Sudan Calls on Security Council to Impose Sanctions on RSF

Smoke is seen rising in Khartoum, Sudan, April 15, 2023. (AP)
Smoke is seen rising in Khartoum, Sudan, April 15, 2023. (AP)
TT
20

Sudan Calls on Security Council to Impose Sanctions on RSF

Smoke is seen rising in Khartoum, Sudan, April 15, 2023. (AP)
Smoke is seen rising in Khartoum, Sudan, April 15, 2023. (AP)

Sudan called on the United Nations Security Council to impose sanctions on the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and its backers in order to break the siege on al-Fasher city in Darfur.

In a statement on Friday, the Foreign Ministry said Sudan welcomes a statement issued by the Council on Thursday on the RSF attack on al-Fasher.

The Council had expressed its grave concern over the attack and the rising violence in North Darfur. It called for holding the RSF and others to account for crimes against all civilians.

The Foreign Ministry also called for ending “foreign meddling” that is fueling the war and instability in Sudan.

It urged more “effective measures” to ensure the implementation of Security Council resolution 2736, saying the RSF has proven that it does not heed demands that are not followed by punitive measures and deterrent steps against its leaders and regional sponsors.

The RSF has met Security Council demands with escalating attacks on refugee camps and impeding the delivery of humanitarian aid to al-Fasher as part of its “genocide campaign”, continued the ministry.

It is time for the international community to take tangible steps against officials who are responsible for atrocities, it stressed.

The RSF seized the Zamzam refugee camp on April 11 after a three-day attack.

The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said over 400 civilians, including women and children, as well as 12 aid workers have been killed.

Over 400,000 people have fled Zamzam to other regions of al-Fasher.



Druze Group ‘Rijal al-Karama’ Rejects Disarmament, Calls for Weapons Regulation in Sweida

Mourners attend funeral of those killed in clashes in southern Sweida town on Saturday (AFP)
Mourners attend funeral of those killed in clashes in southern Sweida town on Saturday (AFP)
TT
20

Druze Group ‘Rijal al-Karama’ Rejects Disarmament, Calls for Weapons Regulation in Sweida

Mourners attend funeral of those killed in clashes in southern Sweida town on Saturday (AFP)
Mourners attend funeral of those killed in clashes in southern Sweida town on Saturday (AFP)

A leading Druze movement said on Sunday that the issue of surrendering arms remains unresolved, even as local leaders in southern Syria announced the official start of implementing a peace agreement brokered by Druze clerics and dignitaries in Sweida province.

Bassem Abu Fakhr, spokesman for the “Rijal al-Karama” movement, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the group's weapons were solely for defense and had never been used offensively.

“The matter of handing over weapons falls under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Defense, and no final decision has been made yet,” Abu Fakhr said. “Our arms have never posed a threat to any party. We have not attacked anyone, and our weapons exist to protect our land and honor.”

He added that while the group does not object to regulating the presence of weapons, full surrender was out of the question.

“We have no issue with organizing arms under state authority, provided they remain within the province’s administrative boundaries and under state supervision,” he said. “But the matter of weapons remains unresolved.”

Formed in 2013, Rijal al-Karama was established to protect the Druze community and prevent its youth from being conscripted into fighting for any side in Syria’s protracted conflict, which erupted after mass protests against then President Bashar al-Assad.

The group continues to operate as an independent local defense force, separate from state security institutions.

Abu Fakhr told Asharq Al-Awsat that a high-level meeting held last Thursday in Sweida—attended by senior Druze spiritual leaders Sheikh Hikmat al-Hijri and Sheikh Hammoud al-Hanawi, along with local dignitaries and community members—resulted in an agreement to reactivate the police and judicial police under the Ministry of Interior.

Abu Fakhr also denied recent reports claiming that Druze clerics, tribal leaders, and faction commanders had agreed to fully surrender their weapons to the state.

“This issue has not been resolved by all parties in Sweida,” he said, reiterating the group’s position: “We have no objection to organizing the weapons under state oversight, as long as they remain within the administrative boundaries of the province, but not to surrendering them.”

The statement underscores continuing tensions over the role of armed groups in Sweida, a province that has largely remained outside the control of both government and opposition forces throughout Syria’s civil war.