RSF Delegation Discusses Peace Strategies with Mediators

Saudi Ambassador to Sudan, Ali bin Jaafar Hassan, with the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) delegation in Geneva (RSF)
Saudi Ambassador to Sudan, Ali bin Jaafar Hassan, with the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) delegation in Geneva (RSF)
TT

RSF Delegation Discusses Peace Strategies with Mediators

Saudi Ambassador to Sudan, Ali bin Jaafar Hassan, with the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) delegation in Geneva (RSF)
Saudi Ambassador to Sudan, Ali bin Jaafar Hassan, with the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) delegation in Geneva (RSF)

The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) reported that their delegation held “crucial” talks late Saturday and into Sunday in Geneva about the “escalating situation in Sudan and the strategies for peace and stability.”
The RSF delegation met separately with the African Union, led by Mohamed Ibn Chambas, and with Saudi Arabian representatives.
They expressed “deep appreciation” for international efforts to promote peace in Sudan, emphasizing that their presence in Geneva shows the RSF’s “sincere commitment to ending the conflict and easing the humanitarian crisis in Sudan.”
The RSF also accused the Sudanese Armed Forces of refusing ceasefire talks and prolonging the conflict, citing internal divisions and influence from remnants of the former regime.
As for peacemaking efforts, the RSF delegation thanked Saudi Arabia for its “persistent efforts to promote peace and stability in Sudan” and for playing a key role in the Jeddah talks that led to the Geneva negotiations.
The delegation also highlighted Saudi Arabia’s substantial humanitarian aid to those affected by the conflict, delivered through the King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Center.
The RSF reaffirmed their commitment to ensuring the “unhindered delivery of humanitarian aid across Sudan.”
US Special Envoy to Sudan, Tom Perriello, stated that discussions with the RSF are ongoing.
Meanwhile, Washington continues to engage in phone talks with Sudan’s Sovereign Council Chairman and Army Chief, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, in an effort to encourage his participation in the negotiations.
Talks are scheduled to resume on Monday after a two-day pause, though mediators have yet to receive confirmation of the Sudanese Armed Forces’ participation.



Dbeibah Slammed for Signing Agreement that Grants Türkiye Wide Privileges in Libya

Turkish forces carry out naval maneuvers off the Libyan coast. (Turkish Defense Ministry file photo)
Turkish forces carry out naval maneuvers off the Libyan coast. (Turkish Defense Ministry file photo)
TT

Dbeibah Slammed for Signing Agreement that Grants Türkiye Wide Privileges in Libya

Turkish forces carry out naval maneuvers off the Libyan coast. (Turkish Defense Ministry file photo)
Turkish forces carry out naval maneuvers off the Libyan coast. (Turkish Defense Ministry file photo)

Head of Libya’s Government of National Unity (GNU) Abdulhamid al-Dbeibah was slammed for signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Türkiye that grants its forces wide privileges in the North African country.

The agreement was signed in March and came to light recently when Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan presented it to parliament on August 12.

The 24-article MoU grants Turkish forces deployed in western Libya “wide privileges and legal immunity”.

“Any crimes committed by the forces while performing their official duties will be subject to Turkish law” and “if they commit crimes outside their official duties, they will be subject to Libyan laws or punished in line with laws in both countries.”

The agreement obligates the Tripoli-based GNU to cover the fuel and logistics needs of all vehicles used by the Turkish troops.

Dbeibah was slammed for signing the “shameful” agreement, while Libyan political analyst Larbi al-Werfalli said the MoU was enough to spark an uprising in Libya against the Turkish “colonization.”

Political analyst Ahmed Abou Arqoub said the MoU effectively turns Libya into a Turkish military based, allowing Ankara to access Libya’s air and naval space without restriction, which could raise regional tensions.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, he warned: “Libya will officially become occupied by Türkiye when the agreement takes effect. It is even expected to cover the costs of the occupation.”

The GNU has not commented on the criticism.

Several observers slammed the agreement as infringing on Libya’s sovereignty and national security.

Head of the National Human Rights Commission in Libya Ahmed Abdulhakim Hamza criticized the “shameful” MoU, adding: “A country occupying another by force is much more dignified and merciful than this insulting” agreement.

Türkiye and western Libyan authorities enjoy vast coordination ties that go back to 2019 when Ankara supported Tripoli against the Libyan National Army in its war on the capital.

Libyan academic Aguilah Dalhoum stressed that the “shameful” MoU is not the product of the moment, but a result of a “series of catastrophic errors committed by several actors on the Libyan political scene.”

“Libya is teetering between political idiocy and fear that have pushed it to sign a security agreement with Türkiye, which will transform Tripoli into an Ottoman province,” he noted.