Asharq Al-Awsat Tours Extremist Dens in Libya: The Story of Sidi Khreibish

A man stands next to the rubble of a destroyed building in Sabri, a central Benghazi district, Libya, August 15, 2017. (Reuters)
A man stands next to the rubble of a destroyed building in Sabri, a central Benghazi district, Libya, August 15, 2017. (Reuters)
TT
20

Asharq Al-Awsat Tours Extremist Dens in Libya: The Story of Sidi Khreibish

A man stands next to the rubble of a destroyed building in Sabri, a central Benghazi district, Libya, August 15, 2017. (Reuters)
A man stands next to the rubble of a destroyed building in Sabri, a central Benghazi district, Libya, August 15, 2017. (Reuters)

The Libyan army, commanded by Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar, announced last summer the liberation of the city of Benghazi from extremist and terrorist groups. However, dozens of gunmen still remain fortified and besieged in the Sidi Khreibish neighborhood, said sources close to the army.

They estimated their numbers to be 90, but sources close to the besieged said that they were closer to 150.

In the second part of a series of features on the extremist dens in Libya, Asharq Al-Awsat took a closer look at the Sidi Khreibish neighborhood, which has become unrecognizable after years of fighting.

The area, known as Old Benghazi, used to be a cultural and shopping hub. Now its streets are littered with explosives and its empty buildings carry the scars of war.

A military officer accompanied Asharq Al-Awsat on its tour. He said that the gunmen have taken up al-Baladi Hotel as their main headquarters.

“We are monitoring them, but entering the area is difficult at the moment,” he continued.

“There is no doubt that we will eventually get there and regain the position,” he stressed, while explaining that the army will incur great losses in the impending battle because the besieged fighters have booby-trapped “everything” in the area.

The Libyan army has described the gunmen as ISIS members, but a mediator close to the armed groups said that they belong to the so-called “Libya 1 Shield,” which was formed three years ago at the national general conference (former parliament) in order to defend Benghazi.

The military official added that the ISIS terrorists have not only booby-trapped the area, but they have also dug underground tunnels where snipers lie in wait.

“They are surviving on expired food and it would be easy for us to bombard them with airstrikes, but we want them alive,” he declared.

Their capture will be valuable because they will be able to inform authorities about the local terror groups’ ties with international ones that are seeking chaos and destruction in Benghazi.

The mediator meanwhile said that the sides that have embroiled these fighters in the Benghazi war do not want them to leave the Sidi Khreibish battle alive.

“If they do, they will expose their backers, who have involved them in the fighting that has been ongoing throughout Libya since 2014,” he added.

Asked if there were any military personnel among the besieged fighters, he replied there are perhaps two or three, but the rest are civilians from the Libya 1 Shield.

He revealed that there have been previous local and international mediation efforts to end the siege, but they have been thwarted by the Muslim Brotherhood and another group. These two parties have been waging “nonstop” anti-military propaganda, alleging that the army was besieging Sidi Khreibish, he said.

“I think someone is benefiting from the continuation of this problem,” he remarked to Asharq Al-Awsat.

A walk in one of Sidi Khreibish’s neighborhoods reveals colored ribbons along the sidewalks and abandoned buildings.

A red and white ribbon means that areas beyond that point were dangerous. Despite the warning, some families attempted to go back to their homes, away from the military’s protection.

One of these families managed to reach their home, located on the second floor of a residential building on al-Shweikhat street, but they were soon surprised to find that it was in the hands of extremists.

The terrorists eventually withdrew, but not without booby-trapping the house, thereby claiming the life of the entire family.

Majed, one of the family’s neighbors in the four-storey building, said that the family did not heed warnings against entering the area. They ignored the ribbons that the military had placed and mine warnings.

Majed volunteered with the army and become a trained soldier.

He spoke of how ISIS had occupied and later completely destroyed his home.

“On the outside, it looked undamaged, but on the inside it was total destruction,” he recalled.

The building was planted with mines and they are still there.

“Two of my neighbors were killed when they returned to inspect their homes after ISIS’ retreat,” Majed explained.

His brother, Darwish, was also killed in the fighting in Sidi Khreibish.

Despite the destruction, residents and construction workers derive hope from an elderly woman, Hajja Khadija, who remained in Sidi Khreibish throughout the years of the fighting.

With a smile of determination and defiance, one of the workers said: “We ware happy to see residents return to the areas that have been cleared of explosives … We will not forget Hajja Khadija, who remained in her house in spite of the war and death.”

“After the fighting eased, we returned to fix electrical cables and Hajja Khadija used to check up on us to encourage us, bringing with her breakfast and lunch,” he said.



Early US Intelligence Report Suggests US Strikes Only Set Back Iran’s Nuclear Program by Months

A woman walks past a residential building that was hit in an Israeli strike covered with a big Iranian flag, in Tehran on June 25, 2025. (AFP)
A woman walks past a residential building that was hit in an Israeli strike covered with a big Iranian flag, in Tehran on June 25, 2025. (AFP)
TT
20

Early US Intelligence Report Suggests US Strikes Only Set Back Iran’s Nuclear Program by Months

A woman walks past a residential building that was hit in an Israeli strike covered with a big Iranian flag, in Tehran on June 25, 2025. (AFP)
A woman walks past a residential building that was hit in an Israeli strike covered with a big Iranian flag, in Tehran on June 25, 2025. (AFP)

A US intelligence report suggests that Iran’s nuclear program has been set back only a few months after US strikes and was not “completely and fully obliterated” as President Donald Trump has said, according to two people familiar with the early assessment.

The report issued by the Defense Intelligence Agency on Monday contradicts statements from Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities. According to the people, the report found that while the Sunday strikes at the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites did significant damage, the facilities were not totally destroyed. The people were not authorized to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

The White House rejected the DIA assessment, calling it “flat-out wrong.” On Wednesday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said in a post on X that “New intelligence confirms” what Trump has stated: “Iran’s nuclear facilities have been destroyed. If the Iranians chose to rebuild, they would have to rebuild all three facilities (Natanz, Fordo, Esfahan) entirely, which would likely take years to do.”

Gabbard’s office declined to respond to questions about the details of the new intelligence, or whether it would be declassified and released publicly.

The office of the director of national intelligence coordinates the work of the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies, including the DIA, which is the intelligence arm of the Defense Department, responsible for producing intelligence on foreign militaries and the capabilities of adversaries.

The DIA did not respond to requests for comment.

The US has held out hope of restarting negotiations with Iran to convince it to give up its nuclear program entirely, but some experts fear that the US strikes and the potential of Iran retaining some of its capabilities could push Tehran toward developing a functioning weapon.

The assessment also suggests that at least some of Iran’s highly enriched uranium, necessary for creating a nuclear weapon, was moved out of multiple sites before the US strikes and survived, and it found that Iran’s centrifuges, which are required to further enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels, are largely intact, according to the people.

At the deeply buried Fordo uranium enrichment plant, where US B-2 stealth bombers dropped several 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs, the entrance collapsed and infrastructure was damaged, but the underground infrastructure was not destroyed, the assessment found. The people said that intelligence officials had warned of such an outcome in previous assessments ahead of the strike on Fordo.

The White House pushes back Trump defended his characterization of the strike's impact.

“It was obliteration, and you’ll see that,” Trump told reporters while attending the NATO summit in the Netherlands. He said the intelligence was “very inconclusive” and described media outlets as “scum” for reporting on it.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who was also at the NATO summit, said there would be an investigation into how the intelligence assessment leaked and dismissed it as “preliminary” and “low confidence.”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, “These leakers are professional stabbers.”

The intelligence assessment was first reported by CNN on Tuesday.

The Israel Atomic Energy Commission said its assessment was that the US and Israeli strikes have “set back Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years.” It did not give evidence to back up its claim.

Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff, who said he has read damage assessment reports from US intelligence and other nations, reiterated Tuesday that the strikes had deprived Iran of the ability to develop a weapon and called it outrageous that the US assessment was shared with reporters.

“It’s treasonous so it ought to be investigated,” Witkoff said on Fox News Channel.

Trump has said in comments and posts on social media in recent days, including Tuesday, that the strike left the sites in Iran “totally destroyed” and that Iran will never rebuild its nuclear facilities.

Netanyahu said Tuesday in a televised statement: “For dozens of years I promised you that Iran would not have nuclear weapons and indeed ... we brought to ruin Iran’s nuclear program." He said the US joining Israel was “historic” and thanked Trump.

Outside experts had suspected Iran had likely already hidden the core components of its nuclear program as it stared down the possibility that American bunker-buster bombs could be used on its nuclear sites.

Bulldozers and trucks visible in satellite imagery taken just days before the strikes have fueled speculation among experts that Iran may have transferred its half-ton stockpile of enriched uranium to an unknown location. And the incomplete destruction of the nuclear sites could still leave the country with the capacity to spin up weapons-grade uranium and develop a bomb.

Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is peaceful, but it has enriched significant quantities of uranium beyond the levels required for any civilian use. The US and others assessed prior to the US strikes that Iran’s theocratic leadership had not yet ordered the country to pursue an operational nuclear weapon, but the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly warned that Iran has enough enriched uranium to make several nuclear bombs should it choose to do so.

Vice President JD Vance said in a Monday interview on Fox News Channel that even if Iran is still in control of its stockpile of 408.6 kilograms (900.8 pounds) of enriched uranium, which is just short of weapons-grade, the US has cut off Iran's ability to convert it to a nuclear weapon.

“If they have 60% enriched uranium, but they don’t have the ability to enrich it to 90%, and, further, they don’t have the ability to convert that to a nuclear weapon, that is mission success. That is the obliteration of their nuclear program, which is why the president, I think, rightly is using that term,” Vance said.

Approximately 42 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium is theoretically enough to produce one atomic bomb if enriched further to 90%, according to the UN nuclear watchdog.

What experts say Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi informed UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi on June 13 — the day Israel launched its military campaign against Iran — that Tehran would “adopt special measures to protect our nuclear equipment and materials.”

American satellite imagery and analysis firm Maxar Technologies said its satellites photographed trucks and bulldozers at the Fordo site beginning on June 19, three days before the Americans struck.

Subsequent imagery “revealed that the tunnel entrances into the underground complex had been sealed off with dirt prior to the US airstrikes,” said Stephen Wood, senior director at Maxar. “We believe that some of the trucks seen on 19 June were carrying dirt to be used as part of that operation.”

Some experts say those trucks could also have been used to move out Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile.

“It is plausible that Iran moved the material enriched to 60% out of Fordo and loaded it on a truck,” said Eric Brewer, a former US intelligence analyst and now deputy vice president at the Nuclear Threat Initiative.

Iran could also have moved other equipment, including centrifuges, he said, noting that while enriched uranium, which is stored in fortified canisters, is relatively easy to transport, delicate centrifuges are more challenging to move without inflicting damage.

Apart from its enriched uranium stockpile, over the past four years Iran has produced the centrifuges key to enrichment without oversight from the UN nuclear watchdog.

Iran also announced on June 12 that it has built and will activate a third nuclear enrichment facility. IAEA chief Grossi said the facility was located in Isfahan, a place where Iran has several other nuclear sites. After being bombarded by both the Israelis and the Americans, it is unclear if, or how quickly, Isfahan’s facilities, including tunnels, could become operational.

But given all of the equipment and material likely still under Iran’s control, this offers Tehran “a pretty solid foundation for a reconstituted covert program and for getting a bomb,” Brewer said.

Kelsey Davenport, director for nonproliferation policy at the Arms Control Association, a nonpartisan policy center, said that “if Iran had already diverted its centrifuges,” it can “build a covert enrichment facility with a small footprint and inject the 60% gas into those centrifuges and quickly enrich to weapons grade levels.”

But Brewer also underlined that if Iran launched a covert nuclear program, it would do so at a disadvantage, having lost to Israeli and American strikes vital equipment and personnel that are crucial for turning the enriched uranium into a functional nuclear weapon.