Making the Lives of Cybercriminals and Spies Harder Online

In the end, spies and cybercriminals may be able to digitally access any information they want, said Ms. Perlroth, who is shown here using pen and paper. Credit Jason Henry for The New York Times
In the end, spies and cybercriminals may be able to digitally access any information they want, said Ms. Perlroth, who is shown here using pen and paper. Credit Jason Henry for The New York Times
TT

Making the Lives of Cybercriminals and Spies Harder Online

In the end, spies and cybercriminals may be able to digitally access any information they want, said Ms. Perlroth, who is shown here using pen and paper. Credit Jason Henry for The New York Times
In the end, spies and cybercriminals may be able to digitally access any information they want, said Ms. Perlroth, who is shown here using pen and paper. Credit Jason Henry for The New York Times

How do New York Times journalists use technology in their jobs and in their personal lives? Nicole Perlroth, a cybersecurity reporter based in Boulder, Colo., discussed the tech she is using.

As a cybersecurity reporter, what do you do to secure your technology setup?

I went through a period about three years ago of trying to have perfect “op sec” for everything. I used a password manager. I had a spare computer for web browsing beyond email, banking and social media. I used Pretty Good Privacy, or PGP, encryption for any emails with sources. And I refused to buy any “Internet of Things” devices, like a Nest thermostat, fearing that all those devices did was give hackers entry into my home.

But over the past year or so, I have to admit, I’ve backtracked. I’ve covered a few too many breaches of password managers and of security companies, and sophisticated nation-state attacks, to believe that there is such thing as “op sec.”

So now my goal is to try to make the lives of cybercriminals and spies harder online, and take my most sensitive communications completely offline — which in practice means meeting my most coveted sources at a set date, time and place once a quarter.

Online, I do make sure to use two-factor authentication whenever it is available. I use Gmail and Chrome’s web browser because those have proved to be the most secure email and web platforms over time. I use encryption apps like Signal, Wickr and Telegram for any sensitive online communications and text messages. I never allow any apps access to any information — like my whereabouts — that they do not need. And I try to exercise good password hygiene, by which I mean I change my passwords regularly, often to long phrases I can remember, and use different, stronger passwords for more sensitive data, like my email, banking and medical records. And as a last resort, I watch what I say in my emails and keep my web camera covered.

What tech tools or web services do you avoid to prevent sensitive information from being exposed?

Alexa, Google Home, Dropcam and anything that has real-time access to my home scare me to death. Likewise, I steer clear of any free music, games or entertainment services for fear of catching a virus. And I never, ever click on links in emails.

Also, I stay far from any app that has not been vetted by Google Play or Apple. It’s disturbingly easy for cybercriminals to design apps that mimic a benign, mainstream product, then plant it in third-party app stores. Once downloaded, those apps potentially have access to every critical piece of information you store on your phone, by which I mean everything.

There was a case this year of a seemingly benign flashlight app in the Google Play store that was stealing users’ banking information. And another flashlight app the year before that was recording audio from users’ phones and sending it to Beijing. That is pretty much my worst-case scenario.

Well, actually the worst-case scenario is someone taking control of my self-driving car. It will be a while before I feel safe buying one of those.

Equifax, the credit bureau, was hacked recently. What did you do?

You mean after I slammed my head on my desk several times? The Equifax hack continues to infuriate. Here’s a company that proved to have minimal security in place, despite the fact it houses our most sensitive information — involuntarily for many of us, I’m afraid — and was hacked after two major, recent security incidents.

As for what I did, I signed up for the credit monitoring, froze my credit and then banged my head against my desk a few more times. This is actually the second time my information has been stolen. I used Anthem for insurance, which was nearly as bad. At this point, all I can do is freeze my credit, change my passwords, set stricter security settings on my life and pray.

Beyond your job, what tech product are you currently obsessed with using in your daily life?

For a tech reporter, I’m actually fairly agnostic about tech in general. I’m not one of those people constantly experimenting with the latest, greatest apps and services. I do not understand Snapchat. Do emojis count? I am bullish on emojis.

As far as my daily tech use, the first thing I do when I wake up in the morning is turn on a podcast, usually The New York Times’s “The Daily” podcast. Then I’ll check Twitter and the Times app. I use The Times’s Cooking app to plan my groceries for the week.

I do use Instacart, though I wish I wasn’t that lazy. And I am one of Spotify’s biggest users. I probably make a new playlist once a week, then I blast it through the house via Sonos. I use Google Docs and Dropbox for work. I try my best to stay off Facebook, but I do use Instagram, mostly to entertain my dog’s followers. He has his own account: “Homerthebestdog,” though we just had to change the name to accommodate our new puppy, so now it’s “HomerandHanzo.” (Sorry, Homes!)

What could be better about the tech?

My biggest beef with the tech I use is robots. As we’ve seen in recent weeks, Facebook, Google and Twitter — especially Twitter — have a huge troll and bot problem. And these aren’t your benign Twitter egg bots. These are now Russian state-backed bots. It’s amazing to see how successful some of their propaganda campaigns have been, and I don’t go a day on Twitter without coming across an obvious bot these days.

I believe in free speech. But I do not believe in free speech for robots.

Smartphones have been equipped with fingerprint sensors for years. Now Apple is moving into face recognition for unlocking a phone. Like or dislike, and why?

That’s a tough question. I am in favor of anything that replaces passwords. Passwords are useless, annoying and security’s weakest link. So initially I applauded Apple’s move to fingerprint sensors.

The problem, of course, is that nothing is completely secure. Over the past few years, a number of security researchers have demonstrated just how successfully fingerprint sensors can be tricked. Now we are moving to facial recognition technology, which has proved to be more secure, but comes with additional privacy concerns. A number of privacy activists have said they worry Apple’s move into facial recognition will “normalize” the practice and prompt everyone from data brokers and advertisers to governments to use facial recognition technology for dodgier use cases, or surveillance.

I think they raise legitimate concerns. But I’m also of the mind-set that the people I worry most about having access to my face template — namely spies or cybercriminals I’ve angered with my reporting — will be able to access anything they want about me with enough time and resources, anyway.

(The New York Times)



Google Says to Build New Subsea Cables from India in AI Push

A logo of Google is on display at Bharat Mandapam, one of the venues for AI Impact Summit, in New Delhi, India, February 17, 2026. REUTERS/Bhawika Chhabra
A logo of Google is on display at Bharat Mandapam, one of the venues for AI Impact Summit, in New Delhi, India, February 17, 2026. REUTERS/Bhawika Chhabra
TT

Google Says to Build New Subsea Cables from India in AI Push

A logo of Google is on display at Bharat Mandapam, one of the venues for AI Impact Summit, in New Delhi, India, February 17, 2026. REUTERS/Bhawika Chhabra
A logo of Google is on display at Bharat Mandapam, one of the venues for AI Impact Summit, in New Delhi, India, February 17, 2026. REUTERS/Bhawika Chhabra

Google announced Wednesday it would build new subsea cables from India and other locations as part of its existing $15 billion investment in the South Asian nation, which is hosting a major artificial intelligence summit this week.

The US tech giant said it would build "three subsea paths connecting India to Singapore, South Africa, and Australia; and four strategic fiber-optic routes that bolster network resilience and capacity between the United States, India, and multiple locations across the Southern Hemisphere".


Mark Zuckerberg Set to Testify in Watershed Social Media Trial 

Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on online child sexual exploitation at the US Capitol in Washington, US, January 31, 2024. (Reuters)
Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on online child sexual exploitation at the US Capitol in Washington, US, January 31, 2024. (Reuters)
TT

Mark Zuckerberg Set to Testify in Watershed Social Media Trial 

Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on online child sexual exploitation at the US Capitol in Washington, US, January 31, 2024. (Reuters)
Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on online child sexual exploitation at the US Capitol in Washington, US, January 31, 2024. (Reuters)

Mark Zuckerberg will testify in an unprecedented social media trial that questions whether Meta's platforms deliberately addict and harm children.

Meta's CEO is expected to answer tough questions on Wednesday from attorneys representing a now 20-year-old woman identified by the initials KGM, who claims her early use of social media addicted her to the technology and exacerbated depression and suicidal thoughts. Meta Platforms and Google’s YouTube are the two remaining defendants in the case, which TikTok and Snap have settled.

Zuckerberg has testified in other trials and answered questions from Congress about youth safety on Meta's platforms, and he apologized to families at that hearing whose lives had been upended by tragedies they believed were because of social media.

This trial, though, marks the first time Zuckerberg will answer similar questions in front of a jury. and, again, bereaved parents are expected to be in the limited courtroom seats available to the public.

The case, along with two others, has been selected as a bellwether trial, meaning its outcome could impact how thousands of similar lawsuits against social media companies would play out.

A Meta spokesperson said the company strongly disagrees with the allegations in the lawsuit and said they are “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.”

One of Meta's attorneys, Paul Schmidt, said in his opening statement that the company is not disputing that KGM experienced mental health struggles, but rather that Instagram played a substantial factor in those struggles.

He pointed to medical records that showed a turbulent home life, and both he and an attorney representing YouTube argue she turned to their platforms as a coping mechanism or a means of escaping her mental health struggles.

Zuckerberg's testimony comes a week after that of Adam Mosseri, the head of Meta's Instagram, who said in the courtroom that he disagrees with the idea that people can be clinically addicted to social media platforms.

Mosseri maintained that Instagram works hard to protect young people using the service, and said it's “not good for the company, over the long run, to make decisions that profit for us but are poor for people’s well-being."

Much of Mosseri's questioning from the plaintiff's lawyer, Mark Lanier, centered on cosmetic filters on Instagram that changed people’s appearance — a topic that Lanier is sure to revisit with Zuckerberg.

He is also expected to face questions about Instagram’s algorithm, the infinite nature of Meta’ feeds and other features the plaintiffs argue are designed to get users hooked.


US Tech Giant Nvidia Announces India Deals at AI Summit

FILED - 04 February 2026, Bavaria, Munich: The NVIDIA logo is seen during a press conference at the opening of Telekom and NVIDIA's AI factory "Industrial AI Cloud". Photo: Sven Hoppe/dpa
FILED - 04 February 2026, Bavaria, Munich: The NVIDIA logo is seen during a press conference at the opening of Telekom and NVIDIA's AI factory "Industrial AI Cloud". Photo: Sven Hoppe/dpa
TT

US Tech Giant Nvidia Announces India Deals at AI Summit

FILED - 04 February 2026, Bavaria, Munich: The NVIDIA logo is seen during a press conference at the opening of Telekom and NVIDIA's AI factory "Industrial AI Cloud". Photo: Sven Hoppe/dpa
FILED - 04 February 2026, Bavaria, Munich: The NVIDIA logo is seen during a press conference at the opening of Telekom and NVIDIA's AI factory "Industrial AI Cloud". Photo: Sven Hoppe/dpa

US artificial intelligence chip titan Nvidia unveiled tie-ups with Indian computing firms on Wednesday as tech companies rushed to announce deals and investments at a global AI conference in New Delhi.

This week's AI Impact Summit is the fourth annual gathering to discuss how to govern the fast-evolving technology -- and also an opportunity to "define India's leadership in the AI decade ahead", organizers say.

Mumbai cloud and data center provider L&T said it was teaming up with Nvidia, the world's most valuable company, to build what it touted as "India's largest gigawatt-scale AI factory".

"We are laying the foundation for world-class AI infrastructure that will power India's growth," said Nvidia boss Jensen Huang in a statement that did not put a figure on the investment.

L&T said it would use Nvidia's powerful processors, which can train and run generative AI tech, to provide data center capacity of up to 30 megawatts in Chennai and 40 megawatts in Mumbai.

Nvidia said it was also working with other Indian AI infrastructure players such as Yotta, which will deploy more than 20,000 top-end Nvidia Blackwell processors as part of a $2 billion investment.

Dozens of world leaders and ministerial delegations have come to India for the summit to discuss the opportunities and threats, from job losses to misinformation, that AI poses.

Last year India leapt to third place -- overtaking South Korea and Japan -- in an annual global ranking of AI competitiveness calculated by Stanford University researchers.

But despite plans for large-scale infrastructure and grand ambitions for innovation, experts say the country has a long way to go before it can rival the United States and China.

The conference has also brought a flurry of deals, with IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw saying Tuesday that India expects more than $200 billion in investments over the next two years, including roughly $90 billion already committed.

Separately, India's Adani Group said Tuesday it plans to invest $100 billion by 2035 to develop "hyperscale AI-ready data centers", a boost to New Delhi's push to become a global AI hub.

Microsoft said it was investing $50 billion this decade to boost AI adoption in developing countries, while US artificial intelligence startup Anthropic and Indian IT giant Infosys said they would work together to build AI agents for the telecoms industry.

Nvidia's Huang is not attending the AI summit but other top US tech figures joining include OpenAI's Sam Altman, Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis and Microsoft founder Bill Gates.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and other world leaders including French President Emmanuel Macron and Brazil's Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva are expected to deliver a statement at the end of the week about how they plan to address concerns raised by AI technology.

But experts say that the broad focus of the event and vague promises made at previous global AI summits in France, South Korea and Britain mean that concrete commitments are unlikely.

Nick Patience, practice lead for AI at tech research group Futurum, told AFP that nonbinding declarations could still "set the tone for what acceptable AI governance looks like".

But "the largest AI companies deploy capabilities at a pace that makes 18-month legislative cycles look glacial," Patience said.

"So it's a case of whether governments can converge fast enough to create meaningful guardrails before de facto standards are set by the companies themselves."