One Year On, Deterrence Offensive Set Assad’s Rule on Path to Collapse

Citizens stand atop an overturned statue of late Syrian president Hafez al Assad in Damascus on December 8, 2024 (AFP)
Citizens stand atop an overturned statue of late Syrian president Hafez al Assad in Damascus on December 8, 2024 (AFP)
TT

One Year On, Deterrence Offensive Set Assad’s Rule on Path to Collapse

Citizens stand atop an overturned statue of late Syrian president Hafez al Assad in Damascus on December 8, 2024 (AFP)
Citizens stand atop an overturned statue of late Syrian president Hafez al Assad in Damascus on December 8, 2024 (AFP)

With the dawn of November 27, 2024, Syria and its people were confronted with the opposition’s “Deterrence of Aggression” offensive, the first spark of a military and political shift that ended an era of repression, injustice, killing and torture.

The campaign returned the initiative to Syrians and opened the door to a new beginning they had long hoped for since their uprising began in March 2011.

The “Deterrence of Aggression” operation, launched by armed opposition factions operating under the Military Operations Administration led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, began in western rural Aleppo.

It came in response to heavy artillery bombardment by the former regime’s army and its allies on opposition areas in Idlib, a strike that killed dozens of civilians.

During the first two days, the offensive drew attention as opposition forces seized most of western rural Aleppo, numerous villages in the southern countryside of the city and parts of eastern Idlib countryside.

Their advance culminated in the full recapture of Aleppo amid a continuous collapse of president Bashar al-Assad’s forces and widespread defections in their ranks.

Assurances from “Deterrence of Aggression” forces that residents of all backgrounds would be protected in their homes and livelihoods helped dispel fears that the former regime had long cultivated.

Most Syrians welcomed the advance with widespread elation.

The rapid shift in control in just two days, an unprecedented scene since the start of the Syrian uprising, left Syrians at home and abroad closely watching the course of the battle.

Twelve days after the operation began, it resulted in the fall of the Assad government.

At the outset, Syrians were struck by how quickly regime forces crumbled, despite being backed by dozens of Iran-linked militias, including Lebanon’s Hezbollah, as well as Russian forces.

Ministry of Defense

Brig. Gen. Hassan Abdel-Ghani of the Syrian Arab Army said in remarks carried by the Syrian Arab News Agency that the “Deterrence of Aggression” campaign “freed the Syrian people from the system of injustice and terrorism”

He said “the Syrian Arab Army today protects every inch of the homeland,” urging Syrians to rally around it and work to rebuild the country.

Abdel-Ghani added: “People of free Syria, our noble families, in these days, after the triumphs, victories and achievements our beloved country has witnessed in all fields, and as we closely follow what is unfolding on all fronts, the Ministry of Defense declares with unwavering will and unbreakable resolve the passing of one year since the launch of the ‘Deterrence of Aggression’ operation.”

“Twelve months have passed since we repelled the system of injustice and terrorism and freed our people from death, bombardment and suffering, and the displaced have returned to their homes after the end of darkness.”

The decisive moment in the operation

Syrian military and strategic expert Ismat al-Absi said the launch of the “Deterrence of Aggression” operation marked a military and political turning point that ended the era of repression and returned the initiative to the Syrian people.

“In just twelve days, the frontlines moved from the liberation of Aleppo to the heart of Damascus, and the regime’s defenses collapsed despite Syrian and Russian airstrikes attempting to slow the advance,” he said.

Al-Absi told Asharq Al-Awsat that the timing of the offensive came shortly after a ceasefire between Israeli forces and Hezbollah in Lebanon went into effect.

“This reduced pressure on the northern front and created an operational opening for rapid progress. The planning and command were local, under a new structure known as the Military Operations Administration led by Hayat Tahrir al Sham, with factions from the National Front and the Syrian National Army operating in coordination across multiple axes.”

The operational expectation for the first day, he said, was to break the initial defensive lines and sever key supply routes within 24 hours, which would trigger a rapid collapse of the regime’s defensive structure around Aleppo.

He noted “broad popular support from the first hours, with a priority placed on protecting civilians and opening the way for displaced families to return, which boosted morale and facilitated the initial breakthroughs. Aleppo became the clearest sign that the initiative had returned to Syrians, serving as a logistical base for the continued advance south.”

Al-Absi estimated that the force that launched the “Deterrence of Aggression” offensive numbered between 18,000 and 25,000 fighters across western rural Aleppo and eastern Idlib.

They were deployed in assault groups, engineering units, reconnaissance teams and drone operators, with Red Band units operating behind enemy lines. A reserve force of eight to twelve thousand fighters was positioned for reinforcement and consolidation.

He estimated the number of Iran-backed militia fighters and allied groups present in Aleppo at the outset of the offensive at between 15,000 and 25,000.

They operated in defensive and fire support formations and included a mix of ideological groups and local loyalist units, with engineering teams and artillery and short-range missile crews, reflecting the presence of “dozens of sectarian militias” on the battlefield.

The decisive moment on the first day of the battle, according to al-Absi, was “the breaching of initial defensive lines and the rapid capture of key sites such as Regiment 46 and Sheikh Aqil, alongside simultaneous advances toward southern rural Aleppo and eastern Idlib. This severed the Damascus Aleppo highway and disrupted redeployment. Behind enemy lines, Red Band shock units carried out operations after six weeks of reconnaissance, mine clearing and opening the major breach that enabled armored vehicles and forward units to push through.”

He said the first day ended with “a new and unprecedented map of control since 2011 that cemented the course of the regime’s subsequent collapse.”

Weapons and decisive impact

Al-Absi said that the use of Shaheen drones to paralyze movement and establish tactical control of the air with precise fire direction and support “significantly hindered the regime’s ability to maneuver around Aleppo.”

“Engineering units cleared mines and opened routes while specialized night combat units provided tactical superiority in the early decisive hours,” he revealed.

He said the regime’s response consisted of intense Syrian Russian airstrikes and attempts to provide air cover to slow the advance, “but these efforts failed to regain the initiative amid severed routes, collapsing defenses and rapid changes in the map of control.”

“The regime sought Russian cover and deterrence signals, yet the pace of events exposed its inability to absorb the shock, ending with its fall within twelve days,” affirmed al-Absi.



EU Urged to 'Act Now' on West Bank Settlement Project

The Palestinian village of Turmus Ayya (foreground) and the Israeli settlement of Shilo (background), north of Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, are pictured on May 6, 2026. (Photo by Zain JAAFAR / AFP)
The Palestinian village of Turmus Ayya (foreground) and the Israeli settlement of Shilo (background), north of Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, are pictured on May 6, 2026. (Photo by Zain JAAFAR / AFP)
TT

EU Urged to 'Act Now' on West Bank Settlement Project

The Palestinian village of Turmus Ayya (foreground) and the Israeli settlement of Shilo (background), north of Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, are pictured on May 6, 2026. (Photo by Zain JAAFAR / AFP)
The Palestinian village of Turmus Ayya (foreground) and the Israeli settlement of Shilo (background), north of Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, are pictured on May 6, 2026. (Photo by Zain JAAFAR / AFP)

More than 400 former diplomats, ministers, and senior officials on Wednesday urged the European Union to "act now" against Israel's "illegal" settlements in the occupied West Bank.

The open letter comes as Israel intends to move forward with E1, a new construction project covering around 12 square kilometers (4.6 square miles) with some 3,400 housing units in the occupied West Bank.

The move would further separate east Jerusalem, occupied and annexed by Israel and predominantly inhabited by Palestinians, from the West Bank.

"The EU and its member states, together with partners, must take immediate action to deter Israel from further advancing its illegal annexation of Palestinian land in the West Bank," said the letter signed by more than 440 figures, including former EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell and former Belgian prime minister Guy Verhofstadt.

The signatories called for targeted sanctions, such as visa bans and business restrictions, on "all those engaged in illegal settlement activity", calling for measures against those promoting or implementing the E1 scheme.

The Israeli government plans to publish an initial tender on June 1 for the construction of housing for up to 15,000 "illegal settlers", AFP quoted the letter as saying, urging the EU and its member states to "act now".

The plan has been condemned by international leaders, with UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres's spokesman saying it would pose an "existential threat" to a contiguous Palestinian state.

Excluding east Jerusalem, more than 500,000 Israelis live in the occupied West Bank in settlements that are illegal under international law, among some three million Palestinians.

In 2025, the expansion of Israeli settlements reached its highest level since at least 2017, when the United Nations began tracking data, according to a UN report.

There has been a spike in deadly attacks by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank since the start of the Iran war on February 28, Palestinian officials and the United Nations have said.

Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967.


Israel Army Says Striking Hezbollah Targets across Lebanon

An Israeli soldier gestures next to a tank, on the Israeli side of the border with Lebanon, May 3, 2026. REUTERS/Shir Torem
An Israeli soldier gestures next to a tank, on the Israeli side of the border with Lebanon, May 3, 2026. REUTERS/Shir Torem
TT

Israel Army Says Striking Hezbollah Targets across Lebanon

An Israeli soldier gestures next to a tank, on the Israeli side of the border with Lebanon, May 3, 2026. REUTERS/Shir Torem
An Israeli soldier gestures next to a tank, on the Israeli side of the border with Lebanon, May 3, 2026. REUTERS/Shir Torem

Israel's army said Wednesday it had begun striking Hezbollah infrastructure in several areas of Lebanon, despite a truce with the neighboring country intended to halt fighting with the Iran-backed militant group. 

"The IDF has begun striking Hezbollah terror infrastructure sites in several areas in Lebanon," a military statement said. 

It came shortly after the army reported "several incidents" during which drones exploded near Israeli soldiers operating in Lebanon's south.  

Lebanon's health ministry said an Israeli strike in Lebanon's eastern Bekaa valley killed four people, with local media reporting the attack took place before the Israeli army issued a warning to evacuate the area along with 11 other towns. 

"An Israeli enemy raid on the town of Zellaya in West Bekaa resulted in four martyrs, including two women and an elderly man," the ministry said. 

Lebanese state media said the attack struck the house of the town's mayor, killing him and three members of his family. 

 


US Wants 'Concrete Actions' on Iran from Next Iraqi PM

Members of Iraq's pro-Iran paramilitary group Kataeb Hezbollah mourn a comrade who was killed in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. AHMAD AL-RUBAYE / AFP/File
Members of Iraq's pro-Iran paramilitary group Kataeb Hezbollah mourn a comrade who was killed in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. AHMAD AL-RUBAYE / AFP/File
TT

US Wants 'Concrete Actions' on Iran from Next Iraqi PM

Members of Iraq's pro-Iran paramilitary group Kataeb Hezbollah mourn a comrade who was killed in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. AHMAD AL-RUBAYE / AFP/File
Members of Iraq's pro-Iran paramilitary group Kataeb Hezbollah mourn a comrade who was killed in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. AHMAD AL-RUBAYE / AFP/File

The United States is looking for "concrete actions" by Iraq's next prime minister to distance the state from pro-Iran armed groups before resuming financial shipments and security aid, a senior official said Tuesday.

Iraq's ruling coalition has put forward Ali al-Zaidi as the next leader and he quickly received a congratulatory call from President Donald Trump, who had threatened to end all US support if former frontrunner Nouri al-Maliki took office.

But a senior US State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Zaidi must address the "blurry line" between pro-Iran armed groups in the Shia-majority country and the state, AFP said.

Washington suspended cash payments for oil revenue, which have been handled from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in an arrangement dating to the aftermath of the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, as well as security assistance over a spate of attacks on US interests.

Resuming full support "would start with expelling terrorist militias from any state institution, cutting off their support from the Iraqi budget (and) denying salary payments to these militia fighters," the official said.

"Those are the type of concrete actions that would give us confidence and say that there's a new mindset."

The official said US facilities in Iraq suffered more than 600 attacks after February 28, when the United States and Israel launched their war on Iran.

The attacks have come to a standstill since a shaky April 8 ceasefire between the United States and Iran, with the exception of Iranian strikes in Iraqi Kurdistan.

"I'm not underestimating the severity of the challenge or what it would take to disentangle these relationships. It could start with a clear and unambiguous statement of policy that the terrorist militias are not part of the Iraqi state," the official said.

"Certain elements of the Iraqi state have continued to provide political, financial and operational cover for these very terrorist militias," he added.

The United States piled pressure on Iraq after it appeared that Maliki would be the next prime minister. During his previous stint in office, relations deteriorated with Washington over accusations of being too close to Iran's Shia clerical government and fanning sectarian flames.

Attacks by armed groups in Iraq have struck the US embassy in Baghdad, its diplomatic and logistics facility at the capital's airport and oil fields operated by foreign companies.