Iranian Weapons in Army's Hands... Will it Reshape the Sudanese Scene?

Sudanese Army Commander Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan during a visit to his forces in the east of the country. (SUNA)
Sudanese Army Commander Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan during a visit to his forces in the east of the country. (SUNA)
TT

Iranian Weapons in Army's Hands... Will it Reshape the Sudanese Scene?

Sudanese Army Commander Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan during a visit to his forces in the east of the country. (SUNA)
Sudanese Army Commander Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan during a visit to his forces in the east of the country. (SUNA)

The announcement that the Sudanese army had acquired Iranian Mohajer-6 drones and that Sudan had restored its relations with the Tehran government, coincided with severe tension in Iranian-US relations, which reached its peak, on Friday night.
The US and UK launched raids on Iranian targets in both Syria and Iraq on Friday, in parallel with missile attacks and the interception of ships in the Red Sea by the Houthis, raising the question of whether these developments will redraw the Sudanese scene.
In addition to the strained relations between Washington and Tehran, the region is witnessing escalating tensions, including the ongoing war between Hamas and Israel, the Houthi’s targeting of tankers in the Red Sea, and the American bombing of sites belonging to the pro-Iranian group, in addition to the recent strikes against Iranian targets in Iraq and Syria.
Dr. Bakri Al-Jak Al-Madani, professor of public policy and administration at Long Island University in New York, believes that Islamists in Sudan, in their drive to consolidate their relations with Iran and their quest to obtain Iranian weapons, do not only aim to improve the army’s operational position on the ground, but rather to achieve a strategic purpose that is to transform the conflict in Sudan into a regional war.
Professor of Political Science at Al-Neelain University, Professor Hassan Al-Saouri, said that America was angry at the restoration of Sudanese-Iranian relations, but he stressed that Sudan has the right to seek its interests wherever they may be.
“Sudan is threatened by 7 or 8 countries, and America is still dealing with it in its old approach by making bright promises, which drives it to search for a party that will support it and fulfill these promises,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.
The academic called on the US to change the way it deals with Sudan, as the African country would not let its interests be exposed to danger.
For his part, professor of political science at Omdurman Islamic University, Dr. Bashir Al-Sharif, stressed that ties between the Muslim Brotherhood movement and Iran were historical, noting that the ruling Islamists in Sudan benefited from that relationship in the areas of military training and supply.



Lebanon Begins Removing Palestinian Arms Outside of Refugee Camps

The army enters a position of a Palestinian group. (Lebanese Army)
The army enters a position of a Palestinian group. (Lebanese Army)
TT

Lebanon Begins Removing Palestinian Arms Outside of Refugee Camps

The army enters a position of a Palestinian group. (Lebanese Army)
The army enters a position of a Palestinian group. (Lebanese Army)

Lebanon kicked off on Saturday the process of removing weapons in possession of Palestinian factions outside of their refugee camps.

The arms are mainly held by groups allied with the ousted Syrian regime that were based in several areas in the Bekaa, South, Beirut and the border with Syria.

The Lebanese army announced on Saturday that it had taken over three military positions that were affiliated with two Palestinian factions that were close to Bashar al-Assad's former regime.

Two of the positions are in the eastern and western Bekaa and belonged to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – General Command. The third, in Rashaya, belonged to the Fatah al-Intifada group.

A security source told Asharq Al-Awsat that the army intelligence has been working on this issue for some time now and was close to completely resolving it.

The army said it had seized a large number of weapons and ammunition, as well as military gear.

The removal of the weapons outside state control is part of the ceasefire agreement reached between Israel and Hezbollah and which calls for dismantling all non-licensed military facilities that manufacture weapons in Lebanon.

The agreement also calls for removing all unlicensed weapons starting from regions south of the Litani River.

A similar agreement for the removal of Palestinian weapons was reached in March 2006, but it was never implemented.

A Lebanese security source, however, said that the latest progress in removing the Palestinian weapons has nothing to do with the ceasefire. Rather, it is related to the collapse of Assad's regime.

These factions were loyal to the regime, and they received funding and equipment from it, the source told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Hisham Debsi, the Director of the Tatweer Center for Studies, said the positions the army has taken over are tied to factions that are affiliated with Syrian security agencies.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that the army should have been able to take over these locations as soon as United Nations Security Council resolution 1559 was issued in 2004.

The Palestinian Authority at the time agreed to the handover of weapons outside and inside refugee camps, but Hezbollah objected to the move and said it needed to be discussed at a dialogue among Lebanese political powers, Debsi went on to say.

At the dialogue, Hezbollah agreed to the removal of weapons inside and outside the camps, but it later thwarted the plan, he added.

The current removal of arms is tied to the implementation of resolution 1701 and others, notably 1559. It is also directly connected to the sudden and dramatic toppling of the Assad regime, he explained.

The Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, Syria’s interim rulers, had issued orders for Palestinian groups affiliated with the regime to lay down their arms. “These factions, which had raised the Palestinian flag and done nothing but harm the Palestinian and Lebanese people, no longer have their regional and Lebanese backers,” so they had no choice but to yield to the orders, Debsi said.

The conditions are ripe for the Lebanese state to impose its sovereignty, through the army, across all its territories and end the presence of any Palestinian armed groups outside the refugee camps, he stressed.

Moreover, the state has the right to impose its authority over the camps and remove the weapons there, he remarked.

At the moment, the removal of Palestinian weapons does not appear to be a precursor to Hezbollah laying down its weapons in areas north of the Litani.

Such a move demands a “major political decision that is off the table at the moment,” said the sources.