US-Sudanese Jeddah Consultations Falter Amid Several Differences

Representatives of the two parties to the Sudanese conflict during the signing of the Jeddah declaration in May 2023. (Reuters)
Representatives of the two parties to the Sudanese conflict during the signing of the Jeddah declaration in May 2023. (Reuters)
TT
20

US-Sudanese Jeddah Consultations Falter Amid Several Differences

Representatives of the two parties to the Sudanese conflict during the signing of the Jeddah declaration in May 2023. (Reuters)
Representatives of the two parties to the Sudanese conflict during the signing of the Jeddah declaration in May 2023. (Reuters)

Talks in Jeddah between representatives of Sudan’s army-backed government and US officials have ended without agreement on the army’s participation in ceasefire negotiations with the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Geneva later this week.

On Thursday, the Port Sudan government dispatched a delegation to Riyadh, where it held consultations over two days with US Special Envoy for Sudan Tom Perriello.

In a statement on Facebook, Minister of Minerals Mohammed Abu Nimo said: “In my capacity as head of the government delegation in the consultative meetings with the Americans in the city of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, I announce the end of the consultations without agreement on the participation of the Sudanese delegation in the Geneva negotiations...”

Informed sources said that the government’s representatives emphasized the need to exclude the Intergovernmental Authority for Development (IGAD) and the United Arab Emirates from the process.

Other points of contention, according to the same sources, included the Sudanese delegation’s refusal that participation in the negotiations be in the name of the government and not the army. It also demanded that the process be launched by implementing the “Jeddah Humanitarian Declaration” before engaging into any other talks.

“The matter of Sudan's participation is now left to the leadership [army chief Gen Abdel Fattah Al Burhan] and its assessment,” Abu Nimo said in his statement.

“There certainly are many details that prompted us to decide to end the consultations without an agreement,” he added without elaborating.

In late July, the United States invited the warring parties – the army and RSF - to hold talks in Geneva to reach a ceasefire under Saudi-Swiss auspices, and in the presence of observers from the African Union, IGAD, the UAE, and Egypt.



Hamas Sources: Trump’s Displacement Remarks Inconsistent with US Messages

US President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in Washington on Monday. (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in Washington on Monday. (Reuters)
TT
20

Hamas Sources: Trump’s Displacement Remarks Inconsistent with US Messages

US President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in Washington on Monday. (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in Washington on Monday. (Reuters)

US President Donald Trump’s recent comments about the war in Gaza have sparked cautious optimism for a potential ceasefire, while also raising serious concerns. During his meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on Monday, Trump said he expects the conflict to end “soon,” adding: “I want the war in Gaza to stop.”

However, Trump reignited controversy by referencing a proposal he once floated early in his presidency: relocating the Palestinians from Gaza and placing the enclave under US control.

While Hamas has not issued an official response, sources within the Palestinian group told Asharq Al-Awsat that Trump’s statements are inconsistent with what is being conveyed behind the scenes.

“These remarks don’t align with what’s being shared with Hamas leadership or mediators,” they said.

They pointed to a shift in US policy and noted that recent American positions conveyed through intermediaries show a more measured approach. They also highlighted strong Arab opposition to any forced displacement from Gaza, which they say has contributed to Washington distancing itself from such ideas - regardless of Trump’s public rhetoric.

The meeting between Trump and Netanyahu also touched on the issue of Israeli hostages held in Gaza. Netanyahu said efforts to reach a new agreement were underway, while Trump confirmed that discussions about a new ceasefire are in progress, though he cautioned that securing the hostages’ release could be “a long process.”

Hamas sources confirmed the movement has received a new Egyptian proposal, which has also been shared with Israel, the United States, and other mediators. They linked Trump’s remarks to recent intensified mediation efforts involving Washington.

Trump’s revival of the Gaza relocation idea was interpreted by some observers as a response to questions from Israeli journalists, rather than a serious policy stance. Hamas sources downplayed the significance of the statement, suggesting it did not reflect current US efforts on the ground.

Meanwhile, Arab foreign ministers recently presented a unified plan in Doha to US envoy Steve Witkoff, centered on Gaza’s reconstruction and governance - without displacing its residents. The plan was reportedly well-received and seen as a foundation for future efforts to resolve the conflict.