Netanyahu Shows ‘Seriousness’ in Reaching Gaza Agreement

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (dpa)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (dpa)
TT

Netanyahu Shows ‘Seriousness’ in Reaching Gaza Agreement

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (dpa)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (dpa)

Political sources close to the Israeli government indicate that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is demonstrating seriousness, for the first time, in negotiations over a prisoner exchange deal with Hamas in the Gaza Strip, and has reportedly initiated an updated proposal, which includes new ideas similar to the ceasefire agreement reached with Lebanon.

According to the sources, several factors have pushed Netanyahu to move in that direction. One major reason is the intervention by US President-elect Donald Trump and his team, who have actively engaged in talks with Netanyahu’s close circle, led by Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer, who is one of Netanyahu’s closest allies, and is highly respected by Trump.

The Israeli news site Walla reported that Trump sent a firm and unequivocal message to Hamas leaders, threatening severe consequences if they did not cooperate. Simultaneously, he emphasized to Israel that he would not tolerate a continuation of the war without purpose, urging both sides to finalize the deal before he takes office in the White House.

Another factor is Netanyahu’s ability to persuade his government to accept the deal as a temporary ceasefire, leaving the door open for resuming hostilities if necessary. This approach mirrors the situation with Lebanon, where the Israeli military continues operations despite the ceasefire. The only significant opposition comes from National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, whose objection is weak and does not threaten the government’s stability. Ben-Gvir is instead negotiating for concessions in settlement policies in the West Bank and maintaining settlement expansion in Gaza on the agenda.

Netanyahu’s personal calculations have also shifted. If he does not move toward a deal, public attention in Israeli society will focus on his corruption trials, which will resume next Tuesday. The proceedings will feature Netanyahu as the central defendant and could overshadow any government achievements. By prioritizing the prisoner exchange deal, Netanyahu and his advisors hope to draw media attention to the negotiations and its phased implementation, diverting focus from the trials for weeks.

Key points of the updated proposal include a temporary halt to hostilities lasting between 42 and 60 days and the release by Hamas of all surviving women captives, men over 50, and those in critical health conditions. While Israel initially demanded the release of 33 captives from these categories, it now recognizes that some may no longer be alive. In return, Israel would release hundreds of Palestinian prisoners, including some serving life sentences.



UN General Assembly Asks Court to Say What Israel Needs to Provide in Gaza

The UN General Assembly often finds itself taking up measures that cannot get through the Security Council due to political concerns. JOHN ANGELILLO / POOL/AFP/File
The UN General Assembly often finds itself taking up measures that cannot get through the Security Council due to political concerns. JOHN ANGELILLO / POOL/AFP/File
TT

UN General Assembly Asks Court to Say What Israel Needs to Provide in Gaza

The UN General Assembly often finds itself taking up measures that cannot get through the Security Council due to political concerns. JOHN ANGELILLO / POOL/AFP/File
The UN General Assembly often finds itself taking up measures that cannot get through the Security Council due to political concerns. JOHN ANGELILLO / POOL/AFP/File

The UN General Assembly approved a resolution Thursday asking the UN’s highest court to state what Israel’s obligations are in Gaza and the West Bank to provide humanitarian assistance essential for the survival of Palestinian civilians.
The vote on the Norwegian-sponsored resolution seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice was 137-12, with 22 abstentions. The United States, Israel's closest ally, voted against the resolution.
Resolutions in the 193-member General Assembly are not legally binding, though they do reflect world opinion, The Associated Press said.
It follows the ICJ’s condemnation of Israel’ s rule over lands it captured 57 years ago. In a nonbinding opinion in July, the court said Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territories is unlawful and called on Israel to end its occupation and halt settlement construction immediately.
Thursday's resolution also follows Israeli laws passed in late October, which take effect in 90 days, that effectively ban the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, known as UNRWA, from operating in the Palestinian territories.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has stressed that no other UN agency can take on UNRWA's role, and a UN spokesman reiterated Thursday that under international law, as the occupying power, Israel would be responsible for fulfilling the basic needs of Palestinians if UNRWA is banned.
Norway’s deputy foreign minister, Andreas Kravik, told reporters that the international community has a responsibility to react to tens of thousands of deaths in Gaza and virtually the entire population experiencing acute hunger, and some near famine.
He said many countries, the UN and its agencies, and aid organizations are ready to step up their humanitarian efforts but the problem is “there’s a lack of access.”
Israel’s UN Ambassador Danny Danon told the assembly before the vote that its members were debating “the same recycled nonsense, where all that matters is attacking Israel and challenge its right to protect its citizens.”
“This time the Palestinians are using a new tool in this diplomatic circus: the International Court of Justice,” he said.
The resolution demands that Israel comply with all its legal obligations under international law, including by the UN's top court.
It expresses concern about the Israeli legislation on UNRWA and Israeli measures to impede assistance to the Palestinians.
The resolution seeks the ICJ’s guidance on additional questions about its July ruling, including what Israel's obligations are “to ensure and facilitate the unhindered provision of urgently needed supplies essential to the survival of the Palestinian civilian population.”