Western Advice Urges Lebanon, Iraq to Shift from Factions to State

Funeral of Hezbollah chief of staff Haitham Tabtabai and others killed in an Israeli strike in Beirut’s southern suburbs (AFP)
Funeral of Hezbollah chief of staff Haitham Tabtabai and others killed in an Israeli strike in Beirut’s southern suburbs (AFP)
TT

Western Advice Urges Lebanon, Iraq to Shift from Factions to State

Funeral of Hezbollah chief of staff Haitham Tabtabai and others killed in an Israeli strike in Beirut’s southern suburbs (AFP)
Funeral of Hezbollah chief of staff Haitham Tabtabai and others killed in an Israeli strike in Beirut’s southern suburbs (AFP)

A senior Western diplomat in Beirut urged regional states to recognize the gravity of the moment the Middle East is navigating in order to prevent the continuation of the wars that erupted after the October 7 attacks in Gaza.

The diplomat, who is closely involved in Western contacts with Lebanon, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the region should “take advantage of President Donald Trump’s desire to play the role of peacemaker, even if moving forward with the American proposals appears difficult at times.”

The envoy pointed to what they described as “the disastrous outcome of allowing armed factions to control the decisions of capitals.”

He listed them as follows:

Hamas acted alone in launching the Al-Aqsa Flood operation, and the outcome was catastrophic, not only for Gaza but also for the West Bank, which is facing constant Israeli attempts to undermine its stability.

Hezbollah in Lebanon acted unilaterally and joined the flood. The result is what we see today.

Israel has seized positions inside Lebanon and has effectively established a security belt inside Lebanese territory, something it would not have been able to do if decisions were in the hands of the country’s legitimate authorities.

The Bashar al-Assad government paid the price for allowing Iran backed factions to operate on its soil, and the result was its collapse.

Syria’s new president, Ahmed al Sharaa, has learned the lesson that the world has grown weary of the era of factions and wants to deal only with states capable of making their decisions within their institutions.

The diplomat said the coming weeks “could be decisive for Lebanon,” noting that “the world’s ability to spare Lebanon a new Israeli attack depends on the ability of the Lebanese authorities to prove they are the sole decision maker in matters of war and peace, without any faction holding decision making power or veto power.”

They expressed hope that “the moderate current within Lebanon’s Shia community will prevail so that Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri can play a rescue role for his community and for Lebanon as a whole.”

They warned that “keeping the Lebanese state without a clear and firm decision regarding the monopoly of weapons could expose Lebanon to serious dangers.”

They noted that “the shift from the era of factions to the era of states is a task facing not only Lebanon but also Baghdad, especially given the continuing deep rift between Iran and the West.”

They said Tehran “must conclude that a new phase has begun in the region, one defined by states rather than factions, and that clinging to the old policy will only lead to more confrontations that Iran itself will not be spared.”

Iraq, which is now seeking a new government, “needs to thoroughly examine the shifts that have taken place in the region and absorb what happened in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria. Syria is without the Assad government, Lebanese Hezbollah is without Hassan Nasrallah, and Iran itself has lost many of its generals and scientists after already losing Qassem Soleimani,” the commander of the Quds Force, the external operations arm of the Revolutionary Guard.

The diplomat said that in the coming phase Iraq must “prioritize state logic over factional logic and adopt rational choices in both domestic and foreign relations.”

They said that strengthening moderation and state institutions within the Coordination Framework would spare Iraq crises it does not need, especially if predictions prove true that the region is moving toward a new military round between Israel and Iran, one the Trump administration will find difficult to stay out of.

They added that “Iraq would be fortunate if the government formation process results in sending a message to the world that Iraq will focus on rebuilding itself and will not be drawn into bloc politics or confrontational rhetoric regionally or internationally.”

They called on political leaders in Baghdad and Beirut to “look to the experience of President al-Sharaa, who managed quickly to bring his country out of isolation after realizing that Syria had no path except the path of the state, even though he himself came from the world of factions.”



Will Lebanon Be the Biggest Loser After the Ceasefire?

Smoke rises after an Iranian missile is intercepted over the Sahel Alma area in Mount Lebanon. (Reuters)
Smoke rises after an Iranian missile is intercepted over the Sahel Alma area in Mount Lebanon. (Reuters)
TT

Will Lebanon Be the Biggest Loser After the Ceasefire?

Smoke rises after an Iranian missile is intercepted over the Sahel Alma area in Mount Lebanon. (Reuters)
Smoke rises after an Iranian missile is intercepted over the Sahel Alma area in Mount Lebanon. (Reuters)

Political sources in Beirut warned Lebanon could emerge as the biggest loser when the current regional war ends, outlining their concerns to Asharq Al-Awsat.

Lebanon is heading toward a severe internal crisis, the sharpest in its modern history with the dispute centering on Hezbollah’s weapons.

The majority of Shiites in the country insists on keeping them, while most other segments say Lebanon’s survival depends on implementing government decisions to limit arms to the state, in line with Lebanese, Arab, and international positions.

The sources noted that Hezbollah has again entered a regional war it cannot influence, risking burdens Lebanon cannot bear.

Hefty price

The war is proving costly for those involved and for countries hit by its spillover.

A ceasefire would likely show Iran suffered heavy damage to its defense, industrial sectors, and infrastructure, potentially setting it back decades. But its size, energy resources, and experience with economic hardship may help it manage the aftermath, unless losses destabilize the system.

Iranian missiles are expected to have caused damage to Israeli institutions and infrastructure, despite a high interception rate. The cost of interception is steep, but Israel appears ready to absorb it, calling the conflict an existential war and relying on strong US support.

Lebanon will struggle the most. Its economy is already near collapse. The country faces a catastrophic situation, with about one million displaced and heavy destruction along the border with Israel.

Israel has said it intends to establish a “buffer zone” inside Lebanese territory, signaling a return of occupation to parts of the country “pending guarantees for the safety of Galilee residents.”

The most dangerous scenario is that Israel’s campaign on the Lebanese front continues even if a ceasefire is reached between the US and Israel on one side and Iran on the other.

The fallout is worsened by a deepening rift among Lebanon’s components, raising the risk of internal conflict.

The role of parliament Speaker Nabih Berri appears diminished as the conflict widens. The current crisis over the expulsion of the Iranian ambassador reflects a deeper divide between the Shiite camp and others over weapons, the war, and Lebanon’s regional role.

Hezbollah described the expulsion as a “sin”, demanding that the government reverse it.

‘Impossible to coexist’

Voices are rising in Lebanon, warning that it was “impossible to coexist” between a “quasi-state” and a “Hezbollah’s statelet.”

Countries that once backed Lebanon’s reconstruction, especially in the Gulf, are now focused on their own losses from Iranian attacks. They have also made clear that they will not help unless the Lebanese state takes full control over decisions of war and peace.

The sources reiterated their warning that Lebanon risks being the biggest loser, especially if Israel expands its ground offensive and internal divisions deepen to the point of questioning the country’s very formula of coexistence.


Netanyahu Says Israel Is Expanding ‘Buffer Zone’ in Lebanon

Smoke billows from an Israeli strike on Marjeyoun in southern Lebanon on Wednesday. (AFP)
Smoke billows from an Israeli strike on Marjeyoun in southern Lebanon on Wednesday. (AFP)
TT

Netanyahu Says Israel Is Expanding ‘Buffer Zone’ in Lebanon

Smoke billows from an Israeli strike on Marjeyoun in southern Lebanon on Wednesday. (AFP)
Smoke billows from an Israeli strike on Marjeyoun in southern Lebanon on Wednesday. (AFP)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Wednesday that his country's forces were expanding a "buffer zone" in southern Lebanon as the military pressed ahead with its campaign against Hezbollah.

"We have created a genuine security zone preventing any infiltration toward the Galilee and the northern border," Netanyahu said in a video statement.

"We are expanding this zone to push the threat from anti-tank missiles further away and to establish a broader buffer zone."

Netanyahu said that dismantling Hezbollah "remains central" to Israel's objectives in Lebanon.

"It is connected to the broader confrontation with Iran," he said.

"We are determined to profoundly transform the situation in Lebanon," he added.

Lebanon was pulled into the Middle East war when Iran-backed Hezbollah began firing rockets into Israel on March 2 to avenge the killing of Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei.


Strike on Western Iraq Kills Seven Security Personnel

Members of Iraq's PMF carry the coffin of the PMF operations commander for Al-Anbar, Saad Dawai alongside others during a mass funeral in Baghdad on March 24, 2026. (AFP)
Members of Iraq's PMF carry the coffin of the PMF operations commander for Al-Anbar, Saad Dawai alongside others during a mass funeral in Baghdad on March 24, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Strike on Western Iraq Kills Seven Security Personnel

Members of Iraq's PMF carry the coffin of the PMF operations commander for Al-Anbar, Saad Dawai alongside others during a mass funeral in Baghdad on March 24, 2026. (AFP)
Members of Iraq's PMF carry the coffin of the PMF operations commander for Al-Anbar, Saad Dawai alongside others during a mass funeral in Baghdad on March 24, 2026. (AFP)

A strike on a base in western Iraq killed seven security personnel, the defense ministry said Wednesday, a day after an attack on the same base targeted the Popular Mobilization Forces.

"This resulted in the death of seven of our heroic fighters and the injury of 13 others," the ministry said of the strike in Anbar province, saying it specifically targeted the base's military healthcare clinic.

Rescue operations were ongoing, it added.

The base hosts Iraqi police, soldiers from the regular army and PMF, a security official told AFP.

It was hit by a deadly strike on Tuesday that the former paramilitaries blamed on the United States.

Iraq said late on Tuesday it would summon the US charge d'affaires and the Iranian ambassador after deadly strikes blamed on their countries, as Iraqi authorities granted the targeted groups the "right to respond".

Iraq has been pulled into the war sparked by US and Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28, and which has since engulfed much of the region.

Iraq has long been a proxy battleground for the United States and Iran, and has struggled to balance diplomatic ties with both countries.

Since the war began, pro-Iran armed groups have claimed responsibility for attacks on US interests in Iraq and across the region, while strikes have also targeted these groups, including state-linked positions.

In the statement from the prime minister's office, however, Iraq granted former paramilitaries within the official armed forces the right to "respond to military attacks" by drones and aircraft that targeted their headquarters.