Tom Cruise’s ‘Digger’ Tanks, Leaving Studio with $250 Mn Hole

Cast member Tom Cruise attends the “Digger” world premiere in London, Britain, September 22, 2026. (Reuters)
Cast member Tom Cruise attends the “Digger” world premiere in London, Britain, September 22, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Tom Cruise’s ‘Digger’ Tanks, Leaving Studio with $250 Mn Hole

Cast member Tom Cruise attends the “Digger” world premiere in London, Britain, September 22, 2026. (Reuters)
Cast member Tom Cruise attends the “Digger” world premiere in London, Britain, September 22, 2026. (Reuters)

The Tom Cruise eco-satire "Digger," a movie that was supposed to herald the action hero's return to serious acting, has bombed at the box office, with industry insiders predicting it could lose a quarter of a billion dollars.

The Alejandro Inarritu comedy, featuring Cruise as an eccentric oil baron who must fix the problem he has helped create, was panned by critics and has left audiences cold, leaving studio Warner Bros. with a big balance sheet hole just as a merger with Paramount Skydance closes.

After two weeks in theaters, the film has grossed just $14.4 million in North America and $35.3 million globally -- tiny numbers for a big-budget movie that points to cumulative losses in the region of $245 million.

"Financially it has to be considered a disaster," Christopher Rosen of Hollywood trade publication The Ankler told AFP.

"It cost anywhere from $160 million to $180 million -- that's even before marketing -- and it's made relatively nothing at the box office."

Marketing for a movie like "Digger" can cost up to $100 million.

Daniel Loria of Boxoffice Pro noted that the film was greenlit under the tenure of outgoing Warner Bros. executives Pam Abdy and Michael De Luca, who made a name for themselves by giving filmmakers the resources and studio budgets to create original, innovative movies.

"Sometimes it works, and sometimes it doesn't," he said.

As an art-house film that satirizes American culture through the lens of a non-American like Inarritu, "Digger" was perhaps destined to be a heavy lift.

"This movie was never going to get a general audience to get behind it, right? I don't think it was ever designed like that," said Loria.

"The film takes every opportunity to push the audience in uncomfortable directions.

"American audiences don't have the easiest time accepting films that criticize American culture, especially when they're made by foreigners."

- A potential mismatch -

The presence of Cruise -- a man sometimes credited with rescuing the box office after its pandemic slump with "Top Gun: Maverick" -- was always going to make the film stand out.

"You've got arguably the biggest movie star in the world (who) was literally everywhere for this movie," said Paul Dergarabedian, a market analyst at Rentrak.

"He was so excited about this movie and working with Alejandro Inarritu.

"By virtue of Tom Cruise's star power, there was a spotlight on this movie. Anything he does is going to be under a microscope."

The size of Cruise's star in the movie firmament makes the comparison even less flattering: "Digger" was never going to be in the same ballpark as the multi-billion dollar "Mission: Impossible" franchise.

But the film's box office does align with the kind of film that Inarritu makes, said Loria.

His movies "aren't really too worried about their box office total; they're worried about having an artistic endeavor behind" them.

That makes "Digger" something of a mismatch, said Loria.

"Unfortunately, I think this was marketed as a general audience movie, when at heart, this is an art-house film."



South Korean TV Drama Industry Seeks $746 Million in Support as Output Declines

Shin Mina as Empress Navier in Disney+/Hulu's new K-drama “The Remarried Empress”. (Disney+/Hulu)
Shin Mina as Empress Navier in Disney+/Hulu's new K-drama “The Remarried Empress”. (Disney+/Hulu)
TT

South Korean TV Drama Industry Seeks $746 Million in Support as Output Declines

Shin Mina as Empress Navier in Disney+/Hulu's new K-drama “The Remarried Empress”. (Disney+/Hulu)
Shin Mina as Empress Navier in Disney+/Hulu's new K-drama “The Remarried Empress”. (Disney+/Hulu)

Twelve South Korean industry groups warned on Wednesday that the country's television drama production base was at risk and called on the government to set up a 1 trillion won ($746 million) investment fund to support production of Korean dramas, known as K-dramas.

K-dramas have been hugely popular globally, ‌but the number produced ‌has fallen from 141 titles in 2022 ‌to ⁠about 115 in 2025, ⁠according to research by Korea IR Service.

Three domestic broadcast networks cut drama output from 91 titles in 2012 to 32 in 2023, and some channels have stopped airing weekday dramas altogether, the groups said.

Such an environment makes it difficult for "a new writer's second work, a supporting actor's first lead role and an assistant ⁠crew member's directing debut", said Song Byeong-joon, chairman ‌of the Korea Drama Production Association.

The ‌groups, which represent industry workers including TV drama producers, directors, writers, ‌actors, cinematographers and crew, attributed the decline in long-form drama production to ‌rising production costs, which they linked to competition with global streaming platforms such as Netflix, and broadcasters' reduced capacity to invest.

They also cited competition from short-form content and AI for audiences and production.

Pay for top-billed ‌stars was the main driver of production costs, Korea IR Service said in a 2025 report, ⁠with pay ⁠climbing as streaming services competed for audience-drawing talent.

Kim Yong-hee, a professor of business administration at Sun Moon University, said the difficulties the groups cited largely reflected the decline of terrestrial broadcasting rather than the sector as a whole.

Official data showed employment across the content industry edged up to 693,090 in 2025 from 688,122 a year earlier, according to the Korea Creative Content Agency.

Broadcasting employment, however, fell 2.3% in 2024, according to a government survey.

A Netflix Korea spokesperson was reached but did not have an immediate comment.

Netflix launched in South Korea in 2016 and in 2023 pledged to invest $2.5 billion in the market over four years.


Movie Review: ‘The Cat in the Hat’ Ridiculously Builds the Stakes So High, the Universe Could Die

This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows, from left, Sebastian, voiced by Tiago Martinez, Waffles, voiced by Matt Berry, and The Cat in the Hat, voiced by Bill Hader, in a scene from "The Cat in the Hat." (Warner Bros. Pictures via AP)
This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows, from left, Sebastian, voiced by Tiago Martinez, Waffles, voiced by Matt Berry, and The Cat in the Hat, voiced by Bill Hader, in a scene from "The Cat in the Hat." (Warner Bros. Pictures via AP)
TT

Movie Review: ‘The Cat in the Hat’ Ridiculously Builds the Stakes So High, the Universe Could Die

This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows, from left, Sebastian, voiced by Tiago Martinez, Waffles, voiced by Matt Berry, and The Cat in the Hat, voiced by Bill Hader, in a scene from "The Cat in the Hat." (Warner Bros. Pictures via AP)
This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows, from left, Sebastian, voiced by Tiago Martinez, Waffles, voiced by Matt Berry, and The Cat in the Hat, voiced by Bill Hader, in a scene from "The Cat in the Hat." (Warner Bros. Pictures via AP)

The folks behind the new animated “The Cat in the Hat” are pretty confident they've got the cat in the bag. It hasn't even opened yet and there are onscreen references to possible movie spinoffs for the jet-powered magical couch and The Things. As the credits roll, the titular feline even gets into the act: “Let's go sequel!”

He's probably right about that, though — an inevitable franchise born on the back of whimsical, beloved IP that now gets the Marvel Cinematic Universe treatment: Put the fate of the world in the balance, insert a horrific enemy and add lots of things — in this case dozens of Things — until we just want it to end. To quote the book's glum goldfish: “No, I do not like it/Not one little bit.”

Directed by Erica Rivinoja and Alessandro Carloni, who also wrote the screenplay, “The Cat in the Hat” is what happens when lots and lots of money gets thrown at a movie with middling returns. (We're talking Taylor Swift cash, courtesy of using her “Shake It Off.”)

At least it distances itself from the live-action approach of the underperforming and creepy 2003 film starring Mike Myers, instead using stylized and varied computer animation. Bill Hader now voices the Cat, with his trademark sarcastic, demented and oily approach. The Cat is portrayed with teeth, though, and that's unsettling.

We meet the Cat after he's bombed his latest assignment. It turns out he works for a gleaming corporate conglomerate that sends out envoys to cheer up kids at their homes. There's even a human resources department and white-collar cubicles — our anarchic Cat as office drone.

Missions here are evaluated on two measures: A hopeful uptick in clients' happiness and the level of destruction left behind. The Cat is good at thing one, but bad at thing two. He faces being fired unless he succeeds at his next task — cheering up two depressed kids whose single mom recently moved them to the city.

When he appears, he's quickly pepper-sprayed by the oldest, Gabby, a marching band nerd with huge glasses and a “creative, artistic soul.” She thinks it's a home invasion and wants to call the cops. This reaction is not canon.

The Cat has to convince Gabby and her younger brother, Sebastian, to have fun, and if there's any damage, he's stolen a device from office supplies — a clocklike “gobacker” — that can undo the past. They soon lose it. “I can't believe this and I'm a talking cat,” says our hero.

Now things click into operatic levels, with a mysterious nefarious creature with gleaming eyes — a cross between a massive bat and a toothy pterodactyl — that is also hunting the device. If it finds it, the “fabric of the universe will be distorted forever.” Yeesh. What happened to: “I know it is wet and the sun is not sunny, but we can have lots of good fun that is funny?”

The goldfish is here — Matt Berry, hijacking the movie — as an English-accented, pseudo-Shakespearean actor-y type fish named Waffles. Waffles? And there are Things galore — during the climactic battle scene — yes, there's a battle scene — there must be thousands of Things. But not one rhyme, a shame.

The animation is handled wonderfully, with three distinct styles for different worlds. (As the book would say: “My tricks are not bad.”) And the voices are perfectly cast: Giancarlo Esposito as Cat's evil boss, Bowen Yang as an intern and Paula Pell as a landlady all stand out.

The messaging is muddled. One is that you should always stand up for a friend. Another is that your parents were, shockingly, once cool. A third is that home is wherever you want it to be. And fourth is making a mess is the best part of childhood.

Making a mess of “The Cat in the Hat” didn't have to happen. It didn't have to have a possible rip in the time-space continuum. It didn't have to flood the zone with Things. And it doesn't need a sequel, please.


Martha Stewart Sorry for ‘Insensitive’ Homeless Halloween Costume

Martha Stewart. (AFP/Getty Images)
Martha Stewart. (AFP/Getty Images)
TT

Martha Stewart Sorry for ‘Insensitive’ Homeless Halloween Costume

Martha Stewart. (AFP/Getty Images)
Martha Stewart. (AFP/Getty Images)

American lifestyle guru Martha Stewart apologized late Sunday for an "insensitive and not funny" Halloween costume after she appeared to dress up as a homeless person.

"It's hard to admit when you've really screwed up," the billionaire, 85, wrote on Instagram after she deleted a photo of herself in ripped jeans, a torn sweater and a dirtied face.

Stewart also held a clipboard that read "I Am Hungry Help Me!!" Social media users quickly slammed her as out of touch.

"I know many people are suffering economically. Wearing a costume like I did was insensitive and not funny. I am very sorry," Stewart said in a statement.

She also acknowledged that an earlier explanation to US media, claiming she had intended to raise awareness of homelessness through her costume, "didn't go far enough."

Stewart built her success in the homemaking and lifestyle industries.

Through her cookbooks, magazines, television shows and retail housewares, Stewart became the personification of gracious living and America's most high-profile lifestyle expert.