Implicit Understanding to Dissociate Cabinet Session from Aoun-Berri Crisis

Lebanon’s President Michel Aoun talks to Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri during the cabinet meeting in Baabda near Beirut, Lebanon December 5, 2017. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
Lebanon’s President Michel Aoun talks to Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri during the cabinet meeting in Baabda near Beirut, Lebanon December 5, 2017. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
TT

Implicit Understanding to Dissociate Cabinet Session from Aoun-Berri Crisis

Lebanon’s President Michel Aoun talks to Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri during the cabinet meeting in Baabda near Beirut, Lebanon December 5, 2017. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
Lebanon’s President Michel Aoun talks to Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri during the cabinet meeting in Baabda near Beirut, Lebanon December 5, 2017. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir

The Lebanese Cabinet is holding its first session this year amid an ongoing dispute between President Michel Aoun and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri over a decree to promote a number of officers, who graduated from the military academy in 1994, without the approval of the finance minister.

Sources noted that there was an implicit understanding to dissociate the Cabinet session from the crisis, especially that officials close to the speaker have pointed last week that any escalation would lead Berri’s Amal Bloc ministers to boycott ministerial sessions.

Amal Movement MP and Agriculture Minister Ghazi Zeaiter told Asharq al-Awsat that ministers representing Amal would participate in Thursday’s Cabinet session at the Baabda Palace, saying: “We are calling for the implementation of the Constitution and the law to overcome the current problem and avoid falling into new problems.”

A number of deputies, who met with Berri on Wednesday, quoted him as saying that the situation “is still the same” with regards to the officers’ decree, reaffirming the need to “abide by the laws and Constitution” to resolve this matter.

The Lebanese speaker underlined “the necessity to take care of people’s problems”, saying: “The time has come to secure electricity, water, medicine and all services across the country.”

The Cabinet is expected to discuss on Thursday an agenda of 43 items, mainly the request of the Defense Ministry to refer the events of Arsal, al-Qaa and Ras Baalbek to the Judicial Council and give the Justice Minister permission to sign a cooperation agreement with Iran for the exchange of convicts between Beirut and Tehran.

Meanwhile, sources at the Baabda Palace told Asharq al-Awsat that there were no developments regarding the officers’ decree issue, noting that it was up to the ministers themselves to raise this matter during the Cabinet session, as it was not included in the agenda.

As for the awaited bid by Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri to contain the crisis, sources in the Future Movement confirmed the presence of such initiative, pointing out that its content is “confidential” and its results “are not guaranteed.”

However, sources in Aoun’s Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) stressed that the dispute was not confined to Aoun and Berri, noting that Hariri was an essential part of it because he signed the decree and therefore supported the position of the president.



Italy Plans to Return Ambassador to Syria to Reflect New Diplomatic Developments, Minister Says

Italy's Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani speaks while meeting with members of the G7, on July 11, 2024, during the NATO summit in Washington. (AP)
Italy's Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani speaks while meeting with members of the G7, on July 11, 2024, during the NATO summit in Washington. (AP)
TT

Italy Plans to Return Ambassador to Syria to Reflect New Diplomatic Developments, Minister Says

Italy's Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani speaks while meeting with members of the G7, on July 11, 2024, during the NATO summit in Washington. (AP)
Italy's Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani speaks while meeting with members of the G7, on July 11, 2024, during the NATO summit in Washington. (AP)

Italy plans to send an ambassador back to Syria after a decade-long absence, the country’s foreign minister said, in a diplomatic move that could spark divisions among European Union allies.

Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani, speaking in front of relevant parliamentary committees Thursday, announced Rome’s intention to re-establish diplomatic ties with Syria to prevent Russia from monopolizing diplomatic efforts in the Middle Eastern country.

Moscow is considered a key supporter of Syrian President Bashar Assad, who has remained in power despite widespread Western isolation and civilian casualties since the start of Syria’s civil war in March 2011.

Peaceful protests against the Assad government — part of the so-called “Arab Spring” popular uprisings that spread across some of the Middle East — were met by a brutal crackdown, and the uprising quickly spiraled into a full-blown civil war.

The conflict was further complicated by the intervention of foreign forces on all sides and a rising militancy, first by al-Qaida-linked groups and then the ISIS group until its defeat on the battlefield in 2019.

The war, which has killed nearly half a million people and displaced half the country’s pre-war population of 23 million, is now largely frozen, despite ongoing low-level fighting.

The country is effectively carved up into areas controlled by the Damascus-based government of Assad, various opposition groups and Syrian Kurdish forces.

In the early days of the conflict, many Western and Arab countries cut off relations with Syria, including Italy, which has since managed Syria-related diplomacy through its embassy in Beirut.

However, since Assad has regained control over most of the territory, neighboring Arab countries have gradually restored relations, with the most symbolically significant move coming last year when Syria was re-admitted to the Arab League.

Tajani said Thursday the EU’s policy in Syria should be adapted to the “development of the situation,” adding that Italy has received support from Austria, Croatia, Greece, the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Cyprus and Slovakia.

However, the US and allied countries in Europe have largely continued to hold firm in their stance against Assad’s government, due to concerns over human rights violations.