Aguila Saleh to Asharq Al-Awsat: Forming Unified Govt Only Way to End Power Struggle in Libya

Political deadlock won’t lead to new military clash, he assured.

Speaker of Libya’s east-based parliament Aguila Saleh. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Speaker of Libya’s east-based parliament Aguila Saleh. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT
20

Aguila Saleh to Asharq Al-Awsat: Forming Unified Govt Only Way to End Power Struggle in Libya

Speaker of Libya’s east-based parliament Aguila Saleh. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Speaker of Libya’s east-based parliament Aguila Saleh. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Speaker of Libya’s east-based parliament Aguila Saleh stressed that resolving his country’s political crisis lies in the formation of a unified government that would end the power struggle between the Government of National Unity (GNU) and its rival government of stability with the aim of holding the delayed elections.

In an interview to Asharq Al-Awsat, Saleh added that the political impasse “won’t lead to a new military clash or war between the Libyans.”

He cited the people’s “awareness that such clashes aim to prolong the division and chaos so that Libya would wind up a failed state that is controlled by foreign powers.”

He underscored the need to hold the parliamentary and presidential elections, saying the ballot boxes would choose who rules.

“Of course, holding transparent elections, whose results are accepted, demands the presence of a unified government for that purpose,” he went on to say.

Moreover, he blamed head of the Tripoli-based GNU Abdulhamid al-Dbeibah for the current impasse, saying it has caused division and financial and administrative corruption.

Asked why the government of stability has failed in entering the capital Tripoli and assuming power, he said: “We had from the start demanded that Sirte city be the base of the government because it is not under the threat of militias so it can function normally without pressure.”

Such a government would then begin dismantling these militias, “however, some countries don’t want stability to prevail in Libya and have refused to work with the government of stability even though it enjoys the parliament’s confidence,” added Saleh.

These countries have claimed that they would not recognize a government that is not based in the capital, he continued. “They realize that a move to the capital would lead to war and fighting. No one wants a new war between the Libyans. The formation of a government is an internal affair and doesn’t require international recognition,” Saleh stated.

“We do not oppose any meeting that would help end the crisis,” he declared in reference to United Nations envoy Abdoulaye Bathily’s call to hold a meeting for Libyan parties. He stressed however, the need to respect the constitutional foundation and electoral laws.

On whether Dbeibah should attend the meeting, Saleh said the head of the GNU is no longer recognized by the parliament, so he no longer represents the cabinet.

“In order to quash accusations that we don’t want a solution to the crisis, we have demanded that if some parties insist on Dbeibah’s participation, then it should be met with the participation of head of the stability government, Dr. Osama Hammad,” said the speaker.

On when the parliamentary and presidential elections could be held, Saleh replied: “When a new unified government is formed and when the electoral commission declares it is ready to hold the polls.”

Asked about the progress in the dismantling of militias and the withdrawal of foreign forces from Libya, he replied: “We are demanding their complete pullout from our country.”



Hamas Sources: Trump’s Displacement Remarks Inconsistent with US Messages

US President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in Washington on Monday. (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in Washington on Monday. (Reuters)
TT
20

Hamas Sources: Trump’s Displacement Remarks Inconsistent with US Messages

US President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in Washington on Monday. (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in Washington on Monday. (Reuters)

US President Donald Trump’s recent comments about the war in Gaza have sparked cautious optimism for a potential ceasefire, while also raising serious concerns. During his meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on Monday, Trump said he expects the conflict to end “soon,” adding: “I want the war in Gaza to stop.”

However, Trump reignited controversy by referencing a proposal he once floated early in his presidency: relocating the Palestinians from Gaza and placing the enclave under US control.

While Hamas has not issued an official response, sources within the Palestinian group told Asharq Al-Awsat that Trump’s statements are inconsistent with what is being conveyed behind the scenes.

“These remarks don’t align with what’s being shared with Hamas leadership or mediators,” they said.

They pointed to a shift in US policy and noted that recent American positions conveyed through intermediaries show a more measured approach. They also highlighted strong Arab opposition to any forced displacement from Gaza, which they say has contributed to Washington distancing itself from such ideas - regardless of Trump’s public rhetoric.

The meeting between Trump and Netanyahu also touched on the issue of Israeli hostages held in Gaza. Netanyahu said efforts to reach a new agreement were underway, while Trump confirmed that discussions about a new ceasefire are in progress, though he cautioned that securing the hostages’ release could be “a long process.”

Hamas sources confirmed the movement has received a new Egyptian proposal, which has also been shared with Israel, the United States, and other mediators. They linked Trump’s remarks to recent intensified mediation efforts involving Washington.

Trump’s revival of the Gaza relocation idea was interpreted by some observers as a response to questions from Israeli journalists, rather than a serious policy stance. Hamas sources downplayed the significance of the statement, suggesting it did not reflect current US efforts on the ground.

Meanwhile, Arab foreign ministers recently presented a unified plan in Doha to US envoy Steve Witkoff, centered on Gaza’s reconstruction and governance - without displacing its residents. The plan was reportedly well-received and seen as a foundation for future efforts to resolve the conflict.