Palestinian President to Honor Prisoners who Died in Israeli Jails 38 Years Ago

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. (Reuters)
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. (Reuters)
TT

Palestinian President to Honor Prisoners who Died in Israeli Jails 38 Years Ago

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. (Reuters)
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. (Reuters)

Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas decided to grant the "Jerusalem Medal of Courage" to the three prisoners, who died as they went on a hunger strike in Nafha Prison 38 years ago.

This move came as clear defiance of Israel's decision to deduct the equivalent of the salaries paid to the families of prisoners from the money it pays to the PA.

Secretary General of Fatah Movement’s Central Committee Jibril Rajoub said Wednesday that the president's coincided with the 38th anniversary of the 33-day historic hunger strike by 68 prisoners at Nafha Prison.

The strike ended with the death of Ali al-Jaafari, Rasim Halaweh and Isaac Maragha, while several inmates were wounded.

“This medal honors the courage of the martyrs and their heroic actions in defending their rights and struggle for freedom and the freedom of their people," Rajoub added.

He stressed that the medal does not only honor their families, but also the whole prisoner movement, including those who are still in Israeli jails and others who have been released.

This medal is one of the highest honors given to the military and civilians who display great courage.

Abbas's decision, which is expected to provoke Israel, came a week after Israel enacted a law to financially penalize the PA for paying stipends to “terrorists” jailed in Israel and their families.

Lawmakers voted 87-15 in favor of the legislation that orders Israel to withhold part of the roughly $130 million in tax revenues that Israel collects on behalf of the Palestinians each month under interim peace agreements.

Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman later announced the establishment of a body to cut funding for the allocation of Palestinian prisoners and to track PA payments to convicted prisoners and their families.

The body, known as the National Office for Combating the Financing of Terrorism, will be charged with enacting a new law that will reduce the equivalent amount of tax revenue collected by Israel for the PA.



Lebanese Army Awaits Political Decision to Implement UNSCR 1701

Soldiers from the Lebanese Army and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol near the southern village of Marjayoun (AFP).
Soldiers from the Lebanese Army and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol near the southern village of Marjayoun (AFP).
TT

Lebanese Army Awaits Political Decision to Implement UNSCR 1701

Soldiers from the Lebanese Army and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol near the southern village of Marjayoun (AFP).
Soldiers from the Lebanese Army and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol near the southern village of Marjayoun (AFP).

Discussions are underway on the role of the Lebanese army in maintaining security in South Lebanon amid rising optimism about a potential ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah and the implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701

As part of these preparations, the Lebanese government has begun strengthening the army by recruiting 1,500 new soldiers out of the 6,000 needed, aligning with the outcomes of the Paris Conference held on October 23, which allocated 200 million euros to support the military institution, from a broader package intended to help the Lebanese people during the Israel-Hezbollah war.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, a security official highlighted that the army currently has 4,500 personnel stationed south of the Litani River but requires additional manpower.

The unidentified official noted, however, that any effective deployment would require a political decision and government support. “The Lebanese military will implement Resolution 1701 as is, with no intention of clashing with any party. However, if Israel violates Lebanese sovereignty, the army is fully prepared to respond,” he said.

Although Hezbollah opposes withdrawing from south of the Litani and handing over border security duties to the Lebanese military and UNIFIL, claiming the army lacks the capabilities to defend against Israeli aggression, the security source clarified that the military has been authorized to repel any attacks but will avoid initiating conflict. The army’s expanded deployment depends on a political decision, which, once made, will see the military act without hesitation to uphold Lebanese sovereignty.

While military preparedness is essential, Brigadier General Wehbeh Qatisha argues that Lebanon’s security requires more than just troops or advanced weaponry at the border. The presence of the Lebanese military as a representative of the Lebanese state is also a significant deterrent. He pointed out that prior to 1970, Israel refrained from attacking Lebanon, despite a much smaller army. However, he cautioned that even with a substantial deployment today, the persistence of Hezbollah’s military presence would continue to undermine Lebanon’s stability and security.

Since the 1969 Cairo Agreement, which allowed the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) to launch operations against Israel from southern Lebanon, the Lebanese army has been restricted in its ability to enforce security along the border. After the PLO’s departure in 1982, Hezbollah took over military operations in the South. Even after the 2006 war and the adoption of Resolution 1701, which called for the Lebanese military and UNIFIL to secure the border, Hezbollah retained its armed presence and continued to conduct exercises simulating conflict with Israel. The latter violated the international resolution thousands of times, until the last war broke out against the background of turning southern Lebanon into a front supporting Gaza.

Qatisha emphasized that the path to stability lies in comprehensive implementation of international resolutions, particularly 1701 and 1559, and restricting arms to the Lebanese army. He argued that achieving balanced deterrence requires not only military force but also a commitment to diplomacy and international support.