US-Sudanese Jeddah Consultations Falter Amid Several Differences

Representatives of the two parties to the Sudanese conflict during the signing of the Jeddah declaration in May 2023. (Reuters)
Representatives of the two parties to the Sudanese conflict during the signing of the Jeddah declaration in May 2023. (Reuters)
TT
20

US-Sudanese Jeddah Consultations Falter Amid Several Differences

Representatives of the two parties to the Sudanese conflict during the signing of the Jeddah declaration in May 2023. (Reuters)
Representatives of the two parties to the Sudanese conflict during the signing of the Jeddah declaration in May 2023. (Reuters)

Talks in Jeddah between representatives of Sudan’s army-backed government and US officials have ended without agreement on the army’s participation in ceasefire negotiations with the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Geneva later this week.

On Thursday, the Port Sudan government dispatched a delegation to Riyadh, where it held consultations over two days with US Special Envoy for Sudan Tom Perriello.

In a statement on Facebook, Minister of Minerals Mohammed Abu Nimo said: “In my capacity as head of the government delegation in the consultative meetings with the Americans in the city of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, I announce the end of the consultations without agreement on the participation of the Sudanese delegation in the Geneva negotiations...”

Informed sources said that the government’s representatives emphasized the need to exclude the Intergovernmental Authority for Development (IGAD) and the United Arab Emirates from the process.

Other points of contention, according to the same sources, included the Sudanese delegation’s refusal that participation in the negotiations be in the name of the government and not the army. It also demanded that the process be launched by implementing the “Jeddah Humanitarian Declaration” before engaging into any other talks.

“The matter of Sudan's participation is now left to the leadership [army chief Gen Abdel Fattah Al Burhan] and its assessment,” Abu Nimo said in his statement.

“There certainly are many details that prompted us to decide to end the consultations without an agreement,” he added without elaborating.

In late July, the United States invited the warring parties – the army and RSF - to hold talks in Geneva to reach a ceasefire under Saudi-Swiss auspices, and in the presence of observers from the African Union, IGAD, the UAE, and Egypt.



War Shakes Middle East Airports, Passengers Held Hostage

Passengers wait at Beirut airport amid disruptions caused by Israeli-Iranian conflict (EPA)
Passengers wait at Beirut airport amid disruptions caused by Israeli-Iranian conflict (EPA)
TT
20

War Shakes Middle East Airports, Passengers Held Hostage

Passengers wait at Beirut airport amid disruptions caused by Israeli-Iranian conflict (EPA)
Passengers wait at Beirut airport amid disruptions caused by Israeli-Iranian conflict (EPA)

The Israeli-Iranian war has severely disrupted air traffic across the Middle East, causing widespread airport closures and forcing the cancellation of hundreds of flights.

Travelers have been left stranded or forced to reroute their journeys amid altered takeoff and landing schedules, with many airports affected by military use of their airspace by both Tel Aviv and Tehran for warplanes, missiles, and drones.

Thousands of passengers have had to substitute flights with land or sea travel to avoid danger or endure long waits for alternate air transport.

Since the Israeli airstrikes on Iran that began in the early hours of last Friday, followed by Iran’s retaliatory drone and missile attacks, the airspace over Israel, Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq has been closed.

Aviation sources reported that more than 650 flights bound for Europe were canceled. Gulf and European carriers have suspended flights to countries caught in the conflict zone.

Sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that airlines are now using safer flight routes, deliberately avoiding Iraqi, Syrian, Jordanian, and Lebanese airspace, as well as the fully closed skies of Israel and Iran.

Some carriers operating emergency flights to Beirut, Amman, and Egypt are following strict safety protocols.

Flights departing Beirut airport are routed westward over the Mediterranean Sea toward Cyprus and then Greece, before continuing to Europe or the Gulf, deliberately avoiding Lebanese, Syrian, and Iraqi airspace—a sharp contrast to pre-conflict routes.

Several Arab and European airlines, including Emirates, flydubai, Etihad, Air France, Transavia, Lufthansa, Ethiopian Airlines, Turkish Airlines, and Pegasus, continue to suspend flights to the region. The disruption has hit operations at Beirut’s Rafic Hariri International Airport, which experienced chaos in the initial days of the war and widespread passenger panic.

However, the airport has since begun stabilizing. Amin Jaber, Director General of Civil Aviation at Rafic Hariri Airport, said the facility “has overcome the initial disruption quickly by implementing swift solutions for stranded travelers.”

He added that a newly formed crisis management committee is closely monitoring risks hour by hour to keep flights clear of security threats.

Jaber confirmed that the conflict “has forced the crisis committee to adopt multiple flight paths for arrivals and departures at Rafic Hariri Airport.”

“Due to security concerns, we rely on the western runway, which is the safest, and use Cypriot airspace to steer aircraft away from missile threats. Whenever missile launches are detected, Lebanese airspace is immediately closed to all flights,” Jaber added.

The disruptions seen at Beirut’s Rafic Hariri International Airport mirror the wider chaos across the region’s airports. Jaber said all airlines operating arrivals and departures at Beirut have comprehensive risk assessments in place.

Beirut airport experienced significant turmoil during the first two days of the conflict, with hundreds of passengers forced to wait indefinitely after numerous flight cancellations and schedule changes.

Many opted to leave the airport and return to the city amid the uncertainty. Jaber noted that conditions have since improved both at Beirut and other airports that have partially suspended operations.

Before any civilian aircraft takes off or lands, airport authorities and airlines ensure no immediate threats jeopardize the safety of planes or passengers.

Former Middle East Airlines (MEA) pilot Mohammad Aziz told Asharq Al-Awsat that flight safety responsibility rests not with pilots alone, but with the risk assessment committees, civil aviation authorities, airport management, and air traffic control towers guiding pilots during flight.

Aziz revealed that planes are equipped with large fuel reserves allowing extended flight time to accommodate emergencies requiring route changes or longer airborne holding patterns.

Currently serving as a safety and security advisor to MEA’s chairman, Captain Aziz highlighted that Rafic Hariri Airport is among the least vulnerable to missile threats because its flight paths are directed west and north. He warned, however, that the greatest danger lies in flights over Syrian territory.

“Despite this,” Aziz said, “Beirut airport management exercises the utmost caution. The control tower and airport authorities remain on high alert, maintaining constant communication with pilots to reroute or divert flights to alternate airports if evolving conditions threaten aircraft and passengers.”