China's Xi Arrives in Egypt

Chinese President Xi Jinping, with his wife First Lady Peng Liyuan, is welcomed by Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and his wife First Lady Entissar Amer upon their arrival at Cairo International Airport for an official visit to Egypt, which is his first state visit to the country in 10 years, in Cairo on September 1, 2026. (AFP)
Chinese President Xi Jinping, with his wife First Lady Peng Liyuan, is welcomed by Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and his wife First Lady Entissar Amer upon their arrival at Cairo International Airport for an official visit to Egypt, which is his first state visit to the country in 10 years, in Cairo on September 1, 2026. (AFP)
TT

China's Xi Arrives in Egypt

Chinese President Xi Jinping, with his wife First Lady Peng Liyuan, is welcomed by Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and his wife First Lady Entissar Amer upon their arrival at Cairo International Airport for an official visit to Egypt, which is his first state visit to the country in 10 years, in Cairo on September 1, 2026. (AFP)
Chinese President Xi Jinping, with his wife First Lady Peng Liyuan, is welcomed by Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and his wife First Lady Entissar Amer upon their arrival at Cairo International Airport for an official visit to Egypt, which is his first state visit to the country in 10 years, in Cairo on September 1, 2026. (AFP)

Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived in Egypt on Tuesday on a rare trip to the Middle East amid the regional conflict with Iran.

Xi and his wife were greeted on the tarmac by Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and the first lady, as well as a performance by an Egyptian folk dance troupe.

The two-day visit comes as both countries seek to manage the fallout of the months-long Middle East war, which began when the United States and Israel launched strikes against Iran on February 28, throwing the crucial trade region into crisis.

Washington vowed last month to destabilize Iran economically, warning of expanded sanctions against Tehran's backers and partners that could hit Chinese banks, among others.

Xi's visit "comes at a time when China's economic interests are directly exposed to the US-Iran war", said Gamal Salama, political science professor at Egypt's Suez University.

China, a major buyer of Iranian oil, has presented itself as a neutral party in the Middle East conflict, repeatedly calling for a lasting ceasefire.

Egypt, a long-time recipient of US military aid, warned against regional escalation after a drone strike hit one of its ports in July.

China is "clearly seeking Egypt's cooperation in managing and shaping regional affairs", said Liu Jia, a research fellow at the Singapore-based Middle East Institute.

Beijing works closely with regional actors such as Egypt, which mediates between Israel and Palestinian groups, Liu added.

Both China and Egypt support an independent Palestinian state as part of a two-state solution.

"China sees Cairo as a strategic power broker," said Salama.

Egypt's "relations with both Washington and regional actors give Beijing both political access and diplomatic leverage across a region where China wants a much greater say," he added.

China's President Xi Jinping walks with his Egyptian counterpart Abdel Fattah al-Sisi followed by their wives Peng Liyuan and Entissar Amer upon their arrival at the Cairo International Airport, Egypt, September 1, 2026. (Reuters)

- 'Renewing the friendship' -

As part of its economic pressure campaign targeting Iran, Washington last week said it would cut off the operations of Egypt's Banque Misr in the UAE from the US financial system.

China, in response to the US measures and threats, has vowed to safeguard its interests.

Beijing has also sought to shore up ties with US-friendly regional nations ahead of a meeting between Xi and US President Donald Trump expected this month.

The Chinese and Egyptian militaries carried out joint air combat exercises in August that featured Beijing's powerful J-16 fighter jet.

Xi's meeting with his Egyptian counterpart Sisi, scheduled for Wednesday, follows a visit to Beijing by Jordan's King Abdullah II, whose country has also been caught up in the US war with Iran.

Xi and Sisi are expected to discuss issues including the Gaza war, Iran, and shipping in the Red Sea and the Strait of Hormuz, according to Egyptian media.

"I look forward to renewing the friendship and working together with President Sisi to... map out a new blueprint for deepening the China-Egypt comprehensive strategic partnership," Xi wrote in an editorial published in Egyptian media on Tuesday.

The Chinese leader's first visit to Egypt in a decade comes as the two nations mark 70 years of diplomatic ties.

China is a major exporter to Egypt, with its trade surplus reaching $12 billion in the first seven months of 2026, according to Chinese customs data.

The leaders are expected to sign agreements on artificial intelligence, transport, energy and investment in the Suez Canal Economic Zone, Egyptian media reported.

The meeting with Xi sets Cairo up to land Chinese investments in its local AI and electronics industries, political scientist Salama said.

"What Egypt is seeking is strategic autonomy: not breaking with Washington, not aligning completely with Beijing, but creating enough room to pursue its own national interests," he added.



UK to Unveil ‘Comprehensive’ Response to Israeli West Bank Settlement Plans in Coming Weeks

The new Israeli settlement “Dotan Valley”, as seen from Arraba whilst Israeli bulldozers uproots olive trees from Palestinian farms in Araba village near the west bank city of Jenin, 01 September 2026. (EPA)
The new Israeli settlement “Dotan Valley”, as seen from Arraba whilst Israeli bulldozers uproots olive trees from Palestinian farms in Araba village near the west bank city of Jenin, 01 September 2026. (EPA)
TT

UK to Unveil ‘Comprehensive’ Response to Israeli West Bank Settlement Plans in Coming Weeks

The new Israeli settlement “Dotan Valley”, as seen from Arraba whilst Israeli bulldozers uproots olive trees from Palestinian farms in Araba village near the west bank city of Jenin, 01 September 2026. (EPA)
The new Israeli settlement “Dotan Valley”, as seen from Arraba whilst Israeli bulldozers uproots olive trees from Palestinian farms in Araba village near the west bank city of Jenin, 01 September 2026. (EPA)

Britain will set out a "comprehensive" package of measures on Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank in the coming weeks, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband said on ‌Tuesday.

Miliband told ‌lawmakers that Israel's ‌E1 ⁠settlement project would cut ⁠across land which the Palestinians seek for a state and "risks making a Palestinian state unviable".

"This government will not acquiesce ⁠in the destruction of the ‌two-state ‌solution," he said. "We will act ‌and I will set out ‌a comprehensive set of measures in the coming weeks."

Britain and other European nations ‌have criticized Israel's plans, while Prime Minister Andy ⁠Burnham ⁠said before taking office that he was "looking at measures to ban trade in goods with illegal settlements".

The Times reported on Monday that US President Donald Trump's administration is "closely" tracking any plans to introduce a trade ban.


More Than 10 EU Countries Eager to Contribute to Lebanon Mission, EU Foreign Policy Chief Says

(COMBO) This combination of handout satellite images taken by Planet Labs PBC shows views of the village of Yaroun in southern Lebanon close to the border with Israel on (top L to R followed by bottom L to R) October 5, 2024; January 10, 2025; January 30, 2025; and on May 2, 2026.  (Photo by 2026 Planet Labs PBC / AFP)
(COMBO) This combination of handout satellite images taken by Planet Labs PBC shows views of the village of Yaroun in southern Lebanon close to the border with Israel on (top L to R followed by bottom L to R) October 5, 2024; January 10, 2025; January 30, 2025; and on May 2, 2026. (Photo by 2026 Planet Labs PBC / AFP)
TT

More Than 10 EU Countries Eager to Contribute to Lebanon Mission, EU Foreign Policy Chief Says

(COMBO) This combination of handout satellite images taken by Planet Labs PBC shows views of the village of Yaroun in southern Lebanon close to the border with Israel on (top L to R followed by bottom L to R) October 5, 2024; January 10, 2025; January 30, 2025; and on May 2, 2026.  (Photo by 2026 Planet Labs PBC / AFP)
(COMBO) This combination of handout satellite images taken by Planet Labs PBC shows views of the village of Yaroun in southern Lebanon close to the border with Israel on (top L to R followed by bottom L to R) October 5, 2024; January 10, 2025; January 30, 2025; and on May 2, 2026. (Photo by 2026 Planet Labs PBC / AFP)

More than 10 European Union members are willing to contribute resources and people to a planned mission to advise and train Lebanon's armed forces, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Tuesday. 

The proposed mission stems from the EU studying ways to strengthen Lebanese forces to help free up the Lebanese army to focus on disarming the armed group Hezbollah. 

Western countries have long called for Lebanon to disarm the Iran-backed group, and doing ‌so is a ‌central component of a ceasefire between Lebanon ‌and ⁠Israel aimed at ⁠ending a war that has run in parallel with the US-Israeli war against Iran. 

The mandate of a UN force in Lebanon, UNIFIL, is set to expire at the end of 2026, and it is expected to begin a year-long drawdown and withdrawal. 

"The EU is not seeking ⁠to replace UNIFIL," Kallas told reporters in Ireland ‌following a gathering of ‌European defense ministers. 

"Our objective is to strengthen the Lebanese armed forces and ‌the ability of the Lebanese state to provide ‌security across its territory," she said, adding that planning is progressing well. 

An EU official told Reuters that the bloc's aim is to establish the mission in mid-October and then deploy personnel in late ‌2026 or early 2027. 

Kallas did not provide detail on which EU countries would ⁠be involved. 

France has ⁠been trying for several months to organize an international conference that would aim to strengthen the Lebanese armed forces, and also proposed creating an international force as part of efforts to replace UNIFIL. 

A senior Western diplomat told Reuters on Tuesday there was limited prospect for major decisions on Lebanon's future before Israel's election in late October. The diplomat also said there was little chance of progress without any clear strengthening of the Lebanese armed forces that would enable them to move into areas previously controlled by Hezbollah. 


Lebanese Presidents and Hezbollah: From Containment to Confrontation

FILED - 16 February 2026, Lebanon, Beirut: FILE PHOTO - Lebanese President Joseph Aoun speaks during a press conference. Photo: Markus Lenhardt/dpa
FILED - 16 February 2026, Lebanon, Beirut: FILE PHOTO - Lebanese President Joseph Aoun speaks during a press conference. Photo: Markus Lenhardt/dpa
TT

Lebanese Presidents and Hezbollah: From Containment to Confrontation

FILED - 16 February 2026, Lebanon, Beirut: FILE PHOTO - Lebanese President Joseph Aoun speaks during a press conference. Photo: Markus Lenhardt/dpa
FILED - 16 February 2026, Lebanon, Beirut: FILE PHOTO - Lebanese President Joseph Aoun speaks during a press conference. Photo: Markus Lenhardt/dpa

Over more than three decades, the approaches taken by Lebanon’s presidents toward Hezbollah and its weapons have shifted in response to changes in the domestic balance of power and regional and international circumstances. The decision to exempt Hezbollah’s weapons from disarmament on the grounds that they constituted “resistance” against the Israeli occupation in southern Lebanon was the first clear breach of the Taif Agreement, which called for the dissolution and disarmament of all militias that had fought during the civil war.

The presidency of the late Lebanese President Elias Hrawi was not in a position to treat Hezbollah on an equal footing with the militias that were dissolved and disarmed. Syrian tutelage, which controlled Lebanon’s political decision-making in coordination with the Iranian regime, had instructed that Hezbollah be elevated from a “militia” to a “resistance” force. This arrangement remained in place until Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon on May 25, 2000. Lebanon then entered a new phase in which Hezbollah remained a political and military actor whose capabilities surpassed those of the state institutions.

From “Militia” to “Resistance”

When Army Commander Emile Lahoud was elected president in October 1998 with the endorsement of the Syrian regime, Hezbollah’s influence within the state grew stronger, particularly after the Israeli withdrawal. The formula of “army, people and resistance” was subsequently entrenched in the ministerial statements of successive governments, particularly after Israel’s war on Lebanon in July 2006.

The same approach continued through most of Michel Suleiman’s presidency, as he dealt with Hezbollah as a resistance force despite major domestic and external changes, most notably the withdrawal of Syrian forces from Lebanon on April 25, 2005, under American pressure, and the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafic Hariri.

In his assessment of this trajectory, former MP Fares Saeed, head of the Saydet al-Jabal Gathering, argues that “the Israeli occupation of part of southern Lebanon and Syria’s control over the internal political game imposed a distinction between Hezbollah and the other Lebanese militias that existed during the civil war.” He says these circumstances “led to Hezbollah being elevated from the status of a militia to that of a resistance force, while the other militias were dissolved and disarmed.”

The Shift Following the Historic Bishops’ Call

Fares Saeed recalls the events of 2000, when Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon, coinciding with the death of Syrian President Hafez al-Assad in June of that year. He says these developments encouraged the Maronite Council of Bishops, headed by the late Maronite Patriarch Nasrallah Boutros Sfeir, to take a stronger position and call for the withdrawal of Syrian forces from Lebanon.

“This historic and courageous position was based on a clear logic,” Saeed says. “Since Israel had withdrawn from southern Lebanon, why should Syria not withdraw as well? There was no longer any reason for it to remain in Lebanon.”

The historic call marked a key moment in reopening the debate over the Syrian presence and the future of Lebanese political life. Along with other factors, it paved the way for the formation of the Qornet Shehwan Gathering, which played a prominent role in the political opposition to the Syrian presence.

Saeed says the Qornet Shehwan Gathering began at that stage by advising Hezbollah to join the call for the Syrian regime to withdraw from Lebanon. This came during Emile Lahoud’s presidency, when Lebanon was closely aligned with Syria and the Iranian axis. He considers that the political and security circumstances at the time did not allow the existing equation to be changed, and therefore Hezbollah’s weapons remained outside the substantive debate over the state’s exclusive control of arms.

The “Wooden Equation”

The presidential terms that followed the Taif Agreement, up until Lebanon was drawn into the war in support of Gaza, were not able to move beyond Hezbollah, even on the most sensitive domestic issues. Michel Suleiman himself was elected president as an initial outcome of the Doha Agreement, which followed Hezbollah’s takeover of Beirut on May 7, 2008.

Former MP Fares Saeed stresses that Suleiman’s arrival at Baabda Palace “did not lead to any fundamental change in the approach to Hezbollah’s weapons, as they continued to be treated as resistance.” He notes that Suleiman “did not engage in a direct confrontation with Hezbollah during most of his presidency, except in its final phase, when he described the ‘army, people and resistance’ formula as a ‘wooden equation.’” This, he says, represented a significant shift in the Lebanese debate over the legitimacy of Hezbollah’s weapons.

The Failed Bet on President Michel Aoun

When President Suleiman’s term ended on May 25, 2014, Lebanon entered a presidential vacuum after the Lebanese Parliament was effectively prevented from electing a successor under pressure from Hezbollah, which imposed the equation: “Either Michel Aoun is president, or there will be no president.”

Aoun was eventually elected on October 31, 2016, prompting Hezbollah to declare victory in the battle, viewing it as “the culmination of the victory of the Iranian axis in Syria and Iraq and the Houthi coup against the legitimate government in Yemen.”

Fares Saeed does not hide his view that “the bet by some on Michel Aoun’s ability to Lebanese Hezbollah failed miserably.” After his election, he says, Aoun secured gains in power, appointments, and deals with Hezbollah’s assistance, and “handed the country over to Hezbollah and Iran.”

President Joseph Aoun’s Positions: A Break With Previous Presidencies

The rhetoric of current President Joseph Aoun represents a break with all previous presidencies that had yielded to the will of Hezbollah and Iran. His speech two days ago marking the 81st anniversary of General Security was perhaps the strongest attack yet on Hezbollah.

“In addition to the conflict with Israel, we are living through an internal war with a faction that stands in opposition to the state and its institutions,” he said. “We tell them: whatever you do, we will continue for the sake of the nation.”

Assessing the speech, Fares Saeed, head of the Saydet al-Jabal Gathering, says the fundamental difference today “lies in the circumstances surrounding Joseph Aoun’s presidency.”

He stresses that “the boldness President Joseph Aoun is showing in addressing Hezbollah’s weapons stems, in part, from his knowledge of the nature of Hezbollah and its intentions toward the Lebanese state, as well as his awareness of its previous attempts to dominate the state’s decision-making.”

He also emphasizes “the importance of the major changes that have taken place, beginning with Hezbollah’s military defeat in its confrontation with Israel, followed by the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime and the collapse of a key part of the Iranian axis in the region.”