Libya Recollections: Gaddafi's Amnesty for Muslim Brotherhood Leaders

Libya's ex-leader Moammar al-Gaddafi. (Reuters)
Libya's ex-leader Moammar al-Gaddafi. (Reuters)
TT
20

Libya Recollections: Gaddafi's Amnesty for Muslim Brotherhood Leaders

Libya's ex-leader Moammar al-Gaddafi. (Reuters)
Libya's ex-leader Moammar al-Gaddafi. (Reuters)

For a long time, it was believed that former guards in Libya’s former rule under Colonel Moammar al-Gaddafi were only men who had feared any changes in Libyan politics, both internally and externally. But as it turns out, this was not the case entirely.

In the second episode of an investigation series, Asharq Al-Awsat sheds light on how the door has been opened for Libyan dissidents to return from abroad, and details the amnesty covering Muslim Brotherhood members and leaders.

One of the closest associates of Gaddafi’s son, Saif al-Islam, said the operation for amnesty was initiated by foreign intelligence agent Abuzed Dorda in 2004 when he was Libya's representative at the United Nations.

This information was also reaffirmed by the former head of the Gaddafi Foundation, Saleh Abdulsalam, tribal leaders and security leaders, who referred to earlier attempts, both to pardon opponents and to bring back Libyan mujahideen from Afghanistan.

Saif al-Islam’s own friend was involved in bringing back Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) leaders from Afghanistan and away from the Taliban government.

The details of this process date back to 2001.

Saif al-Islam’s friend, who was in the negotiating delegation, revealed that Tripoli under Gaddafi tried to conclude an unfinished deal with Mullah Omar, the late Afghanistan-based Taliban spiritual leader.

LIFG’s Abdelhakim Belhaj, Sami al-Saadi and Khalid al-Sharif will return in exchange for promises of Libya's recognition of the Taliban, investment in its government, and ensuring good treatment for returning Libyan leaders handed over to Tripoli. The US war on Afghanistan that year thwarted the deal.

Afghanistan was plagued by several wars, most prominent is the Soviet Union invasion in 1979. Thousands of fighters from the Arab region came to expel the Russians from Afghanistan.

But after the Russian troops left in 1989, most Arab countries feared the return of these combatants, because they had become extreme and more capable of fighting. Among them was the LIFG.

LIFG leaders, namely Belhaj, would later will be known for preparing to oppose the Gaddafi regime.

"We went to Kandahar to meet with Mullah Omar," Saif al-Islam’s close associate said.

“First we were received by Taliban foreign minister Mulla Wakil Ahmed Mutwakil... Then we met with Mullah Omar. We asked him to hand over LIGF leaders and members to us, in return for Libya weighing up recognizing the Taliban regime and assisting it in infrastructure projects, including the construction of a road between Jalalabad and Kabul,” he added, speaking under the condition of anonymity.

“It was a strange encounter,” he described the negotiations with Mullah Omar.

"When Mullah sat on the floor of the high terrace, he did not talk much.”

According to Saif al-Islam’s close friend, “it was agreed at the conclusion of these negotiations that committees will be formed.”

It was the Libyan state in general that started this initiative, he added.

“I was involved in negotiations through the institution headed by Saif al-Islam,” the associate confessed.

"We were supposed to go back to Afghanistan to complete the talks, but the September 11 attacks in the United States and the subsequent developments hindered the process,” he added.

However, Saif al-Islam's friend admitted to visiting Afghanistan two weeks after the outbreak of the war and began overseeing relief convoys sent by the Gaddafi Foundation to Kandahar, Jalalabad and Kabul to help Afghans.

Western intelligence agencies have been hunting down Arab Afghan leaders and sending those arrested to investigation and detention centers, including the famous Guantánamo Bay prison.



Netanyahu’s Governing Coalition Is Fracturing. Here’s What It Means for Israel and Gaza

 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu walks in the Knesset, Israel's parliament, on the day of a vote over a possible expulsion of Ayman Odeh from parliament, in Jerusalem, July 14, 2025. (Reuters)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu walks in the Knesset, Israel's parliament, on the day of a vote over a possible expulsion of Ayman Odeh from parliament, in Jerusalem, July 14, 2025. (Reuters)
TT
20

Netanyahu’s Governing Coalition Is Fracturing. Here’s What It Means for Israel and Gaza

 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu walks in the Knesset, Israel's parliament, on the day of a vote over a possible expulsion of Ayman Odeh from parliament, in Jerusalem, July 14, 2025. (Reuters)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu walks in the Knesset, Israel's parliament, on the day of a vote over a possible expulsion of Ayman Odeh from parliament, in Jerusalem, July 14, 2025. (Reuters)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government suffered a serious blow on Tuesday when an ultra-Orthodox party announced it was bolting the coalition.

While this doesn’t immediately threaten Netanyahu’s rule, it could set in motion his government’s demise, although that could still be months away. It also could complicate efforts to halt the war in Gaza.

United Torah Judaism's two factions said they were leaving the government because of disagreements over a proposed law that would end broad exemptions for religious students from enlistment into the military.

Military service is compulsory for most Jewish Israelis, and the issue of exemptions has long divided the country. Those rifts have only widened since the start of the war in Gaza as demand for military manpower has grown and hundreds of soldiers have been killed.

The threat to the government “looks more serious than ever,” said Shuki Friedman, vice president of the Jewish People Policy Institute, a Jerusalem think tank.

Netanyahu is on trial for alleged corruption, and critics say he wants to hang on to power so that he can use his office as a bully pulpit to rally supporters and lash out against prosecutors and judges. That makes him all the more vulnerable to the whims of his coalition allies.

Here is a look at Netanyahu's political predicament and some potential scenarios:

The ultra-Orthodox are key partners

Netanyahu, Israel’s longest serving leader, has long relied on the ultra-Orthodox parties to prop up his governments.

Without UTJ, his coalition holds just 61 out of parliament’s 120 seats. That means Netanyahu will be more susceptible to pressure from other elements within his government, especially far-right parties who strongly oppose ending the war in Gaza.

The political shake up isn't likely to completely derail ceasefire talks, but it could complicate how flexible Netanyahu can be in his concessions to Hamas.

A second ultra-Orthodox party is also considering bolting the government over the draft issue. That would give Netanyahu a minority in parliament and make governing almost impossible.

The ultra-Orthodox military exemptions have divided Israel

A decades-old arrangement by Israel’s first prime minister granted hundreds of ultra-Orthodox men exemptions from compulsory Israeli service. Over the years, those exemptions ballooned into the thousands and created deep divisions in Israel.

The ultra-Orthodox say their men are serving the country by studying sacred Jewish texts and preserving centuries’ old tradition. They fear that mandatory enlistment will dilute adherents’ connection to the faith.

But most Jewish Israelis see the exemption as unfair, as well as the generous government stipends granted to many ultra-Orthodox men who study instead of work throughout adulthood. That bitterness has only worsened during nearly two years of war.

The politically powerful ultra-Orthodox parties have long had outsize influence in Israel’s fragmented political system and used that status to extract major concessions for their constituents.

But a court last year ruled Netanyahu’s government must enlist the ultra-Orthodox so long as there is no new law codifying the exemptions.

Netanyahu’s coalition has been trying to find a path forward on a new law. But his base is largely opposed to granting sweeping draft exemptions and a key lawmaker has stood in the way of giving the ultra-Orthodox a law they can get behind, prompting their exit.

The political shake up comes during Gaza ceasefire talks

The resignations don't take effect for 48 hours, so Netanyahu will likely spend the next two days seeking a compromise. But that won't be easy because the Supreme Court has said the old system of exemptions amounts to discrimination against the secular majority.

That does not mean the government will collapse.

Netanyahu's opponents cannot submit a motion to dissolve parliament until the end of the year because of procedural reasons. And with parliament's summer recess beginning later this month, the parties could use that time to find a compromise and return to the government.

Cabinet Minister Miki Zohar, from Netanyahu’s Likud party, said he was hopeful the religious party could be coaxed back to the coalition. “God willing, everything will be fine,” he said. A Likud spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Once the departures become official, Netanyahu will have a razor-thin majority. The far-right parties within it could threaten to leave the coalition, further weakening him, if he gives in to too many of Hamas' demands.

Hamas wants a permanent end to the war as part of any ceasefire deal. Netanyahu's hard-line partners are open to a temporary truce, but say the war cannot end until Hamas is destroyed.

If they or any other party leave the coalition, Netanyahu will have a minority government, and that will make it almost impossible to govern and likely lead to its collapse. But he could still find ways to approve a ceasefire deal, including with support from the political opposition.

Israel may be on the path toward early elections

Netanyahu could seek to shore up his coalition by appeasing the far-right and agreeing for now to just a partial, 60-day ceasefire with Hamas, promising his governing partners that he can still resume the war once it expires.

But Netanyahu is balancing those political constraints with pressure from the Trump administration, which is pressing Israel to wrap up the war.

Gayil Talshir, a political scientist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said she expects Netanyahu to work during those 60 days to shift the narrative away from the draft exemptions and the war in Gaza, toward something that could potentially give him an electoral boost – like an expansion of US-led normalization deals between Israel and Arab or Muslim countries.

Once the 60-day ceasefire is up, Netanyahu could bend to US pressure to end the war and bring home the remaining hostages in Gaza — a move most Israelis would support.

Elections are currently scheduled for October 2026. But if Netanyahu feels like he has improved his political standing, he may want to call elections before then.