Iraqi President to Asharq Al-Awsat: Iran’s Influence Is Exaggerated, Factions Are Under Control

Rashid speaks of ‘security concerns’ over the new situation in Syria

Iraqi President Abdullatif al-Rashid in Davos. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Iraqi President Abdullatif al-Rashid in Davos. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Iraqi President to Asharq Al-Awsat: Iran’s Influence Is Exaggerated, Factions Are Under Control

Iraqi President Abdullatif al-Rashid in Davos. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Iraqi President Abdullatif al-Rashid in Davos. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Iraqi President Abdullatif al-Rashid described as “positive” US President Donald Trump’s commitment to peace, saying it was a step forward “in resolving conflicts in the world and Middle East.”

Al-Rashid sat down for an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos to discuss the Iran’s “very exaggerated” impact on the armed factions in Iraq, the developments in Syria and the need for the international community to find radical solutions to detention camps in Iraq that are holding terrorists from different nationalities.

Trump’s return

Rashid welcomed Trump’ reelection as president, saying Iraq enjoys “good ties with the US.”

“We thank the Americans for standing by our side in fighting the ISIS terrorist group. Their forces are still deployed in Iraq,” he went on to say.

Rashid, who had sent a message of congratulations to Trump on his return to office, said the latter has repeatedly said that he wanted to help in ending wars in the region and the world and for security and peace to prevail across the globe.

“This is a positive step for everyone,” he remarked.

On the Iraqi army’s readiness in facing terrorist threats after the US troop withdrawal in 2026, Rashid said the threats in his country had dropped.

“Iraq is now free of terrorist activity. Some ISIS pockets and other terrorist elements remain, but this is the case in nearly all countries in the world,” he explained.

As for the American troops, he said they remain in Iraq in line with bilateral agreements, the request of the Iraqi government and in coordination and consultation with political forces that are the foundations of parliament.

The forces take part in the formation of the executive authority and in choosing a president and members of parliament, he continued.

‘Exaggerated’ Iranian influence

Turning to Iran, Rashid said that talk of Iran’s influence on the Iraqi armed factions is “very exaggerated.”

“These factions are under the control of the Iraqi government. With the war on Gaza over, I believe the factions realized that there is no need to turn to their weapons or join the fight, especially now that the ceasefire has taken effect,” he added.

“The government now wants to impose its control over the armed factions according to measures and mechanisms that are being devised by the relevant authorities with the goal of putting an end to any combat activity,” he revealed.

On Iran, he described it as an “important country.”

“We enjoy good ties with it, but we are the ones who decide things in Iraq. We are not under the control of any country,” Rashid stressed.

“This is the culmination of a long struggle that was led by the Iraqi people. We fought against dictatorship for a long time, perhaps more than any other country in the region. We have also long suffered from terrorism. Before that, we suffered from the economic siege,” he stated.

“Today, however, security and stability have been restored to Iraq. We are not only trying to improve our relations with our neighbors, but we are also strengthening them. We are also trying to bridge gaps between countries in the region to serve the interests of all parties,” he continued.

“We live in a historic region. It boasts more resources than any other region in neighboring countries, so we must take advantage of what we have been blessed with. We must enjoy peace and security and concern ourselves in resolving problems of neighboring countries,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Iraqi President Abdullatif al-Rashid speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat from Davos. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Security concerns

Rashid confirmed that Iraq has security concerns over the developments in neighboring Syria.

Before elaborating on what they are, Rashid recalled Iraq’s attempts to support stability in Syria.

“We tried several times during Bashar al-Assad's time in power to help in coming up with solutions to reach a settlement in Syria. Syria is important to the Middle East and it shares borders with several regional countries,” he noted.

“Bashar’s regime, unfortunately, did not invest in our efforts,” he lamented. “We had backed Syria’s return to the Arab League and tried to bridge differences between the regime and various factions.”

Rashid reminded that Iraq never severed its ties with Syria and continued to support it. “This does not mean, however, that we approved of the regime’s actions and the Syrian government’s behavior. On the contrary, we constantly criticized the regime and encouraged it to improve the situation in Syria.”

Today, “we wish the new Syrian administration success in improving the situation, but the scene isn’t very clear at the moment,” he said, while welcoming the positive statements made by leader of the transitional authority Ahmed al-Sharaa about his determination to improve the situation in Syria.

On the security level, Rashid said Iraq and Syria share a long border, “and the reality is that several terrorist groups are active there. This worries us.”

“The international community must work on finding radical solutions to the crisis of terrorists from different nationalities who are held in detention camps,” he urged.

Water crisis

The persistent water crisis in Iraq has deepened in recent years, impacting its economy and food security.

Rashid acknowledged the crisis, noting that solutions to it are also available. “They can be easily implemented if there was a real and serious desire to do so,” he said, while referring to two main factors that can move them forward.

The first, Rashid said, is the behavior of neighboring countries. Iraq heavily depends on the Euphrates and Tigris rivers, whose sources are both located outside the country. The majority are located in Türkiye, while some tributaries are in Iran.

“Iran and Türkiye's cooperation is very necessary and important” in resolving this issue, the president explained.

“Historically, there were never dams or artificial barriers on the Euphrates and Tigris rivers in Türkiye. Today, several dams have been built on the rivers, which has been denying us water. This is one of the main reasons for the water problem in Iraq,” he said.

As for Iran, “we are consulting with it over the water issue and working together to resolve this problem,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat, revealing that Iranian officials are “receptive” to Baghdad's demands and stressing that Iraq “has not taken its fair share of the water.”

He hoped the water crisis would be resolved through peaceful means and understanding, not armed conflicts.

The second factor, said Rashid, is climate. “This is something we cannot control. We need to take advantage of the rainfall to help in agriculture and raising cattle,” he added. He also underlined the importance of storing groundwater.

The president acknowledged that Iraq is not adopting modern irrigation methods given the lack of good internal management of the water file.



Hamas Says Path for Gaza Must Begin with End to ‘Aggression’ 

Makeshift tents of displaced Palestinian families among the ruins of their homes at sunset during the holy month of Ramadan in Jabaliya northern Gaza Strip on, 19 February 2026. (EPA)
Makeshift tents of displaced Palestinian families among the ruins of their homes at sunset during the holy month of Ramadan in Jabaliya northern Gaza Strip on, 19 February 2026. (EPA)
TT

Hamas Says Path for Gaza Must Begin with End to ‘Aggression’ 

Makeshift tents of displaced Palestinian families among the ruins of their homes at sunset during the holy month of Ramadan in Jabaliya northern Gaza Strip on, 19 February 2026. (EPA)
Makeshift tents of displaced Palestinian families among the ruins of their homes at sunset during the holy month of Ramadan in Jabaliya northern Gaza Strip on, 19 February 2026. (EPA)

Discussions on Gaza's future must begin with a total halt to Israeli "aggression", the Palestinian movement Hamas said after US President Donald Trump's Board of Peace met for the first time.

"Any political process or any arrangement under discussion concerning the Gaza Strip and the future of our Palestinian people must start with the total halt of aggression, the lifting of the blockade, and the guarantee of our people's legitimate national rights, first and foremost their right to freedom and self-determination," Hamas said in a statement Thursday.

Trump's board met for its inaugural session in Washington on Thursday, with a number of countries pledging money and personnel to rebuild the Palestinian territory, more than four months into a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has insisted however that Hamas must disarm before any reconstruction begins.

"We agreed with our ally the US that there will be no reconstruction of Gaza before the demilitarization of Gaza," Netanyahu said.

The Israeli leader did not attend the Washington meeting but was represented by his foreign minister Gideon Saar.

Trump said several countries had pledged more than seven billion dollars to rebuild the territory.

Muslim-majority Indonesia will take a deputy commander role in a nascent International Stabilization Force, the unit's American chief Major General Jasper Jeffers said.

Trump, whose plan for Gaza was endorsed by the UN Security Council in November, also said five countries had committed to providing troops, including Morocco, Kazakhstan, Kosovo and Albania.


Official Contacts Aim to Keep Lebanon out of War on Iran as Israel Raises Readiness on Northern Front 

This photograph shows a memorial for slain Lebanese Hezbollah longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah at the entrance of the southern village of Qannarit on February 16, 2026. (AFP)
This photograph shows a memorial for slain Lebanese Hezbollah longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah at the entrance of the southern village of Qannarit on February 16, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Official Contacts Aim to Keep Lebanon out of War on Iran as Israel Raises Readiness on Northern Front 

This photograph shows a memorial for slain Lebanese Hezbollah longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah at the entrance of the southern village of Qannarit on February 16, 2026. (AFP)
This photograph shows a memorial for slain Lebanese Hezbollah longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah at the entrance of the southern village of Qannarit on February 16, 2026. (AFP)

Israel has raised the alert level of its military along the border with Lebanon, raising questions that Lebanon’s south may again be involved in a regional confrontation should the US attack Iran.

Given the heightened tensions between the US and Iran, questions have been asked over whether Hezbollah will become involved in a new war. Its Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem had recently announced that the party will not remain on the side if Iran is attacked.

On the ground, Israel blew up houses in southern Lebanon border towns and carried out air strikes in the south. Israeli military spokesman Avichay Adraee said the raids targeted “Hezbollah infrastructure,” including arms caches and rocket launchers.

Their presence in the south is a violation of current agreements, he added.

Amid the high regional tensions, Israel’s Maariv quoted a military source as saying that the army has come up with plans, including a preemptive strike against Hezbollah, which would drag the south and the whole of Lebanon into a new war.

Ministerial sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the presidency has been carrying out internal and foreign contacts since Thursday morning to keep Lebanon out of any escalation.

Hezbollah had launched a “support front” war against Israel a day after Hamas’ October 7, 2023 attack. In 2024, the war spiraled into an all-out conflict, with Israel decimating the Hezbollah leadership and severely weakening the party.

Israel believes that Hezbollah has been rebuilding its capabilities since the ceasefire that was struck in November 2024.

Kassim Kassir, a political analyst who is close to Hezbollah, told Asharq Al-Awsat: “No one knows what Hezbollah will do because the situation is tied the extent of the attack, should it happen.”

He noted that Qassem was ambiguous when he said the party will decide what to do when the time is right, but at any rate, he stressed that the party will not remain on the sidelines or abandon Iran.

“No one knows what Hezbollah’s abilities are, so everything is possible,” Kassir said.

Riad Kahwaji, a security and defense affairs expert, said he does not rule out the possibility that Hezbollah would join the war should the US attack Iran.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, he stressed that Iran is now the United States’ main target, when previously it used to confront its proxies.

It has now taken the fight directly to the heart of the problem, which is the Iranian regime, he remarked.

The extent of the military mobilization in the region and the frequent American statements about regime change all indicate that a major military operation may be imminent, he added.

Israel’s military also favors preemptive operations, so it is watching Hezbollah, which remains Iran’s most powerful regional proxy despite the blows it received in 2024 war, Kahwaji said.

Hezbollah still possesses a rocket arsenal that can threaten Israel, he remarked.

Israel’s high level of alert on the border with Lebanon could be in readiness for any development. Should Tel Aviv receive word from Washington that it intends to attack Iran, then it could launch operations against Hezbollah as part of preemptive strikes aimed at preventing the party from launching attacks against it, Kahwaji said.

“As long as Hezbollah possesses heavy weapons, such as rockets, and drones, that it has not handed over to the army, then Lebanon will continue to be vulnerable to attacks in the next confrontation. It will be exposed to Israeli strikes as long as this issue remains unresolved,” he added.


Israel Keen to Attack Iran’s Regional Proxies before they Can Join the War

Two Israeli soldiers launch a drone. (Israeli Army)
Two Israeli soldiers launch a drone. (Israeli Army)
TT

Israel Keen to Attack Iran’s Regional Proxies before they Can Join the War

Two Israeli soldiers launch a drone. (Israeli Army)
Two Israeli soldiers launch a drone. (Israeli Army)

The Israeli army is preparing to carry out “massive and unprecedented” strikes against groups backed by Iran, including the Houthis in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon and armed factions in Iraq, should they join a potential war in the region, revealed Israeli military sources.

Iran is applying great pressure on these groups to take part in any upcoming conflict because the regime in Tehran concluded that their staying on the sidelines during the 12-day June war in 2025 was a strategic error, the sources said according to Israeli estimates.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had on Thursday warned Iran that his country is making its own preparations for possible Iranian missile strikes in response to any US action.

“We are prepared for any scenario,” he said, adding that if Iran attacks Israel, “they will experience a response they cannot even imagine.”

A military source said the Houthis pose a “direct threat not just to Israel, but to the whole world.” He accused the Houthis of impeding international trade in the Red Sea.

Even though the Houthis are not firing at all ships, they are still a threat to everyone, added the source. The militants are producing weapons and possess advanced technology, he warned, comparing them to a “dangerous ticking timebomb that must be swiftly neutralized.”

Israeli and foreign experts revealed that Iran is providing large financial support to its allied armed groups in the region in order for them to join a war should US President Donald Trump act on his threat to strike Iran.

In 2025, Iran allotted a billion dollars to these groups so that they can carry out rocket attacks against Israel.

It remains to be seen if these groups will respond to Iran’s pressure. Israeli estimates believe that the Kataib Hezbollah in Iraq are unlikely to join a war, while Hezbollah and the Houthis are more prepared to do so.

Israel has turned to mediators to warn these parties that any attack against it will be met with a “massive and unprecedented response.”

In Lebanon, the sources said that the military operations Israel is carrying out against Hezbollah and other armed groups are aimed at undermining the party’s efforts to bolster its combat abilities.

They acknowledged, however, that the Israeli military establishment senses that Hezbollah is rebuilding its capabilities at a faster pace than Israel’s operations at reining it in.

The Houthis, meanwhile, have a relatively greater margin of independence, but they are always ready to take part in any regional war to shift attention away from the situation inside Yemen, said Israeli estimates.

The Houthis are receiving Iranian funds to boost their military capabilities and produce more weapons. They also continue to smuggle weapons to Hamas in Gaza. Israel also accuses them of extorting several countries, whereby they pledge not to attack their ships in exchange for money.

The Houthis are ultimately fully supportive of Iran’s goals despite the blows they have been dealt by Israel. The Houthis are suffering from a drop in combat abilities. The pace of their training of fighters has also dropped, while their airports have been damaged in Israeli attacks and the Houthis are facing difficulties in rebuilding them.

Despite the losses, the Houthis are still a threat. They possess heavy long-range missiles and drones and still have the ability to shut Israel’s southern Eilat port.