Allawi Refuses to Repeat Scenario of 2010 Elections

Iraq's former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi speaks to reporters during a news conference in Baghdad March 20, 2016. REUTERS/Khalid Al Mousily/Files
Iraq's former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi speaks to reporters during a news conference in Baghdad March 20, 2016. REUTERS/Khalid Al Mousily/Files
TT

Allawi Refuses to Repeat Scenario of 2010 Elections

Iraq's former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi speaks to reporters during a news conference in Baghdad March 20, 2016. REUTERS/Khalid Al Mousily/Files
Iraq's former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi speaks to reporters during a news conference in Baghdad March 20, 2016. REUTERS/Khalid Al Mousily/Files

Iraqi political parties are engaging in talks over the upcoming local and general elections, which are scheduled to be held in mid-May.
 
As the majority of Shi'ite parties have voiced their rejection of any postponement, other political forces have preferred to delay the proposed date to resolve pending matters including the displaced and the reconstruction of governorates destroyed during the war against ISIS.
 
According to Ihsan Al-Shamri, who is close to the government, “one of the ruling political leaders called for the formation of an interim government in exchange for accepting the postponement of the elections.”
 
While he refused to reveal the name of that leader, Shamri stressed in a statement to Asharq Al-Awsat that Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi “is committed to holding the elections on time, despite pressure being exerted on him, because the delay would lead the country to a new cycle of problems.”
 
In parallel, Ayad Allawi, vice-president of the Iraqi National List, hinted at the possibility of postponing the elections in the absence of the adequate conditions.
 
“Whether the elections are postponed or not is up to the Parliament and the Cabinet, but we stress the need for the right atmosphere to conduct them,” he said during a ceremony organized by Al-Wefaq party on the occasion of the Iraqi Army Day.
 
Allawi went on to say that most of the elections that took place in the past “were not accurate or correct, and today there are serious problems plaguing Iraq; including the problem of the displaced and the crisis with Kurdistan, and all this needs to be resolved so we can hold the elections.”
 
A source close to Al-Wefaq revealed that Allawi was leading intensive negotiations with a wide spectrum of personalities and political parties. While the latter called for not repeating the experience of the 2010 elections with regards to foreign and regional interference, the source, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Asharq Al-Awsat that Allawi did not want a scenario similar to the 2010 polls, especially in terms of his presidency of the “Iraqiya” alliance, which gathered the majority of leading Sunni figures.
 
The source explains that both Al-Wefaq and Allawi parties did not want to engage in a sectarian or national alliance that does not fulfill the aspirations of the Iraqi people.



Hamas, Fatah Agree to Form Committee to Govern Gaza

A man hides behind a column as smoke and dust spread as a result of an explosion during an Israeli raid targeting a school in the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood on the outskirts of Gaza City on September 1, 2024 (AFP)
A man hides behind a column as smoke and dust spread as a result of an explosion during an Israeli raid targeting a school in the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood on the outskirts of Gaza City on September 1, 2024 (AFP)
TT

Hamas, Fatah Agree to Form Committee to Govern Gaza

A man hides behind a column as smoke and dust spread as a result of an explosion during an Israeli raid targeting a school in the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood on the outskirts of Gaza City on September 1, 2024 (AFP)
A man hides behind a column as smoke and dust spread as a result of an explosion during an Israeli raid targeting a school in the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood on the outskirts of Gaza City on September 1, 2024 (AFP)

A Palestinian source confirmed that Fatah and Hamas have agreed to form a body called the Social Support Committee to govern Gaza after the war. The source told Asharq Al-Awsat that the final agreement was reached during discussions in Cairo and will be presented to President Mahmoud Abbas for approval.

The two-page document describes the committee as the body responsible for managing Gaza under the authority of the Palestinian government in Ramallah. It outlines six key principles for its formation: preserving the unity of Palestinian territories within the 1967 borders (West Bank, Jerusalem, and Gaza), maintaining communication between the Palestinian government and the committee, adhering to the Palestinian political framework, preventing Gaza’s separation from other Palestinian territories, selecting independent and qualified Palestinian leaders, and coordinating with existing local authorities in Gaza.

The committee’s mandate will end when its purpose is fulfilled, general elections are held, or another agreed-upon framework is implemented, subject to national consensus and a decision by the Palestinian president.

The Palestinian Authority and Hamas turned to this committee as a way to counter regional and international efforts to marginalize them in post-war Gaza governance, according to the sources.

Under the agreement, the committee will report to the Palestinian Authority, overseeing humanitarian aid distribution, civil affairs, and Gaza’s reconstruction, including managing the Rafah border crossing. According to the document, the joint body will assume control of Rafah under the terms of the 2005 border agreement, which stipulated Palestinian Authority management of the crossing with international monitors and remote Israeli oversight. While the US and the EU support a return to this arrangement, Israel has so far opposed it, offering only a symbolic role for the Palestinian Authority at Rafah.

The agreement, mediated by Egypt, is part of a broader effort to secure a prisoner exchange deal, a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, and an eventual Israeli withdrawal. Officials from both Hamas and Israel have expressed cautious optimism about a potential deal, though the details remain unclear.

Asharq Al-Awsat recently reported that Hamas is more open than ever to a phased agreement for Gaza, similar to the framework adopted in Lebanon. Sources indicated that Hamas is willing to accept a gradual Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, including contentious areas such as Philadelphi and Netzarim. The group is also prepared to let the Palestinian Authority manage the Rafah crossing if it leads to its immediate reopening.

The agreement also proposes establishing an international fund for Gaza’s reconstruction and reactivating pre-war mechanisms for border crossings. However, it avoids addressing contentious issues such as security control, arms, and law enforcement in Gaza.