HRW: Both Warring Parties in Sudan Acquired New Weapons

Women shout slogans as they take part in a demonstration on the opening day of Sudan ceasefire talks, in Geneva, on August 14, 2024. (AFP)
Women shout slogans as they take part in a demonstration on the opening day of Sudan ceasefire talks, in Geneva, on August 14, 2024. (AFP)
TT

HRW: Both Warring Parties in Sudan Acquired New Weapons

Women shout slogans as they take part in a demonstration on the opening day of Sudan ceasefire talks, in Geneva, on August 14, 2024. (AFP)
Women shout slogans as they take part in a demonstration on the opening day of Sudan ceasefire talks, in Geneva, on August 14, 2024. (AFP)

Both warring parties in Sudan, the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), have newly acquired modern foreign-made weapons and military equipment, Human Rights Watch (HRW) said in a report released on Monday.

It called on the UN Security Council to renew and expand the arms embargo and its restrictions on the Darfur region to all of Sudan and hold violators to account.

HRW said it analyzed 49 photos and videos, most apparently filmed by fighters from both sides, posted on the social media platforms Facebook, Telegram, TikTok, and X, showing weapons used or captured in the conflict.

The apparently new equipment includes armed drones, drone jammers, anti-tank guided missiles, truck-mounted multi-barrel rocket launchers, and mortar munitions, and are produced by companies registered in China, Iran, Russia and Serbia.

Although HRW did not specify how the warring parties acquired the new equipment, it noted that the Sudan conflict is one of the world’s worst humanitarian and human rights crises.

“The warring parties are committing atrocities with impunity, and the newly acquired weapons and equipment are likely to be used in the commission of further crimes,” it said.

HRW warned that the SAF and the RSF may use such weapons and equipment to continue to commit war crimes and other serious human rights violations not just in Darfur, but across the country.

It said the UN Security Council is expected to decide on September 11 whether to renew the Sudan sanctions regime, which prohibits the transfer of military equipment to the Darfur region.

The organization noted that since April 2023, the new conflict has affected most of Sudan’s states, but Security Council members have yet to take steps to expand the arms embargo to the whole country.

HRW said its findings demonstrate both the inadequacy of the current Darfur-only embargo and the grave risks posed by the acquisition of new weapons by the warring parties.

“A countrywide arms embargo would contribute to addressing these issues by facilitating the monitoring of transfers to Darfur and preventing the legal acquisition of weapons for use in other parts of Sudan,” it stressed.

The NGO said that the Sudanese government has opposed an expansion of the arms embargo and in recent months has lobbied members of the Security Council to end the sanctions regime and remove the Darfur embargo altogether.

“The prevalence of atrocities by the warring parties creates a real risk that weapons or equipment acquired by the parties would most likely be used to perpetuate serious violations of human rights and humanitarian law, harming civilians,” HRW wrote in its report.

It therefore called on the Security Council to publicly condemn individual governments that are violating the existing arms embargo on Darfur and take urgently needed measures to sanction individuals and entities that are violating the embargo.



Lebanon Ready for Indirect Negotiations with Israel to End the War

Mourners waving the flags of Hezbollah and Amal movement attend the funeral of Lebanese civil defence members, killed in an Israeli strike, in the southern Lebanese village of Borj Qalauay on September 9, 2024. (Photo by Mahmoud ZAYYAT / AFP)
Mourners waving the flags of Hezbollah and Amal movement attend the funeral of Lebanese civil defence members, killed in an Israeli strike, in the southern Lebanese village of Borj Qalauay on September 9, 2024. (Photo by Mahmoud ZAYYAT / AFP)
TT

Lebanon Ready for Indirect Negotiations with Israel to End the War

Mourners waving the flags of Hezbollah and Amal movement attend the funeral of Lebanese civil defence members, killed in an Israeli strike, in the southern Lebanese village of Borj Qalauay on September 9, 2024. (Photo by Mahmoud ZAYYAT / AFP)
Mourners waving the flags of Hezbollah and Amal movement attend the funeral of Lebanese civil defence members, killed in an Israeli strike, in the southern Lebanese village of Borj Qalauay on September 9, 2024. (Photo by Mahmoud ZAYYAT / AFP)

The Lebanese government has said it was ready to engage in indirect negotiations with Israel to establish a ceasefire and bring an end to the conflict between Hezbollah and the Israeli army in South Lebanon. This comes amid intensifying exchanges of fire and Israel’s threats to escalate the war.

During a meeting with ambassadors and representatives from United Nations Security Council member states, Prime Minister Najib Mikati emphasized the need for the Security Council to take “more decisive and effective measures” in addressing Israeli violations and attacks on the Lebanese population.

He stressed that the Security Council’s response must be “swift and robust, aiming to protect innocent lives and civil defense personnel working tirelessly to alleviate the suffering of the people.”

Mikati also condemned “Israel’s continued targeting of Lebanese civilians, a clear violation of international law and a threat to the safety and security of the country’s population.”

He expressed gratitude to Security Council members for their support in renewing UNIFIL’s mandate and their commitment to maintaining stability in Lebanon.

Following the meeting, Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib noted that the ambassadors affirmed their support for the protection of civilians and international laws, including the Geneva Conventions, which safeguard individuals during conflicts.

He said: “Most ambassadors indirectly condemned these attacks and emphasized their opposition to targeting civilians. We agreed to avoid the term ‘de-escalation’ and instead focus on halting the attacks.”

“As a government, we seek a ceasefire and an end to the war. We have informed the relevant parties of our willingness to engage in indirect negotiations with Israel to achieve this,” Bou Habib added.

He mentioned that the prime minister has instructed Lebanon’s UN mission to consult with Security Council members about convening a session on Lebanon, particularly regarding the targeting of the population. He also highlighted “strong support for Lebanon from all sides, which is preventing a full-scale war in the South.”

“Israel is refusing negotiations, and Hezbollah may also oppose them, but Hezbollah is not a state. It is the Lebanese state that decides. If a viable resolution is proposed, we will accept it as a government and work to convince Hezbollah to agree. This is the responsibility of the Lebanese state, as Hezbollah is not a member of the United Nations—Lebanon is,” Bou Habib remarked.

In response to a question, the foreign minister stressed that any ceasefire resolution would be a new one, not an amendment to Resolution 1701.

Israeli Threats

Lebanon’s call for negotiations comes amid growing threats from Israel. Former Israeli war cabinet member and leader of the National Unity Party, Benny Gantz, said Israel should consider launching a war against Lebanon if no ceasefire agreement or prisoner exchange with Hamas is reached soon.

Speaking at the Middle East American Dialogue (MEAD) conference in Washington, Gantz stated: “It’s time to focus on the North. We are behind schedule, and I believe we must strike a deal to bring back the hostages, even if it comes at a painful cost. However, if no agreement is reached in the coming days or weeks, we should escalate the war in the North and ensure the safe return of our citizens to their homes.”

He added: “We can achieve this, even if it requires targeting the state of Lebanon itself. I see no other way forward.”

Military Developments

On the ground, the Israeli army announced that its warplanes and helicopters targeted Hezbollah military facilities and launch sites in Kfar Kila, Taybeh, Hanin, and Yaroun on Sunday night.

Lebanon’s Ministry of Health reported that an Israeli airstrike on Hanin injured four people, who were taken to the hospital for treatment.

In response, Hezbollah claimed to have launched drones targeting the headquarters of the Israeli Golani Brigade and the 621st Egoz Unit at the Shraga barracks near Acre. The group also reported attacking the Jall Al-Alam site with drones, stating they directly hit their targets.

Israeli media reported that Hezbollah’s drone strike caused damage to a residential apartment on the 14th floor of a new building in north Nahariya.