Blinken Demands Appointment of Deputy to Abbas

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken meet in Ramallah on January 10. (EPA)
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken meet in Ramallah on January 10. (EPA)
TT

Blinken Demands Appointment of Deputy to Abbas

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken meet in Ramallah on January 10. (EPA)
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken meet in Ramallah on January 10. (EPA)

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken had proposed to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas last week that the Palestinian Authority carry out a number of broad reforms at its agencies to allow them to perform their duties in the West Bank and post-war Gaza, American and Palestinian sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The proposals made during the “tense” meeting in Ramallah included the appointment of a deputy to Abbas and granting greater privileges to a government of technocrats.

The US is seeking a new structure of rule in the occupied West Bank and Gaza that would have expanded privileges in the security and financial sectors and foreign relations.

The two sources said it was unlikely that Abbas would yield to the growing pressure to appoint a deputy or abandon his own privileges in favor of a new prime minister.

The differences are likely to impede post-war efforts in Gaza.

Abbas responded to Blinken’s proposals by saying that there was a need for Washington to carry out its own reform in policy towards the Palestinians.

Washington must kick off an effective process to stop the Israeli war on Gaza and begin reconstruction, create an environment that is conducive to the reforms, stop Israeli raids in the West Bank and settler attacks on Palestinians, release PA funds seized by Israel and pave the way for the two-state solution, said the sources.

The PA’s measured approach in complying with reform demands poses a challenge to Washington, which ties its financial and political support to Ramallah to these actual reforms.

At the moment, it appears that Washington doesn't have a clear vision of what an alternative to the PA could be like, allowing Abbas greater room to maneuver.

Since the eruption of the war on October 7, Washington had come up with several scenarios over the party “qualified” in managing Gaza after the conflict.

It went through several options, such as proposing that Israel run post-war Gaza, the formation of a ruling council comprised of local clans, and that Arab countries play a role in running the enclave.

Ultimately, Washington came back to the PA, saying it should play a central role in running the West Bank and Gaza after the conflict is over on condition that it carry out “rapid” reforms to establish a “revitalized” authority that is capable of shouldering the responsibilities of the new phase.

The pressure Washington is applying on Abbas is reminiscent of the pressure former President George W. Bush’s administration applied on Yasser Arafat to abandon some of his privileges in favor a prime minister which eventually led him to being sidelined.



Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
TT

Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)

Politicians in Beirut said they have not received any credible information about Washington resuming its mediation efforts towards reaching a ceasefire in Lebanon despite reports to the contrary.

Efforts came to a halt after US envoy Amos Hochstein’s last visit to Beirut three weeks ago.

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri dismissed the reports as media fodder, saying nothing official has been received.

Lebanon is awaiting tangible proposals on which it can build its position, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The only credible proposal on the table is United Nations Security Council resolution 1701, whose articles must be implemented in full by Lebanon and Israel, “not just Lebanon alone,” he stressed.

Resolution 1701 was issued to end the 2006 July war between Hezbollah and Israel and calls for removing all weapons from southern Lebanon and that the only armed presence there be restricted to the army and UN peacekeepers.

Western diplomatic sources in Beirut told Asharq Al-Awsat that Berri opposes one of the most important articles of the proposed solution to end the current conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.

He is opposed to the German and British participation in the proposed mechanism to monitor the implementation of resolution 1701. The other participants are the United States and France.

Other sources said Berri is opposed to the mechanism itself since one is already available and it is embodied in the UN peacekeepers, whom the US and France can join.

The sources revealed that the solution to the conflict has a foreign and internal aspect. The foreign one includes Israel, the US and Russia and seeks guarantees that would prevent Hezbollah from rearming itself. The second covers Lebanese guarantees on the implementation of resolution 1701.

Berri refused to comment on the media reports, but told Asharq Al-Awsat that this was the first time that discussions are being held about guarantees.

He added that “Israel is now in crisis because it has failed to achieve its military objectives, so it has resorted to more killing and destruction undeterred.”

He highlighted the “steadfastness of the UN peacekeepers in the South who have refused to leave their positions despite the repeated Israeli attacks.”