IMF Urges US to Curb Deficit, Tackle its ‘Ever-Increasing’ Debt Burden

Gita Gopinath, IMF’s first deputy managing director (X) 
Gita Gopinath, IMF’s first deputy managing director (X) 
TT

IMF Urges US to Curb Deficit, Tackle its ‘Ever-Increasing’ Debt Burden

Gita Gopinath, IMF’s first deputy managing director (X) 
Gita Gopinath, IMF’s first deputy managing director (X) 

A top IMF official has called on the US to reduce its fiscal deficit and tackle its “ever-increasing” debt burden at a time of rising concerns about President Donald Trump’s plans for sweeping tax cuts.

“The US fiscal deficits are too large and they need to be brought down,” Gita Gopinath, the IMF’s first deputy managing director, told the Financial Times this week.

She also warned that the world’s biggest economy was still affected by “very elevated” trade policy uncertainty despite “positive developments”, such as the Trump administration dialing back tariffs on China.

Gopinath’s comments came after Moody’s stripped the US of its last remaining pristine triple A credit rating owing to concerns over the country’s growing debt.

Trump’s proposal to prolong his 2017 tax cuts beyond this year has added to those worries and prompted unease among investors.

The administration says the cuts — combined with deregulation — will pay for themselves with higher growth, but neither Moody’s nor financial markets are convinced.

The rating agency said last week that the proposed legislation, which Trump calls “the big, beautiful bill”, would raise US deficits from 6.4% last year to just under 9% by 2035.

Treasury secretary Scott Bessent told NBC on Sunday that the Moody’s downgrade was “a lagging indicator”, blaming the fiscal situation on the Biden administration.

He added that the administration was “determined to bring the spending down and grow the economy.”

Bessent previously said he would cut the deficit to 3% by the end of Trump’s term.

But Gopinath noted that US debt to GDP was “ever-increasing”, adding: “It should be that we have fiscal policy in the US that is consistent with bringing debt to GDP down over time.”

The federal government debt held by the public amounted to 98% of GDP in fiscal 2024, compared with 73% a decade earlier, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Although the IMF said last month that it expected the US fiscal deficit to fall this year as long as tariff revenues grew, those projections did not account for Trump’s tax bill, which is winding its way through Congress.

Gopinath added that Bessent had been right to make a “clear call” to bring down fiscal deficits.

Trump is pressuring Republicans in the House of Representatives, where he has a slim majority, to support the legislation, arguing that doing otherwise would increase voters’ tax bills.

Deficit worries and Moody’s downgrade have driven the dollar lower and pushed prices down and yields up in the Treasury market.

The 30-year Treasury bond yield on Monday rose to 5.04%, its highest level since 2023.

A bigger deficit means the government will have to sell more bonds at a time when foreign and domestic investors have begun to question the stability of the US market.

The IMF in April cut its US growth forecast by nearly a percentage point to 1.8 per cent in 2025, while dropping its global growth projection to 2.8%, as it incorporated the impact of Trump’s tariffs.

Since then, Trump has announced sharp cuts to American levies, as China and the US agreed to slash respective tariffs by 115 percentage points for 90 days.

 

 

 



US Involvement in Iran-Israel Conflict Raises Fears of Strait of Hormuz Closure

A general view of the Strait of Hormuz (Reuters)
A general view of the Strait of Hormuz (Reuters)
TT

US Involvement in Iran-Israel Conflict Raises Fears of Strait of Hormuz Closure

A general view of the Strait of Hormuz (Reuters)
A general view of the Strait of Hormuz (Reuters)

As the conflict between Iran and Israel intensifies, experts warn that direct US involvement could trigger a dangerous escalation, most notably, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global energy chokepoint.

If Iran were to follow through on this long-standing threat, the consequences would be severe, cutting off roughly 20% of the world’s oil exports and 30% of global natural gas shipments.

Russian strategic analyst Andrey Ontikov told Asharq Al-Awsat that fears remain real and growing, particularly if the war expands.

If the United States is drawn into the war alongside Israel, the likelihood of Iran moving to close the Strait of Hormuz becomes the most serious and effective threat, he said.

Ontikov explained that such a move would paralyze global energy flows from the Gulf, sending oil and gas prices soaring and inflicting major economic damage on both exporting and importing nations.

The resulting disruption would directly affect international shipping, raise transport and insurance costs, and cause energy prices to spike, further straining already fragile global supply chains, he added.

He also warned that broader geopolitical implications are at stake. A regional war involving the Strait of Hormuz could jeopardize key trade corridors, including China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Russia’s North-South transport corridor.

That would have a direct economic impact on both Beijing and Moscow, forcing countries to look urgently for alternative trade routes, Ontikov said.

Oil prices are already rising, though Ontikov believes that if tensions ease, the global economic impact could be contained. However, a prolonged or widened war would paint a far more troubling picture.

Saudi economic expert Dr. Ibrahim Alomar, head of Sharah Consulting, echoed these concerns.

“If the conflict stays limited, the effects may include a temporary $10–$20 increase in oil prices and limited disruption to financial and shipping markets,” he said. “But a broader war could push oil prices above $120, causing inflation and a sharp global economic slowdown.”

Alomar warned that in the worst-case scenario - where the Strait of Hormuz is fully closed - oil prices could skyrocket past $200, triggering hyperinflation, severe recession, and a collapse in global financial markets.

“Such a scenario could ultimately reshape the global economic system, depending on who emerges least damaged from the crisis,” he concluded.