عربي English Türkçe اردو فارسى
Logo
Latest News
Fashion

Report: LVMH's Dior Lagged on Supply Chain Disclosure

FILE PHOTO: A logo of fashion house Dior is seen outside a shop in Paris, France, April 15, 2024. REUTERS/Manon Cruz/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A logo of fashion house Dior is seen outside a shop in Paris, France, April 15, 2024. REUTERS/Manon Cruz/File Photo
TT
TT

Report: LVMH's Dior Lagged on Supply Chain Disclosure

FILE PHOTO: A logo of fashion house Dior is seen outside a shop in Paris, France, April 15, 2024. REUTERS/Manon Cruz/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A logo of fashion house Dior is seen outside a shop in Paris, France, April 15, 2024. REUTERS/Manon Cruz/File Photo

LVMH's second-largest fashion brand Dior was until last month behind on disclosures required by UK law about working conditions in its supply chain, and made outdated statements on its website of a third-party certification that it terminated more than a year ago, Reuters has found.
In Britain, the Modern Slavery Act of 2015 requires companies with UK turnover of 36 million pounds ($46 million) or above to publish annual statements on their websites detailing the steps they are taking to combat forced labor in their business and supply chains globally.
Until July 19, Dior's UK website showed an anti-slavery statement from 2020 and a sustainability certification that was no longer valid, a Reuters review of company filings showed.
Dior, part of $345-billion conglomerate LVMH that is getting a global marketing boost as major sponsor to the Paris Olympics, has come under the spotlight after Italy's competition authority on July 17 said it was probing whether it and Italian label Armani had misled consumers over their commitment to craftsmanship and social responsibility following a judicial investigation that exposed potential sweatshop-like conditions at some Italian contractors.
The investigation prompted Europe's top asset manager Amundi and other investors to ask LVMH to take more aggressive steps to monitor its suppliers' treatment of workers, these investors have told Reuters.
Dior has condemned the illegal practices uncovered at some suppliers, said it had stopped working with them and that it was cooperating with authorities. Armani has expressed confidence in a "positive result following the investigation."
Dior published a 2023 modern slavery statement after Reuters enquired on July 18 about its compliance with the UK regulation. The new document says it was approved by subsidiary Christian Dior UK's board on July 18.
In its updated modern slavery statement, which is longer and more detailed than its 2020 one, the French brand said Christian Dior UK plans a training course to raise employees' awareness of modern slavery and to encourage them to take action if they suspect wrongdoing.
"We have been preparing an up to date modern slavery statement, which...has now been published on our website," Dior said in a written statement on July 19 in reply to Reuters' inquiries about the anti-slavery disclosure.
As of Aug. 5, Dior also had not published statements for 2021 and 2022. The company did not directly address Reuters questions about its missing statements.
Although publishing the statements is mandatory by law, no company has been penalized for not complying, according to Sara Thornton, professor of modern slavery policy at the University of Nottingham's Rights Lab. Some lawmakers and rights groups are pushing for penalties to be introduced.
In 2020, Britain's Home Office estimated that 83% of eligible organizations complied with the Modern Slavery Act.
LVMH on July 19 said in an email to Reuters that its UK-based Dior subsidiary applies "group wide procedures concerning respect for human rights and addressing modern slavery risk in our business and supply chains."
Another subsidiary, Parfums Christian Dior UK, has published British modern slavery statements for 2021, 2022 and 2023.
LVMH Chief Financial Officer Jean-Jacques Guiony said in a call with analysts on July 23 the conglomerate was unaware of the alleged worker exploitation at the Dior suppliers in Italy, adding LVMH "accepted full responsibility for what happened."
Guiony said LVMH would "intensify" controls over its supply chain, adding that it planned to strengthen audits and controls of its subcontractors.
'A CERTIFIED APPROACH'
Until July 19, the sustainability page of Dior's website also featured the Butterfly Mark, a certification by luxury-focused sustainability audit firm Positive Luxury, which assesses companies on 23 environmental, social and governance issues.
Above the Butterfly Mark logo, a statement titled "A Certified Approach" said Christian Dior Couture obtained the certification in 2021 "following a rigorous audit", adding that it "attests to the authenticity of its sustainability strategy".
In June 2023 Dior, which was due to start its reassessment process, decided not to do so, CEO Amy Nelson-Bennett told Reuters on July 17. "Their Butterfly Mark certification and community membership was therefore terminated," she said.
Brands are required to remove the certification mark within 90 days after deciding not to be reassessed, Nelson-Bennett said. Dior removed the certification mark and accompanying statement in July 2024.
Approached by Reuters, Dior and LVMH did not respond to a request to comment on the certification and the logo on the website.
Positive Luxury currently certifies, or is reviewing, roughly 170 brands, including LVMH-owned Belvedere Vodka. Its audit asks companies and brands to answer hundreds of questions on environmental, social and governance issues, including how much oversight a brand has on suppliers.
Positive Luxury reassesses all the brands that it certifies every two years, adjusting its audit to keep up with new regulations, Nelson-Bennett said.
Companies are gearing up for new European Union supply chain rules that require tighter audits of suppliers to mitigate human rights and environmental risks.

Most Viewed

 
 
Fashion

As Fast Fashion's Waste Pollutes Africa's Environment, Designers in Ghana are Finding a Solution

Attendees at a thrift and an upcycle show pose for a photograph in Accra, Ghana, Sunday, Oct. 27, 2024. (AP Photo/Misper Apawu)
Attendees at a thrift and an upcycle show pose for a photograph in Accra, Ghana, Sunday, Oct. 27, 2024. (AP Photo/Misper Apawu)
TT
TT

As Fast Fashion's Waste Pollutes Africa's Environment, Designers in Ghana are Finding a Solution

Attendees at a thrift and an upcycle show pose for a photograph in Accra, Ghana, Sunday, Oct. 27, 2024. (AP Photo/Misper Apawu)
Attendees at a thrift and an upcycle show pose for a photograph in Accra, Ghana, Sunday, Oct. 27, 2024. (AP Photo/Misper Apawu)

In a sprawling secondhand clothing market in Ghana’s capital, early morning shoppers jostle as they search through piles of garments, eager to pluck a bargain or a designer find from the stalls selling used and low-quality apparel imported from the West.
At the other end of the street, an upcycled fashion and thrifting festival unfolds with glamour and glitz, The Associated Press reported. Models parade along a makeshift runway in outfits that designers created out of discarded materials from the Kantamanto market, ranging from floral blouses and denim jeans to leather bags, caps and socks.
The festival is called Obroni Wawu October, using a phrase that in the local Akan language means “dead white man’s clothes.” Organizers see the event as a small way to disrupt a destructive cycle that has made Western overconsumption into an environmental problem in Africa, where some of the worn-out clothes end up in waterways and garbage dumps.
“Instead of allowing (textile waste) to choke our gutters or beaches or landfills, I decided to use it to create something ... for us to use again,” said Richard Asante Palmer, one of the designers at the annual festival organized by the Or Foundation, a nonprofit that works at the intersection of environmental justice and fashion development.
Ghana is one of Africa's leading importers of used clothing. It also ships some of what it gets from the United Kingdom, Canada, China and elsewhere to other West African nations, the United States and the UK, according to the Ghana Used Clothing Dealers Association.
Some of the imported clothes arrive in such poor shape, however, that vendors dispose of them to make room for the next shipments. On average, 40% of the millions of garments exported weekly to Ghana end up as waste, according to Neesha-Ann Longdon, the business manager for the Or Foundation’s executive director.
The clothing dealers association, in a report published earlier this year on the socioeconomic and environmental impact of the nation’s secondhand clothing trade, cited a much lower estimate, saying only 5% of the items that reach Ghana in bulk are thrown out because they cannot be sold or reused.
In many African countries, citizens typically buy preowned clothes — as well as used cars, phones and other necessities — because they cost less than new ones. Secondhand shopping also gives them a chance to score designer goods that most people in the region can only dream of.
But neither Ghana's fast-growing population of 34 million people nor its overtaxed infrastructure is equipped to absorb the amount of cast-off attire entering the country. Mounds of textile waste litter beaches across the capital, Accra, and the lagoon which serves as the main outlet through which the city’s major drainage channels empty into the Gulf of Guinea.
“Fast fashion has taken over as the dominant mode of production, which is characterized here as higher volumes of lower-quality goods,” Longdon said.
Jonathan Abbey, a fisherman in the area, said his nets often capture textile waste from the sea. Unsold used clothes “aren’t even burned but are thrown into the Korle Lagoon, which then goes into the sea,” Abbey said.
The ease of online shopping has sped up this waste cycle, according to Andrew Brooks, a King’s College London researcher and the author of “Clothing Poverty: The Hidden World of Fast Fashion and Second-hand Clothes.”
In countries like the UK, unwanted purchases often end up as charity donations, but clothes are sometimes stolen from street donation bins and exported to places where the consumer demand is perceived to be higher, Brooks said. Authorities rarely investigate such theft because the clothes are "seen as low-value items,” he said.
Donors, meanwhile, think their castoffs are “going to be recycled rather than reused, or given away rather than sold, or sold in the UK rather than exported overseas,” Brooks said.
The volume of secondhand clothing sent to Africa has led to complaints of the continent being used as a dumping ground. In 2018, Rwanda raised tariffs on such imports in defiance of US pressure, citing concerns the West's refuse undermined efforts to strengthen the domestic textile industry. Last year, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni said he would ban imports of clothing “from dead people.”
Trade restrictions might not go far in either reducing textile pollution or encouraging clothing production in Africa, where profits are low and incentives for designers are few, experts say.
In the absence of adequate measures to stop the pollution, organizations like the Or Foundation are trying to make a difference by rallying young people and fashion creators to find a good use for scrapped materials.
Ghana's beaches had hardly any discarded clothes on them before the country's waste management problems worsened in recent years, foundation co-founder Allison Bartella said.
“Fast forward to today, 2024, there are mountains of textile waste on the beaches,” she said.