Sources to Asharq Al-Awsat: Hamas to Discuss Weapons Issue With Mediators in Coming Days

A Palestinian child picks flowers on Thursday from a field near destroyed buildings in the Nuseirat refugee camp, north of Deir al-Balah in central Gaza (AFP)
A Palestinian child picks flowers on Thursday from a field near destroyed buildings in the Nuseirat refugee camp, north of Deir al-Balah in central Gaza (AFP)
TT

Sources to Asharq Al-Awsat: Hamas to Discuss Weapons Issue With Mediators in Coming Days

A Palestinian child picks flowers on Thursday from a field near destroyed buildings in the Nuseirat refugee camp, north of Deir al-Balah in central Gaza (AFP)
A Palestinian child picks flowers on Thursday from a field near destroyed buildings in the Nuseirat refugee camp, north of Deir al-Balah in central Gaza (AFP)

As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu intensifies pressure to disarm Hamas and other armed factions as part of the second phase of a ceasefire, the Palestinian movement is pushing back, saying the issue of weapons must be resolved through a broader “national consensus.”

Factional sources in Gaza told Asharq Al-Awsat that “general consultations” are underway with Hamas on the weapons issue alongside other matters.

One source said more serious talks with mediators are likely to begin in the coming days, particularly as preparations to hand over governmental responsibilities in the enclave to the Gaza Administration Committee begin.

Netanyahu said at a news conference on Tuesday that the disarmament process will happen either the easy way or the hard way, but it will happen in the end.

US President Donald Trump has also said Hamas must disarm as it had pledged to do, while his envoy to the United Nations, Mike Waltz, said the Board of Peace would put pressure on the movement to disarm.

Senior Hamas officials insist the weapons file is a purely Palestinian matter that does not concern the movement alone, and that any decision must be taken within a framework of “national consensus.”

No agreement yet

A Hamas source told Asharq Al-Awsat that the issue of the “weapons of resistance” remains at the stage of general consultations, whether among factions or with mediators.

The source said Hamas has again floated ideas and approaches, including placing the weapons under the custodianship of an agreed Palestinian body, or under guarantees from mediators, in a way that would prevent their disarmament by US or Israeli means or their transfer to either side.

The sources stressed that no agreement has been reached to date and that the issue has not yet been seriously discussed.

Israeli Channel 13 reported on Monday that the United States is expected in the coming days to present Israel and Hamas with a document setting a deadline to begin disarmament and comply with the conditions of the second phase.

The report said the document would allow the Israeli government to act independently to carry out the process if the Palestinian movement failed to comply.

Israeli military sources, cited by the public broadcaster on Sunday, expressed doubt that Hamas would accept disarmament. Channel 14 reported that a series of military plans had been approved to force Hamas to do so, including the possibility of reoccupying the Gaza Strip in full.

US envoy Steve Witkoff said days ago that a new meeting with Hamas might be needed if required, adding that he expected the movement to agree to disarm eventually.

Inclusive national framework

Hamas sources inside and outside Gaza said the movement wants any agreement on weapons to be reached within a comprehensive, inclusive national framework. They said consultations have taken place with Palestinian factions and that a proposal is being formulated to present to mediators during serious talks on the issue.

Sources said some mediators raised the issue of weapons during recent meetings, including a meeting in Istanbul days ago between Hamas leaders and Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan.

One source said mediators and some parties, which he did not specify, had shown acceptance of approaches put forward during the general consultations that affirm the right of Palestinian factions to retain what enables them to resist occupation.

On Hamas’s understanding of “national consensus,” sources, including a senior leader, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the weapons do not belong to Hamas alone, noting that other armed factions have taken part effectively in resisting the Israeli occupation.

“We cannot alone decide the fate of an important issue tied to the principles and future of the Palestinian cause,” one of the Hamas sources said.

While Hamas appears keen to avoid being seen as standing alone behind a decision to hand over or dismantle faction weapons in a way that would portray it as defeated, the sources rejected that interpretation.

They said several issues must be settled within a framework of Palestinian national consensus, as was done in the handover of governance in Gaza to a technocratic committee.

They added that a national committee of Gaza factions would work with the committee to ensure it receives all the tools needed for government work, to reach an inclusive national formulation on this “fateful issue.”

The sources said national consensus is not limited to weapons but extends to other “existential issues.”

What role for Fatah

Asked whether Fatah would take part in new factional consultations on the weapons issue, a senior Hamas source said: “Certainly, we are seeking that. But we do not know whether it will refuse, as it did in consultations on forming the technocratic committee, or agree. In any case, Hamas has no problem with decisions being taken in the same way.”

He said the goal of factional consultations due to be held soon in Cairo is to reach an explicit agreement on the fate of the weapons of resistance, without any unilateral decision by Hamas or any other faction on this and other critical issues related to the future of Gaza and the Palestinian cause.

These include moving toward a comprehensive Palestinian national dialogue to restore unity under Arab, Islamic, and international sponsorship.

Israeli and US threats

It remains unclear how Israel and the US will respond to Hamas’s steps, as Israel threatens a return to military action. Some Palestinians believe the Trump administration may be open to other options regarding the future of the weapons.

Trump said about Hamas members, roughly two weeks ago, that they were born with weapons in their hands, so giving them up is not a simple matter.

US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz said on Wednesday that all military, terrorist, and offensive infrastructure will be destroyed, including tunnels and weapons production facilities, and they will not be rebuilt.

He added that independent international monitors would oversee the disarmament process in Gaza, placing weapons permanently out of use through an agreed process to decommission them, supported by an internationally funded buyback and reintegration program.

Mousa Abu Marzook, a member of Hamas’s political bureau, said in televised remarks that any arrangements concerning Gaza must be reached in understanding with the movement, including the weapons issue. He said Hamas has never accepted handing over its weapons in any form.



EU Urged to 'Act Now' on West Bank Settlement Project

The Palestinian village of Turmus Ayya (foreground) and the Israeli settlement of Shilo (background), north of Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, are pictured on May 6, 2026. (Photo by Zain JAAFAR / AFP)
The Palestinian village of Turmus Ayya (foreground) and the Israeli settlement of Shilo (background), north of Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, are pictured on May 6, 2026. (Photo by Zain JAAFAR / AFP)
TT

EU Urged to 'Act Now' on West Bank Settlement Project

The Palestinian village of Turmus Ayya (foreground) and the Israeli settlement of Shilo (background), north of Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, are pictured on May 6, 2026. (Photo by Zain JAAFAR / AFP)
The Palestinian village of Turmus Ayya (foreground) and the Israeli settlement of Shilo (background), north of Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, are pictured on May 6, 2026. (Photo by Zain JAAFAR / AFP)

More than 400 former diplomats, ministers, and senior officials on Wednesday urged the European Union to "act now" against Israel's "illegal" settlements in the occupied West Bank.

The open letter comes as Israel intends to move forward with E1, a new construction project covering around 12 square kilometers (4.6 square miles) with some 3,400 housing units in the occupied West Bank.

The move would further separate east Jerusalem, occupied and annexed by Israel and predominantly inhabited by Palestinians, from the West Bank.

"The EU and its member states, together with partners, must take immediate action to deter Israel from further advancing its illegal annexation of Palestinian land in the West Bank," said the letter signed by more than 440 figures, including former EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell and former Belgian prime minister Guy Verhofstadt.

The signatories called for targeted sanctions, such as visa bans and business restrictions, on "all those engaged in illegal settlement activity", calling for measures against those promoting or implementing the E1 scheme.

The Israeli government plans to publish an initial tender on June 1 for the construction of housing for up to 15,000 "illegal settlers", AFP quoted the letter as saying, urging the EU and its member states to "act now".

The plan has been condemned by international leaders, with UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres's spokesman saying it would pose an "existential threat" to a contiguous Palestinian state.

Excluding east Jerusalem, more than 500,000 Israelis live in the occupied West Bank in settlements that are illegal under international law, among some three million Palestinians.

In 2025, the expansion of Israeli settlements reached its highest level since at least 2017, when the United Nations began tracking data, according to a UN report.

There has been a spike in deadly attacks by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank since the start of the Iran war on February 28, Palestinian officials and the United Nations have said.

Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967.


Israel Army Says Striking Hezbollah Targets across Lebanon

An Israeli soldier gestures next to a tank, on the Israeli side of the border with Lebanon, May 3, 2026. REUTERS/Shir Torem
An Israeli soldier gestures next to a tank, on the Israeli side of the border with Lebanon, May 3, 2026. REUTERS/Shir Torem
TT

Israel Army Says Striking Hezbollah Targets across Lebanon

An Israeli soldier gestures next to a tank, on the Israeli side of the border with Lebanon, May 3, 2026. REUTERS/Shir Torem
An Israeli soldier gestures next to a tank, on the Israeli side of the border with Lebanon, May 3, 2026. REUTERS/Shir Torem

Israel's army said Wednesday it had begun striking Hezbollah infrastructure in several areas of Lebanon, despite a truce with the neighboring country intended to halt fighting with the Iran-backed militant group. 

"The IDF has begun striking Hezbollah terror infrastructure sites in several areas in Lebanon," a military statement said. 

It came shortly after the army reported "several incidents" during which drones exploded near Israeli soldiers operating in Lebanon's south.  

Lebanon's health ministry said an Israeli strike in Lebanon's eastern Bekaa valley killed four people, with local media reporting the attack took place before the Israeli army issued a warning to evacuate the area along with 11 other towns. 

"An Israeli enemy raid on the town of Zellaya in West Bekaa resulted in four martyrs, including two women and an elderly man," the ministry said. 

Lebanese state media said the attack struck the house of the town's mayor, killing him and three members of his family. 

 


US Wants 'Concrete Actions' on Iran from Next Iraqi PM

Members of Iraq's pro-Iran paramilitary group Kataeb Hezbollah mourn a comrade who was killed in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. AHMAD AL-RUBAYE / AFP/File
Members of Iraq's pro-Iran paramilitary group Kataeb Hezbollah mourn a comrade who was killed in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. AHMAD AL-RUBAYE / AFP/File
TT

US Wants 'Concrete Actions' on Iran from Next Iraqi PM

Members of Iraq's pro-Iran paramilitary group Kataeb Hezbollah mourn a comrade who was killed in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. AHMAD AL-RUBAYE / AFP/File
Members of Iraq's pro-Iran paramilitary group Kataeb Hezbollah mourn a comrade who was killed in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. AHMAD AL-RUBAYE / AFP/File

The United States is looking for "concrete actions" by Iraq's next prime minister to distance the state from pro-Iran armed groups before resuming financial shipments and security aid, a senior official said Tuesday.

Iraq's ruling coalition has put forward Ali al-Zaidi as the next leader and he quickly received a congratulatory call from President Donald Trump, who had threatened to end all US support if former frontrunner Nouri al-Maliki took office.

But a senior US State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Zaidi must address the "blurry line" between pro-Iran armed groups in the Shia-majority country and the state, AFP said.

Washington suspended cash payments for oil revenue, which have been handled from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in an arrangement dating to the aftermath of the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, as well as security assistance over a spate of attacks on US interests.

Resuming full support "would start with expelling terrorist militias from any state institution, cutting off their support from the Iraqi budget (and) denying salary payments to these militia fighters," the official said.

"Those are the type of concrete actions that would give us confidence and say that there's a new mindset."

The official said US facilities in Iraq suffered more than 600 attacks after February 28, when the United States and Israel launched their war on Iran.

The attacks have come to a standstill since a shaky April 8 ceasefire between the United States and Iran, with the exception of Iranian strikes in Iraqi Kurdistan.

"I'm not underestimating the severity of the challenge or what it would take to disentangle these relationships. It could start with a clear and unambiguous statement of policy that the terrorist militias are not part of the Iraqi state," the official said.

"Certain elements of the Iraqi state have continued to provide political, financial and operational cover for these very terrorist militias," he added.

The United States piled pressure on Iraq after it appeared that Maliki would be the next prime minister. During his previous stint in office, relations deteriorated with Washington over accusations of being too close to Iran's Shia clerical government and fanning sectarian flames.

Attacks by armed groups in Iraq have struck the US embassy in Baghdad, its diplomatic and logistics facility at the capital's airport and oil fields operated by foreign companies.