Protests in Syria’s Jazira Region Over Deteriorating Living Conditions

Residents protest on the Hol-Hasakah road (Hasakah Observatory)
Residents protest on the Hol-Hasakah road (Hasakah Observatory)
TT

Protests in Syria’s Jazira Region Over Deteriorating Living Conditions

Residents protest on the Hol-Hasakah road (Hasakah Observatory)
Residents protest on the Hol-Hasakah road (Hasakah Observatory)

Protesters in the al-Hol area east of Hasakah province blocked the main route used by fuel tankers heading into other parts of Syria, demonstrating against worsening living conditions.

The move came amid calls for demonstrations in Hasakah, Qamishli, al-Shaddadi, al-Yarubiyah, Ras al-Ain, Tell Hamis, and Tell Brak — areas collectively known as Syria’s Jazira region — and opposition to the implementation of integration measures perceived as favoring the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) at the expense of other local communities.

Economic hardship has deepened in eastern Syria at a time when residents had hoped for relief following the January 29 agreement between the Syrian government and the SDF, which provides for the integration of the Autonomous Administration’s institutions into the structures of the Syrian state.

Although economic pressures are affecting all parts of Syria, they may be particularly severe in the country’s eastern region, especially in the aftermath of the Euphrates flooding disaster. Researcher Abdul Wahab Assi said that continued economic strain could prompt residents to reassess the government-SDF integration process, which they see as moving too slowly.

In his view, some residents may attribute part of the deterioration in living conditions to the broader instability resulting from the sluggish pace of integration — not because the process itself has directly caused services to decline, but because ongoing administrative and political uncertainty affects essential sectors such as bread supplies, fuel, electricity, employment opportunities, and development, particularly in agriculture.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Assi added that the integration process may also have generated genuine concerns among segments of the population about the possible implementation of economic policies, whether related to customs duties, taxes, crop procurement, or agricultural support, that fail to take into account the region’s unique circumstances and already fragile economy. “Any such decision would have a direct impact on people’s livelihoods,” he stated.

Assi further noted that there is little evidence to suggest that all residents of eastern Syria view accelerated integration as an automatic solution to economic and development challenges. Rather, some groups remain wary that integration could lead to policies, which do not reflect the region’s specific needs.

On Sunday, residents of Umm Hujayrah, a town in the al-Hol countryside east of Hasakah, staged a protest during which they blocked several roads and prevented a convoy of fuel tankers from traveling into other parts of the country. Video footage circulated by local media showed the demonstration. According to the Hasakah Media Center, protesters called for improved public services, the delivery of basic necessities, and relief from mounting economic pressures.

Reports from Syria’s Jazira region indicate that a combination of factors has contributed to worsening living conditions, amid a widespread perception among many Arab residents that the integration process is being carried out primarily in the interests of the SDF rather than other communities.

Journalist Khalil Hussein, a native of the Jazira region, said this perception has been reinforced by rising prices resulting from newly imposed customs duties - previously minimal in the area - as well as higher fuel costs.

He argued that SDF-controlled areas have been less affected because oil fields in Hasakah remain under SDF control and much of the oil is directed to predominantly Kurdish areas. Oil leaving Qamishli, for example, is sent to Ain al-Arab (Kobani) rather than to places such as al-Shaddadi, raising questions about the benefits of integration.

Hussein told Asharq Al-Awsat that residents of these areas are no longer primarily concerned with who controls or administers their territories. Instead, their main concern is improving what he described as their harsh living conditions.

Meanwhile, activists in the Jazira region called for demonstrations across predominantly Arab areas in opposition to the integration process.

“What is taking place before our eyes today is not the integration of these militias into state institutions. Rather, it is the government itself being absorbed into their structure and an explicit handover of control over our lives to those who displaced us and killed our sons,” Activist Suhaib al-Yaarubi wrote on social media.

At the same time, residents of the southern countryside of al-Yarubiyah appealed to the Syrian government to intervene and secure drinking water supplies amid severe shortages and the failure of water tankers to reach areas that lack wells and water networks.

Local sources said that water shortages in rural Hasakah worsen during the summer as temperatures rise. Higher fuel prices have also driven up the cost of tanker-delivered drinking water.

Residents of southern and eastern rural Hasakah complain that their areas have been neglected.

According to journalist Khalil Hussein, years of SDF control have brought no significant development projects to these districts, while services such as hospitals, schools, and universities have been set up in cities including Hasakah and Qamishli.

He criticized the SDF’s treatment of predominantly Arab rural areas of Hasakah, saying they have been viewed largely as “a commercial market for the distribution of goods.”



Iraq Condemns Attacks on Saudi Arabia, Rejects Use of Its Territory to Target the Kingdom

Prince Faisal bin Farhan and Dr. Fuad Hussein (Saudi Foreign Ministry)
Prince Faisal bin Farhan and Dr. Fuad Hussein (Saudi Foreign Ministry)
TT

Iraq Condemns Attacks on Saudi Arabia, Rejects Use of Its Territory to Target the Kingdom

Prince Faisal bin Farhan and Dr. Fuad Hussein (Saudi Foreign Ministry)
Prince Faisal bin Farhan and Dr. Fuad Hussein (Saudi Foreign Ministry)

Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein condemned the recent terrorist attacks targeting areas of Saudi Arabia, reaffirming his government's rejection of attacks on civilians and civilian facilities and its refusal to allow Iraqi territory to be used as a launching point for any attacks or activities threatening the security of the Kingdom or other countries in the region.

His remarks came during a telephone call Thursday with Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan, during which the two ministers reviewed bilateral relations and ways to strengthen cooperation across various fields to advance mutual interests and enhance coordination in addressing current regional challenges.

The call also addressed the recent terrorist attacks targeting areas of Saudi Arabia.

Hussein reiterated the Iraqi government's condemnation of the attacks and its rejection of any actions that could endanger civilians or civilian infrastructure.

He stressed Iraq's firm opposition to the use of its territory for hostile acts targeting Saudi Arabia or undermining the Kingdom's security and stability.

For his part, Prince Faisal bin Farhan reaffirmed Saudi Arabia's support for the Iraqi government's efforts to reduce tensions and promote dialogue and cooperation with neighboring countries, contributing to greater security and stability across the region.


Sources Reveal to Asharq Al-Awsat Details of Fatah-Hamas Talks in Cairo

 A Palestinian boy throws stones at Israeli troops during an Israeli army raid at Balata refugee camp near the West Bank city of Nablus, 21 October 2026.   EPA/ALAA BADARNEH
A Palestinian boy throws stones at Israeli troops during an Israeli army raid at Balata refugee camp near the West Bank city of Nablus, 21 October 2026. EPA/ALAA BADARNEH
TT

Sources Reveal to Asharq Al-Awsat Details of Fatah-Hamas Talks in Cairo

 A Palestinian boy throws stones at Israeli troops during an Israeli army raid at Balata refugee camp near the West Bank city of Nablus, 21 October 2026.   EPA/ALAA BADARNEH
A Palestinian boy throws stones at Israeli troops during an Israeli army raid at Balata refugee camp near the West Bank city of Nablus, 21 October 2026. EPA/ALAA BADARNEH

 

Several Palestinian sources have revealed details of meetings held in Cairo days ago between a senior Fatah delegation and leaders and representatives of Palestinian factions, particularly Hamas. The discussions ended with an agreement to resume talks in the near future.

Two sources, one from Hamas and another from a different Palestinian faction, separately told Asharq Al-Awsat that the meetings would resume after the Israeli Knesset elections scheduled for next Tuesday, with the aim of reaching an agreement.

The Hamas source said two meetings had been held between the movement's delegation, which included Zaher Jabarin, head of its political bureau in the West Bank, and political bureau members Ghazi Hamad and Hussam Badran, and a Fatah delegation led by Jibril Rajoub and including Mohammad Shtayyeh.

The source noted that the first meeting was attended by Maj. Gen. Ahmed Abdel Khalek, the Egyptian intelligence official responsible for Palestinian affairs.

While the Hamas source described the first meeting as positive, a Fatah source and two representatives of other Palestinian factions who had been briefed on its outcome offered a different assessment.

They said the meeting had produced no meaningful understandings or concrete basis for further progress, with one source describing its results as particularly poor.

Nevertheless, they acknowledged that the atmosphere had been constructive, with both sides showing a willingness to listen to each other's demands.

All four sources said the Hamas delegation had raised several issues during the first meeting, including restructuring the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), the Supreme Court, employment, the future of employees in Gaza, passports and objections to the Palestinian Authority security services' treatment of Hamas members in the West Bank.

Hamas emphasized the need to resolve these issues as essential steps toward ending the Palestinian political division.

However, discussions focused primarily on the PLO and the need to address broader questions concerning the Palestinian national project and its future.

The second meeting, which most sources described as more significant and serious, saw the Fatah delegation present a document from Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas containing several demands that Hamas would be required to accept.

Asharq Al-Awsat revealed the contents of the document late last month.

The demands included ending the consequences of the Hamas takeover of Gaza and committing to a single governing system, one law and one legitimate armed force.

They also called for recognition of the PLO and its political program as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, adherence to peaceful popular resistance, and commitment to a political settlement based on the two-state solution in accordance with international resolutions.

The document further stipulated the formation of a technocratic government by decision of President Abbas, with authority over the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip.

It also required that responsibility for negotiations toward a comprehensive peace agreement remain exclusively with the PLO.

 

Hamas Reservations

 

According to a Hamas source and another Palestinian faction representative, the Hamas delegation raised reservations about three provisions in Abbas's document.

The sources said Hamas had no objection to recognizing the PLO and its political program but would not recognize the organization's commitments, particularly those concerning recognition of Israel, security coordination with Israeli authorities and other political arrangements governing Palestinian relations with Israel.

A second point of disagreement concerned Hamas's acceptance of a Palestinian state along the June 4, 1967, borders while refusing to recognize Israel as a second state without a clear process and concrete steps toward implementing a two-state solution.

The third issue concerned restricting resistance exclusively to peaceful methods.

The Hamas delegation requested alternative wording that would not rule out other forms of resistance.

According to the same sources, these issues remained unresolved.

The Fatah delegation informed Hamas representatives that it would refer the disputed provisions for internal discussions within the movement and consultations with President Abbas, who appeared determined to secure Hamas's acceptance of the document in its entirety.

 

Meetings with Other Palestinian Factions

 

The Fatah and Hamas delegations also met representatives of other Palestinian factions, including Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and the Fatah Democratic Reform Current led by Mohammed Dahlan, a former Fatah leader who broke away from the movement.

The meetings addressed many of the same issues, although discussions between Fatah and Dahlan's faction focused primarily on internal reconciliation.

Dahlan's representatives presented demands calling for the reinstatement of all members expelled from Fatah, the restoration of salaries to those whose payments had been suspended, and the reintegration of all members into the movement's governing bodies, including the Central Committee and Revolutionary Council.

Rajoub confirmed that these demands would be conveyed to President Abbas.

The Fatah delegation also met the leadership of Islamic Jihad in discussions that sources from both movements described as highly positive.

A Fatah source said Islamic Jihad had affirmed its commitment to any agreement reached through national consensus.

The group also requested a change to the wording concerning resistance, objecting to restricting it exclusively to peaceful popular resistance.

Four sources from Hamas and other Palestinian factions revealed that Egyptian officials had made clear that it was not Cairo's responsibility to convene a Palestinian national dialogue.

They said the decision to call such a dialogue must come from President Abbas, although Egypt remained fully prepared to host it.

According to the sources, Egyptian officials stressed to all the factions that bilateral meetings should pave the way for agreement on the outstanding issues before a comprehensive national dialogue is convened.

Cairo emphasized the importance of avoiding another failed reconciliation effort, insisting that broad agreement on the key issues should be reached before launching formal national talks.

The Egyptian side also pointed out that such a dialogue would attract close attention not only from Palestinians but also from Arab and Islamic countries, European governments and the United States.

A successful dialogue could help open the way for an internationally supported political process that would shape the options available to Palestinians and determine the future direction of their national cause.

 


Jordan, Egypt Condemn Attack on King Fahd International Airport in Saudi Arabia

King Fahd International Airport in Dammam (SPA)
King Fahd International Airport in Dammam (SPA)
TT

Jordan, Egypt Condemn Attack on King Fahd International Airport in Saudi Arabia

King Fahd International Airport in Dammam (SPA)
King Fahd International Airport in Dammam (SPA)

The Jordanian government condemned the terrorist attack carried out by the Houthi militia against King Fahd International Airport in Dammam, which resulted in the death of two individuals and injuries to others.

In a statement, the Jordanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed Jordan’s condemnation and denunciation of the attacks on the airport, civilians and civilian and economic assets in Saudi Arabia, describing these acts as a flagrant violation of international law and a brutal assault on the Kingdom’s sovereignty, security, stability, and the safety of its citizens and residents.

The ministry further affirmed Jordan’s absolute solidarity with the Kingdom, expressing its full support for all measures taken by Saudi Arabia to protect its security, stability, national assets, and the safety of its citizens and residents.

It extended its sincere condolences and sympathy to the families of the victims and wished a speedy recovery to those injured.

Earlier, Egypt also condemned the attack, describing it as a violation of international law and condemning the indiscriminate targeting of air traffic, civilian infrastructure and people.

In a statement issued by the Foreign Ministry, Egypt categorically rejected such acts, warning that they risked exacerbating the crisis, heightening tensions and undermining regional stability.

Egypt reaffirmed its full solidarity with Saudi Arabia and its leadership, and its support for the kingdom’s efforts to defend its territory and citizens. It stressed that Saudi Arabia’s security is an integral part of Arab and Egyptian national security.