What If Artificial Intelligence Prevailed?

The effect of AI is set to unfold further in 2024. (ShutterStock)
The effect of AI is set to unfold further in 2024. (ShutterStock)
TT

What If Artificial Intelligence Prevailed?

The effect of AI is set to unfold further in 2024. (ShutterStock)
The effect of AI is set to unfold further in 2024. (ShutterStock)

In the dynamic landscape of 2023, one of the pivotal factors driving the ascent of technology company stocks lies in the prevailing optimism surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) and its anticipated impact. The effect of AI is set to unfold further in 2024.

However, the question that looms large is whether AI poses a threat to the job market, potentially disrupting the livelihoods of the majority of workers and employees starting from the upcoming year.

This inquiry has not only been posed by many observers, but has also been championed by tech magnate Elon Musk, who advocates for legislations to curb the proliferation of AI. Musk argues that machines, endowed with faster problem-solving and data processing capabilities, might ultimately turn against humanity.

Yet, the lingering question remains: is this assertion an exaggeration, or is it a plausible scenario?

Many viewpoints suggest that AI will obliterate the realm of asset management and financial markets, supplanting traditional practices.

However, such a perspective is inherently limited in comprehending the intricacies of both AI and human intelligence. AI fundamentally operates based on the quantity of input from historical information, employing statistical analysis to sift through and formulate logic.

Conversely, human relationships with the past are subjective, and depth of understanding is often confined to specific details. Human choices regarding issue details are frequently not driven by specific logical reasons, as they may be influenced by entrenched beliefs or unfounded suspicions.

Human behavior is often characterized by irrationality, yet within the realm of the human mind lies the capacity for logic. Consequently, many human opinions and thoughts prove unpredictable, even as human logical behavior pertains to specifics and details rather than adhering to the past as an absolute rule.

The intelligent and successful human mind engages with the past qualitatively, often inclined toward skepticism and criticism, in stark contrast to machines, which may struggle to delve into crucial details and rely quantitatively on the past, lacking a qualitative understanding even if equipped with logical reasoning.

Take, for instance, the divergence of human intelligence in predicting Federal Reserve policies—whether to raise, defer, or reduce interest rates—an inconsistency that reverberates through financial markets. Similarly, in the 2007 financial crisis, human intelligence varied in assessing the quality of mortgage assets, leading to the profound economic turmoil that shook markets.

In both crises, a minority sensed the impending danger early on and took preemptive action—a distinctly human trait stemming from the unrestricted and independent nature of the human mind.

Machines, on the other hand, struggle to transcend the average human estimates and often fall prey to errors. For instance, during the coronavirus pandemic, the lack of historical information posed a challenge for AI, resulting in predominantly speculative outputs and fears.

This highlighted the inadequacy of AI in developing suitable models for proposing optimal solutions in the absence of historical data.

AI represents a significant leap in human progress, streamlining traditional and routine tasks, mitigating some human errors, and expanding the scope for innovation and initiative.

The beauty of innovation lies in its maturation over time. While it is anticipated that average human lifespan will increase in the future, the peril of this intelligence lies in its potential to eliminate jobs requiring human initiative and interpersonal skills, potentially widening social disparities and global wealth gaps.

Plato’s ancient assertion that the elite use their intellect while the lower class relies on physical labor resonates through the ages, highlighting the enduring societal implications.

Ultimately, AI serves as an augmentation to human evolution rather than a threat. Therefore, humans must prioritize continuous education, recognizing that knowledge knows no age or bounds.

Humanity should break away from conventional thinking, critically evaluate the past, and, above all, remember to laugh, love, dream, and maintain optimism for the future.



An American Tradition: Defeated Candidates Attending the President-Elect’s Inauguration

Vice President Kamala Harris talks to reporters after overseeing the ceremonial certification of her defeat to incoming President-elect Donald Trump, at the US Capitol in Washington, Jan. 6, 2025. (AP)
Vice President Kamala Harris talks to reporters after overseeing the ceremonial certification of her defeat to incoming President-elect Donald Trump, at the US Capitol in Washington, Jan. 6, 2025. (AP)
TT

An American Tradition: Defeated Candidates Attending the President-Elect’s Inauguration

Vice President Kamala Harris talks to reporters after overseeing the ceremonial certification of her defeat to incoming President-elect Donald Trump, at the US Capitol in Washington, Jan. 6, 2025. (AP)
Vice President Kamala Harris talks to reporters after overseeing the ceremonial certification of her defeat to incoming President-elect Donald Trump, at the US Capitol in Washington, Jan. 6, 2025. (AP)

In January 1981, Jimmy Carter nodded politely toward Ronald Reagan as the new Republican president thanked the Democrat for his administration's help after Reagan resoundingly defeated Carter the previous November.

Twenty years earlier, after a much closer race, Republican Richard Nixon clasped John F. Kennedy's hand and offered the new Democratic president a word of encouragement.

The US has a long tradition of defeated presidential candidates sharing the inauguration stage with the people who defeated them, projecting to the world the orderly transfer of power. It's a practice that Vice President Kamala Harris will resume on Jan. 20 after an eight-year hiatus.

Only once in the television era — with its magnifying effect on a losing candidate's expression — has a defeated candidate skipped the exercise. That candidate, former President Donald Trump, left for Florida after a failed effort to overturn his loss based on false or unfounded theories of voter fraud.

With Harris watching, Trump is scheduled to stand on the Capitol's west steps and be sworn in for a second term.

Below are examples of episodes that have featured a losing candidate in a rite that Reagan called "nothing short of a miracle."

2001: Al Gore and George W. Bush Democrat Al Gore conceded to Republican George W. Bush after 36 days of legal battling over Florida's ballots ended with a divided Supreme Court ruling to end the recount.

But Gore, the sitting vice president, would join Bush on the west steps of the Capitol a month later as the Texas governor was sworn in. After Bush took the oath, he and Gore shook hands, spoke briefly and smiled before Gore returned to his seat clapping along to the presidential anthem, "Hail to the Chief."

A disappointed Gore accepted the outcome and his role in demonstrating continuity of governance, former Gore campaign spokeswoman Kiki McLean said.

"He may have wished, ‘I wish that was me standing there,’" McLean said. "But I don't think Gore for one minute ever doubted he should be there in his capacity as vice president."

Hillary Clinton smiles wide as she and former President Jimmy Carter, from left, former first lady Rosalynn Carter, former President Bill Clinton, former President George W. Bush, and former first lady Laura Bush wait for the start of the inauguration ceremony to swear President-elect Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States, at the Capitol in Washington, Jan. 20, 2017. (AP)

2017: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Democrat Hillary Clinton was candid about her disappointment in losing to Trump in 2016, when — like Gore against Bush — she received more votes but failed to win an Electoral College majority. "Obviously, I was crushed," she told Howard Stern on his radio show in 2019.

Calling Inauguration Day "one of the hardest days of my life," Clinton said she planned to attend Trump's swearing-in out of a sense of duty, having been first lady during her husband's presidency from 1993 to 2001. "You put on the best face possible," Clinton said on Stern's show.

2021: Mike Pence (with Trump absent) and Joe Biden Trump four years ago claimed without evidence that his loss to President Joe Biden was marred by widespread fraud. Two weeks earlier, Trump supporters had stormed the Capitol in a violent siege aimed at halting the electoral vote certification.

Instead, then-Vice President Mike Pence was the face of the outgoing administration.

"Sure, it was awkward," Pence's former chief of staff Marc Short said.

Still, Pence and his wife met privately with Biden and his wife to congratulate them in the Capitol before the ceremony, and escorted newly sworn-in Vice President Kamala Harris and her husband out of the Capitol afterward, as tradition had prescribed, Short said.

"There was an appreciation expressed for him by members of both chambers in both parties," he said.

1993: George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton Bush stood on the Capitol's west steps three times for his swearing-in — as vice president twice and in 1989 to be inaugurated as president. He would attend again in 1993 in defeat.

He joined Bill Clinton, the Democrat who beat him, on the traditional walk out onto the east steps. Bush would return triumphantly to the inaugural ceremony eight years later as the father of Clinton's successor, George W. Bush.

1961: Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy Nixon had just lost the 1960 election by fewer than 120,000 votes in what was the closest presidential contest in 44 years. But the departing vice president approached Kennedy with a wide grin, a handshake and an audible "good luck" just seconds after the winning Democrat's swearing-in.

Nixon would have to wait eight years to be sworn in as president, while his losing Democratic opponent — outgoing Vice President Hubert Humphrey — looked on. He was inaugurated a second time after winning reelection in 1972, only to resign after the Watergate scandal.

President-elect Ronald Reagan applauds as outgoing President Jimmy Carter waves to the crowd at Reagan's inaugural ceremony, in Washington, Jan. 20, 1981. (AP Photo, File)

1933: Herbert Hoover and Franklin D. Roosevelt Like Bush, Hoover would attend just one inauguration as a new president before losing to a Democrat four years later. But Democrat Franklin Roosevelt's 1933 swearing-in would not be Hoover's last. Hoover would live for another 31 years, see four more presidents sworn in, and sit in places of honor at the two inaugurations of Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower.

1897: Grover Cleveland and Benjamin Harrison Cleveland, the sitting Democratic president, lost reelection in 1888 while winning more popular votes than former Indiana Sen. Benjamin Harrison. But Cleveland still managed to hold Harrison’s umbrella while the Republican was sworn in during a rainy 1889 inauguration.

Elected to a second, non-consecutive term in 1892, Cleveland, however, would stand solemnly behind William McKinley four years later at the Republican's 1897 inauguration, leaving the presidency that day after losing the 1896 nomination of his own party.

Cleveland was the only president to win two non-consecutive terms until Trump's victory in November.