Lenderking Blames Houthis and Iran for Red Sea ‘Militarization’

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, the US envoy to Yemen calls for an “immediate end” to “terrorism” against ships

US Special Envoy for Yemen Tim Lenderking. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
US Special Envoy for Yemen Tim Lenderking. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Lenderking Blames Houthis and Iran for Red Sea ‘Militarization’

US Special Envoy for Yemen Tim Lenderking. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
US Special Envoy for Yemen Tim Lenderking. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Both Iran and the Houthis should be blamed for the “militarization of the Red Sea,” said Tim Lenderking, the US special envoy to Yemen, stressing that the military action undertaken by the United States and its allies is "against the Houthi military capability.” Lenderking said the Houthis are acting "like a global terrorist organization,” calling on them to “stop their attacks immediately.”

Lenderking was talking in an exclusive interview with Asharq Al-Awsat on the eve of his new tour in the region, said the situation in Red Sea “has become unbearable.” However, he left the door open to different measures, adding: “When their attacks stop, we can stop too.” He believed that this Houthi behavior “contradicts support for the Palestinians.” Pointing out that their behavior is endangering the “tremendous progress” achieved in the “peace process” led by the United Nations.

Lenderking stressed that “Iran poses a major threat,” describing supplying the Houthis with money and weapons to attack ships as “very convenient for Iran’s agenda,” which is acting to “destabilize,” and not “the behavior of a member of the international community.”  

- First. Now with this attack on the US Post in Jordan, it's not within your scope, but apparently, Iran is behind those attacks in Jordan, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. This is your area, and there is the huge problem in the Red Sea. How is the US going to deal with this issue?  

You’re absolutely right to point out the central role that Iran plays in destabilizing activity all over the region. This is nothing new. This is a feature of Iran's regional behavior since 1979. Instead of seeking constructive diplomatic solutions to the conflicts plaguing the region, Tehran has instead, time and time again, sought to destabilize it. If Iran were truly interested in peace in the region, they would cease their arming and financing of the Houthis and other destabilizing groups.  Instead, we only see that support continuing, as evidenced by the recent interdiction of a shipment of weapons from Iran to Yemen.  

This attack last week is just another example. This one is particularly egregious because it killed three US service members. What we see on the Yemen front is the Iranians playing a very active role in facilitating and assisting the Houthi attacks on ships in the Red Sea. This is a very unfortunate posture for the Iranians and the Houthis to take. What has this this led to? The militarization of the Red Sea. Something no country, including Iran, supposedly wanted up to this point. There are now more warships and more other ships protecting international commerce than there were before.  

The Houthis are driving up prices through attacks on international shipping. That means an increase in the prices of wheat and other goods getting to the Palestinian people or to other parts of Africa, Europe, and Asia. It's driving up fuel prices. It's adding on 5,000 miles, as shippers say they don't want anything to do with the Red Sea. They are having to go around the southern tip of Africa. How many tons of food are going to be spoiled by this additional long traverse? And how much higher will food prices go? This is hitting ordinary consumers. It's not just hitting the Israelis. It's not just hitting the Americans. It's hitting ordinary consumers around the world in every country, including Yemen, and the Palestinians as well.  

So, I would argue that the Houthi attacks must stop because they are inflicting damage on the global community and on Yemen. And that's why we think that the Houthi attacks are misguided. They're reckless. They’re indiscriminate, and that's why they should stop.  

- They say they are outraged by the Israeli attacks on the Palestinian civilians as you’ve just mentioned, and if the US pressure Israel, then everything will stop, not only within the Red Sea context, but also in the wider context. Iran is using this argument all the time. Again, they have the same the Axis of Resistance. They have the same argument, why doesn't the US listen to this?  

What the Houthis are doing is an example of someone having a problem with their neighbor and burning down the neighborhood grocery store. They're harming their neighbors and themselves and not actually addressing the core issue. This is why 24 countries signed a statement last week supporting military action to deter and degrade Houthi attacks. And this military action is not against Yemen, or against Yemenis. It is against the Houthi military capability which they are using to attack civilian shipping.  

So, we've been very clear about what the scope of these military strikes is. Similarly, the Houthis are behaving like a terrorist organization; attacking civilians, attacking civilian shipping, attacking innocent mariners, detaining them, threatening to hijack ships, not releasing the crew of the Galaxy Leader, 25 people from five different countries.  

We now have announced a designation of the Houthis as a specially designated global terrorist group, which will go into effect on February 16. This is the kind of response that the Houthis are generating. They're alienating the world community, and doing nothing to help the Palestinians, and putting the peace process in Yemen - which parties have painstakingly negotiated over the last two years, including the Houthis - in jeopardy. The Houthi behavior is misguided, and they should stop their attacks on shipping immediately.  

- And at the same time, what's going on probably, as you’ve just mentioned also, that this is affecting the peace process within the Yemeni parties, and then probably your support is also getting compromised. Is that the case?  

Our support for the peace process remains unshakable. I don't think that the peace effort in Yemen would be as far along had it not been for US support, and the commitment of this administration, and the priority that the President places on peace in Yemen through a Yemeni - Yemeni political negotiation and a durable ceasefire. Those remain US goals, and this is very much what we want to return to.  

But unfortunately, much of the progress that has been made over the last two years, which has created a truce in Yemen, which is still holding, is being jeopardized by the militarization of the Red Sea, which is caused by the Houthi attacks, and the threats that they are posing to shipping and to the civilian population. Absent political settlement, the humanitarian and economic crises will continue to get worse.   

The designation is a direct response to Houthi attacks on shipping. If there are no Houthi attacks on shipping, there is no need to designate them as a terrorist organization. If there are no Houthi attacks on shipping, there is no need for a growing coalition of countries to strike and degrade their military capability to protect international shipping.

- You’re talking about Operation Prosperity Guardian…  

Prosperity Guardian is another action that the Houthi attacks have generated – a large international response, defensive in nature, solely to protect crews and international ships which the Houthis are attacking in a reckless and indiscriminate manner. They say that they are only attacking Israeli ships, but that is simply not the case. They have attacked international ships with owners and crew of all different nationalities. Even hijacking and detaining a crew from Mexico, Ukraine, the Philippines and Bulgaria. That's the behavior of pirates. That's not the behavior of a group that seeks international support for a Yemen peace effort. That's the behavior of pirates.   

- Are you going to take additional measures if they continue their attacks against the international shipments?  

We have been very clear that we seek de-escalation in the Red Sea, but the Houthi attacks cannot continue. We are evaluating every day the situation in the Red Sea and elsewhere in the region, and what aggressive and militaristic steps the Iranians or the Houthis might be taking. But it is our fervent hope, and we're working every day on this, to de-escalate all of these conflicts.  

You've seen that American officials are working with Qatar and other countries for the release of the remaining hostages and a prolonged humanitarian pause to the fighting. We have made a strong push for more humanitarian assistance to Gaza, to address the tragic situation there. And we were very patient with the attacks on shipping until the situation became intolerable, and were forced to take action because of Houthi behavior. When their attacks stop, we can stop also.

- You don't want escalation. But nonetheless, the situation is just dragging the US into this, probably.

I fear that other parties may be wishing to escalate. And the Houthis by attacking a huge variety of ships, that was an escalation. Attacking Israel, and trying to hit the civilian populations, was an escalation. Again, these things do not help the Palestinians. They’re not bringing a single morsel of assistance or food to the Palestinian people, because of their actions. Nor are the Houthi attacks helping Yemen, which has one of the world’s largest humanitarian and economic disasters.  

They should stop. And we can return the focus to the Yemen peace effort, and put more effort towards supporting the Palestinians and their legitimate aspirations for a two-state solution, which Houthi behavior frankly is complicating and undermining.  

There isn't a single country in the Gulf that supports what the Houthis are doing; attacking international shipping, masquerading under the banner of support for the Palestinians, because the reality is that this behavior is contrary to supporting the Palestinians.

- Could you please elaborate more what you've been doing with the Saudis and the other countries in the region?  

We're working very closely with the Saudis, other regional actors and the Yemeni parties, on the Yemen peace effort. That's been the case since the start of this administration, reflecting the priority that the President placed on ending the Yemen conflict. We have appreciated Saudi Arabia's engagement mediating between the Houthis and the Yemen government, and helping contribute a roadmap for peace in Yemen, which the Houthi and the Yemen government and regional countries support.  

So ironically, while the world is focused on the Houthis’ reckless attacks on global shipping, tremendous progress was made in the past month on the peace process– captured in an announcement by the UN on December 23 last year – that an agreement has been reached. This is the best opportunity that Yemen has had for its peace process in nine years.  

Why are the Houthis jeopardizing peace by behaving like an armed militia group and a terrorist organization in attacking civilian shipping? Why are they driving away the attention from the Yemen peace effort, attention Yemeni peace needs and deserves? They are choosing to sabotage all the good work that so many parties have put into creating a dream that the Yemen conflict could finally be over – why are the Houthis – trying to throw that all away? Instead of prioritizing the Yemeni people?

- What are the immediate obstacles facing this political track led by the UN?

I think the obstacles are the recklessness of the Houthi behavior. Prior to their attacks, both the Yemen government and the Houthis had approved this roadmap that the UN now is able to try to operationalize. And again, this is the most tangible progress that’s been made in the Yemen conflict in 9 years. And that’s been put in jeopardy by the indiscriminate nature of the Houthi attacks on the Red Sea shipping. What international country would support a peace effort in Yemen when one of the parties - the Houthis - is attacking the global economy?  It is not the behavior of the Yemen government or any other party in Yemen that’s threatening the Yemen peace effort. It is the Houthis.  

- Iran is in the picture no matter how we speak negatively about the situation. So, this is a dilemma: how you're going to deal with it?  

Iran is a major threat, and in our conversations every day we talk about how to respond to the Iranian threat, especially in light of the killing of three service members in Jordan. Look at what we see Iran doing. We know that Iran is supporting, aiding and facilitating Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping. This is very convenient for Iran's regional agenda. It's not convenient for the Yemeni people, however. It's not convenient for other Arab countries.  

Look at the contents of a small ship that were seized about two weeks ago by US forces enforcing UN Security Council resolutions on not smuggling, to aid the Houthis or fan the conflict in Yemen. That particular ship was filled with lethal equipment heading toward the Houthis to be used for their attacks on Red Sea shipping. So, this is the behavior of those seeking to destabilize. This is not the behavior of members of the international community. So, we need everybody to dial it back, de-escalate, and return to the legitimate and genuine peace effort in Yemen that is now threatened by Houthi attacks.

We are talking to our partners multiple times a day. We have numerous engagements that we are planning to ensure that there is the speediest possible resolution in the Red Sea, which enables a return to the Yemen peace process. All of my efforts are focused on this particular line of effort.



Diplomatic, Military Push for Lebanon in Paris

Group photo of participants in a meeting to support the Lebanese Armed Forces in Paris on Thursday (French president’s account)
Group photo of participants in a meeting to support the Lebanese Armed Forces in Paris on Thursday (French president’s account)
TT

Diplomatic, Military Push for Lebanon in Paris

Group photo of participants in a meeting to support the Lebanese Armed Forces in Paris on Thursday (French president’s account)
Group photo of participants in a meeting to support the Lebanese Armed Forces in Paris on Thursday (French president’s account)

Senior officials and military officers gathered in Paris on Thursday to discuss support for the Lebanese Armed Forces and security services.

French President Emmanuel Macron first met Lebanese President Joseph Aoun at the Elysee Palace before the two joined Jordan’s King Abdullah II for a trilateral summit at Les Invalides.

The three leaders later opened a technical-military meeting attended by military commanders, chiefs of staff and senior officers from 17 countries and organizations.

“Paris is today the place where our partners are coming together to strengthen Lebanon’s sovereignty and enable it to fully ensure its own security,” Macron wrote on X.

“A Lebanon at peace offers renewed hope for the entire Middle East. A sovereign and stable Lebanon is a decisive step toward peace and stability across the region.”

“Together with the Lebanese president and the king of Jordan, and in close coordination with the United States, Saudi Arabia and our international partners, we support the Lebanese Armed Forces, which are indispensable to asserting the authority of the Lebanese state throughout its territory,” he added.

Turning to wider regional tensions, Macron argued that “diplomacy and dialogue alone” could end an escalation with no prospect of resolution.

He reiterated France’s solidarity with Jordan and condemnation of Iranian attacks, while stressing the importance of freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, the Red Sea and the Bab al-Mandab Strait.

Regional Dimension

Aoun revealed measures taken by the state and urged support for its armed forces as an investment in regional security and stability.

King Abdullah’s participation, within the framework of the Aqaba Process, gave the meeting a broader regional dimension.

According to Lebanon’s National News Agency (NNA), citing presidential sources, the three leaders discussed the “dangerous regional situation” and stressed the need to intensify international efforts toward comprehensive and sustainable de-escalation. They also discussed developments in Gaza, the West Bank and Jerusalem.

Aoun stressed the interconnected nature of regional security and called for a common regional security strategy based on joint energy projects and economic, security and political cooperation.

The Lebanese president also sought to put behind him a period of strained relations with France, thanking Macron for France’s support for Lebanon and its efforts to strengthen state authority, sovereignty and official institutions.

He praised Macron’s efforts, in cooperation with the Italian prime minister, to find an alternative to UNIFIL to prevent a security vacuum in South Lebanon, and called for broader economic and energy cooperation, including the resumption of oil and gas exploration in Lebanese blocks.

‘A Moment for Decision’

Aoun painted a bleak picture of conditions in South Lebanon because of Israeli attacks and practices, but said the country now had an opportunity based on “a clear determination to rebuild the state and its institutions and move forward with the reforms the country needs.”

He said the goal was to establish “a strong state and effective institutions,” with the army and security services playing a central role.

While emphasizing the importance of the state’s monopoly on weapons, Aoun insisted that this was “first and foremost a Lebanese choice and a Lebanese interest.”

He also defended negotiations with Israel, warning that agreements succeed not merely by being signed but by being respected and implemented by all parties.

He called on Lebanon’s “friends and partners” to help ensure the full implementation of what had been agreed and to treat Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity as a principle “not subject to selectivity.”

Aoun detailed the army’s responsibilities, including extending state authority, maintaining security and stability, preventing border violations and combating smuggling. He also highlighted the role it would be expected to assume after UNIFIL’s mission ends to prevent a security vacuum.

“There can be no strengthening of state authority without strong, effective military and security institutions present throughout Lebanese territory,” he underlined.

The Lebanese president called for concrete results from the preparatory meeting, including a roadmap and clear timetable for an international conference to support the army and Internal Security Forces, as well as a long-term approach to assisting Lebanon’s security institutions.

He pledged “full transparency and accountability” and said the Lebanese state would assume a growing share of financing its security institutions.

“Invest in the success of the Lebanese state and in the stability of the region,” Aoun concluded. “This is a moment for decision, not a moment for waiting.”


Sisi Warns of Attempts to ‘Bring Down Egypt,’ Denies ‘Militarization of the State’

Sisi during a previous visit to the Egyptian Military Academy in the New Administrative Capital (Egyptian Presidency) 
Sisi during a previous visit to the Egyptian Military Academy in the New Administrative Capital (Egyptian Presidency) 
TT

Sisi Warns of Attempts to ‘Bring Down Egypt,’ Denies ‘Militarization of the State’

Sisi during a previous visit to the Egyptian Military Academy in the New Administrative Capital (Egyptian Presidency) 
Sisi during a previous visit to the Egyptian Military Academy in the New Administrative Capital (Egyptian Presidency) 

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi warned Thursday of continuing attempts to bring down Egypt, saying that what happened between 2011 and 2013 “is not over,” that the plan behind it “has not stopped” and that “the persistence in seeking to bring down the state still exists.”

He made the remarks at a graduation ceremony for judges who completed a training course at the Egyptian Military Academy.

The president referred to the Jan. 25, 2011 uprising that ousted late President Hosni Mubarak, the violence that followed and the rise to power of the now-banned Muslim Brotherhood before its removal in 2013.

He urged Egyptians and families to remain vigilant, stressing that responsibility rested with everyone, “not only officials, intellectuals and media professionals.”

The Egyptian leader also defended mandatory training courses provided by the military academy to state officials and employees across various fields, which have drawn reservations from some quarters.

He described the academy as “a gateway to employment in the Egyptian state,” acknowledging that the approach had initially appeared unusual and unclear but saying its expected impact would be felt years from now.

The aim of making the academy a gateway for institutions including the judiciary, Foreign Ministry and Administrative Control Authority was to apply the same standards to everyone, he explained.

Detailed criteria had been established for selecting young men and women for each ministry according to its requirements, with the aim of creating an institution that applies “honest standards without favoritism or preferential treatment.”

In January, Sisi announced that judges would join academy programs following controversy in judicial circles over reports that appointments to the Public Prosecution could be entrusted to the Egyptian Military Academy.

Some judges had also expressed reservations over a 2023 cabinet decision requiring new appointees across state bodies and agencies, including judges, to complete a six-month qualifying course at the academy.

Responding to those concerns Thursday, the president said genuine reform of state institutions required “a serious path” and time, particularly in countries with populations in the millions.

He denied the “militarization of the state,” reiterating that what happened between 2011 and 2013 “is not over” and that efforts to bring down the state persist.

The academy courses were also intended to give state institutions an opportunity to interact with one another and expose trainees to different career paths, he added, saying the training would bring benefits, greater cohesion and a deeper understanding of the ties binding the state together.

Reflecting on 2011, the president said Egypt had witnessed “extremely dangerous practices” and faced major problems, but that “God Almighty willed that Egypt, unlike others, survive.”

“What happened to other countries was arranged and planned, but Egypt survived by God’s grace,” he said, adding that the country’s resources did not allow it to confront prolonged challenges.

According to the president, psychologists and sociologists helped design the academy’s programs. One objective, he explained, was to shield young people from “the idea of destroying Egypt, as was being planned for the country in 2011 and 2012.”


French Lawyers Object to Handling of ISIS Detainees in Iraq

A suspected ISIS member arrives for questioning at Karkh Prison in Baghdad (AP) 
A suspected ISIS member arrives for questioning at Karkh Prison in Baghdad (AP) 
TT

French Lawyers Object to Handling of ISIS Detainees in Iraq

A suspected ISIS member arrives for questioning at Karkh Prison in Baghdad (AP) 
A suspected ISIS member arrives for questioning at Karkh Prison in Baghdad (AP) 

An Iraqi official said the cases of ISIS detainees transferred from Syria to Iraq earlier this year were being handled exclusively by the Counter-Terrorism Service and the Supreme Judicial Council because of the sensitivity of the issue.

The official told Asharq Al-Awsat that the cases remained “an Iraqi national security matter,” adding that they went beyond “formal defense requirements.”

“Their files are still being reviewed by senior authorities, and it may take some time before they are referred to trial,” the official added.

The comments came after a team of French lawyers accused Iraqi authorities of refusing them permits to follow the cases of French clients accused of belonging to ISIS after their transfer from northeastern Syria to Iraq.

The lawyers warned that their clients could face death sentences after trials they described as “lacking the minimum standards of justice.”

In a statement Thursday, the defense team said several French nationals they represented had been “unlawfully transferred from northeastern Syria to Iraq” and were due to appear before courts in Baghdad in the coming days.

The lawyers reported meeting some of the detainees in Iraq and witnessing what they described as inhumane and degrading treatment and violence.

They also informed French authorities of torture suffered by the detainees in Iraq and the arbitrary nature of the proceedings.

The lawyers said they had been denied access to their clients’ case files and could not speak to them without Iraqi authorities present.

They also alleged that court-appointed lawyers assigned to defend the detainees — some of whom had been able to meet them for only 10 minutes — insulted them in front of their guards.

‘They Were Children’

The lawyers noted that some of the detainees were young men who had been children when their parents forcibly took them to Syria and were now adults. They applied over the summer for new permits to travel to Iraq, but Iraqi authorities “rejected our requests at the last minute,” they added.

The lawyers recently renewed their request to meet their clients, “but we learned that their trials would be held without us.”

According to the defense team, French authorities merely confirmed the information, explaining that Iraq did not recognize the French lawyers’ right to represent the detainees in the country or intervene in local judicial proceedings concerning them.

“France knows very precisely the fate awaiting these French nationals,” the lawyers warned, noting that 11 French citizens transferred to Iraq in 2018 “under the same circumstances” were sentenced to death by Baghdad’s Central Criminal Court.

They argued that those trials “did not meet the minimum standards of a fair trial guaranteed by Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.”

The defense team urged French authorities to “urgently return them to France” to prevent them from facing the death penalty and becoming victims of a “flagrant denial of justice,” noting that the request had been submitted “many months ago.”

Al-Hol and Prisons

Deputy Minister of Migration and Displacement Karim al-Nouri, meanwhile, told Asharq Al-Awsat that “a distinction must be made between two matters.”

The first concerns al-Hol camp in northeastern Syria’s Hasakah region, which he said held “more than 60,000 people from countries around the world, including more than 25,000 Iraqis, most of them children and women.”

Al-Nouri distinguished them from detainees in prisons held by the SDF.

“The camps were under the SDF (Syrian Democratic Forces) and then came under the control of official Syrian forces,” he explained.

Iraqis who returned from prisons were also different from those repatriated from Hasakah and al-Hol after security screening, he added.

“A distinction must be made between those who returned to Iraq, most of whom returned to their homes and have had no security violations recorded against them, and those who are currently in prisons,” al-Nouri said, adding that those in prison had different cases that fell outside the remit of the Migration and Displacement Ministry, with responsibility resting with the judiciary.

Iraqi Judicial Jurisdiction

Legal expert Ali al-Tamimi told Asharq Al-Awsat that Iraq’s refusal to allow French lawyers to represent their clients rested on “two aspects: the Iraqi Law of Lawyers and the law governing criminal jurisdiction,” both of which he said gave Iraq the right to refuse.

Under Iraq’s Law of Lawyers No. 173 of 1965, lawyers registered to practice must hold Iraqi citizenship, al-Tamimi explained, noting an exception for Palestinians residing in Iraq as refugees.

A foreign lawyer who is not a member of a bar association in an Arab country may only appear alongside an Iraqi lawyer, he added. This requires approval from both the head of the Iraqi Bar Association and the president of the Supreme Judicial Council for a specific case, after confirming that the foreign lawyer continues to practice law.

On jurisdiction, al-Tamimi said Iraq considered the detainees to have “committed crimes on its territory.”

He cited an Iraqi judicial source as saying they had “all held senior positions in ISIS,” with some involved in planning attacks in the Iraq-Syria region.

Al-Tamimi noted that Article 6 of Iraq’s Penal Code applies Iraqi law to crimes committed in the country, while Anti-Terrorism Law No. 13 of 2005 gives Iraqi courts jurisdiction over terrorism cases.

He continued that proceedings are governed “exclusively by Iraqi Code of Criminal Procedure No. 23 of 1971, which guarantees the right to a defense, but through an Iraqi-licensed lawyer.”

“If the defendant has no lawyer, the court appoints one.”

Asked whether international law required Iraq to allow foreign lawyers to represent the defendants, al-Tamimi said the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations gave France the right to consular visits and access, “not the right to impose its lawyers to plead cases.”

“National security considerations and the integrity of the proceedings prevent this,” he underlined.