‘Forceful Smuggling’: Drug Networks’ New Direction on Syrian-Jordanian Border

Jordanian army patrol on the border with Syria (AFP)
Jordanian army patrol on the border with Syria (AFP)
TT
20

‘Forceful Smuggling’: Drug Networks’ New Direction on Syrian-Jordanian Border

Jordanian army patrol on the border with Syria (AFP)
Jordanian army patrol on the border with Syria (AFP)

Smuggling networks in southern Syria have developed new tactics for their cross-border operations towards Jordan.

No longer content with attempting to smuggle drugs and weapons alone, these networks have escalated to engaging in fierce clashes with Jordanian border guard forces.

The clashes are seen as an attempt by the networks to forcefully impose trafficking operations.

“The past few days have witnessed an increase in the number of operations, transforming them from mere infiltration and smuggling attempts to armed confrontations,” confirmed a military source from the General Command of the Jordan Armed Forces-Arab Army (JAF).

According to the source, smugglers are looking to forcefully cross borders by targeting border guard forces.

The onset of winter, coupled with fog, signals the start of a season for smuggling operations, a resident of Syrian towns near the Jordanian border, who requested anonymity, told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The surge in smuggling operations has led to Syrian-Jordanian border regions experiencing prolonged nighttime clashes, the most intense being between smugglers and the Jordanian border guard forces.

A military commander from reconciliation factions in Daraa, who also requested anonymity, revealed to Asharq Al-Awsat that the recent lull in smuggling activities during the summer was exploited by traffickers to amass a significant quantity of drugs in the area.

Smugglers have also used the time to recruit and prepare youth operatives for transportation and smuggling operations during the winter, revealed the commander, who recently participated in military operations conducted by the Eighth Brigade against groups engaged in the trade and smuggling of drugs.

The commander emphasized the exploitation of weather conditions in the southern region during this time, marked by extensive fog that hampers clear visibility.

They also shed light on the resurgence of smuggling networks as evidenced by the continued flow of trafficked shipments from the region to Jordan.

This persists despite security operations in some Syrian border villages.

The operations failed to target individuals and key centers supplying Syria’s southern region with drugs.

Instead, they focused on what the commander described as “small-scale dealers” easily replaceable in the midst of security chaos, lack of safety, and deteriorating economic and living conditions in the area.



Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
TT
20

Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 

The US military intervention alongside Israel in its war against Iran has sparked growing concern in Lebanon, mixing fear with uncertainty about what lies ahead, especially as the region awaits Iran’s response.

Lebanese citizens are questioning whether Iran will retaliate solely against Israel or also strike nearby US military bases. Some speculate that Iran might avoid targeting American bases in neighboring countries that have shown solidarity with Tehran, as maintaining these relationships could help Iran push for an end to the war and a return to US-Iranian dialogue.

Despite mounting regional tension, Hezbollah continues to avoid direct military involvement. This position aligns with the recent statements of Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, who affirmed that Hezbollah will not intervene.

While some interpreted Hezbollah Deputy Secretary-General Naim Qassem’s pledge of “full support to Iran in any way we deem appropriate” as a divergence, sources say the party is fully aligned with Berri.

Berri maintains that dialogue between Washington and Tehran is the only path to halting the conflict and addressing Iran’s nuclear file. His stance is echoed by Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and other political actors.

US envoy Thomas Barrack, currently stationed in Türkiye, reportedly discussed these matters with Lebanese officials and promised to return in three weeks, hoping for progress toward a ceasefire and the implementation of UN Resolution 1701, which calls for Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon and for weapons to be under the exclusive control of the Lebanese state.

According to sources, the US escalation has prompted behind-the-scenes consultations between Hezbollah, the Amal Movement, and Lebanese state officials. These talks aim to evaluate the situation and ensure Lebanon remains out of the regional conflict.

Hezbollah remains firm in its decision not to engage militarily, refusing to offer Israel a pretext to expand the war into Lebanon. Despite internal solidarity with Iran, Hezbollah is keenly aware that joining the war would not shift the military balance, which now involves advanced weaponry beyond its capabilities.

The sources added that the party is also mindful of Lebanese Shiite public sentiment, which favors stability over another devastating war. Memories of past conflicts, including the toll of Hezbollah’s support for Gaza, linger. Fears of displacement and economic ruin are driving many in Beirut’s southern suburbs to sell their homes, often at steep losses.