Israel’s Explicit Blackout Policy Conceals Gaza’s Realities

Funeral procession of an Israeli soldier who was killed in the northern Gaza Strip during the army’s ground operation against Hamas on Tuesday (Reuters)
Funeral procession of an Israeli soldier who was killed in the northern Gaza Strip during the army’s ground operation against Hamas on Tuesday (Reuters)
TT

Israel’s Explicit Blackout Policy Conceals Gaza’s Realities

Funeral procession of an Israeli soldier who was killed in the northern Gaza Strip during the army’s ground operation against Hamas on Tuesday (Reuters)
Funeral procession of an Israeli soldier who was killed in the northern Gaza Strip during the army’s ground operation against Hamas on Tuesday (Reuters)

Israeli political, military, and media institutions are following a policy of concealing any information related to the repercussions of airstrikes on civilians in Gaza.

These establishments are also obscuring all data concerning Hamas and withholding footage regarding the abducted individuals, alongside a vague stance on the course of Israeli operations in Gaza, considering it part of their military tactics.

Due to this policy, Israelis remain uninformed about the details of thousands of children and women who fall victim to airstrikes conducted from a distance by Israel’s air force, navy, and ground forces.

Hebrew media explicitly declares that it does not publish statements issued by Hamas and does not broadcast appearances of the official spokesperson for the movement, Abu Obeida.

Additionally, it refrains from disseminating Hamas announcements about the number of prisoners killed in the airstrikes, asserting that the figure has risen to 60.

On Monday night, when Hamas announced the death of soldier Noa Marciano due to Israeli shelling, the military informed her family that she was killed in Gaza.

The army affirmed that its information was derived from intelligence sources, not from the tape broadcast by Hamas on this matter, and her words were not aired before her death.

Media outlets justify this decision by stating that they do not wish to be tools in the propaganda campaign of Hamas.

Israelis are compelled to resort to social networks to learn about the fate of their children.

Even on social media, cyber units of the Israeli intelligence occasionally intervene, obstructing their view.

Consequently, they resort to watching Hamas statements on YouTube.

This policy is generating mass discontent among the families of those abducted by Hamas.

These families increasingly feel that the issue of prisoners is not a top priority of the Israeli government, prompting them to escalate their protest activities.



The Border Zone with Lebanon: A Refuge for Syrians Fearing ‘Change’

The Jdeidet Yabous Syrian border crossing, where images of Assad and his father appear to have been defaced (Asharq Al-Awsat).
The Jdeidet Yabous Syrian border crossing, where images of Assad and his father appear to have been defaced (Asharq Al-Awsat).
TT

The Border Zone with Lebanon: A Refuge for Syrians Fearing ‘Change’

The Jdeidet Yabous Syrian border crossing, where images of Assad and his father appear to have been defaced (Asharq Al-Awsat).
The Jdeidet Yabous Syrian border crossing, where images of Assad and his father appear to have been defaced (Asharq Al-Awsat).

The road from Beirut to Damascus is now lined with unfamiliar scenes. In just a few days, everything has changed for those traveling to the Syrian capital by land from Lebanon. Once an economic lifeline for Damascus, the route bustled with visitors—Syrians and Lebanese alike—and large trucks carried goods from Beirut’s port to Syria, a necessity brought on by international sanctions that have forced the country to rely on this corridor.

The journey to Damascus via Lebanon begins at the Masnaa border crossing, which, during the early days of Syria’s upheaval, saw unprecedented traffic heading into Syria. While outbound traffic has returned to normal—or even declined—inbound activity has surged again. Hundreds of Syrian families line up at the border, hoping for “humanitarian exceptions” to enter Lebanon. However, the influx has clogged the route for everyone, even those eligible for entry. For days, the road was virtually impassable until Lebanese authorities intervened to reopen it. Still, complaints from Syrians about alleged abuses at the border prompted General Security chief Major General Elias al-Baysari to launch an investigation into these violations, followed by measures to reduce the number of entries to just a few hundred.

Some Syrians leave after being denied entry, only for others to arrive, clinging to the hope that Lebanon might eventually open its doors. Entry is now restricted to those with valid residency, travelers transiting through Beirut’s airport, or individuals with official documentation.

Families wait in cars, with children and women inside while men gather around fires outside. Ayman, a man in his fifties from rural Damascus, anxiously waits for permission to cross after being denied entry by the checkpoint. He mentions receiving a promise that his case will be reviewed. “We are in danger. I won’t take my children back to die,” he says, refusing to elaborate on the exact threat. Determined, he vows to remain in the deserted zone indefinitely if necessary.

Despite no reports of targeted violence against former regime supporters or religious minorities—especially Shiites—fear remains pervasive. Bilal, a Syrian from the predominantly Shiite town of Zahraa near Aleppo, recounts how a relative was killed and claims that his name is on a wanted list. “I’ll never go back,” he says firmly.

The scene repeats itself just past the first opposition-held checkpoint, opposite the abandoned Syrian passport office. Crossing is straightforward and no longer requires ID for Lebanese citizens, unlike in the past. A friendly greeting and a wave from the armed guards suffice, often accompanied by a smile and “Welcome!” This is a stark contrast to the past, when multiple military checkpoints, infamous for soliciting bribes in the form of bread, cigarettes, or cash, made travel cumbersome.

Now, entering and exiting Syria via land is remarkably easy—no paperwork, no questions, and no inspections.

Near a victory arch along the road, adorned with images of deposed Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his late father Hafez, stands a young man. His old car is parked nearby, with his wife and three children—all under ten years old—waiting inside. Hesitantly, he approaches a Lebanese traveler, asking whether he can enter Lebanon without the “yellow card” once issued by Syrian authorities for outgoing vehicles. Syrian border guards had turned him away, warning that Lebanese authorities might confiscate his car.

The man, from the Shiite-majority village of Foua near Idlib, is determined to reach Lebanon. “I’ve arranged for work with someone there, and I need to leave as soon as possible,” he explains nervously. Though he insists no one has harmed him, his unease is evident as he prepares to leave.

The Assads’ towering portraits remain intact, likely due to their height, while those at ground level have been torn down or trampled. Military checkpoints have been vandalized or destroyed.

Abandoned vehicles litter the roadside, some still smoldering, while others have been stripped of all valuables—tires, parts, and accessories. Military vehicles, tanks, and armored carriers, some still loaded with ammunition, lie deserted along the route from the border to Damascus. These remnants tell the story of a collapsed regime and an uncertain future.

Scattered among the wreckage are vehicles destroyed by Israeli missile strikes targeting Syrian air defense systems, including anti-aircraft launchers mounted on military trucks.

The stretch of abandoned military hardware extends from the Syrian border to the outskirts of Damascus. These vehicles were once meant to defend the capital but now lie powerless, deserted by soldiers who left their uniforms discarded along the roadside as they fled. The old Syrian flag lies tattered and forgotten in multiple locations, untouched—neither reclaimed nor mourned.