Electoral Symbols in Egypt Hold Political Significance

A voter holds an electoral ballot during the 2014 presidential polls. (Reuters)
A voter holds an electoral ballot during the 2014 presidential polls. (Reuters)
TT

Electoral Symbols in Egypt Hold Political Significance

A voter holds an electoral ballot during the 2014 presidential polls. (Reuters)
A voter holds an electoral ballot during the 2014 presidential polls. (Reuters)

Egyptian presidential elections candidates, President Abdul Fattah al-Sisi and his competitor Moussa Mustafa, have chosen their electoral symbols ahead of next months polls.

The announcement of the symbols helps shed light on the importance of these emblems in the electoral process.

Sisi opted for a star, while Moussa opted for an airplane.

The images will remain in the people’s memory long after elections are over. Symbols were initially introduced to help illiterate people distinguish between candidates.

Experts said however that while electoral platforms speak to the voters’ mind, the symbols speak to their hearts.

Dr. Jamal Salameh, a political science professor at Suez University, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the symbols were originally introduced to help illiterate people.

“They however persisted after that because they are an easy method for all voters,” he added.

This method also exists in the majority of countries, not just in ones with high illiteracy rates, he explained.

The United States, for example, places a symbol next to each electoral candidate, which makes the voters’ job easier, especially if the candidate list is long, he went on to say.

Symbols are usually linked to historic eras, some may even spark ridicule among voters. The symbol, said Salameh does influence the voters, so it is important that candidates adopt pictures that carry positive connotations, as opposed to ones that can spark derision.

In addition, social factors must also be taken into consideration when choosing a symbol because an emblem that is accepted in one environment may be rejected in another.

Dr. Samia Khodr, a sociology professor at the Ain Shams University, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the symbols act as a communication link between the candidate and the voter.

A symbol therefore holds social and cultural significance. For example, a gun may be accepted in violent societies, but in Egypt, such an emblem may give people the impression of violence.

The people are usually influenced by the symbols that represent their environment. A boat, for example, may have more of an impact on coastal societies. Older voters may remember the palm tree as the symbol of the Al-Wafd Party. The tree can also resonate with agricultural societies.

“In general, a candidate usually chooses a positive symbol that gives a sense of hope among the voters,” said Khodr.

A 2015 Egyptian report said that the use of of symbols was linked to hieroglyphics, which were adopted during the age of the Pharaohs in Ancient Egypt.

Egyptologist Issam Satani told Asharq Al-Awsat that symbols were an important part of hieroglyphic language, whose letters were based on nature.

Symbols helped express several deep thoughts, especially those of humanitarian and existential values, he added.

The balance, he said, still represents justice, the Eye of Horus still stands for security and the sun stands for joy and hope.

The ancient Egyptians used symbols in their daily life, and as human civilization developed, the symbols transformed into a universal language that is used in the modern age, he explained.



Iran Opts for Dialogue with Europe ahead of Trump's Return to Office

President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
TT

Iran Opts for Dialogue with Europe ahead of Trump's Return to Office

President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)

It is difficult to predict what the outcomes will be of the discussions between Iran, France, Britain and Germany about Tehran’s nuclear program in Geneva on Friday.

Last week, the UN atomic watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors passed a resolution again ordering Iran to urgently improve cooperation with the agency and requesting a "comprehensive" report aimed at pressuring Iran into fresh nuclear talks.

Britain, France, Germany and the United States, which proposed the resolution, dismissed as insufficient and insincere a last-minute Iranian move to cap its stock of uranium that is close to weapons-grade. Diplomats said Iran's move was conditional on scrapping the resolution.

Iran has been weighing its response to the censure, debating whether to increase uranium enrichment or by being open to the proposals expected at the Geneva talks.

The discussions may seek a new nuclear deal instead of the 2015 one with Tehran that is in tatters.

As it stands, Iran is likely to opt for negotiations instead of escalation due to a number of internal, regional and international reasons.

Diplomatic sources in Paris noted US President-elect Donald Trump’s appointments of officials handling Middle East affairs, underscoring their unreserved support to Israel and clear hostility to Iran.

These appointments may lead Iran to think twice before resorting to any escalation.

Even before Trump has taken office, his circles have said that the new president will take “several executive decisions related to Iran and that will be declared on his first day in office.” The decisions will be binding and do not need Congress’ approval.

However, Trump is unpredictable and the sources did not rule out the surprise possibility of him striking a deal with Iran related to its nuclear program and behavior in the Middle East. This means that Tehran will have to make major concessions, including abandoning its policy of “exporting the revolution”.

This remains a far-fatched possibility, however. In all likelihood, Washington under Trump will return to his “maximum pressure” policy against Iran on political, diplomatic and economic levels to make it return to the negotiations table and agree on a deal that completely ends its nuclear ambitions.

So, at the Geneva meeting on Friday, Tehran will seek to achieve two main goals: a nuclear breakthrough during what remains of US President Joe Biden’s time in office, and attempt to lure the European powers away from Trump.

The truth is that Tehran is wading in the unknown. One only has to go back to Trump’s past statements about how Israel should have struck Iran’s nuclear facilities during its October 26 attack on the country.

Trump has already shown Iran his hardline stance when he ordered the assassination of Quds Forces leader Qassem Soleimani near Baghdad airport in January 2020.

Based on this, Tehran is scrambling to avert a joint American-Israeli strike that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been dreaming of.

Iran is vulnerable now due to two main reasons: the Israeli strike in October weakened Iran’s air defenses and Netanyahu has said that Israeli jets can now run rampant over Iran without any worries.

And Tehran can no longer rely on its allied militias to threaten Israel with all-out war. Hamas in Gaza is no longer in a position to threaten Israel and neither is Hezbollah in Lebanon.

So, Iran now finds itself exposed and would rather turn to negotiations with Europe than risk escalation that would cost it dearly with Israel now that it can no longer rely on Hamas and Hezbollah.