Government Delay Revives Specter of ‘Two Administrations’ in Iraq’s Kurdistan Region

A photo published by the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan website showing Bafel Talabani meeting Masrour Barzani. 
A photo published by the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan website showing Bafel Talabani meeting Masrour Barzani. 
TT

Government Delay Revives Specter of ‘Two Administrations’ in Iraq’s Kurdistan Region

A photo published by the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan website showing Bafel Talabani meeting Masrour Barzani. 
A photo published by the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan website showing Bafel Talabani meeting Masrour Barzani. 

Nearly two years after elections for Iraq’s Kurdistan Region parliament, the winning Kurdish parties have yet to convene the legislature, elect a speaker, or form a new government. Had that process moved forward, it would have produced a fully empowered cabinet to replace Prime Minister Masrour Barzani’s administration, which has been serving in a caretaker capacity since before the October 2024 regional elections.

In May 2023, Iraq’s Federal Supreme Court, which rules on constitutional disputes, declared the extension of the Kurdistan parliament unconstitutional and ruled that Barzani’s cabinet should be considered a caretaker government.

With the political stalemate showing no sign of easing, a senior figure in the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) warned that the region could drift toward “two officially separate administrations.”

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat on condition of anonymity, the official said Kurdistan already operates under a dual administrative system in practice, but warned that the arrangement could become formal if Kurdish parties remain unable to agree on a new government.

The Kurdistan Region effectively had two separate administrations from the mid-1990s until 2006, following armed conflict between the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the PUK. The KDP governed from Erbil and Duhok, while the PUK administered Sulaymaniyah, with separate governments, security forces, and financial institutions.

The split officially ended in 2006 with the formation of a unified Kurdistan Regional Government after years of political negotiations following the 1998 Washington Agreement, although both parties retained strong influence in their traditional strongholds.

The PUK official blamed the KDP for delaying government formation, saying it “wants everything” and is unwilling to relinquish key government positions to other parties. The two dominant Kurdish parties have repeatedly traded blame for the prolonged political paralysis.

A senior KDP official previously told Asharq Al-Awsat that continued failure to form a government could ultimately force the region to hold fresh elections.

According to politicians and activists, the rival bloc — which includes the PUK and the New Generation Movement — is demanding the premiership and an equal share of senior government positions.

The PUK official acknowledged that a return to separate administrations would undermine the region’s future but said the party remains prepared to make concessions to preserve Kurdistan’s unity. He also pointed to a recent meeting between PUK leader Bafel Talabani and the party’s parliamentary bloc, during which Talabani stressed that the PUK is not obstructing the formation of a new cabinet and supports accelerating the process.

However, comments from other senior PUK figures have raised concerns. Yousif Goran, a member of the party’s political bureau and head of its research center, wrote on the party’s official website that the long-term viability of the Kurdistan Region “in its current form” is increasingly in doubt because of internal political dysfunction and shifting regional and international dynamics.

He added that the region has not experienced such deep political polarization since the administrations were unified in 2006 and argued that meaningful political change is now essential. He also warned that Iraqi Kurdistan no longer enjoys the level of international backing it received after 1991, when it effectively separated from Baghdad’s control.

Meanwhile, Kifah Mahmoud, media adviser to KDP leader Masoud Barzani, dismissed talk of separate administrations as “political suicide” that would endanger the region’s highest interests. He described such proposals as part of broader efforts to undermine the Kurdistan Region and its federal model, insisting that parliament is the proper forum for resolving political disputes.

Mahmoud also said early elections remain one option for breaking the deadlock, while arguing that the PUK’s alliance with the New Generation Movement should have been formed before, rather than after, the regional elections.

 

 

 

 

 



Violent Pilot Altercation Forces Diversion of UAE Plane en Route to Israel

A Flydubai aircraft (archive - Asharq Al-Awsat)
A Flydubai aircraft (archive - Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Violent Pilot Altercation Forces Diversion of UAE Plane en Route to Israel

A Flydubai aircraft (archive - Asharq Al-Awsat)
A Flydubai aircraft (archive - Asharq Al-Awsat)

A violent altercation between two pilots forced a flight traveling between the United Arab Emirates and Israel to divert on Wednesday. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office denied reports that the aircraft had been hijacked, according to Reuters.

Netanyahu stressed that the situation was "under control" and that all necessary measures are being taken to ensure the safe return of the Israeli passengers.

Flydubai said Flight FZ1073 experienced an incident while airborne and landed safely in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, with all passengers unharmed.

CNN, citing sources, reported that a violent clash between the pilots led to the transmission of emergency signals. An Israeli official told Reuters that the pilots sent distress codes after becoming involved in a physical confrontation, though it remained unclear whether either pilot intentionally activated the alerts.

Israeli media reported that the aircraft, carrying about 150 passengers, briefly transmitted emergency codes, raising concerns that it may have been hijacked and prompting Israel to scramble two fighter jets to escort the plane.

According to the Ynet news website, the emergency signal was transmitted while the aircraft was descending under manual control and turning back in the opposite direction.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz held urgent security consultations following the incident.

The flight departed Dubai at 7:05 a.m. local time and was scheduled to land at Ben Gurion Airport near Tel Aviv at about 9:30 a.m.

Roughly 90 minutes into the flight, as the aircraft entered Jordanian airspace, it transmitted Code 7700, the international signal for a general emergency. It later sent Code 7500, used to indicate unlawful interference with an aircraft, including a possible hijacking.

Israeli Air Force fighter jets were scrambled to escort the plane while authorities worked to determine the cause of the emergency alerts.


Iraqi Factions Threaten to ‘Bring Down Government’ Over Iran Flight Ban

An Iraqi man walks past a sign posted along a street in Baghdad on Sept. 29, 2026, as the international coalition’s mission against ISIS comes to an end. (AFP) 
An Iraqi man walks past a sign posted along a street in Baghdad on Sept. 29, 2026, as the international coalition’s mission against ISIS comes to an end. (AFP) 
TT

Iraqi Factions Threaten to ‘Bring Down Government’ Over Iran Flight Ban

An Iraqi man walks past a sign posted along a street in Baghdad on Sept. 29, 2026, as the international coalition’s mission against ISIS comes to an end. (AFP) 
An Iraqi man walks past a sign posted along a street in Baghdad on Sept. 29, 2026, as the international coalition’s mission against ISIS comes to an end. (AFP) 

Baghdad has so far maintained its position of barring Iranian airlines from landing at Iraqi airports in compliance with US Treasury sanctions, but Tehran-allied groups are pushing to bring down the government and close Iraq’s land crossings with neighboring countries.

The Iraqi government has also revived the issue of Tehran’s refusal to grant Iraq an exemption allowing its oil exports to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, seeking to counter escalating campaigns and threats by Iran-aligned militias against Prime Minister Ali Falih al-Zaidi and their continued pressure to allow Iranian aircraft to land at Iraqi airports, according to sources.

US authorities have issued limited exemptions for Iraqi Airways flights between Iran and Najaf airport only, while the Transport Ministry announced that flights would operate from the Iraqi side.

Ban and International Companies

Although the government has attributed the ban on Iranian flights to international regulations and systems, a former Transport Ministry official told Asharq Al-Awsat that the government could adapt those regulations to allow Iranian aircraft to land because Iraq has sovereignty over its airspace.

“The government is relying on international aviation regulations to put forward its position of complying with the US sanctions decision,” the official said.

Government spokesman Haider al-Aboudi stressed that “the government did not decide to ban Iranian aviation,” noting that airports operate within an international system similar to the oil sector and are bound by global requirements.

He explained that the international system includes companies providing services such as ground handling, monitoring and insurance, as well as ensuring the safety of airspace and passengers.

Companies operating at Baghdad and Basra airports have a presence at no fewer than 200 airports worldwide, maintain financial accounts and conduct transactions in dollars, prompting them to stop providing services to Iranian companies to avoid US sanctions, al-Aboudi added.

Kataib Hezbollah Threats

Despite the official explanations, armed factions have continued threatening the government since Iranian flights to Iraqi airports were suspended.

Hundreds of faction supporters demonstrated outside Najaf airport on Monday, denouncing the ban and demanding that it be lifted.

Kataib Hezbollah has emerged as one of the most hard-line factions on the issue. Its security official, Abu Mujahid al-Assaf, threatened to bring down Zaidi’s government unless the restrictions on Iranian flights were lifted.

“Zaidi and those behind him should know that a government that does not work in the interests of the people will be brought down by all means,” al-Assaf said in a statement.

He warned that if the air restrictions on Iran remained in place after Oct. 1, Iraqis could take a position “that may extend to closing the border crossings of countries participating in the blockade of the Iranian people.”

Firas Elias, a political science professor at the University of Mosul, said the pressure was “not only about aviation and restricting weapons to state control, but about preserving Tehran’s influence and its Iraqi cards at a sensitive moment in negotiations with Washington.”

US Treasury Exemption

Amid escalating Iranian pressure on Baghdad, the US Treasury Department on Tuesday issued a special license allowing Iraqi Airways to conduct transactions normally required to operate passenger services between Iraq and Iran through Najaf airport, subject to specific conditions and restrictions.

The license expires upon completion of the authorized transactions or on Oct. 28, 2026, while the Treasury Department retains the right to revoke or modify it at any time.

Its scope is narrow: flights must depart exclusively from Najaf International Airport and return there, and may carry only Iranian passengers traveling for religious tourism.

It also prohibits bulk cash transfers, shipments intended for Iranian intelligence, military or law enforcement agencies, and sanctioned individuals, including Iranian government officials and members of Iran-aligned militias.

Government-linked sources had previously indicated that Zaidi’s government asked Washington for an exemption to resume some flights between Iraq and Iran, particularly those carrying patients, students and religious pilgrims.

Following the US exemption, Iraq’s Transport Ministry announced that Iraqi Airways had secured authorization to operate flights to Iran, paving the way for their resumption in October. Flights will operate from the Iraqi side and through Najaf only, while the ban on Iranian airlines remains in place.

 

 

 


Gen-Gvir Threatens to Burn Sinwar’s Body, Blames Netanyahu for Oct. 7 Attack

Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir attend a Sukkot gathering and political rally held outside Kibbutz Nir Am, near the separation fence with the Gaza Strip (AFP) 
Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir attend a Sukkot gathering and political rally held outside Kibbutz Nir Am, near the separation fence with the Gaza Strip (AFP) 
TT

Gen-Gvir Threatens to Burn Sinwar’s Body, Blames Netanyahu for Oct. 7 Attack

Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir attend a Sukkot gathering and political rally held outside Kibbutz Nir Am, near the separation fence with the Gaza Strip (AFP) 
Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir attend a Sukkot gathering and political rally held outside Kibbutz Nir Am, near the separation fence with the Gaza Strip (AFP) 

Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir on Tuesday blamed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the failure of the October 7, 2023 attack, also accusing former Israeli Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi and former Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar of misleading the PM and failing to provide him with sufficient intelligence regarding Hamas’ intentions.

In an interview with Israel’s public radio, Ben-Gvir reiterated his demand to receive the defense portfolio following Israel’s upcoming election.

“After I get the defense portfolio, I will make sure to burn Sinwar’s body and the bodies of the October 7th terrorists. As Defense Minister, I will lead a significant change in approach,” he said.

Ben-Gvir said of Netanyahu: “I also have criticisms of him, which is why I am in the Jewish Power party and not Likud.”

He said, “Before October, I presented a different vision for Gaza, but it was met with contempt by senior officials. They belittled me as national security minister, while Netanyahu also dismissed me, saying that security professionals believed nothing would happen from Gaza. That was just one week before October 7.”

Ben-Gvir also responded to accusations that Netanyahu had facilitated the transfer of millions of dollars to the Gaza Strip, saying the decision had not been made within the government or the security cabinet.

Had he been in office at the time, he said, he would have “turned the table” and rejected such a decision.

The minister noted that he previously resigned from the government after objecting to some of its decisions. “In the end, it turned out I was right about everything I said. No one believed me, and no one listened to me.”

On September 22, Ben-Gvir said he will seek the post of defense minister in the next government, as the country prepares for next month's elections.

“The reason I am putting myself forward is that the time has come to change the mindset within the army,” Ben Gvir said, at a press conference in Jerusalem.

The minister put forward a “security plan” that includes the “encouragement of voluntary emigration” of Palestinians from both Gaza and the occupied West Bank.

On Tuesday, Ben-Gvir threatened to make sure the body of former Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, who was killed by Israeli forces in October 2024, would be burned.

Sinwar, who headed Hamas in Gaza during the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack and later became chairman of the group’s political bureau, was killed by Israeli forces in Rafah in October 2024.