Opposition Rallies Cry Against Dragging Lebanon to War

Opposition parties and figures are seen at the Maarab meeting on Saturday. (Lebanese Forces)
Opposition parties and figures are seen at the Maarab meeting on Saturday. (Lebanese Forces)
TT

Opposition Rallies Cry Against Dragging Lebanon to War

Opposition parties and figures are seen at the Maarab meeting on Saturday. (Lebanese Forces)
Opposition parties and figures are seen at the Maarab meeting on Saturday. (Lebanese Forces)

The Lebanese opposition launched on Saturday a rallying cry against parties that are “tampering with Lebanon’s security and dragging the Lebanese people” towards conflict and towards “countries that sponsor illegal organizations.”

It called for the implementation of United Nations Security Council resolution 1701 and the deployment of the army along Lebanon’s entire borders. It urged bolstering the monitoring of the entire border with Syria and the implementation of the agreement on the return of Syrians back to their country.

The Lebanese Forces organized on Saturday a meeting of opposition groups. Held at Maarab, the meeting, “1701 in Defense of Lebanon”, was attended by parties, lawmakers, politicians, activists and journalists, from across Lebanon’s sectarian spectrum, who are opposed to Hezbollah.

The meeting was notably boycotted by some parties that share the LF’s views, while others, such as the Kataeb party, sent representatives. Kataeb leader Sami Gemayel and MPs from his party did not attend the meeting.

The Progressive Socialist Party, National Moderation bloc, Saydet Al Jabal gathering, and the National Council to End the Iranian Occupation in Lebanon declined to attend the meeting.

Some observers said the failure to attract a large number of opposition parties may have rendered the Maarab meeting a “failure”. The LF and other participants said however, that the meeting served its purpose and delivered the message it wanted to send.

Former minister, MP Ashraf Rifi described the meeting as “excellent”.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, he added that the meeting was necessary given the circumstances in Lebanon, comparing it to the 2005 Bristol Gathering that helped galvanize the opposition against Syrian hegemony over Lebanon.

LF sources described the Maarab meeting as successful, saying it underlined the demand to defend and consolidate Lebanon’s sovereignty.

“The meeting was not aimed at forming a political front,” they told Asharq Al-Awsat.

They highlighted the timing of the meeting, explaining that Lebanon is in danger and so it was “necessary to launch a political cry and this is what happened.”

“Whoever declined the invite had their reasons and considerations. What matters is that this political cry was made, and we didn’t expect anything more than that,” they stressed.

On what the meeting was expected to yield, they replied: “More of the same. We will continue to do what we have been doing. We will exert more pressure and follow diplomatic efforts that are pushing for the implementation of resolution 1701, which bothers Hezbollah.”

“The implementation of the resolution is the only demand the international community is making. It is essential to avert Lebanon from being dragged to war,” they added.

The meeting’s concluding statement underscored three main issues.

“First: The possession of weapons outside state security institutions, led by the army, and carried by any party regardless of their motives, is a threat to Lebanese sovereignty and a flagrant violation against the security of the entire Lebanese people,” it said, demanding the immediate laying down of these arms.

“Second: The Lebanese army is trusted by all Lebanese people and so, it has the right and duty to protect the borders and Lebanese sovereignty against any foreign attack, especially from Israel,” continued the statement.

“Third: The Lebanese government, even in its caretaker capacity, alone has the responsibility to implement and apply Lebanese laws and international resolutions,” it continued.

“Based on the above and the developments in southern Lebanon and the possibility that they may take a turn for the worst, the gatherers appeal to the caretaker government of Prime Minister Najib Mikati to immediately issue orders for the deployment of the army in regions south of the Litani River and along the entire border with Israel,” it said.

“Such a step would have a massive political impact and the deployment could act as a decisive deterrence force against any Israeli plots and possible offensive against Lebanese sovereignty,” it went on to say.

It also called for tightening security along the border with Syria and closing all illegal crossing through which weapons, people, funds, goods, illicit material and criminals continue to be smuggled.

LF leader Samir Geagea said the meeting was aimed at drafting with a small roadmap to attempt to prevent Lebanon from being dragged to war and stress the need to implement resolution 1701 in full, which has been an issue of consensus by successive governments.

Moreover, he noted that Lebanon is living in a state of the “non-state” with the existence of a “statelet that has usurped the country’s military decisions.”

The meeting was held to discuss “what can be done in wake of diplomatic reports that have warned that the situation in the South could deteriorate,” he added.

He warned that allowing Hezbollah to maintain its line of action is a threat to the whole of Lebanon, remarking that facts have demonstrated that the Iran-backed party is incapable of defending Lebanon against Israel.

Hezbollah claims that its operations against Israel are aimed at supporting Gaza, when in fact, they have not helped Gaza in any way, he stated. “Rather, the fighting has cost Lebanon dearly in losses of life and damage to southern villages and regions. It has also led to massive economic losses,” he said.

“Iran’s intervention itself has done more harm than good to the Palestinian cause,” he added.

Hezbollah has also played a negative role as attested by the international community against it and Iran, he continued.

“So, the main winners in the scenario are Iran and Israel, while Palestine is the biggest loser,” Geagea noted.



Meta's Zuckerberg Faces Questioning at Youth Addiction Trial

REUTERS/Francis Mascarenhas Purchase Licensing Rights
REUTERS/Francis Mascarenhas Purchase Licensing Rights
TT

Meta's Zuckerberg Faces Questioning at Youth Addiction Trial

REUTERS/Francis Mascarenhas Purchase Licensing Rights
REUTERS/Francis Mascarenhas Purchase Licensing Rights

Meta Platforms CEO and billionaire Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is set to be questioned for the first time in a US court on Wednesday about Instagram's effect on the mental health of young users, as a landmark trial over youth social media addiction continues. While Zuckerberg has previously testified on the subject before Congress, the stakes are higher at the jury trial in Los Angeles, California. Meta may have to pay damages if it loses the case, and the verdict could erode Big Tech's longstanding legal defense against claims of user harm, Reuters reported.

The lawsuit and others like it are part of a global backlash against social media platforms over children's mental health. Australia has prohibited access to social media platforms for users under age 16, and other countries including Spain are considering similar curbs. In the US, Florida has prohibited companies from allowing users under age 14. Tech industry trade groups are challenging the law in court. The case involves a California woman who started using Meta's Instagram and Google's YouTube as a child. She alleges the companies sought to profit by hooking kids on their services despite knowing social media could harm their mental health. She alleges the apps fueled her depression and suicidal thoughts and is seeking to hold the companies liable.

Meta and Google have denied the allegations, and pointed to their work to add features that keep users safe. Meta has often pointed to a National Academies of Sciences finding that research does not show social media changes kids' mental health.

The lawsuit serves as a test case for similar claims in a larger group of cases against Meta, Alphabet's Google, Snap and TikTok. Families, school districts and states have filed thousands of lawsuits in the US accusing the companies of fueling a youth mental health crisis.

Zuckerberg is expected to be questioned on Meta's internal studies and discussions of how Instagram use affects younger users.

Over the years, investigative reporting has unearthed internal Meta documents showing the company was aware of potential harm. Meta researchers found that teens who report that Instagram regularly made them feel bad about their bodies saw significantly more “eating disorder adjacent content” than those who did not,

Reuters reported

in October. Adam Mosseri, head of Instagram, testified last week that he was unaware of a recent Meta study showing no link between parental supervision and teens' attentiveness to their own social media use. Teens with difficult life circumstances more often said they used Instagram habitually or unintentionally, according to the document shown at trial.

Meta's lawyer told jurors at the trial that the woman's health records show her issues stem from a troubled childhood, and that social media was a creative outlet for her.


Israel Permits 10,000 West Bank Palestinians for Friday Prayers at Al Aqsa

Palestinians attend Friday prayers in a mosque following an attack that local Palestinians said was carried out by Israeli settlers, in the village of Deir Istiya near Salfit in the Israeli-occupied West Bank November 14, 2025. REUTERS/Sinan Abu Mayzer
Palestinians attend Friday prayers in a mosque following an attack that local Palestinians said was carried out by Israeli settlers, in the village of Deir Istiya near Salfit in the Israeli-occupied West Bank November 14, 2025. REUTERS/Sinan Abu Mayzer
TT

Israel Permits 10,000 West Bank Palestinians for Friday Prayers at Al Aqsa

Palestinians attend Friday prayers in a mosque following an attack that local Palestinians said was carried out by Israeli settlers, in the village of Deir Istiya near Salfit in the Israeli-occupied West Bank November 14, 2025. REUTERS/Sinan Abu Mayzer
Palestinians attend Friday prayers in a mosque following an attack that local Palestinians said was carried out by Israeli settlers, in the village of Deir Istiya near Salfit in the Israeli-occupied West Bank November 14, 2025. REUTERS/Sinan Abu Mayzer

Israel announced that it will cap the number of Palestinian worshippers from the occupied West Bank attending weekly Friday prayers at the Al-Aqsa Mosque in east Jerusalem at 10,000 during the holy month of Ramadan, which began Wednesday.

Israeli authorities also imposed age restrictions on West Bank Palestinians, permitting entry only to men aged 55 and older, women aged 50 and older, and children up to age 12.

"Ten thousand Palestinian worshippers will be permitted to enter the Temple Mount for Friday prayers throughout the month of Ramadan, subject to obtaining a dedicated daily permit in advance," COGAT, the Israeli defense ministry agency in charge of civilian matters in the Palestinian territories, said in a statement, AFP reported.

"Entry for men will be permitted from age 55, for women from age 50, and for children up to age 12 when accompanied by a first-degree relative."

COGAT told AFP that the restrictions apply only to Palestinians travelling from the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.

"It is emphasised that all permits are conditional upon prior security approval by the relevant security authorities," COGAT said.

"In addition, residents travelling to prayers at the Temple Mount will be required to undergo digital documentation at the crossings upon their return to the areas of Judea and Samaria at the conclusion of the prayer day," it said, using the Biblical term for the West Bank.

During Ramadan, hundreds of thousands of Palestinians traditionally attend prayers at Al-Aqsa, Islam's third holiest site, located in east Jerusalem, which Israel captured in 1967 and later annexed in a move that is not internationally recognized.

Since the war in Gaza broke out in October 2023, the attendance of worshippers has declined due to security concerns and Israeli restrictions.

The Palestinian Jerusalem Governorate said this week that Israeli authorities had prevented the Islamic Waqf -- the Jordanian-run body that administers the site -- from carrying out routine preparations ahead of Ramadan, including installing shade structures and setting up temporary medical clinics.

A senior imam of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, Sheikh Muhammad al-Abbasi, told AFP that he, too, had been barred from entering the compound.

"I have been barred from the mosque for a week, and the order can be renewed," he said.

Abbasi said he was not informed of the reason for the ban, which came into effect on Monday.

Under longstanding arrangements, Jews may visit the Al-Aqsa compound -- which they revere as the site of the first and second Jewish temples -- but they are not permitted to pray there.

Israel says it is committed to upholding this status quo, though Palestinians fear it is being eroded.

In recent years, a growing number of Jewish ultranationalists have challenged the prayer ban, including far-right politician Itamar Ben Gvir, who prayed at the site while serving as national security minister in 2024 and 2025.


EU Exploring Support for New Gaza Administration Committee, Document Says

Palestinians push a cart past the rubble of residential buildings destroyed during the two-year Israeli offensives, in Gaza City, February 17, 2026. REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa
Palestinians push a cart past the rubble of residential buildings destroyed during the two-year Israeli offensives, in Gaza City, February 17, 2026. REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa
TT

EU Exploring Support for New Gaza Administration Committee, Document Says

Palestinians push a cart past the rubble of residential buildings destroyed during the two-year Israeli offensives, in Gaza City, February 17, 2026. REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa
Palestinians push a cart past the rubble of residential buildings destroyed during the two-year Israeli offensives, in Gaza City, February 17, 2026. REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa

The European Union is exploring possible support for a new committee established to take over the civil administration of Gaza, according to a document produced by the bloc's diplomatic arm and seen by Reuters.

"The EU is engaging with the newly established transitional governance structures for Gaza," the European External Action Service wrote in a document circulated to member states on Tuesday.

"The EU is also exploring possible support to the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza," it added.

European foreign ministers will discuss the situation in Gaza during a meeting in Brussels on February 23.