Geagea Warns Against 'Implicating Lebanon in Adventures'

Lebanese Forces Leader Samir Geagea (Reuters)
Lebanese Forces Leader Samir Geagea (Reuters)
TT

Geagea Warns Against 'Implicating Lebanon in Adventures'

Lebanese Forces Leader Samir Geagea (Reuters)
Lebanese Forces Leader Samir Geagea (Reuters)

Lebanese Forces Party Leader Samir Geagea warned Hezbollah of engaging, alongside Iran, in any war that might break out in the region and considered such move as the “ruin of Lebanon.”

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Geagea noted that in the event of the eruption of a major Israeli-Iranian and US-Iranian confrontation, “which I believe is unlikely now”, Hezbollah “will think a lot” before engaging in it, “because it is not a simple thing and we should have a clear position taking into consideration the country’s interests.”

“No one should take part in any adventure because it is not the time for adventures. The region will be burning and we do not accept that anyone implicates the country and destroys it except in case of direct attack from any foreign country on Lebanon,” he stated.

On a different note, the LF leader said that the circumstances of the recent naturalization decree “constituted a blow to the tenure of President Michel Aoun,” ruling out, however, the president’s direct responsibility for the names included in the decree.

“Although it was the president who signed the decree, I believe that he was not informed of all the names included,” he said.

Geagea stressed that the problem with the current naturalization decree was that no one knew anything about it, which has raised many doubts.

“Everything was done secretly, away from politicians as well,” he said, adding: “Reactions among the Lebanese communities, whether among Shiite, Sunni, Christian or Druze, were negative, because those concerned behaved in a very suspicious manner, and therefore we couldn't remain silent on a subject like this, regardless of whether it was the best decree of the universe.”

On his assessment of the latest parliamentary elections, Geagea said his party fought the electoral battle alone, except in three districts where it allied with the Kataeb party.

He underlined in this regard that the Lebanese Forces’ electoral alliances were based on the party’s political stances, and were not mere alliances without any political meaning.

“We have fought the elections with new and acceptable figures, who reflect our reality and the image we would like to see in power and governance in Lebanon,” he noted.

As for the LF share in the next government, Geagea said his party must be represented based on its “popular, political and parliamentary size.”

“The elections proved that there are two great forces within the Christian community. They proved that there are equal forces,” he explained, noting that Christian representation in the government must be agreed upon by the LF and the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) and the president.

Asked about his party’s relation with Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil, the LF leader emphasized that the real problem was not about governmental shares and ministerial portfolios, but about the principle of partnership.

“Bassil’s concept of partnership is to support anything that he does. As for us, partnership is when we agree and support each other in anything we want to do, and if no agreement is reached, we don’t support the step that we have not agreed upon,” he explained.

He noted in this regard that Bassil “considers himself to be representing the tenure”, but the LF always “avoids dragging the presidency into internal sensitivities.”

Geagea also said he believed that there were no obstacles hampering the formation of a new government.



Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich has told Asharq Al-Awsat that the US does not plan to withdraw its forces from Syria.

The US is committed to “the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with,” he said.

Here is the full text of the interview.

Question: Mr. Goldrich, thank you so much for taking the time to sit with us today. I know you are leaving your post soon. How do you assess the accomplishments and challenges remaining?

Answer: Thank you very much for the chance to talk with you today. I've been in this position for three years, and so at the end of three years, I can see that there's a lot that we accomplished and a lot that we have left to do. But at the beginning of a time I was here, we had just completed a review of our Syria policy, and we saw that we needed to focus on reducing suffering for the people in Syria. We needed to reduce violence. We needed to hold the regime accountable for things that are done and most importantly, from the US perspective, we needed to keep ISIS from reemerging as a threat to our country and to other countries. At the same time, we also realized that there wouldn't be a solution to the crisis until there was a political process under resolution 2254, so in each of these areas, we've seen both progress and challenges, but of course, on ISIS, we have prevented the reemergence of the threat from northeast Syria, and we've helped deal with people that needed to be repatriated out of the prisons, and we dealt with displaced people in al-Hol to reduce the numbers there. We helped provide for stabilization in those parts of Syria.

Question: I want to talk a little bit about the ISIS situation now that the US troops are still there, do you envision a timeline where they will be withdrawn? Because there were some reports in the press that there is a plan from the Biden administration to withdraw.

Answer: Yeah. So right now, our focus is on the mission that we have there to keep ISIS from reemerging. So I know there have been reports, but I want to make clear that we remain committed to the role that we play in that part of Syria, to the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with, and to the need to prevent that threat from reemerging.

Question: So you can assure people who are saying that you might withdraw, that you are remaining for the time being?

Answer: Yes, and that we remain committed to this mission which needs to continue to be pursued.

Question: You also mentioned the importance of humanitarian aid. The US has been leading on this. Are you satisfied with where you are today on the humanitarian front in Syria?

Answer: We remain committed to the role that we play to provide for humanitarian assistance in Syria. Of the money that was pledged in Brussels, we pledged $593 million just this past spring, and we overall, since the beginning of the conflict, have provided $18 billion both to help the Syrians who are inside of Syria and to help the refugees who are in surrounding countries. And so we remain committed to providing that assistance, and we remain keenly aware that 90% of Syrians are living in poverty right now, and that there's been suffering there. We're doing everything we can to reduce the suffering, but I think where we would really like to be is where there's a larger solution to the whole crisis, so Syrian people someday will be able to provide again for themselves and not need this assistance.

Question: And that's a perfect key to my next question. Solution in Syria. you are aware that the countries in the region are opening up to Assad again, and you also have the EU signaling overture to the Syrian regime and Assad. How do you deal with that?

Answer: For the United States, our policy continues to be that we will not normalize with the regime in Syria until there's been authentic and enduring progress on the goals of resolution 2254, until the human rights of the Syrian people are respected and until they have the civil and human rights that they deserve. We know other countries have engaged with the regime. When those engagements happen, we don't support them, but we remind the countries that are engaged that they should be using their engagements to push forward on the shared international goals under 2254, and that whatever it is that they're doing should be for the sake of improving the situation of the Syrian people.

Question: Let's say that all of the countries decided to talk to Assad, aren’t you worried that the US will be alienated in the process?

Answer: The US will remain true to our own principles and our own policies and our own laws, and the path for the regime in Syria to change its relationship with us is very clear, if they change the behaviors that led to the laws that we have and to the policies that we have, if those behaviors change and the circumstances inside of Syria change, then it's possible to have a different kind of relationship, but that's where it has to start.

Question: My last question to you before you leave, if you have to pick one thing that you need to do in Syria today, what is it that you would like to see happening today?

Answer: So there are a number of things, I think that will always be left and that there are things that we will try to do, to try to make them happen. We want to hold people accountable in Syria for things that have happened. So even today, we observed something called the International Day for victims of enforced disappearances, there are people that are missing, and we're trying to draw attention to the need to account for the missing people. So our step today was to sanction a number of officials who were responsible for enforced disappearances, but we also created something called the independent institution for missing persons, and that helps the families, in the non-political way, get information on what's happened. So I'd like to see some peace for the families of the missing people. I'd like to see the beginning of a political process, there hasn't been a meeting of the constitutional committee in two years, and I think that's because the regime has not been cooperating in political process steps. So we need to change that situation. And I would, of course, like it's important to see the continuation of the things that we were talking about, so keeping ISIS from reemerging and maintaining assistance as necessary in the humanitarian sphere. So all these things, some of them are ongoing, and some of them remain to be achieved. But the Syrian people deserve all aspects of our policy to be fulfilled and for them to be able to return to a normal life.