American military vehicles are seen at the Harir base in Erbil. (US Army file photo)
American military vehicles are seen at the Harir base in Erbil. (US Army file photo)
TT

‘Mysterious’ Attack Carried out on Iraqi Base, US Ruled out as Culprit

American military vehicles are seen at the Harir base in Erbil. (US Army file photo)
American military vehicles are seen at the Harir base in Erbil. (US Army file photo)

An Iraqi base on the outskirts of Baghdad came under a rocket attack in the past two days, revealed military sources.

The attackers of the Saqr base south of Baghdad remained unknown amid speculation that the authorities were trying to stop news about the development from spreading.

It is believed that the assault was American retaliation to attacks by pro-Iran factions on American troops in Iraq. The sources also said the attack may have been carried out by Israel.

Tensions have been high in Iraq amid the ongoing attacks on American bases. The latest targeted the Harir base north of Erbil, capital of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region, on Saturday.

Iraqi officials have so far refused to comment on the Saqr base attack, but a senior officer spoke of blasts being heard and fires breaking out at the facility.

Iraqi federal forces assumed control of the base from American troops in 2010. It has since become the base of some police units and members of the pro-Iran Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF).

It has come under rocket and drone attacks in the past. The most intense was reported in July 2021.

The senior officer told Asharq Al-Awsat that the attack on Saqr didn’t bare the hallmarks of an American assault. He believes that the American forces are following clear rules of engagement in Iraq.

Asharq Al-Awsat previously reported that American responses to assaults on its troops may not be limited to strikes on pro-Iran factions.

Sources from the Iran-aligned Coordination Framework said the US may retaliate by striking military bases, used by the official authorities, that the factions may use to launch attacks against the American troops.

The sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Americans won’t be the only sides retaliating to the attacks by the armed factions, meaning another party may get involved.

Meanwhile, differences between Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and the pro-Iran groups appear to be deepening after contacts between them failed in deterring the latter from stopping their attacks on American forces.

A political aide revealed that Sudani informed his partners of the “worrying” outcomes of the escalation shortly after he held talks in Tehran with Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and following his talks in Baghdad with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken last week.

Sunni and Kurdish MPs believe that Sudani is trying to distance his government from the actions of the armed groups even if some of them are represented in the cabinet.

A leading Coordination Framework member said the factions and Iranians informed Sudani that the attacks will not stop in spite of the government’s concern.



Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
TT

Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)

Politicians in Beirut said they have not received any credible information about Washington resuming its mediation efforts towards reaching a ceasefire in Lebanon despite reports to the contrary.

Efforts came to a halt after US envoy Amos Hochstein’s last visit to Beirut three weeks ago.

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri dismissed the reports as media fodder, saying nothing official has been received.

Lebanon is awaiting tangible proposals on which it can build its position, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The only credible proposal on the table is United Nations Security Council resolution 1701, whose articles must be implemented in full by Lebanon and Israel, “not just Lebanon alone,” he stressed.

Resolution 1701 was issued to end the 2006 July war between Hezbollah and Israel and calls for removing all weapons from southern Lebanon and that the only armed presence there be restricted to the army and UN peacekeepers.

Western diplomatic sources in Beirut told Asharq Al-Awsat that Berri opposes one of the most important articles of the proposed solution to end the current conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.

He is opposed to the German and British participation in the proposed mechanism to monitor the implementation of resolution 1701. The other participants are the United States and France.

Other sources said Berri is opposed to the mechanism itself since one is already available and it is embodied in the UN peacekeepers, whom the US and France can join.

The sources revealed that the solution to the conflict has a foreign and internal aspect. The foreign one includes Israel, the US and Russia and seeks guarantees that would prevent Hezbollah from rearming itself. The second covers Lebanese guarantees on the implementation of resolution 1701.

Berri refused to comment on the media reports, but told Asharq Al-Awsat that this was the first time that discussions are being held about guarantees.

He added that “Israel is now in crisis because it has failed to achieve its military objectives, so it has resorted to more killing and destruction undeterred.”

He highlighted the “steadfastness of the UN peacekeepers in the South who have refused to leave their positions despite the repeated Israeli attacks.”