‘Day of Reckoning’ Boxing Film Exceeds 150 Million Views in Just One Week

‘Day of Reckoning’ new trailer has officially accumulated over 150 million views since its launch only a week ago.
‘Day of Reckoning’ new trailer has officially accumulated over 150 million views since its launch only a week ago.
TT
20

‘Day of Reckoning’ Boxing Film Exceeds 150 Million Views in Just One Week

‘Day of Reckoning’ new trailer has officially accumulated over 150 million views since its launch only a week ago.
‘Day of Reckoning’ new trailer has officially accumulated over 150 million views since its launch only a week ago.

‘Day of Reckoning’, the much talked about new trailer starring an array of titan names from the world of boxing, has now officially accumulated over 150 million views since its launch only a week ago.

The video, lauded by many for pushing the boundaries of sports promo films with its impressive cinematic quality and originality, was unveiled by Turki Alalshikh, Chairman of the General Entertainment Authority (GEA) a week ago to promote what is an unparalleled fight card by the same name ‘Day of Reckoning’, set to take place on December 23 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

The gripping short film stars a number of the big-name boxers that are due to feature on the night transformed into zombies, and has earned praise globally since its launch across Instagram, X, TikTok, Facebook and YouTube, having accumulated more than 150 million views, including 123 million on X alone.

‘Day of Reckoning’ was directly supervised by Turki Alalshikh, who worked alongside Big Time Creative Shop, the agency founded by GEA as the creative arm of its organization, on its script and production to bring the concept to life, and was directed by Romain Chassaing.

Leading media outlets around the world have described it as ‘one of the greatest fight promos ever’ suggesting it has ‘a hint of Hollywood’, which has ‘ignited the internet’ and left fans ‘buzzing’ for the big night itself this coming Saturday. It includes scenes such as former WBC world title holder Deontay Wilder and Frank Warren, owner of Queensbury Promotions, careering around a corner in a van and two-time Unified World Heavyweight Champion Anthony Joshua signing a contract in blood with Eddie Hearn watching on as he smokes a cigar.

Another heavyweight contender Filip Hrgovic is seen casually replacing one of his eyeballs, while Otto Wallin decapitates a zombie with a single punch.

Director Romain Chassaing said: “The shoot was very, very fun. The boxers really enjoyed it. There was something very cool between [Anthony] Joshua and Eddie [Hearn], they were laughing a lot, and the scene with Frank [Warren] in the van with a crazy [Deontay] Wilder was very fun to shoot, because Wilder is playing it very well.

"With just three days to go until the unprecedented fight night, ‘Day of Reckoning’ sees a co-main event which features Anthony Joshua going up against Otto Wallin, alongside Joseph Parker taking on the Bronze Bomber Deontay Wilder.



Disney Sues Hong Kong Company It Says Is Selling Illegal Mickey Mouse Jewelry

Mickey Mouse balloons are displayed at Disneyland Paris in Chessy, France, June 8, 2018. (AP)
Mickey Mouse balloons are displayed at Disneyland Paris in Chessy, France, June 8, 2018. (AP)
TT
20

Disney Sues Hong Kong Company It Says Is Selling Illegal Mickey Mouse Jewelry

Mickey Mouse balloons are displayed at Disneyland Paris in Chessy, France, June 8, 2018. (AP)
Mickey Mouse balloons are displayed at Disneyland Paris in Chessy, France, June 8, 2018. (AP)

The Walt Disney Co. on Wednesday sued a Hong Kong jewelry company it accuses of selling illegal Mickey Mouse jewelry.

The international media and entertainment conglomerate filed a lawsuit in federal court in Los Angeles against the Red Earth Group, which sells jewelry online under the name Satéur.

Disney says the marketing and branding of the rings, necklaces and earrings in Satéur's “Mickey 1928 Collection” violate its trademark rights and that the Hong Kong company is deliberately trying to fool customers into thinking the pieces are official Disney merchandise.

Satéur, the suit alleges, “intends to present Mickey Mouse as its own brand identifier for its jewelry merchandise and "seeks to trade on the recognizability of the Mickey Mouse trademarks and consumers’ affinity for Disney and its iconic ambassador Mickey Mouse.”

A message seeking comment from representatives of the Red Earth Group was not immediately answered.

The lawsuit is indicative of Disney's dogged efforts to protect its intellectual property from unauthorized appropriation. Although the earliest version of Mickey Mouse entered the public domain last year after Disney's copyright expired, the company still holds trademark rights to the character.

Lawyers for Disney argue in the suit that Red Earth’s online marketing efforts “extensively trade on the Mickey Mouse trademarks and the Disney brand” with language that includes describing the jewelry as great for “Disney enthusiasts.”

Such tactics indicate Red Earth was “intentionally trying to confuse consumers,” the lawsuit says. The impression created, it says, "suggests, at a minimum, a partnership or collaboration with Disney.”

The earliest depiction of Mickey Mouse, who first appeared publicly in the film short “Steamboat Willie” in 1928, are now in the US public domain. The widely publicized moment was considered a landmark in iconography going public.

The lawsuit alleges that Red Earth and Satéur are trying to use that status as a “ruse” to suggest the jewelry is legal, by dubbing it the “Mickey 1928 Collection” and saying it is being sold in tribute to the mouse's first appearance.

The centerpiece of the collection, the suit says, is a piece of jewelry marketed as the "Satéur Mickey 1928 Classique Ring,” which has a Steamboat Willie charm sitting on the band holding a synthetic stone.

But there is an essential difference between copyright, which protects works of art, and trademark, which protects a company's brand.

Even if a character is in the public domain, it cannot be used on merchandise in a way that suggests it is from the company with the trademark, as Disney alleges Red Earth is doing.

“Disney remains committed to guarding against unlawful trademark infringement and protecting consumers from confusion caused by unauthorized uses of Mickey Mouse and our other iconic characters,” Disney said in a statement Wednesday.

The lawsuit seeks an injunction against Red Earth selling the jewelry or trading on Disney's trademark in any other way, along with monetary damages to be determined later.