Egypt Revises its Plans to Manage Water Amid Possible Flood Risks

Egypt’s delegation during the Cairo GERD talks (Egyptian Ministry of Water)
Egypt’s delegation during the Cairo GERD talks (Egyptian Ministry of Water)
TT

Egypt Revises its Plans to Manage Water Amid Possible Flood Risks

Egypt’s delegation during the Cairo GERD talks (Egyptian Ministry of Water)
Egypt’s delegation during the Cairo GERD talks (Egyptian Ministry of Water)

While Egypt is reviewing its plan to manage water amid potential flood risks, the North African nation will participate on Saturday in a new round of talks concerning the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD).
Egyptian Minister of Water Resources, Dr. Hani Sweilem, said a new round of Renaissance Dam negotiations will be held in Addis Ababa on December 16, 17, and 18 between Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia.
The talks aim to reach a “legal” agreement over operating the dam following the third round of negotiations that ended in Cairo last October.
In July, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi and Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed agreed to initiate urgent negotiations to finalize an agreement between Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sudan on the filling of the GERD and the rules of its operations.
The two leaders said they would make all the necessary efforts to finalize the agreement in four months.
Three rounds of negotiations were held in Cairo and Addis Ababa since then, but failed to achieve any progress.
An earlier statement by Egypt's Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation said the “Ethiopian intransigence” was behind the failure of the GERD talks, but expressed hope that Addis Ababa will show political will and seriousness to reach a legally binding agreement to fill and operate the dam.
Egyptian Professor of Public International Law, Secretary General of The International Committee for The Defense of Water resources, Mohamed Mahran told Asharq Al-Awsat that the upcoming negotiations represent a real opportunity to resolve the outstanding differences between the three countries and to reach a legally binding agreement that takes into account the water rights of Egypt and Sudan.
Mahran said the worsening economic crisis in Ethiopia could push Addis Ababa to back down from “its rigid positions towards the Renaissance Dam file.”
But at the same time, he warned against “the escalation of the crisis and failure to reach a solution,” stressing that the negotiations are the last chance to avoid a humanitarian and environmental catastrophe.
Egypt and Sudan demand a binding legal agreement regulating the filling and operating of the dam Ethiopia is building on the Blue Nile.
The dam could reduce water supplies to the two countries and cause other environmental and economic damages.
Ethiopia defends its right to development and generates the electricity its people need.
In September, Addis Ababa said it had completed the fourth and final phase of filling a reservoir for its planned massive hydroelectric power plant on the Blue Nile.
Meanwhile, Egyptian Minister of Water Resources, Dr. Hani Sweilem, said on Friday that his ministry is monitoring the spillways of streams and valleys to ensure their readiness to receive flood water.
He said the work is particularly conducted in North and South Sinai, Matrouh, and Upper Egypt, where the spillways and valleys are located.
Egypt’s Ministry of Irrigation has already prepared a plan to manage water in Egypt till the year 2037 with investments of more than $50 million.

 

 



Israel Sees More to Do on Lebanon Ceasefire

FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon,  January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo
TT

Israel Sees More to Do on Lebanon Ceasefire

FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon,  January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo

Israel said on Thursday the terms of a ceasefire with Hezbollah were not being implemented fast enough and there was more work to do, while the Iran-backed group urged pressure to ensure Israeli troops leave south Lebanon by Monday as set out in the deal.

The deal stipulates that Israeli troops withdraw from south Lebanon, Hezbollah remove fighters and weapons from the area and Lebanese troops deploy there - all within a 60-day timeframe which will conclude on Monday at 4 a.m (0200 GMT).

The deal, brokered by the United States and France, ended more than a year of hostilities triggered by the Gaza war. The fighting peaked with a major Israeli offensive that displaced more than 1.2 million people in Lebanon and left Hezbollah severely weakened.

"There have been positive movements where the Lebanese army and UNIFIL have taken the place of Hezbollah forces, as stipulated in the agreement," Israeli government spokesmen David Mencer told reporters, referring to UN peacekeepers in Lebanon.

"We've also made clear that these movements have not been fast enough, and there is much more work to do," he said, affirming that Israel wanted the agreement to continue.

Mencer did not directly respond to questions about whether Israel had requested an extension of the deal or say whether Israeli forces would remain in Lebanon after Monday's deadline.

Hezbollah said in a statement that there had been leaks talking about Israel postponing its withdrawal beyond the 60-day period, and that any breach of the agreement would be unacceptable.
The statement said that possibility required everyone, especially Lebanese political powers, to pile pressure on the states which sponsored the deal to ensure "the implementation of the full (Israeli) withdrawal and the deployment of the Lebanese army to the last inch of Lebanese territory and the return of the people to their villages quickly.”

Any delay beyond the 60 days would mark a blatant violation of the deal with which the Lebanese state would have to deal "through all means and methods guaranteed by international charters" to recover Lebanese land "from the occupation's clutches," Hezbollah said.