UN Security Council to Vote on Draft Resolution to Establish Aid Monitoring Mechanism in Gaza

Security Council members attend a meeting in New York (Reuters)
Security Council members attend a meeting in New York (Reuters)
TT

UN Security Council to Vote on Draft Resolution to Establish Aid Monitoring Mechanism in Gaza

Security Council members attend a meeting in New York (Reuters)
Security Council members attend a meeting in New York (Reuters)

 

The UN Security Council is preparing to vote on a draft resolution on Monday afternoon calling for “establishing a UN mechanism” to monitor humanitarian relief shipments to Gaza via land, sea, and air routes.




The draft demands the “immediate” release of all captives, rejecting the “forced displacement” of the Palestinian people.




The UAE, the only Arab member of the Council, and in coordination with Egypt and Palestine, prepared a draft resolution demanding all parties comply with their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law, notably regarding the protection of civilians.




The text calls for protecting civilians and civilian facilities, delivering aid, and protecting humanitarian workers, recalling the duty to respect and protect civilian facilities, including hospitals, medical facilities, schools, places of worship, and UN facilities.




It calls on the parties to the conflict to allow, facilitate, and enable the immediate, safe, and widespread delivery of humanitarian assistance directly to the Palestinian civilian population throughout the Strip, which requires an urgent and sustained cessation of hostilities to allow delivery of aid.




- Delivery of aid




The Security Council failed several times to pass various draft resolutions, either because of the veto of the five permanent members of the Council, namely the US, the UK, France, Russia, and China, or because they did not obtain sufficient votes to approve them.




Any decision requires at least nine votes without the use of the veto.




The new draft resolution calls for allowing and facilitating the use of all land, sea, and air routes leading to the entire Gaza Strip, including border crossings, including the Kerem Shalom crossing.




It also asserted the need to ensure the access of humanitarian workers and aid, including fuel, food, medical supplies, and emergency shelter assistance to people in need throughout Gaza.




- Monitoring mechanism




The draft resolution welcomed the role of states not party to the conflict in allowing the free passage of humanitarian relief shipments, especially coordinating with Egypt to use the Rafah border crossing.




It called upon the UN Sec-Gen Antonio Guterres to establish a monitoring mechanism in the Gaza Strip with the necessary personnel and equipment under his authority.




It requested the urgent deployment of the UN monitoring mechanism for one year, which will be automatically extended for periods of one year.




The resolution also demands the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages and ensuring humanitarian access, adding that fuel should be provided at levels that meet the required humanitarian needs.

It strongly condemned all violations of international humanitarian law, including all indiscriminate attacks and acts of violence against civilians and civil targets.




The text asserted that civilian targets, places of refuge, UN facilities, and surrounding areas are protected under international humanitarian law.




It rejected the forced displacement of civilian populations, including children, in violation of international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law.




- The two-state solution




Under this draft, the Security Council reiterated its commitment to the two-state solution of living side by side and in peace and security, per international law and relevant UN resolutions.




It stressed the unification of the Gaza Strip with the West Bank under the unified administration of the Palestinian Authority (PA).




According to the resolution, all parties to the conflict should take all appropriate steps to ensure the safety and security of UN workers, personnel of its specialized agencies, and all other staff participating in humanitarian activities under international humanitarian law.




It called for the implementation of Resolution 2712 in full, calling upon the Sec-Gen to submit a written report to the Security Council within five working days of adopting this resolution on implementing Resolution 2712 and every 30 days after that.

 



Will Lebanon Be the Biggest Loser After the Ceasefire?

Smoke rises after an Iranian missile is intercepted over the Sahel Alma area in Mount Lebanon. (Reuters)
Smoke rises after an Iranian missile is intercepted over the Sahel Alma area in Mount Lebanon. (Reuters)
TT

Will Lebanon Be the Biggest Loser After the Ceasefire?

Smoke rises after an Iranian missile is intercepted over the Sahel Alma area in Mount Lebanon. (Reuters)
Smoke rises after an Iranian missile is intercepted over the Sahel Alma area in Mount Lebanon. (Reuters)

Political sources in Beirut warned Lebanon could emerge as the biggest loser when the current regional war ends, outlining their concerns to Asharq Al-Awsat.

Lebanon is heading toward a severe internal crisis, the sharpest in its modern history with the dispute centering on Hezbollah’s weapons.

The majority of Shiites in the country insists on keeping them, while most other segments say Lebanon’s survival depends on implementing government decisions to limit arms to the state, in line with Lebanese, Arab, and international positions.

The sources noted that Hezbollah has again entered a regional war it cannot influence, risking burdens Lebanon cannot bear.

Hefty price

The war is proving costly for those involved and for countries hit by its spillover.

A ceasefire would likely show Iran suffered heavy damage to its defense, industrial sectors, and infrastructure, potentially setting it back decades. But its size, energy resources, and experience with economic hardship may help it manage the aftermath, unless losses destabilize the system.

Iranian missiles are expected to have caused damage to Israeli institutions and infrastructure, despite a high interception rate. The cost of interception is steep, but Israel appears ready to absorb it, calling the conflict an existential war and relying on strong US support.

Lebanon will struggle the most. Its economy is already near collapse. The country faces a catastrophic situation, with about one million displaced and heavy destruction along the border with Israel.

Israel has said it intends to establish a “buffer zone” inside Lebanese territory, signaling a return of occupation to parts of the country “pending guarantees for the safety of Galilee residents.”

The most dangerous scenario is that Israel’s campaign on the Lebanese front continues even if a ceasefire is reached between the US and Israel on one side and Iran on the other.

The fallout is worsened by a deepening rift among Lebanon’s components, raising the risk of internal conflict.

The role of parliament Speaker Nabih Berri appears diminished as the conflict widens. The current crisis over the expulsion of the Iranian ambassador reflects a deeper divide between the Shiite camp and others over weapons, the war, and Lebanon’s regional role.

Hezbollah described the expulsion as a “sin”, demanding that the government reverse it.

‘Impossible to coexist’

Voices are rising in Lebanon, warning that it was “impossible to coexist” between a “quasi-state” and a “Hezbollah’s statelet.”

Countries that once backed Lebanon’s reconstruction, especially in the Gulf, are now focused on their own losses from Iranian attacks. They have also made clear that they will not help unless the Lebanese state takes full control over decisions of war and peace.

The sources reiterated their warning that Lebanon risks being the biggest loser, especially if Israel expands its ground offensive and internal divisions deepen to the point of questioning the country’s very formula of coexistence.


Netanyahu Says Israel Is Expanding ‘Buffer Zone’ in Lebanon

Smoke billows from an Israeli strike on Marjeyoun in southern Lebanon on Wednesday. (AFP)
Smoke billows from an Israeli strike on Marjeyoun in southern Lebanon on Wednesday. (AFP)
TT

Netanyahu Says Israel Is Expanding ‘Buffer Zone’ in Lebanon

Smoke billows from an Israeli strike on Marjeyoun in southern Lebanon on Wednesday. (AFP)
Smoke billows from an Israeli strike on Marjeyoun in southern Lebanon on Wednesday. (AFP)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Wednesday that his country's forces were expanding a "buffer zone" in southern Lebanon as the military pressed ahead with its campaign against Hezbollah.

"We have created a genuine security zone preventing any infiltration toward the Galilee and the northern border," Netanyahu said in a video statement.

"We are expanding this zone to push the threat from anti-tank missiles further away and to establish a broader buffer zone."

Netanyahu said that dismantling Hezbollah "remains central" to Israel's objectives in Lebanon.

"It is connected to the broader confrontation with Iran," he said.

"We are determined to profoundly transform the situation in Lebanon," he added.

Lebanon was pulled into the Middle East war when Iran-backed Hezbollah began firing rockets into Israel on March 2 to avenge the killing of Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei.


Strike on Western Iraq Kills Seven Security Personnel

Members of Iraq's PMF carry the coffin of the PMF operations commander for Al-Anbar, Saad Dawai alongside others during a mass funeral in Baghdad on March 24, 2026. (AFP)
Members of Iraq's PMF carry the coffin of the PMF operations commander for Al-Anbar, Saad Dawai alongside others during a mass funeral in Baghdad on March 24, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Strike on Western Iraq Kills Seven Security Personnel

Members of Iraq's PMF carry the coffin of the PMF operations commander for Al-Anbar, Saad Dawai alongside others during a mass funeral in Baghdad on March 24, 2026. (AFP)
Members of Iraq's PMF carry the coffin of the PMF operations commander for Al-Anbar, Saad Dawai alongside others during a mass funeral in Baghdad on March 24, 2026. (AFP)

A strike on a base in western Iraq killed seven security personnel, the defense ministry said Wednesday, a day after an attack on the same base targeted the Popular Mobilization Forces.

"This resulted in the death of seven of our heroic fighters and the injury of 13 others," the ministry said of the strike in Anbar province, saying it specifically targeted the base's military healthcare clinic.

Rescue operations were ongoing, it added.

The base hosts Iraqi police, soldiers from the regular army and PMF, a security official told AFP.

It was hit by a deadly strike on Tuesday that the former paramilitaries blamed on the United States.

Iraq said late on Tuesday it would summon the US charge d'affaires and the Iranian ambassador after deadly strikes blamed on their countries, as Iraqi authorities granted the targeted groups the "right to respond".

Iraq has been pulled into the war sparked by US and Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28, and which has since engulfed much of the region.

Iraq has long been a proxy battleground for the United States and Iran, and has struggled to balance diplomatic ties with both countries.

Since the war began, pro-Iran armed groups have claimed responsibility for attacks on US interests in Iraq and across the region, while strikes have also targeted these groups, including state-linked positions.

In the statement from the prime minister's office, however, Iraq granted former paramilitaries within the official armed forces the right to "respond to military attacks" by drones and aircraft that targeted their headquarters.