Russian ‘Africa Sector’ General Sets Moscow’s Priorities with Damascus

Russian ‘Africa Sector’ General Sets Moscow’s Priorities with Damascus
TT

Russian ‘Africa Sector’ General Sets Moscow’s Priorities with Damascus

Russian ‘Africa Sector’ General Sets Moscow’s Priorities with Damascus

A joint military convoy of Syrian, Russian, and Turkish officers toured southwestern Syria on Monday, highlighting the changes the country has undergone less than a year after the fall of Moscow’s former ally.

The delegation, comprising around 15 SUVs escorted by 10 Syrian public security and military police vehicles, inspected sites that had once hosted Russian forces, before Moscow was compelled to actively reposition its troops across Syrian territory.

The convoy moved from Saasaa in the Damascus countryside toward Beit Jen, at the far southwestern edge of the Damascus countryside bordering Quneitra province, then proceeded to the area west of Beit Jen town, before heading to central Quneitra countryside.

According to sources, the delegation, whose mission was not publicly announced, inspected military sites that had previously served as Russian headquarters during the former regime.

The route taken by the convoy saw a heavy deployment of Syrian public security forces. The unprecedented tour, amid ongoing Israeli violations in the region, carried multiple messages.

It followed two significant developments: first, a visit to Damascus by Syrian Defense Minister Major General Murhaf Abu Qasra for talks with Russian Deputy Defense Minister Yunus-Bek Yevkurov, the highest-ranking Russian official to visit Syria since the fall of Bashar al-Assad.

Second, the visit came shortly after a phone call between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The Kremlin said the call covered the situation in Gaza, Iran’s nuclear file, and ways to ensure stability in Syria. Analysts suggest that Moscow and Damascus are now coordinating efforts to curb Israeli overreach and establish guarantees to restore calm in southern Syria.

Countering Israeli Pretexts

The visit builds on the outcomes of Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s trip to Moscow a month ago, where he reportedly discussed resuming Russian patrols in coordination with Damascus and efforts to pressure Israel to halt ongoing violations.

Russian sources indicate discussions on redeploying Russian military police units in southern Syria to remove Israeli pretexts. Israel controls extensive areas in Damascus countryside, Quneitra, and Daraa, posing a threat to civilians, with dozens reportedly detained by Israeli forces.

Moscow’s role, in this context, is to reassure Israel that Syrian territory will not be used for attacks threatening Israeli security, while Syrian-Russian cooperation will prevent Iranian-backed militias and extremist groups from consolidating in the region.

Strategic Russian Repositioning

The visit by Yevkurov, according to Russian sources, addresses broader issues beyond southern security arrangements. It signals a comprehensive reconfiguration of Russia’s military presence in Syria, reflecting a pragmatic new framework that protects the interests of both countries. Following the meetings, Moscow and Damascus announced discussions on strengthening military coordination and cooperation.

Leaks suggested potential Russian support for modernizing the Syrian army and providing advanced defensive technologies, although such plans are closely linked to Russian-Israeli understandings to avoid new attacks on Syrian military sites.

The broader Syrian-Russian dialogue, spanning military and political levels, appears focused on redefining bilateral priorities. The Russian outlet Tsargrad, close to the military establishment, noted that Yevkurov’s visit is particularly significant for shaping the new military relationship.

Yevkurov, a senior general in the Russian Ministry of Defense responsible for the “African sector,” oversees Russia’s growing military operations in Africa and has been under sanctions from Britain, Canada, the European Union, and the United States since 2022. His African portfolio is relevant in Syria, as the country serves as a key logistical hub for supplies sent to the continent.

Previously, Moscow proposed adjusting its Syrian bases to function as “humanitarian supply stations” for Africa and other regions. Russian sources say this explains Yevkurov’s Damascus visit, aimed at securing logistical support for Russia’s military and economic operations in Africa via Syria’s Hmeimim airbase and Tartus naval facility.

According to the same source, Syria is also crucial for Russia to maintain influence in the Middle East and as a traditional market for Russian military industrial products. Moscow sees Syria as part of a broader economic, humanitarian, and cultural network that it considers valuable and difficult to abandon.

Damascus’ Interests

For Damascus, Russian support is seen as vital to counterbalance growing Turkish influence, provide maneuvering space for potential alignment with the United States, gain backing at the United Nations and Security Council, and facilitate mutual guarantees with Israel. Russia is also expected to play a moderating role with Syrian minorities, including Kurds, Druze, and Alawites, given its reputation as a trusted mediator.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov recently highlighted this approach, noting that Moscow has contributed significantly to Syria’s economy, social sector, national cadre training, and defense capabilities.

He added that these contributions must be adapted to new circumstances, including the functioning of Russian military bases. Lavrov said Syrian leadership and several regional countries are keen to maintain Russia’s presence under a framework that serves both parties’ interests.



Aoun Says Future Deal Will Not Cede Lebanese Territory, Country No Longer ‘Arena for Anyone’s Wars’

A photograph released by the Lebanese Presidency on April 17, 2026, shows Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun delivering a televised address to the Lebanese people from the Baabda Presidential Palace, east of the capital Beirut. (Lebanese Presidency)
A photograph released by the Lebanese Presidency on April 17, 2026, shows Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun delivering a televised address to the Lebanese people from the Baabda Presidential Palace, east of the capital Beirut. (Lebanese Presidency)
TT

Aoun Says Future Deal Will Not Cede Lebanese Territory, Country No Longer ‘Arena for Anyone’s Wars’

A photograph released by the Lebanese Presidency on April 17, 2026, shows Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun delivering a televised address to the Lebanese people from the Baabda Presidential Palace, east of the capital Beirut. (Lebanese Presidency)
A photograph released by the Lebanese Presidency on April 17, 2026, shows Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun delivering a televised address to the Lebanese people from the Baabda Presidential Palace, east of the capital Beirut. (Lebanese Presidency)

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun said on Friday that any future deal reached by the government would not cede any ‌territory or ‌undermine Lebanon's national ‌rights, ⁠without saying whether ⁠he was referring to prospective talks with Israel.

The televised address was ⁠his first speech ‌since ‌the US brokered a ‌ceasefire to ‌end fighting between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah on Thursday. ‌

The text of the deal ⁠says ⁠Israel and Lebanon would hold direct talks to produce a "peace between the two countries".

Aoun said Lebanon was on the verge of a "new phase" of "permanent agreements."

"Now, we all stand before a new phase," he added, stressing "it is the phase of transition from working on a ceasefire to working on permanent agreements that preserve the rights of our people, the unity of our land, and the sovereignty of our nation."

He added that direct talks with Israel were "not a sign of weakness nor a concession... negotiations do not mean, and will never mean, giving up any right, conceding any principle, or compromising the sovereignty of this nation."

Moreover, Aoun stressed that Lebanon was no longer an "arena" for anyone's wars.

"We are confident that we will save Lebanon... we have reclaimed Lebanon and Lebanon's decision-making power for the first time in nearly half a century," he declared, adding that "today, we negotiate for ourselves... we are no longer a pawn in anyone's game, nor an arena for anyone's wars, and we never will be again."

"I hereby affirm... that there will be no agreement that infringes upon our national rights, diminishes the dignity of our steadfast people, or relinquishes an iota of this nation's soil."


Hezbollah Tallies Its Dead from Israel War, Estimates Exceed 1,000

A woman walks next to an ambulance at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. (Reuters)
A woman walks next to an ambulance at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Hezbollah Tallies Its Dead from Israel War, Estimates Exceed 1,000

A woman walks next to an ambulance at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. (Reuters)
A woman walks next to an ambulance at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. (Reuters)

Hezbollah said its fighters would “keep their fingers on the trigger” hours after a ceasefire took effect between Lebanon and Israel, warning it would not stay silent over any Israeli violations and would not repeat its past restraint under the October 2024 ceasefire, when Israel continued attacks and assassinations against its members and commanders.

In recent hours, the Iran-backed party focused on helping large numbers of displaced people return to their homes, while tracking Israeli movements in occupied areas and preparing for a possible new confrontation at any moment.

Death toll unclear

People closely following Hezbollah said it was still counting its dead, with no final toll yet, as many fighters remain under rubble in villages and towns that saw fierce clashes, including the southern towns of Khiam and Bint Jbeil, where Israeli forces are deployed, complicating search efforts.

Some bodies are difficult to identify, while others have been taken captive.

Sources said Hezbollah would not, for now or in the near future, announce casualty figures, as it did in the previous war.

It stopped issuing official death notices after the toll passed 500 and is maintaining that approach, they said, with estimates suggesting the number is high and may exceed 1,000, particularly after heavy fighting in Khiam and Bint Jbeil.

Hezbollah statement

In a statement after the ceasefire, Hezbollah said it carried out 2,184 military operations during the 45-day battle from March 2 to April 16.

It said its drones and rocket fire struck Israeli settlements and cities from the Lebanese border to beyond Tel Aviv, up to 160 km deep.

It said its fighters conducted about 49 operations a day, adding: “The hands of these fighters will remain on the trigger, on guard against the enemy’s treachery and any violation of its commitments.”

Hezbollah lawmakers on Friday accompanied displaced residents returning to their towns and villages in the south, Bekaa Valley, and Beirut’s southern suburbs.

Hezbollah lawmaker Hassan Fadlallah said the group would accept no surrender or submission.

“This issue is settled for us. If the Americans want to give the Israeli enemy freedom of movement, and if some Lebanese officials submit and make concessions, that will have no application on the ground,” he said, warning that the ceasefire “must not become a tool for the enemy to blackmail the authorities.”

He added: “The Lebanese authorities must withdraw from direct negotiations that will only lead to submission to Israeli dictates. This threatens Lebanon’s future and fate.”

People check destruction behind posters of Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem (bottom) and a killed Hezbollah member in Beirut's southern suburbs after a 10-day ceasefire with Israel came into effect on April 17, 2026. (AFP)

‘A major defeat’

While Hezbollah and its supporters frame the outcome as a victory, security and defense analyst Riad Kahwaji told Asharq al Awsat the battlefield suggests otherwise.

“When the war began, the Israelis were in five points, while Hezbollah fighters were active along axes such as Naqoura, Kfar Kila, and Aita al-Shaab. Today, Israeli forces are deeper inside Lebanese territory,” he said.

“Israeli control has reached 10 km, compared with around 2 or 3 km before. Hezbollah lost territory, was forced to retreat, its death toll is in the hundreds, its number of captives has risen, and the scale of destruction in the south, the southern suburbs and the Bekaa is many times greater,” Kahwaji added.

He said tens of thousands have been displaced after their homes were destroyed. “This is defeat, in every sense of the word.”

Kahwaji said that even if Israeli soldiers were killed, their numbers were not comparable to Hezbollah’s losses, and that the scale of damage in Lebanon versus Israel underscored the imbalance.

“Hezbollah considers its survival and ability to fire rockets a victory, even though it has again shown it acts as an Iranian tool and entered the war in support of Iran,” he stressed.

Ready for another round

Political writer Qassem Kassir, who is closely familiar with Hezbollah’s position, offered a sharply different view, saying the group had emerged stronger than after the 2024 war.

“If we do not say it won, what is certain is that Israel failed to achieve its military and security goals. Tel Aviv was unable to target Hezbollah’s leadership. Although some commanders were killed, the number is very small compared with the previous war,” he said.

Kassir said Hezbollah had “managed the battle with precision and success” and was preparing for a possible new confrontation, unless comprehensive solutions are reached, including a full Israeli withdrawal, the return of captives, an end to attacks and launch of reconstruction.


Secret Israeli Ministerial Talks under US Pressure Discuss Vision of ‘New Gaza’

A satellite image of Gaza port. (Reuters  file)
A satellite image of Gaza port. (Reuters file)
TT

Secret Israeli Ministerial Talks under US Pressure Discuss Vision of ‘New Gaza’

A satellite image of Gaza port. (Reuters  file)
A satellite image of Gaza port. (Reuters file)

Israeli media sources said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered two secret meetings of senior officials across several ministries, under US pressure, to discuss the future of Gaza, including a possible commercial port and reconstruction plans.

Observers linked the meetings to a military escalation in which Israeli forces struck multiple areas on the margins of operations in Lebanon, in what they said was meant to divert attention from the talks, opposed by far-right ministers.

Israel’s Channel 12 reported on Thursday that a meeting this week was chaired by acting director general of the prime minister’s office, Drorit Steinmetz, with participation from the finance ministry, the National Security Council, the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories, and the energy, transport and environmental protection ministries.

Citing five unnamed sources, the channel said the meeting followed US pressure and requests from American officials at the Civil-Military Coordination Center (CMCC) in Kiryat Gat. It said this was the second government meeting on the issue held in complete secrecy.

Talks focused on managing US forces inside Gaza, as well as control of border crossings and the near-term flow of goods.

Ministries were asked to present positions on establishing a civilian port in Gaza. Israel’s vision was also reviewed alongside proposals from the CMCC, involving foreign representatives and aid groups.

These proposals fall under what US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner have called a “new Gaza,” including high-rise buildings, industrial zones, desalination plants, a gas platform, and an airport, the report said.

Representatives from the electricity and water authorities and the transport ministry were asked to provide professional assessments.

The report said Israel’s leadership had issued clear guidance that no reconstruction would move forward unless Gaza is fully demilitarized and the Palestinian Hamas group is disarmed. Israel also said it would not fund any reconstruction.

Despite official statements, Channel 12 said Israel appears to be compelled to engage with external initiatives that contradict its stated position.

Netanyahu’s office said policy remains unchanged, no reconstruction before Hamas is disarmed and Gaza fully demilitarized, a condition it has not been met despite commitments to the US administration and mediators.

It added that professional-level discussions are not meant to advance reconstruction, but to assess international proposals and prevent the establishment of a status quo on the ground that could harm Israel’s interests.