Facebook Bans Pages of Far-Right Group Britain First for Inciting Hatred

A woman's hand and the logo of Britain First are pictured during a rally in Rochester, Britain November 15, 2014. REUTERS/Kevin Coombs
A woman's hand and the logo of Britain First are pictured during a rally in Rochester, Britain November 15, 2014. REUTERS/Kevin Coombs
TT
20

Facebook Bans Pages of Far-Right Group Britain First for Inciting Hatred

A woman's hand and the logo of Britain First are pictured during a rally in Rochester, Britain November 15, 2014. REUTERS/Kevin Coombs
A woman's hand and the logo of Britain First are pictured during a rally in Rochester, Britain November 15, 2014. REUTERS/Kevin Coombs

Facebook (FB.O) banned on Wednesday far-right group Britain First from its platform and deleted the pages its leader Paul Golding and deputy leader Jayda Fransen for violating rules designed to stop the incitement of hatred.

Facebook said it had taken down Britain First’s Facebook page, which had more than two million likes, and those of its leaders for repeatedly sharing videos designed to insight hatred against Muslims.

Facebook gave repeated warnings to Britain First to remove hateful and Islamaphobic content, but these had been ignored.

A fringe party, British First shot to the fore last November when Trump sparked outrage in Britain and a sharp rebuke from Prime Minister Theresa May for retweeting British far-right anti-Islam videos.

The removal of the Britain First pages comes as Facebook and other internet firms like Twitter (TWTR.N) and Google (GOOGL.O) are under growing pressure to police their networks, refereeing content to prevent extremist groups spreading their messages and recruiting online.

May has joined forces with the leaders of France and Italy to urge social media companies to do more to remove extremist content. She said on Wednesday that she welcomed the announcement by Facebook.

“I hope other companies will follow,” she told British lawmakers.

Facebook said it was careful not to remove posts or pages just because they were controversial and some people didn’t like them, but said that Britain First had gone further and broken its anti-hatred rules with its anti-Islam posts.

“We do not do this lightly, but they have repeatedly posted content designed to incite animosity and hatred against minority groups, which disqualifies the pages from our service,” Facebook said in a blog post.

"We are an open platform for all ideas and political speech goes to the heart of free expression.," Facebook added. "But political views can and should be expressed without hate. People can express robust and controversial opinions without needing to denigrate others on the basis of who they are."



Tens Killed, Injured in West Kordofan, Reports Say

 The public hospital in the city of Al-Majlad before the attack 
 The public hospital in the city of Al-Majlad before the attack 
TT
20

Tens Killed, Injured in West Kordofan, Reports Say

 The public hospital in the city of Al-Majlad before the attack 
 The public hospital in the city of Al-Majlad before the attack 

Dozens of people were killed and injured in a drone strike on a public hospital in the city of Al-Majlad, in the western state of Kordofan, western Sudan. The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and local bodies blamed the Sudanese Army (SAF) for the attack.

“The shelling on Saturday afternoon killed 34 civilians, including medical personnel, and wounded dozens more,” the RSF said in a statement on Sunday.

Also, Al-Majlad Emergency Room, a local group in the West Kordofan State, posted a statement on its Facebook page, blaming the army for the attack.

Until Sunday evening, the Sudanese army had not responded to the accusations. Its official spokesman, Nabil Abdullah, has not answered calls for comment.

According to local sources, the attack on the hospital came shortly after the RSF had transferred to the facility dozens of its members injured in the fierce clashes that broke out last week with the SAF in Babanusa.

On Saturday, the Sudanese army had said in a statement that its forces in the 22nd Infantry Division operating in Babanusa, repelled a major RSF attack on the city.

On Sunday, the Emergency Lawyers, a rights group that monitors abuses in the Sudanese war, confirmed the deaths and injuries in the raid on Al-Majlad’s hospital.

“The hospital is one of the state's primary health facilities. It houses a dialysis unit that provides regular services to patients,” the group said, adding that the attack constitutes a “serious violation.”

The lawyers added, “We categorically reject any explanations that could be offered to justify this attack. We hold the parties behind the shelling fully responsible for the human and material losses.”

Meanwhile, local sources said that the majority of residents in Al-Majlad and the nearby towns and villages, mainly rely on this hospital to receive treatment and healthcare.

Earlier, SAF media sources said on social media that the military had carried out an airstrike on the city of Al-Majdal, without specifying the targeted area.

Despite international calls to protect hospitals during armed conflict, medical facilities have been repeatedly attacked, with both sides of conflict blaming each other for the incidents.

Last May, the SAF blamed the RSF for the attack on a hospital in Obeid, the capital of northern Kordofan, where six people were killed and 12 others injured.