Judicial Development Reopens Probe into Beirut Port Explosion

03 September 2020, Lebanon, Beirut: A general view of the damaged Beirut port, the place of a massive explosion that rocked Beirut on 04 August 2020. (dpa)
03 September 2020, Lebanon, Beirut: A general view of the damaged Beirut port, the place of a massive explosion that rocked Beirut on 04 August 2020. (dpa)
TT
20

Judicial Development Reopens Probe into Beirut Port Explosion

03 September 2020, Lebanon, Beirut: A general view of the damaged Beirut port, the place of a massive explosion that rocked Beirut on 04 August 2020. (dpa)
03 September 2020, Lebanon, Beirut: A general view of the damaged Beirut port, the place of a massive explosion that rocked Beirut on 04 August 2020. (dpa)

Lebanon’s Public Prosecutor Jamal al-Hajjar annulled on Monday a ruling by his predecessor Ghassan Oueidat two years ago that ordered a stop to any cooperation with Tarek Bitar, the judge presiding over the investigation into the Beirut port explosion of August 4, 2020.

Hajjar’s ruling marks a shift in the case and created a shock in political and judicial circles that fear that Bitar will resume his investigation and issue arrest warrants against suspects.

Nerves are especially strained as appointments have been set for March and April to interrogate several security officials and politicians in the case, most notably former Prime Minister Hassan Diab.

No sooner had news of the annulment broken out that lawyers representing the families of the victims and others representing politicians who have been summoned for questioning flocked to the Justice Palace in Beirut to verify the news.

A judicial source told Asharq Al-Awsat that Hajjar had taken a “firm decision in resuming cooperation with Bitar.” He will receive all warrants issued by him, including summons for suspects to appear before interrogation.

Observers attributed Hajjar’s change in position to “massive political pressure he had to endure and the changes that have taken place in Lebanon” after Israel’s latest war on Hezbollah and the party’s significant loss of influence in the country.

The judicial source refused to comment on the speculation.

It instead said that for an entire year since he assumed his post, Hajjar has been advising Bitar to remove politicians from his circle of inquiries because they can only be tried at the Supreme Council.

Hajjar effectively failed in changing Bitar’s convictions, who has been insisting that everyone in the case be included without exception.

“So, Hajjar was forced to resume cooperation with him to avoid accusations that he is obstructing the probe and the truth behind the greatest crime ever committed in Lebanon,” the source said.

Ahead of the annulment, Hajjar, Bitar, President of the Higher Judicial Council Judge Suheil Abboud and Justice Minister Adel Nassar had held a series of meetings at the Justice Palace and Justice Ministry to discuss means in which to resume the cooperation between the Bitar and the Public Prosecution.

Bitar was forced to suspend his investigations for 13 months as a result of 43 lawsuits filed against him, but he remained undeterred, issuing a number of summons in 2022, including one against Oueidat.

Oueidat responded by filing a complaint against Bitar and ordering a travel ban against him that is still in effect. He also ordered the release of all 17 detainees held in the case, in defiance of Bitar’s work.

The judicial investigator has set a session for Friday to probe a General Security officer over his involvement in the case.

Other appointments will probe other officials in the case, including former General Security chief Abbas Ibrahim, former Army Commander Jean Qahwaji and several retired military officers. The probe will be complete with the interrogation of politicians.



Uncertain Future for the PFLP-GC in Post-Assad Syria

Syrian President Ahmed Al-Sharaa with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Damascus on April 18 (AP) 
Syrian President Ahmed Al-Sharaa with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Damascus on April 18 (AP) 
TT
20

Uncertain Future for the PFLP-GC in Post-Assad Syria

Syrian President Ahmed Al-Sharaa with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Damascus on April 18 (AP) 
Syrian President Ahmed Al-Sharaa with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Damascus on April 18 (AP) 

The brief detention of Talal Naji, Secretary-General of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – General Command (PFLP-GC), by Syrian authorities has renewed scrutiny over the status of Palestinian factions still operating in Syria, particularly those that aligned with the former Assad regime.

Naji’s arrest and swift release come amid a major political realignment following the collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s government in December 2024. Once one of the most active and heavily armed Palestinian groups in Syria, the PFLP-GC now faces an uncertain future, along with other factions that were long tolerated—or even supported—under Assad’s rule.

A well-informed Palestinian source, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the new Syrian administration has appointed a figure known as Abu Abdul Rahman al-Shami to oversee the file of Palestinian factions. Since assuming the role, al-Shami has convened multiple meetings with faction representatives, including regular attendees from the PFLP-GC, to discuss the fate of their fighters, weapons, property, and military infrastructure.

According to the source, al-Shami has made it clear that the new government intends to hold accountable any individuals or groups implicated in crimes against Syrian civilians during the civil war. Palestinian factions have been instructed to surrender all weapons and military equipment, and to limit their activities to humanitarian and relief work. The PFLP-GC, the source said, has largely complied.

Despite the fall of the Assad regime, Naji and much of the PFLP-GC’s second- and third-tier leadership have remained in Syria. Its offices in Damascus reportedly continue to operate, though under heightened scrutiny. Other faction leaders, however, have fled. Among them are Khaled Abdul Majid (Popular Struggle Front), Ziyad al-Saghir (Fatah–Intifada), Mohammad al-Saeed (Liwa al-Quds), and Saed Abdel Al (Free Palestine Movement). Most are believed to have sought refuge in Lebanon.

Sources confirmed that several PFLP-GC fighters have been detained in recent weeks in connection with alleged war crimes committed during their cooperation with Assad’s forces. The Syrian government has also moved to seize faction offices and military installations across the country, including properties belonging to Fatah–Intifada, the Free Palestine Movement, and the Sa’iqa Forces. Sa’iqa’s leader, Mohammad Qais, remains in Syria.

In a further blow, authorities have reportedly frozen bank accounts belonging to some Palestinian factions, both in state and private banks, although it remains unclear whether the PFLP-GC is among them.

Additionally, it is widely believed that the PFLP-GC has handed over its military training camps, which were previously spread across Damascus countryside, Daraa, Aleppo, and Suwayda. “The situation is extremely sensitive, and everyone is anxious,” one Palestinian source told Asharq Al-Awsat. “It’s likely they’ve surrendered those sites.”

The sense of unease deepened last month when Syrian authorities detained two senior Islamic Jihad officials in Damascus: Khaled Khaled, head of the group’s Syria bureau, and Abu Ali Yasser, its chief organizational officer. Both remain in custody, and no official charges have been announced.

The current atmosphere of fear and uncertainty has driven faction leaders to avoid public comment. Most now insist on anonymity when speaking to local or international media.

Before the outbreak of the Syrian uprising in March 2011, Syria hosted more than a dozen Palestinian factions. As the conflict escalated, the Assad regime encouraged the formation of new pro-regime groups, composed largely of Palestinian refugees, to fight alongside its forces.