Electoral Symbols in Egypt Hold Political Significance

A voter holds an electoral ballot during the 2014 presidential polls. (Reuters)
A voter holds an electoral ballot during the 2014 presidential polls. (Reuters)
TT

Electoral Symbols in Egypt Hold Political Significance

A voter holds an electoral ballot during the 2014 presidential polls. (Reuters)
A voter holds an electoral ballot during the 2014 presidential polls. (Reuters)

Egyptian presidential elections candidates, President Abdul Fattah al-Sisi and his competitor Moussa Mustafa, have chosen their electoral symbols ahead of next months polls.

The announcement of the symbols helps shed light on the importance of these emblems in the electoral process.

Sisi opted for a star, while Moussa opted for an airplane.

The images will remain in the people’s memory long after elections are over. Symbols were initially introduced to help illiterate people distinguish between candidates.

Experts said however that while electoral platforms speak to the voters’ mind, the symbols speak to their hearts.

Dr. Jamal Salameh, a political science professor at Suez University, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the symbols were originally introduced to help illiterate people.

“They however persisted after that because they are an easy method for all voters,” he added.

This method also exists in the majority of countries, not just in ones with high illiteracy rates, he explained.

The United States, for example, places a symbol next to each electoral candidate, which makes the voters’ job easier, especially if the candidate list is long, he went on to say.

Symbols are usually linked to historic eras, some may even spark ridicule among voters. The symbol, said Salameh does influence the voters, so it is important that candidates adopt pictures that carry positive connotations, as opposed to ones that can spark derision.

In addition, social factors must also be taken into consideration when choosing a symbol because an emblem that is accepted in one environment may be rejected in another.

Dr. Samia Khodr, a sociology professor at the Ain Shams University, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the symbols act as a communication link between the candidate and the voter.

A symbol therefore holds social and cultural significance. For example, a gun may be accepted in violent societies, but in Egypt, such an emblem may give people the impression of violence.

The people are usually influenced by the symbols that represent their environment. A boat, for example, may have more of an impact on coastal societies. Older voters may remember the palm tree as the symbol of the Al-Wafd Party. The tree can also resonate with agricultural societies.

“In general, a candidate usually chooses a positive symbol that gives a sense of hope among the voters,” said Khodr.

A 2015 Egyptian report said that the use of of symbols was linked to hieroglyphics, which were adopted during the age of the Pharaohs in Ancient Egypt.

Egyptologist Issam Satani told Asharq Al-Awsat that symbols were an important part of hieroglyphic language, whose letters were based on nature.

Symbols helped express several deep thoughts, especially those of humanitarian and existential values, he added.

The balance, he said, still represents justice, the Eye of Horus still stands for security and the sun stands for joy and hope.

The ancient Egyptians used symbols in their daily life, and as human civilization developed, the symbols transformed into a universal language that is used in the modern age, he explained.



What to Know about the Ceasefire Deal between Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah

People gather as cars drive past rubble from damaged buildings in Beirut's southern suburbs, after a ceasefire between Israel and Iran-backed group Hezbollah took effect at 0200 GMT on Wednesday after US President Joe Biden said both sides accepted an agreement brokered by the United States and France, in Lebanon, November 27, 2024. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
People gather as cars drive past rubble from damaged buildings in Beirut's southern suburbs, after a ceasefire between Israel and Iran-backed group Hezbollah took effect at 0200 GMT on Wednesday after US President Joe Biden said both sides accepted an agreement brokered by the United States and France, in Lebanon, November 27, 2024. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
TT

What to Know about the Ceasefire Deal between Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah

People gather as cars drive past rubble from damaged buildings in Beirut's southern suburbs, after a ceasefire between Israel and Iran-backed group Hezbollah took effect at 0200 GMT on Wednesday after US President Joe Biden said both sides accepted an agreement brokered by the United States and France, in Lebanon, November 27, 2024. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
People gather as cars drive past rubble from damaged buildings in Beirut's southern suburbs, after a ceasefire between Israel and Iran-backed group Hezbollah took effect at 0200 GMT on Wednesday after US President Joe Biden said both sides accepted an agreement brokered by the United States and France, in Lebanon, November 27, 2024. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir

A ceasefire deal that went into effect on Wednesday could end more than a year of cross-border fighting between Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah militant group, raising hopes and renewing difficult questions in a region gripped by conflict.
The US- and France-brokered deal, approved by Israel late Tuesday, calls for an initial two-month halt to fighting and requires Hezbollah to end its armed presence in southern Lebanon, while Israeli troops are to return to their side of the border. It offers both sides an off-ramp from hostilities that have driven more than 1.2 million Lebanese and 50,000 Israelis from their homes.
An intense bombing campaign by Israel has left more than 3,700 people dead, many of them civilians, Lebanese officials say. Over 130 people have been killed on the Israeli side.
But while it could significantly calm the tensions that have inflamed the region, the deal does little directly to resolve the much deadlier war that has raged in Gaza since the Hamas attack on southern Israel in October 2023 that killed 1,200 people.
Hezbollah, which began firing scores of rockets into Israel the following day in support of Hamas, previously said it would keep fighting until there was a stop to the fighting in Gaza. With the new cease-fire, it has backed away from that pledge, in effect leaving Hamas isolated and fighting a war alone.
Here’s what to know about the tentative ceasefire agreement and its potential implications:
The terms of the deal
The agreement reportedly calls for a 60-day halt in fighting that would see Israeli troops retreat to their side of the border while requiring Hezbollah to end its armed presence in a broad swath of southern Lebanon. President Joe Biden said Tuesday that the deal is set to take effect at 4 a.m. local time on Wednesday (9 p.m. EST Tuesday).
Under the deal, thousands of Lebanese troops and U.N. peacekeepers are to deploy to the region south of the Litani River. An international panel led by the US would monitor compliance by all sides. Biden said the deal “was designed to be a permanent cessation of hostilities.”
Israel has demanded the right to act should Hezbollah violate its obligations, but Lebanese officials rejected writing that into the proposal. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday that the military would strike Hezbollah if the UN peacekeeping force, known as UNIFIL, does not enforce the deal.
Lingering uncertainty
Hezbollah indicated it would give the ceasefire pact a chance, but one of the group's leaders said the group's support for the deal hinged on clarity that Israel would not renew its attacks.
“After reviewing the agreement signed by the enemy government, we will see if there is a match between what we stated and what was agreed upon by the Lebanese officials,” Mahmoud Qamati, deputy chair of Hezbollah’s political council, told the Qatari satellite news network Al Jazeera.
“We want an end to the aggression, of course, but not at the expense of the sovereignty of the state” of Lebanon, he said.
The European Union’s top diplomat, Josep Borrell, said Tuesday that Israel’s security concerns had been addressed in the deal.
Where the fighting has left both sides After months of cross-border bombings, Israel can claim major victories, including the killing of Hezbollah’s top leader, Hassan Nasrallah, most of his senior commanders and the destruction of extensive militant infrastructure.
A complex attack in September involving the explosion of hundreds of walkie-talkies and pagers used by Hezbollah was widely attributed to Israel, signaling a remarkable penetration of the militant group.
The damage inflicted on Hezbollah has hit not only in its ranks, but the reputation it built by fighting Israel to a stalemate in the 2006 war. Still, its fighters managed to put up heavy resistance on the ground, slowing Israel’s advance while continuing to fire scores of rockets, missiles and drones across the border each day.
The ceasefire offers relief to both sides, giving Israel’s overstretched army a break and allowing Hezbollah leaders to tout the group’s effectiveness in holding their ground despite Israel’s massive advantage in weaponry. But the group is likely to face a reckoning, with many Lebanese accusing it of tying their country’s fate to Gaza’s at the service of key ally Iran, inflicting great damage on a Lebanese economy that was already in grave condition.
No answers for Gaza Until now, Hezbollah has insisted that it would only halt its attacks on Israel when it agreed to stop fighting in Gaza. Some in the region are likely to view a deal between the Lebanon-based group and Israel as a capitulation.
In Gaza, where officials say the war has killed more than 44,000 Palestinians, Israel’s attacks have inflicted a heavy toll on Hamas, including the killing of the group’s top leaders. But Hamas fighters continue to hold scores of Israeli hostages, giving the militant group a bargaining chip if indirect ceasefire negotiations resume.
Hamas is likely to continue to demand a lasting truce and a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in any such deal, while Netanyahu on Tuesday reiterated his pledge to continue the war until Hamas is destroyed and all hostages are freed.
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, whose forces were ousted from Gaza by Hamas in 2007 and who hopes to one day rule over the territory again as part of an independent Palestinian state, offered a pointed reminder Tuesday of the intractability of the war, demanding urgent international intervention.
“The only way to halt the dangerous escalation we are witnessing in the region, and maintain regional and international stability, security and peace, is to resolve the question of Palestine,” he said in a speech to the UN read by his ambassador.