عربي English Türkçe اردو فارسى
Logo
Latest News
Interviews

British Ambassador to Yemen: The West Has Forgotten the Reason of War

British Ambassador to Yemen Michael Aron (Asharq Al-Awsat)
British Ambassador to Yemen Michael Aron (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT
20
TT

British Ambassador to Yemen: The West Has Forgotten the Reason of War

British Ambassador to Yemen Michael Aron (Asharq Al-Awsat)
British Ambassador to Yemen Michael Aron (Asharq Al-Awsat)

The newly-appointed British Ambassador to Yemen, Michael Aron, said that the public opinion in the West has forgotten the reason that had started the war because of the worsening humanitarian crisis.

Stressing the deployment of strenuous efforts to alleviate the sufferings of the Yemeni population, Aron noted that the war started with a coup perpetrated by a small group of Yemenis, in reference to Houthi militias, adding that there was no need for an Iranian role in Yemen.

The ambassador said he believed that efforts initiated by the new UN Special Envoy, Martin Griffiths, would yield “real results to resolve the Yemeni crisis this year,” adding that the envoy would travel to Sanaa and Aden this week to listen to the opinion of the different sides before returning to New York to attend a Security Council session on April 17 and meet with UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres.

On the Saudi role, Aron said: “I think it was clear in the visit of the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to Britain that the Saudis want a solution to the problem and, in my opinion, the Saudi role is very important in this regard as Saudi Arabia supports the solution and the political process but cannot accept to live under the threat of ballistic missiles from a neighboring country.”

“They also want security along their borders, and they reject any role for Iran in Yemen and we support them in all these concerns, and it is very important to agree on these matters,” he added.

Asked about the guarantees that would make the militias accept a new peace initiative, especially with the outcome of the Kuwait negotiations, where the legitimate government signed the international peace agreement and offered many compromises, while the Houthis rejected the agreement, the British ambassador stressed that Yemenis living in areas controlled by Houthis would not accept the continuation of war.

“So I believe that with the efforts of the Special Envoy and the help of the international community, the problem can be solved this year,” Aron stated.

He emphasized that the Yemeni file was a priority for the British government, which he said was helping the UN efforts and the special envoy.

He noted that Griffiths, of British nationality, was an independent employee who has been appointed to assume this post due to his technical expertise.

“We support his efforts… I am optimistic and I think the opportunities in the coming months are real and not just words,” Aron said.

The British ambassador presented an overview of his country’s humanitarian support to Yemen.

He said that during the 2017-2018 fiscal year, Britain has offered 205 Million GBP in aid, which makes the country the second largest donor of financial aid.

He also underlined British support to the efforts of the United Nations, expressing satisfaction with the appointment of Lise Grande as the new UN humanitarian coordinator in Sanaa.

“We are working with the Coalition and neighboring countries to bring aid through the port of Hodeidah. I believe that easing sanctions on the Houthis could be a confidence-building step and would allow the distribution of aid to all Yemenis without any sanctions from both sides,” Aron noted.

The British ambassador highly valued the humanitarian plan launched by Saudi Arabia to support the Yemeni people and the central bank. He also praised efforts deployed by the Yemeni legitimate forces, backed by the Coalition, to fight terrorism on Yemeni territories.

Asked about Iran’s negative role in Yemen, Aron said: “I do not think there is a need for an Iranian role in Yemen. I spoke to the Yemenis and they do not want any role for Iran in their country. The relationship between the Houthis and Iran is new, and is not welcome by Yemenis.”

“So if the Iranians say they want peace in the region and Yemen and they are sincere in that, they should withdraw and stop their military assistance to the Houthis, which is an important part of solving the problem,” he stated.

Most Viewed

 
Interviews

UN Envoy to Sudan: Foreign Arms Fuel Military Illusions, Prolong War

The United Nations’ special envoy to Sudan, Ramtane Lamamra (UN Photo) 
The United Nations’ special envoy to Sudan, Ramtane Lamamra (UN Photo) 
TT
20
TT

UN Envoy to Sudan: Foreign Arms Fuel Military Illusions, Prolong War

The United Nations’ special envoy to Sudan, Ramtane Lamamra (UN Photo) 
The United Nations’ special envoy to Sudan, Ramtane Lamamra (UN Photo) 

The United Nations’ special envoy to Sudan, Ramtane Lamamra, has issued a stark warning about the continued flow of weapons into the war-torn country, saying it only “feeds military delusions” and delays peace.

In his first in-depth interview since assuming the role earlier this year, Lamamra told Asharq Al-Awsat that peace in Sudan cannot be imposed from outside but must be forged by Sudanese themselves through collective will and unity.

“Peace is not imposed, it is made,” he said. “And if Sudanese do not make it, it will not come to them from the outside.”

Lamamra, an Algerian diplomat and former foreign minister with decades of experience in African mediation, emphasized that no military solution is possible in Sudan’s conflict. Instead, he called for an urgent political settlement, warning that “each day of delay means more fragmentation, more bloodshed.”

Following meetings in Port Sudan with Sovereign Council leader Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and ongoing communications with the leadership of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), Lamamra acknowledged that the path to peace remains long and difficult.

He condemned what he described as a dangerous “logic of dominance” driving the conflict—a belief that complete military victory is possible, regardless of the cost to Sudan’s social fabric. “Some actors still think peace can wait until one side wins,” he said. “But that’s a delusion. There is no military solution.”

Instead, he stressed: “Sudan needs a political solution based on compromise, not revenge.”

Since taking office, Lamamra has focused on coordinating rather than expanding international mediation efforts. He voiced concern about the “overcrowding of mediators,” which he said has allowed Sudanese factions to exploit international divisions.

To address this, Lamamra launched a consultative group that includes the African Union, the Arab League, and peace-sponsoring countries. The group has met in Cairo, Djibouti, and Mauritania and plans to convene again in Brussels under EU sponsorship.

“What we need is not more mediators, but consensus around a unified vision,” he said. “Multiple tracks have allowed some parties to bet on contradictory international positions, delaying serious efforts toward peace.”

He pointed to UN Security Council Resolution 2724, which tasked him with coordinating peace efforts, emphasizing that its implementation hinges on aligning international efforts behind a single, realistic peace strategy.

Asked whether Sudan’s war has faded from global attention, Lamamra acknowledged that media coverage may fluctuate but said the humanitarian catastrophe continues to deepen.

“The suffering is daily and ongoing,” he said, highlighting the dire conditions in North Darfur and the rapidly deteriorating situation in Zamzam camp. “The tragedy breaks the heart.”

With over 13 million internally displaced and millions more seeking refuge abroad, Lamamra described Sudan as the site of the world’s largest humanitarian crisis today. “This is a country under siege by arms, division, and international silence,” he said.

He praised the special attention paid by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who has longstanding ties to Sudan dating back to his leadership of the UN refugee agency.

Lamamra was especially vocal about the dangerous role of foreign military support. “Feeding the war with weapons is not support for resolution—it is participation in prolonging delusion and division,” he said.

He accused some regional and international actors of backing Sudanese factions in hopes of future influence. “They forget that war leaves nothing intact to control,” he noted. “It’s in no one’s interest to see Sudan collapse.”

The envoy reiterated the UN’s calls for a total halt to arms shipments and strict enforcement of Security Council resolutions aimed at cutting off military funding.

Despite international interference, Lamamra emphasized that the ultimate responsibility for ending the war lies with Sudanese themselves. “History will judge them first and foremost,” he underlined.

Lamamra said the Jeddah Declaration—an agreement brokered by Saudi Arabia to ensure humanitarian access and civilian protection—remains a viable starting point for peace efforts. He commended Riyadh’s efforts and urged regional actors to intensify pressure on warring factions.

He also pointed to the upcoming Arab League summit in Baghdad as a potential turning point. “Sudan is central to the Arab identity. This is not a crisis that allows for neutrality,” he said.

In a direct message to the Sudanese public, Lamamra expressed admiration for their resilience. “I visited Port Sudan recently and met with leaders and citizens. I was moved by their hospitality and strong will to take charge of their future,” he said.

He pledged the UN’s continued support, acknowledging the scale of the humanitarian challenge: “Children, women, and innocent civilians are being stripped of life’s basic necessities. This crisis demands a moral awakening—not just from governments, but from everyone who hears and sees.”

Lamamra concluded: “Peace is not a one-time event—it’s a long-term project. And if we don’t begin now, there may be nothing left to build on in a few months.”