Lenderking Blames Houthis and Iran for Red Sea ‘Militarization’

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, the US envoy to Yemen calls for an “immediate end” to “terrorism” against ships

US Special Envoy for Yemen Tim Lenderking. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
US Special Envoy for Yemen Tim Lenderking. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Lenderking Blames Houthis and Iran for Red Sea ‘Militarization’

US Special Envoy for Yemen Tim Lenderking. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
US Special Envoy for Yemen Tim Lenderking. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Both Iran and the Houthis should be blamed for the “militarization of the Red Sea,” said Tim Lenderking, the US special envoy to Yemen, stressing that the military action undertaken by the United States and its allies is "against the Houthi military capability.” Lenderking said the Houthis are acting "like a global terrorist organization,” calling on them to “stop their attacks immediately.”

Lenderking was talking in an exclusive interview with Asharq Al-Awsat on the eve of his new tour in the region, said the situation in Red Sea “has become unbearable.” However, he left the door open to different measures, adding: “When their attacks stop, we can stop too.” He believed that this Houthi behavior “contradicts support for the Palestinians.” Pointing out that their behavior is endangering the “tremendous progress” achieved in the “peace process” led by the United Nations.

Lenderking stressed that “Iran poses a major threat,” describing supplying the Houthis with money and weapons to attack ships as “very convenient for Iran’s agenda,” which is acting to “destabilize,” and not “the behavior of a member of the international community.”  

- First. Now with this attack on the US Post in Jordan, it's not within your scope, but apparently, Iran is behind those attacks in Jordan, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. This is your area, and there is the huge problem in the Red Sea. How is the US going to deal with this issue?  

You’re absolutely right to point out the central role that Iran plays in destabilizing activity all over the region. This is nothing new. This is a feature of Iran's regional behavior since 1979. Instead of seeking constructive diplomatic solutions to the conflicts plaguing the region, Tehran has instead, time and time again, sought to destabilize it. If Iran were truly interested in peace in the region, they would cease their arming and financing of the Houthis and other destabilizing groups.  Instead, we only see that support continuing, as evidenced by the recent interdiction of a shipment of weapons from Iran to Yemen.  

This attack last week is just another example. This one is particularly egregious because it killed three US service members. What we see on the Yemen front is the Iranians playing a very active role in facilitating and assisting the Houthi attacks on ships in the Red Sea. This is a very unfortunate posture for the Iranians and the Houthis to take. What has this this led to? The militarization of the Red Sea. Something no country, including Iran, supposedly wanted up to this point. There are now more warships and more other ships protecting international commerce than there were before.  

The Houthis are driving up prices through attacks on international shipping. That means an increase in the prices of wheat and other goods getting to the Palestinian people or to other parts of Africa, Europe, and Asia. It's driving up fuel prices. It's adding on 5,000 miles, as shippers say they don't want anything to do with the Red Sea. They are having to go around the southern tip of Africa. How many tons of food are going to be spoiled by this additional long traverse? And how much higher will food prices go? This is hitting ordinary consumers. It's not just hitting the Israelis. It's not just hitting the Americans. It's hitting ordinary consumers around the world in every country, including Yemen, and the Palestinians as well.  

So, I would argue that the Houthi attacks must stop because they are inflicting damage on the global community and on Yemen. And that's why we think that the Houthi attacks are misguided. They're reckless. They’re indiscriminate, and that's why they should stop.  

- They say they are outraged by the Israeli attacks on the Palestinian civilians as you’ve just mentioned, and if the US pressure Israel, then everything will stop, not only within the Red Sea context, but also in the wider context. Iran is using this argument all the time. Again, they have the same the Axis of Resistance. They have the same argument, why doesn't the US listen to this?  

What the Houthis are doing is an example of someone having a problem with their neighbor and burning down the neighborhood grocery store. They're harming their neighbors and themselves and not actually addressing the core issue. This is why 24 countries signed a statement last week supporting military action to deter and degrade Houthi attacks. And this military action is not against Yemen, or against Yemenis. It is against the Houthi military capability which they are using to attack civilian shipping.  

So, we've been very clear about what the scope of these military strikes is. Similarly, the Houthis are behaving like a terrorist organization; attacking civilians, attacking civilian shipping, attacking innocent mariners, detaining them, threatening to hijack ships, not releasing the crew of the Galaxy Leader, 25 people from five different countries.  

We now have announced a designation of the Houthis as a specially designated global terrorist group, which will go into effect on February 16. This is the kind of response that the Houthis are generating. They're alienating the world community, and doing nothing to help the Palestinians, and putting the peace process in Yemen - which parties have painstakingly negotiated over the last two years, including the Houthis - in jeopardy. The Houthi behavior is misguided, and they should stop their attacks on shipping immediately.  

- And at the same time, what's going on probably, as you’ve just mentioned also, that this is affecting the peace process within the Yemeni parties, and then probably your support is also getting compromised. Is that the case?  

Our support for the peace process remains unshakable. I don't think that the peace effort in Yemen would be as far along had it not been for US support, and the commitment of this administration, and the priority that the President places on peace in Yemen through a Yemeni - Yemeni political negotiation and a durable ceasefire. Those remain US goals, and this is very much what we want to return to.  

But unfortunately, much of the progress that has been made over the last two years, which has created a truce in Yemen, which is still holding, is being jeopardized by the militarization of the Red Sea, which is caused by the Houthi attacks, and the threats that they are posing to shipping and to the civilian population. Absent political settlement, the humanitarian and economic crises will continue to get worse.   

The designation is a direct response to Houthi attacks on shipping. If there are no Houthi attacks on shipping, there is no need to designate them as a terrorist organization. If there are no Houthi attacks on shipping, there is no need for a growing coalition of countries to strike and degrade their military capability to protect international shipping.

- You’re talking about Operation Prosperity Guardian…  

Prosperity Guardian is another action that the Houthi attacks have generated – a large international response, defensive in nature, solely to protect crews and international ships which the Houthis are attacking in a reckless and indiscriminate manner. They say that they are only attacking Israeli ships, but that is simply not the case. They have attacked international ships with owners and crew of all different nationalities. Even hijacking and detaining a crew from Mexico, Ukraine, the Philippines and Bulgaria. That's the behavior of pirates. That's not the behavior of a group that seeks international support for a Yemen peace effort. That's the behavior of pirates.   

- Are you going to take additional measures if they continue their attacks against the international shipments?  

We have been very clear that we seek de-escalation in the Red Sea, but the Houthi attacks cannot continue. We are evaluating every day the situation in the Red Sea and elsewhere in the region, and what aggressive and militaristic steps the Iranians or the Houthis might be taking. But it is our fervent hope, and we're working every day on this, to de-escalate all of these conflicts.  

You've seen that American officials are working with Qatar and other countries for the release of the remaining hostages and a prolonged humanitarian pause to the fighting. We have made a strong push for more humanitarian assistance to Gaza, to address the tragic situation there. And we were very patient with the attacks on shipping until the situation became intolerable, and were forced to take action because of Houthi behavior. When their attacks stop, we can stop also.

- You don't want escalation. But nonetheless, the situation is just dragging the US into this, probably.

I fear that other parties may be wishing to escalate. And the Houthis by attacking a huge variety of ships, that was an escalation. Attacking Israel, and trying to hit the civilian populations, was an escalation. Again, these things do not help the Palestinians. They’re not bringing a single morsel of assistance or food to the Palestinian people, because of their actions. Nor are the Houthi attacks helping Yemen, which has one of the world’s largest humanitarian and economic disasters.  

They should stop. And we can return the focus to the Yemen peace effort, and put more effort towards supporting the Palestinians and their legitimate aspirations for a two-state solution, which Houthi behavior frankly is complicating and undermining.  

There isn't a single country in the Gulf that supports what the Houthis are doing; attacking international shipping, masquerading under the banner of support for the Palestinians, because the reality is that this behavior is contrary to supporting the Palestinians.

- Could you please elaborate more what you've been doing with the Saudis and the other countries in the region?  

We're working very closely with the Saudis, other regional actors and the Yemeni parties, on the Yemen peace effort. That's been the case since the start of this administration, reflecting the priority that the President placed on ending the Yemen conflict. We have appreciated Saudi Arabia's engagement mediating between the Houthis and the Yemen government, and helping contribute a roadmap for peace in Yemen, which the Houthi and the Yemen government and regional countries support.  

So ironically, while the world is focused on the Houthis’ reckless attacks on global shipping, tremendous progress was made in the past month on the peace process– captured in an announcement by the UN on December 23 last year – that an agreement has been reached. This is the best opportunity that Yemen has had for its peace process in nine years.  

Why are the Houthis jeopardizing peace by behaving like an armed militia group and a terrorist organization in attacking civilian shipping? Why are they driving away the attention from the Yemen peace effort, attention Yemeni peace needs and deserves? They are choosing to sabotage all the good work that so many parties have put into creating a dream that the Yemen conflict could finally be over – why are the Houthis – trying to throw that all away? Instead of prioritizing the Yemeni people?

- What are the immediate obstacles facing this political track led by the UN?

I think the obstacles are the recklessness of the Houthi behavior. Prior to their attacks, both the Yemen government and the Houthis had approved this roadmap that the UN now is able to try to operationalize. And again, this is the most tangible progress that’s been made in the Yemen conflict in 9 years. And that’s been put in jeopardy by the indiscriminate nature of the Houthi attacks on the Red Sea shipping. What international country would support a peace effort in Yemen when one of the parties - the Houthis - is attacking the global economy?  It is not the behavior of the Yemen government or any other party in Yemen that’s threatening the Yemen peace effort. It is the Houthis.  

- Iran is in the picture no matter how we speak negatively about the situation. So, this is a dilemma: how you're going to deal with it?  

Iran is a major threat, and in our conversations every day we talk about how to respond to the Iranian threat, especially in light of the killing of three service members in Jordan. Look at what we see Iran doing. We know that Iran is supporting, aiding and facilitating Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping. This is very convenient for Iran's regional agenda. It's not convenient for the Yemeni people, however. It's not convenient for other Arab countries.  

Look at the contents of a small ship that were seized about two weeks ago by US forces enforcing UN Security Council resolutions on not smuggling, to aid the Houthis or fan the conflict in Yemen. That particular ship was filled with lethal equipment heading toward the Houthis to be used for their attacks on Red Sea shipping. So, this is the behavior of those seeking to destabilize. This is not the behavior of members of the international community. So, we need everybody to dial it back, de-escalate, and return to the legitimate and genuine peace effort in Yemen that is now threatened by Houthi attacks.

We are talking to our partners multiple times a day. We have numerous engagements that we are planning to ensure that there is the speediest possible resolution in the Red Sea, which enables a return to the Yemen peace process. All of my efforts are focused on this particular line of effort.



Syria Hails Shift From Captagon Hub to Anti-Drug Partner

Syria’s Anti-Narcotics Directorate seized 25 million professionally packaged Captagon pills. (Syrian Interior Ministry)
Syria’s Anti-Narcotics Directorate seized 25 million professionally packaged Captagon pills. (Syrian Interior Ministry)
TT

Syria Hails Shift From Captagon Hub to Anti-Drug Partner

Syria’s Anti-Narcotics Directorate seized 25 million professionally packaged Captagon pills. (Syrian Interior Ministry)
Syria’s Anti-Narcotics Directorate seized 25 million professionally packaged Captagon pills. (Syrian Interior Ministry)

Syria on Friday marked what it called its shift from a “Captagon hub” to a “partner in combating it,” as the world observed the International Day against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking.

The official Syrian Arab News Agency, SANA, said this year’s event was held under the slogan “The global drug problem: persistent issues, new challenges and innovative responses,” citing rapid changes in global drug markets, the rise of new substances and increasingly complex smuggling routes.

SANA said the occasion came as Syria presses ahead with efforts to dismantle drug production and smuggling networks following changes in the file after the fall of the former government, a reference to the government of former President Bashar al-Assad.

“After years in which Syria, under the former regime, was one of the world’s most prominent hubs for producing and smuggling Captagon, the country entered a new phase after liberation,” SANA said in a report on Friday.

That phase, it said, is focused on dismantling drug factories, pursuing trafficking networks and expanding international cooperation, turning Syria “from a source of threat into an active partner in combating it.”

SANA said that in December 2025, one year after Assad’s government fell, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, UNODC, confirmed the disruption of large-scale Captagon manufacturing in Syria.

It said the Syrian government had dismantled 15 Captagon manufacturing facilities and 13 smaller storage sites since December 2024, the month the former government fell.

The agency said UNODC’s 2026 report also noted that disruption in the Captagon market after Assad’s fall had pushed up pill prices in some areas. The report also warned that some users could turn to other synthetic drugs, such as methamphetamine.

Coinciding with the international anti-drug day, SANA said the Interior and Health ministries had launched a national campaign under the slogan “Syria Without Drugs.”

Brig. Gen. Khaled Eid, head of the Anti-Narcotics Directorate, told Syrian Alikhbariah that reaching a “Syria Without Drugs” was not just a slogan, but a national project built on scientific and carefully studied plans.

He said the campaign rests on a balance between deterrence and treatment. “The user is viewed as a victim who requires care, while the dealer and smuggler are treated as perpetrators of a crime that requires punishment,” he said.

Eid said the Interior Ministry had faced “a complex reality” in recent months, including local manufacturing centers and distribution networks targeting young people. He said this required stronger security controls, tighter oversight of border crossings, better-equipped anti-narcotics units with modern tracking technology, and an integrated database on active networks.

According to SANA, Syria’s Anti-Narcotics Directorate has carried out 1,550 drug seizures and interdiction operations since Assad’s fall. The operations led to the dismantling of 90 international smuggling networks and the closure of 17 Captagon factories.

The seized materials included 697 million Captagon pills, 15 metric tons of hashish, 10 million narcotic pharmaceutical pills, 180 kg of cocaine, 84.5 kg of crystal meth, 7 kg of heroin and 221 metric tons of chemical precursors, according to Eid.

Separately, the UN Security Council unanimously passed a resolution renewing the mandate of the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force in the Golan, known as UNDOF, during a session on Thursday.

Syrian Alikhbariah quoted Syria’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Ibrahim Olabi, as saying at the session that Syria was now one of the most stable countries in the region and was “engaged in reconstruction, restoring institutions and attracting investment.”

He also cited Syria’s cooperation with international partners on counterterrorism, chemical weapons-related obligations and regional security.

Olabi also addressed political change in Syria, saying “the change in Syria was represented by the disappearance of a regime that practiced torture and used chemical weapons.”

On Israel, Olabi expressed “Syria’s concern over Israeli statements about not withdrawing from Syria,” saying “Israel’s current actions can be interpreted as an attempt to seize the lands it occupied.”

Olabi said the change in Syria that Israel appeared to fear was the removal of “an authoritarian regime that used chemical weapons against its people.” He asked whether Israel preferred the situation that had existed under Assad.

UNDOF was established after the October 1973 war under the Disengagement of Forces Agreement signed by Syria and Israel in 1974. The force has operated since then in the buffer zone to monitor compliance with the ceasefire in the Syrian Golan Heights, which Israel has occupied since 1967.


Iraq Row Erupts Over ‘Missing’ $140 Bn

 A session of Iraq’s parliament in Baghdad, March 2026. (Iraqi News Agency)
A session of Iraq’s parliament in Baghdad, March 2026. (Iraqi News Agency)
TT

Iraq Row Erupts Over ‘Missing’ $140 Bn

 A session of Iraq’s parliament in Baghdad, March 2026. (Iraqi News Agency)
A session of Iraq’s parliament in Baghdad, March 2026. (Iraqi News Agency)

A senior Iraqi official has ignited a new dispute over the fate of about $140 billion in public revenues, as Iraq presses ahead with corruption investigations involving high-ranking officials at the oil and electricity ministries.

The cases center on allegations that tens of millions of dollars and billions of Iraqi dinars were stolen through contracts suspected of being fake.

The developments come as the Iraqi government faces mounting financial and political pressure ahead of Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi’s visit to the United States in mid-July.

The government is also grappling with efforts to bring weapons under state control, complete the formation of the government and confront financial strain caused by a drop in Iraqi oil exports after the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

The pressure has prompted Baghdad to seek alternatives to secure state employees’ salaries for the next three months.

Missing $140 billion

In a televised interview broadcast two days ago, former Finance Ministry undersecretary Masoud Haider said the state treasury had received about 455 trillion dinars over the three years of the previous government, equivalent, by his estimate, to about $345 billion.

Haider said operating spending and public-sector salaries totaled about $205 billion, then questioned the fate of the remaining $140 billion.

Haider, a member of the Kurdistan Democratic Party, said spending on infrastructure projects, including overpasses in Baghdad, could not explain the gap.

He accused the Finance Ministry of blocking his access to data from the accounting and budget departments while he served as undersecretary.

He said the restriction was imposed because of his ethnic and party affiliation and presented an official document that he said barred the two departments from dealing with him without the minister’s approval.

Haider said he informed former Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani of what he described as a legal violation, but said Sudani took no action.

Former Finance Minister Taif Sami denied the accusations. In a statement, she said Haider’s remarks were “baseless and not supported by any reports or official documents issued by the relevant oversight authorities.”

Sami said oil revenues are monitored and audited by the Federal Integrity Commission and the Federal Board of Supreme Audit, as well as by international auditing systems that track oil exports and reconcile exported volumes with collected revenues.

She said the disappearance of the cited sums would be “impossible” without their appearing in official records and reports.

She said non-oil revenues had also grown in recent years as a result of reform measures, including the introduction of point-of-sale systems and follow-up with public companies to collect dues and transfer them to the public treasury after audit by the Federal Board of Supreme Audit.

On revenues from the Kurdistan Region, Sami said the file differed from other federal revenues. She said the region’s revenues had not been transferred to the federal treasury in a way that would allow them to be included in the accounts cited.

Sami said maintaining public trust in financial and oversight institutions required accuracy and reliance on facts and official documents, not estimates or accusations unsupported by evidence.

Major budget changes

On Iraq’s severe financial crisis, lawmaker Hussein al-Daraji said in press remarks that the time left this year was not enough to prepare and pass a 2026 budget draft in parliament.

He said the government was instead preparing a draft 2027 budget, which he expected to be sent to parliament in October or November.

Daraji said the government planned major changes to the 2027 budget law, making it different from previous budgets in how it is prepared, how its tables are structured and how spending is set.

He said the decision to bypass the 2026 budget was driven by accounting issues stemming from the advanced stage of the fiscal year. The state, he said, is still spending under a temporary one-twelfth disbursement mechanism, based on the Financial Management Law and the previous three-year budget.

According to the parliamentary finance committee, the government and parliament have agreed to focus technical efforts on preparing the 2027 budget in an economic format with new spending tables.

The draft is expected to be referred to parliament before the end of the year, with the aim of reducing the deficit and passing it before the start of the new fiscal year.


Lebanon Banking on US Pressure to Yield ‘Declaration of Intent’ in Negotiations with Israel

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun chairs a cabinet meeting on Thursday. (Lebanese Presidency)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun chairs a cabinet meeting on Thursday. (Lebanese Presidency)
TT

Lebanon Banking on US Pressure to Yield ‘Declaration of Intent’ in Negotiations with Israel

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun chairs a cabinet meeting on Thursday. (Lebanese Presidency)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun chairs a cabinet meeting on Thursday. (Lebanese Presidency)

Lebanon is counting on US pressure to push Israel to soften its position after the third day of the fifth round of Lebanese-Israeli negotiations in Washington failed to yield a breakthrough.

The two delegations failed to agree on a declaration of intent, prompting the US State Department to extend the round by one day and schedule a fourth session for Friday.

The extension came after Lebanon’s cabinet on Thursday approved a mandate for the negotiating delegation to continue the talks.

The decision was backed unanimously by ministers, including those aligned with Hezbollah and the Amal Movement, even as the “Shiite duo” continues to reject direct negotiations with Israel.

Differences remain

Thursday’s talks were the longest since the fifth round began, lasting 11 hours. They had been expected to end with a news conference, and journalists were invited in the evening.

But the event was canceled without explanation before the US State Department announced that negotiations would continue for another day, signaling that major differences remained.

Sources familiar with the talks said the extension followed a failure to agree on the final wording of the declaration of intent, despite discussions having reached the stage of detailed drafting.

The sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Lebanon is insisting the declaration include core principles: affirmation of Lebanese sovereignty, recognition of the Lebanese army’s role in extending state authority, and a clear link between any field arrangements or “model areas” and a full Israeli withdrawal from occupied Lebanese territory, along with the return of displaced people.

Israel, the sources said, remains firm. It is demanding security guarantees to prevent Hezbollah from rebuilding its military infrastructure and is refusing to include any clear commitment to a full withdrawal from Lebanese territory in the declaration of intent.

(2L/R) Israel's Ambassador to the US Yechiel Leiter, State Department Chief of Staff Daniel Holler, US Ambassador to Lebanon Michel Issa and Lebanese Ambassador to the US Nada Hamadeh attend a meeting between Israeli and Lebanese delegations hosted by the United States at the State Department in Washington, DC, on June 3, 2026. (AFP)

The sources said the main sticking point is the issue of “model areas.” They said Israel had retreated from an earlier approval of the proposal and is now demanding that the Lebanese army first deploy in areas outside the yellow line, meaning areas still under Lebanese state control north of the Litani River.

The aim, the sources said, is for the army to impose control there and disarm Hezbollah. Lebanon rejects that approach and insists that any model areas must first be tied to Israel’s withdrawal from the territory it occupies.

The sources also pointed with concern to security developments on Friday in the south, where Israeli incursions continued. They cited indications of attempts to expand the yellow line on the ground.

“All of this makes Lebanon even more determined to link any understanding to a full Israeli withdrawal,” one source said.

Lebanon banks on US pressure

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio had said Thursday that progress had been made in the negotiations and suggested that a declaration of intent could be reached. But that has not happened, with differences between the two delegations still unresolved.

Lebanon is now counting on further US pressure to push Israel to ease its stance and accept the Lebanese proposal in Friday’s session, particularly on withdrawal and the model areas. The sources said Rubio was expected to follow the talks from Washington after returning there.

In parallel, Lebanon’s cabinet approved on Thursday a decision “taking note” of the negotiations underway in Washington.

The decision said the cabinet took note of the mandate granted by the president, in agreement with the prime minister, to the Lebanese negotiating delegation, authorizing it to take the necessary steps to achieve the desired outcome under the delegation's supervision.

The sources said the mandate allows the Lebanese delegation to sign in Washington any agreement or declaration of intent that may be reached, but does not bring it into force. Implementation would still depend on cabinet approval.

They stressed that the delegation is not acting independently. President Joseph Aoun is continuously following the talks and issuing instructions to ensure the delegation remains committed to Lebanon’s core principles throughout the negotiations.