عربي English Türkçe اردو فارسى
Logo
Latest News
Business

Cost of Israeli War on Gaza Reaches $62 Billion

A soldier fixes the Israeli flag on a tank during a military maneuver near the border with Lebanon in northern Israel. (Reuters)
A soldier fixes the Israeli flag on a tank during a military maneuver near the border with Lebanon in northern Israel. (Reuters)
TT
TT

Cost of Israeli War on Gaza Reaches $62 Billion

A soldier fixes the Israeli flag on a tank during a military maneuver near the border with Lebanon in northern Israel. (Reuters)
A soldier fixes the Israeli flag on a tank during a military maneuver near the border with Lebanon in northern Israel. (Reuters)

Following the shock of war, the Israeli economy found itself at a crossroads, as it witnessed a clear slowdown in commercial, investment, and service activity.

These challenges did not only impact the economic situation, but posed social and political challenges that obstructed the path of continuous growth that had lasted for almost two years.

A report issued by Moody’s rating agency said that the ongoing war costs Israel $269 million daily. The report was based on a preliminary study that took into account the estimates of the Israeli Ministry of Finance. This means that the war has cost Israel $61.9 billion since its eruption around 230 days ago.

According to data from the Israeli Ministry of Finance, the fiscal deficit rose to 7 percent of GDP in 4 months of the current year, reaching $35.7 billion since April 2023, which is higher than the government’s estimate of 6.6 percent for the entire year of 2024.

It is also an unprecedented number since the global financial crisis in 2008, according to the Ministry of Finance, which indicated that the fiscal deficit in April amounted to $3.16 billion.

The war forced the government to increase defense spending significantly, which accounted for about two-thirds of total spending in four months. In contrast, revenues declined by 2.2 percent, due to a decrease in tax payments.

The government plans to raise about $60 billion in debt this year and increase taxes to meet its financial needs. The average monthly bond sales tripled after the outbreak of the war, according to Bloomberg estimates, which indicated that the government had collected about $55.4 billion since October, from domestic and foreign markets.

In light of the growing financial burdens resulting from the war, Israel was receiving blow after blow from international rating agencies, which of course affected its attempts to raise external financing. After Moody’s lowered its sovereign rating for Israel by one notch to A2, Standard & Poor’s joined in in April and lowered the rating from AA- to A+.

In light of the uncertainty about the extent of the impact of the ongoing war with Hamas, it is widely expected that the Bank of Israel will leave short-term interest rates unchanged during its meeting on Monday, for the third time in a row.

In January, the Monetary Policy Committee reduced the key interest rate by 25 basis points, which followed 10 consecutive increases in interest rates, in a strong tightening cycle from the lowest level ever at 0.1 percent in April 2022, before a temporary pause in July.

According to a Reuters poll, further cuts in interest rates during the rest of 2024 are at risk due to inflation pressures.

The annual inflation rate continued to rise in April to 2.8 percent, after falling to 2.5 percent in February.

In light of talk about a possible Israeli military rule in Gaza, Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper reported, citing an official document, that such strategy in Gaza would cost Tel Aviv no less than 20 billion shekels ($5.4 billion) annually. The newspaper reported that the Israeli security establishment prepared an analytical document to study the financial consequences of establishing a military government in the Gaza Strip.

The fate of the Israeli economy in the war period and beyond depends largely on several factors, including political and security stability, transformations in various economic sectors, and developments in regional conflicts. Despite the existing challenges, some expectations indicate that the Israeli economy will recover at a moderate pace, but this does not replace the need to better promote growth and stability, especially in light of the turbulent geopolitical conditions that the region is witnessing.

In an interview with the Jerusalem Post newspaper, the former governor of the Bank of Israel, Karnit Flug, said that the government response to the economic challenges resulting from the conflict between Israel and Hamas were not commensurate with the situation.

She explained the proposed measures (some of which were approved in the Knesset, while others were postponed or planned to be implemented in the future) are not sufficient to address the current challenges.

Most Viewed

 
 
Business

OECD Lifts 2026 Global Growth Forecast to 2.9% Despite Mideast War

OECD Lifts 2026 Global Growth Forecast to 2.9% Despite Mideast War
TT
TT

OECD Lifts 2026 Global Growth Forecast to 2.9% Despite Mideast War

OECD Lifts 2026 Global Growth Forecast to 2.9% Despite Mideast War

Economic growth has remained "resilient" in many countries despite the war in the Middle East, the OECD said Wednesday as it slightly raised its GDP forecasts for the year.

Global economic growth is now seen at 2.9 percent, a 0.1-point increase from estimates in June by the Paris-based group of 38 industrialized countries.

Even though energy prices have soared since the United States and Israel launched strikes against Iran last February, the OECD noted that "broader financial conditions remain supportive", as seen in rising equity markets and continued access to credit.

"Sizeable oil inventories, additional supply from outside the Gulf economies and discretionary government support measures all helped to cushion the impact on the global economy," the group said in its quarterly update.

It also cited the massive investments in artificial intelligence and the resulting boost to production and trade, which could result in "stronger growth than projected".

But global growth has slowed sharply from the 3.4 percent chalked up last year, and the group trimmed its 2027 growth forecast by 0.1 percentage point, to three percent.

Governments have started raising interest rates to contain inflation pressures stemming from high oil and gas prices, which have sent diesel and other fuel costs to highs not seen in years.

That has sent government bond yields to levels not seen since the global financial crisis of 2007-2008, pushing up borrowing costs even as countries worldwide grapple with high debt and deficits.

"Rising bond yields underline more than ever the need for enhanced efforts to contain and reallocate government spending, improve public-sector efficiency and strengthen revenues to ensure longer-term debt sustainability and maintain the ability of governments to react to significant shocks," the OECD said.

It also warned of prolonged inflation if the Mideast war continues, with price increases in the G20 group of developing and emerging economies seen at 4.1 percent overall this year.

"Other significant downside risks include potential weather-related supply shocks, including a very strong El Nino, that adversely impact agricultural production and add to rising food price pressures," AFP quoted it as saying.

For the United States, it expects GDP to expand 2.2 percent this year, up 0.2 points from its June forecast, while the eurozone could see growth of one percent, also up 0.2 points.

Japan's growth is now seen at 0.8 percent, up 0.2 points, while the forecast for the Chinese economy, the world's second largest, was held steady at 4.5 percent.

For the G20, the OECD sees growth of 3.1 percent.

Business

IMF: Egypt Absorbs Economic Shocks of War

A man walks past a traditional sidewalk kiosk in Cairo on September 18, 2026 (AFP)
A man walks past a traditional sidewalk kiosk in Cairo on September 18, 2026 (AFP)
TT
TT

IMF: Egypt Absorbs Economic Shocks of War

A man walks past a traditional sidewalk kiosk in Cairo on September 18, 2026 (AFP)
A man walks past a traditional sidewalk kiosk in Cairo on September 18, 2026 (AFP)

Egypt has weathered one of the region's largest recent economic shocks without a broader downturn, benefiting from improved international reserves, exchange rate flexibility, and a swift policy response.

However, the economy’s ability to remain resilient will continue to depend on addressing chronic weaknesses, including high public debt, large financing needs, the banking sector’s elevated exposure to the government, and the expanding role of the state in economic activity.

The findings were published in a country focus prepared by Amine Mati, IMF’s mission chief for Egypt, and Yevgeniya Korniyenko, a senior economist at the IMF’s Middle East and Central Asia Department.

Entitled ‘Resilience Under Pressure: Egypt's Economy Defied Expectations,’ the two economists found that policy reforms undertaken under the IMF-supported program had strengthened growth, put inflation on a downward path, and helped rebuild international reserves and improve banks’ foreign asset positions.

Also, the IMF’s latest assessments indicate that gross financing needs are expected to remain around 40% of GDP in the near term and decline only gradually to below 30% by 2030. More broadly, the state footprint in the economy remains excessively high.

Economy Absorbs Shocks

According to the IMF, Egypt entered the latest period of regional conflict in a stronger macroeconomic position than during previous episodes of external stress.

The Fund said policy reforms undertaken under its-supported program had strengthened growth, put inflation on a downward path, and helped rebuild international reserves and improve banks’ foreign asset positions.

Also, the Fund noted that financial markets reacted sharply.

“Nonresident holdings of local-currency government debt fell from $39.1 billion in February to $22.2 billion in early April, while the Egyptian pound depreciated by about 14–17%,” it wrote.

As pressures eased, portfolio inflows resumed, non-resident holdings returned to near pre-conflict levels, and the pound recovered much of its initial losses.

The IMF linked this performance to the fact that exchange rate flexibility absorbed external pressures, while energy price adjustments in the wake of higher international oil prices, spending restraint, and expanded targeted support helped preserve policy discipline.

Non-Stop Growth

In its country focus, the IMF found that the financial shock in Egypt did not spill over into a broader economic downturn.

“Growth remained strong, reaching 5.0% in the third quarter of FY2025/26, while tourism stayed resilient, remittances surged to record highs, and Suez Canal activity continued its gradual recovery following some temporary disruption amid the regional turmoil,” it wrote.

Also, fiscal pressures were contained through revenue mobilization and expenditure restraint.

As for inflation, it rose in response to the currency depreciation and energy price adjustments, but the increase proved less severe than expected, although the path back to the inflation target was pushed back by a year.

Crucially, the IMF said, international reserves remained comfortably above adequate levels despite initial capital outflows, reflecting exchange rate flexibility in absorbing external pressures—a key difference from past episodes.

Gross Financing Needs Still High

The latest shock demonstrated Egypt’s improved resilience, but significant vulnerabilities remain, the IMF found.

It said public debt and gross financing needs are still high, financing relies heavily on short maturities, and banks’ exposure to the government remains elevated.

The fund warned that these vulnerabilities—particularly amid heightened global uncertainty—leave Egypt exposed to shifts in global financing conditions and renewed external shocks, while reinforcing the sovereign-bank nexus and increasing the risk of fiscal dominance.

Large government financing needs can also crowd out private sector credit and investment, it said.

The report found that reducing public debt and high gross financing needs will require stronger debt management, with a shift toward longer-term, market-based financing, a broader investor base, and deeper domestic debt markets to reduce refinancing risks and strengthen debt sustainability.

Most importantly, it said, “more decisive implementation of the State Ownership Policy and divestment program, stronger governance of state-owned enterprises, and greater competition will be critical to reducing the state’s footprint and creating the conditions for stronger private sector led growth.”

Business

Ban on US Diesel Exports Would Hurt, Not Help Fuel Markets, Analysts Say

Gas and diesel prices are displayed at a Mobil station, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel)
Gas and diesel prices are displayed at a Mobil station, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel)
TT
TT

Ban on US Diesel Exports Would Hurt, Not Help Fuel Markets, Analysts Say

Gas and diesel prices are displayed at a Mobil station, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel)
Gas and diesel prices are displayed at a Mobil station, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel)

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he backed the idea of a diesel export ban as a way to lower prices that have hit record highs due to a global supply shortage. But analysts and market watchers warn that such a measure would do little to ease high energy prices, and could worsen supply and economic disruptions around the globe, Reuters said.

Trump's comments come as average US diesel prices have jumped to a record $6.5107 a gallon, according to AAA. Diesel is critical to the global economy because it powers transportation, farm equipment and the machinery used to make and move goods.

Shortages in the fuel can lead to price spikes that stoke inflation by raising the cost of moving everything from groceries and consumer goods to industrial materials — already a major pain point for Trump and Republicans headed into the November midterm elections.

WHY ‌ARE DIESEL PRICES HIGH?

Diesel ‌prices have surged amid supply disruptions from Ukrainian strikes on Russia's refineries and the US-Iran ‌war, which ⁠has disrupted or ⁠halted trade along major routes including the Strait of Hormuz. The US is a major exporter of diesel, and countries have increasingly turned to it amid disruptions abroad.

The US exported a record 1.6 million barrels per day of diesel in August, up from about 1 million bpd in February before the war began. Top buyers include Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Peru, Morocco, France and the United Kingdom, according to Kpler.

US on-road diesel inventories have fallen to 96.97 million barrels, nearly 13% under the seasonal average for the previous five years. The drop in inventories comes even as refiners in the US are running at about 97% of capacity.

HOW WOULD A BAN IMPACT THE MARKET?

Major trade groups, including ⁠the American Petroleum Institute, oppose a ban on diesel exports.

"Restricting US diesel exports would wreak ‌havoc on fuel markets at home and abroad, destabilize refinery operations and deepen a global ‌refining crisis already putting upward pressure on US prices. Gulf Coast refineries produce more diesel than the region consumes, while geography and infrastructure constraints prevent ‌that surplus from simply being redirected to every US market that needs it," the API said in a statement.

A ban ‌on diesel exports would push up prices of diesel globally, while pushing down prices in the United States and hurting US refining margins, analysts warned.

"Initially, a diesel ban would send global prices skyrocketing... A ban could raise world prices by as much as 100%, given the fuel’s low price elasticity of demand," said energy economist Philip Verleger.

Any ban would likely push refineries to cut the amount of crude they process. If US refineries cut ‌runs, it would also lower the amount of gasoline and other products produced and push up prices for those fuels, analysts and traders said.

"Banning exports of diesel would drive refiners ⁠to cut runs because the physical ⁠market they can access would be cut, and no market participant in any market sells product at a loss. While an export ban might have a very short-term impact that lowers price, it would not be long-lived...," said Kenneth Medlock III, a fellow in Energy and Resource Economics at the Baker Institute for Public Policy.

WHAT ARE THE POLITICAL AND GEOPOLITICAL IMPLICATIONS?

Some Republican Senate candidates in the most competitive races for the November 3 elections called for administration to implement the export ban to try to alleviate high costs for Americans.

“It is more of political soundings than actual reality,” said Jim Mitchell, director of oil trading analytics at consultancy Wood Mackenzie.

While a diesel export ban could, in theory, lower prices in the United States, it would not ease tightness in Europe, which is structurally short diesel and relies heavily on supplies from the US Gulf Coast.

"That would seem pretty damaging to some key US allies," Mitchell said.

"A ban on US diesel exports, even if temporary, would have the same long-term effect as President (Richard) Nixon’s soybean embargo: the world would no longer view the United States as a dependable source," Verleger said. In 1973 Nixon imposed a temporary soybean embargo that angered importers including Japan and, some analysts say, led to greater dependence on Brazil for the commodity.