Is a Western-Iranian Clash in Red Sea Imminent after US Strike against the Houthis?

The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. (AFP)
The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. (AFP)
TT
20

Is a Western-Iranian Clash in Red Sea Imminent after US Strike against the Houthis?

The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. (AFP)
The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. (AFP)

Iran announced it was deploying a warship to the Red Sea after the US repelled an attack by the Tehran-aligned Houthi militias in Yemen on a container vessel.

US helicopters repelled the attack, sinking three ships and killing 10 militants, according to accounts by American, Maersk, and Houthi officials on Sunday.

Iran’s deployment of the Alborz is seen as an act of support to the Houthis, but it may deepen the tensions in the area and transform Yemen and its territorial waters into an arena of an international conflict.

The deployment took place after Houthi spokesman and their so-called foreign minister Mohammed Abdulsalam Flita met with secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council Ali Akbar Ahmadian in Tehran.

Flita said he discussed with his host "issues of common interest." Iran’s Mehr news agency reported that the officials tackled regional security issues. Ahmadian also praised the Houthis for threatening international marine navigation in the Red Sea.

The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. This has prompted major shipping companies to take the longer and costlier route around Africa's Cape of Good Hope rather than through the Suez Canal.

The Red Sea is the entry point for ships using the Suez Canal, which handles about 12% of global trade and is vital for the movement of goods between Asia and Europe.

The United States launched Operation Prosperity Guardian on Dec. 19, saying more than 20 countries had agreed to participate in the efforts to safeguard ships in Red Sea waters near Yemen.

Meanwhile, the New York Times reported on Monday that Pentagon officials have come up with plans to strike Houthi missile and drone basis in Yemen should the need arise, but there are concerns that such a move would play into Iran’s hands.

It added that senior officials at the Defense Department were pushing for harsher measures against Iran’s proxies in the region.

The British Sunday Times reported that London, alongside Washington, was preparing to launch air strikes against a number of targets. The operations may take place in the Red Sea or Yemen.

Writing in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, British Defense Secretary Grant Shapps said: "We are willing to take direct action, and we won’t hesitate to take further action to deter threats to freedom of navigation in the Red Sea."

"The Houthis should be under no misunderstanding: we are committed to holding malign actors accountable for unlawful seizures and attacks," he said.

Biggest losers

Meanwhile, Yemeni academic and researcher Fares al-Beel told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Yemenis are "the biggest losers" in the Red Sea showdown.

He remarked that in spite of the threats, the US and Iran were unlikely to take any further escalatory steps.

He explained that the US doesn’t want to expand the conflict, but wants it to remain limited to Israel’s war on Gaza. Iran, for its part, cannot wage a direct confrontation because that would compromise its expansionist ambitions in the region.

It will not burn any bridges at this stage. Rather, it will use the conflict in the Red Sea to gain popular support, al-Beel went on to say.

Moreover, he said Iran’s deployment of a warship in the Red Sea is an act of moral support to the Houths. When it comes down to the wire, it will opt for non-military solutions. The same will take place with Hamas, which is backed by Tehran, after the war.

He did not rule out the possibility of the eruption of "limited confrontations", but the race for power and influence will continue to hold sway in the region.

The Yemeni people and their economy are the ultimate losers in this situation, al-Beel lamented.

Yemeni political analyst Mohammed al-Saar told Asharq Al-Awsat that the instability in the Red Sea is revealing Iran to be a major player in the conflict.

Tehran is seeking to maintain its influence in the region through providing support to the Houthis, he added.

Yemeni political analyst Mahmoud al-Taher ruled out the possibility of a major escalation in the Red Sea.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that the countries surrounding Yemen want peace. Iran is also aware that the countries overlooking the Red Sea do not want an escalation and are seeking to defuse tensions.

Tehran deployed its warship to the Red Sea in a show of force and to send a message of support to the Houthis, he remarked.

"At any rate, the developments have proven what we have always warned of. Tehran wants to control the Bab al-Mandeb Strait and Red Sea through the Houthis," Taher stated.

This issue will weigh heavily over the potential peace or truce talks in Yemen, he predicted.

The Houthis and the forces of the Prosperity Guardian coalition will continue to clash, but Iran will not be dragged into a direct confrontation, he said. Iran will continue to order the Houthis to carry out attacks.

Furthermore, Taher said the convention on freedom of international marine navigation binds members of the UN Security Council and countries overlooking the Red Sea to protect the area. Any action by them against the Houthis should be a precursor to the liberation of Yemen’s Hodeidah province from the militias.



Palestinian Envoy Tells UN Court that Israel is Killing Civilians and Targeting Aid Workers in Gaza

A Palestinian flag flies outside the International Court of Justice, rear, which opened hearings into a United Nations request for an advisory opinion on Israel's obligations to allow humanitarian assistance in Gaza and the West Bank, in The Hague, Netherlands, Monday, April 28, 2025. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)
A Palestinian flag flies outside the International Court of Justice, rear, which opened hearings into a United Nations request for an advisory opinion on Israel's obligations to allow humanitarian assistance in Gaza and the West Bank, in The Hague, Netherlands, Monday, April 28, 2025. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)
TT
20

Palestinian Envoy Tells UN Court that Israel is Killing Civilians and Targeting Aid Workers in Gaza

A Palestinian flag flies outside the International Court of Justice, rear, which opened hearings into a United Nations request for an advisory opinion on Israel's obligations to allow humanitarian assistance in Gaza and the West Bank, in The Hague, Netherlands, Monday, April 28, 2025. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)
A Palestinian flag flies outside the International Court of Justice, rear, which opened hearings into a United Nations request for an advisory opinion on Israel's obligations to allow humanitarian assistance in Gaza and the West Bank, in The Hague, Netherlands, Monday, April 28, 2025. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)

A Palestinian diplomat has told the United Nations’ top court that Israel is killing and displacing civilians and targeting aid workers in Gaza in a “man-made catastrophe of unprecedented proportions.”

Ambassador Ammar Hijazi was speaking Monday at the opening of a week of hearings at the International Court of Justice into Israel’s legal obligations to facilitate aid in the occupied territories, The Associated Press said.

Israel denies deliberately targeting civilians and aid staff.

The United Nations’ highest court opened hearings Monday into Israel’s obligation to “ensure and facilitate” urgently needed humanitarian assistance to Palestinian civilians in the occupied territories, bringing the ongoing conflict in Gaza back into focus in The Hague.

Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called the hearings part of a “systematic persecution and delegitimization” of his country. Speaking in Jerusalem as the hearings began in The Hague, Saar said the court was “becoming completely politicized.” He called the proceeding “shameful.”

A week of hearings has been scheduled in response to a request last year from the UN General Assembly, which asked the International Court of Justice to weigh in on Israel’s legal responsibilities after the country blocked the UN agency for Palestinian refugees from operating on its territory.

In a resolution sponsored by Norway, the General Assembly requested an advisory opinion, a non-binding but legally important decision from the court, on Israel's obligations in the occupied territories to "ensure and facilitate the unhindered provision of urgently needed supplies essential to the survival of the Palestinian civilian population?”

Hearings open as the humanitarian aid system in Gaza is nearing collapse. Israel has blocked the entry of food, fuel, medicine and other humanitarian supplies since March 2. It renewed its bombardment on March 18, breaking a ceasefire, and seized large parts of the territory, saying it aims to push Hamas to release more hostages. Despite the stepped-up Israeli pressure, ceasefire efforts remain deadlocked.

The World Food Program said last week its food stocks in the Gaza Strip have run out under Israel’s nearly 8-week-old blockade, ending a main source of sustenance for hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in the territory. Many families are struggling to feed their children.

The United Nations was the first to address the court on Monday, followed by Palestinian representatives. In total, 40 states and four international organizations are scheduled to participate. Israel is not scheduled to speak during the hearings, but could submit a written statement. Israel's Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The United States, which voted against the UN resolution, is scheduled to speak on Wednesday.

The court will likely take months to rule. But experts say the decision, though not legally binding, could profoundly impact international jurisprudence, international aid to Israel and public opinion.

“Advisory opinions provide clarity,” Juliette McIntyre, an expert on international law at the University of South Australia, told The Associated Press. Governments rely on them in international negotiations and the outcome could be used to pressure Israel into easing restrictions on aid.

Whether any ruling will have an effect on Israel, however, is unclear. Israel has long accused the United Nations of being unfairly biased against it and has ignored a 2004 advisory ruling by the ICJ that found its West Bank separation barrier illegal.

On Tuesday, South Africa, a staunch critic of Israel, will present its arguments. In hearings last year in a separate case at the court, the country accused Israel of committing genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza — a charge Israel denies. Those proceedings are still underway.

Israel's troubled relations with UNRWA

Israel’s ban on the agency, known as UNRWA, came into effect in January. The organization has faced increased criticism from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right allies, who claim the group is deeply infiltrated by Hamas. UNRWA rejects that claim.

Israel alleged that 19 out of UNRWA’s approximately 13,000 staff in Gaza took part in Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack in southern Israel, which killed about 1,200 people and set off the war in Gaza. UNRWA said it fired nine staffers after an internal UN investigation concluded that they could have been involved, although the evidence was not authenticated and corroborated. Israel later alleged that about 100 other Palestinians in Gaza were Hamas members, but never provided any evidence to the United Nations. Israel has also accused Hamas of using UN facilities for cover, building tunnels near UN buildings and diverting aid deliveries for its own use.

The Israeli ban doesn't apply directly to Gaza. But it controls all entry to the territory, and its ban on UNRWA from operating inside Israel greatly limits the agency's ability to function. Israeli officials say they are looking for alternative ways to deliver aid to Gaza that would cut out the United Nations.

UNRWA was established by the UN General Assembly in 1949 to provide relief for Palestinians who fled or were expelled from their homes in what is now Israel during the war surrounding Israel's creation the previous year until there is a political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The agency has been providing aid and services — including health and education — to some 2.5 million Palestinians in Gaza, the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, as well as 3 million more in Syria, Jordan and Lebanon.

Israel’s air and ground war has killed over 51,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants. Israel says it has killed around 20,000 militants, without providing evidence.