Bahrain FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: Qatar Burned The Return Ships

 Bahraini Foreign Minister Sheikh Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Bahraini Foreign Minister Sheikh Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT
20

Bahrain FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: Qatar Burned The Return Ships

 Bahraini Foreign Minister Sheikh Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Bahraini Foreign Minister Sheikh Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Bahraini Foreign Minister Sheikh Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa described the ongoing dispute with Qatar as “unprecedented and very deep,” stressing that Doha “has burned the return ships.”

“There must be a new agreement and a new regime, and Doha should be placed under scrutiny,” he said.

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, the minister emphasized that Qatar was the least to commit to the Gulf Cooperation Council agreements. Underlining the necessity for reforms in Doha, he noted that the Arab quartet was holding on its stance and conditions with regards to the crisis.

“The policy of hostility adopted by Qatar against the GCC states is clear, and the most blatant example is its prevalent hostility towards Saudi Arabia recently, in particular by insulting Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman,” he noted.

The foreign minister went on to say that the crisis with Qatar has severely deepened.

“I do not know how Qatar will return. It has committed to the enemies of the region, such as Iran, and separated itself from the GCC. We are realistic in dealing with this issue and we don’t want to waste more time,” he affirmed.

As for Qatar’s participation in the upcoming Gulf Summit, which will be hosted by Saudi Arabia on Sunday, Sheikh Khalid ruled out the possibility to freeze the ongoing dispute during the meeting, “because the issue cannot be solved only by warm salutations.”

Qatar’s delay and escalation have made the solution even more difficult, according to the minister.

Asked about the conditions set by the Arab quartet boycotting Qatar (Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain and Egypt), Sheikh Khalid said: “The conditions are the same and we will not give up on them because they are based on international law, international principles and the principles of good neighborliness and respect.”

“What I see is that Qatar has burned all the return ships, and no longer has any ship that could bring it back to the Council… Once Qatar commits to carrying out the demands, we will have another opinion,” he added.

On a different note, the Bahraini foreign minister said that the upcoming GCC meeting would discuss strategic military cooperation among GCC States and other issues of mutual concern.

Commenting on the ongoing crisis in Yemen, he emphasized that the Houthis were not marginalized, but “they excluded the others and seized power adopting the Hezbollah and Iranian approach.”

“As for Iran, the ball is now in its court. It is the offensive country that is trying to impose its dominance. It is the one that is insulting and harming the region. The GCC countries stand to defend their security and stability until Iran changes its approach,” the minister affirmed.



Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
TT
20

Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon

The former US special envoy, Amos Hochstein, said the maritime border agreement struck between Lebanon and Israel in 2022 and the ceasefire deal reached between Israel and Hezbollah at the end of last year show that a land border demarcation “is within reach.”

“We can get to a deal but there has to be political willingness,” he said.

“The agreement of the maritime boundary was unique because we’d been trying to work on it for over 10 years,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“I understood that a simple diplomatic push for a line was not going to work. It had to be a more complicated and comprehensive agreement. And there was a real threat that people didn’t realize that if we didn’t reach an agreement we would have ended up in a conflict - in a hot conflict - or war over resources.”

He said there is a possibility to reach a Lebanese-Israeli land border agreement because there’s a “provision that mandated the beginning of talks on the land boundary.”

“I believe with concerted effort they can be done quickly,” he said, adding: “It is within reach.”

Hochstein described communication with Hezbollah as “complicated,” saying “I never had only one interlocutor with Hezbollah .... and the first step is to do shuttle diplomacy between Lebanon, Lebanon and Lebanon, and then you had to go to Israel and do shuttle diplomacy between the different factions” there.

“The reality of today and the reality of 2022 are different. Hezbollah had a lock on the political system in Lebanon in the way it doesn’t today.”

North of Litani

The 2024 ceasefire agreement requires Israel to withdraw from Lebanon and for the Lebanese army to take full operational control of the south Litani region, all the way up to the border. It requires Hezbollah to demilitarize and move further north of the Litani region, he said.

“I don’t want to get into the details of other violations,” he said, but stated that the ceasefire works if both conditions are met.

Lebanon’s opportunity

“Lebanon can rewrite its future ... but it has to be a fundamental change,” he said.

“There is so much potential in Lebanon and if you can bring back opportunity and jobs - and through economic and legal reforms in the country - I think that the future is very bright,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Hezbollah is not trying to control the politics and remember that Hezbollah is just an arm of Iran” which “should not be imposing its political will in Lebanon, Israel should not be imposing its military will in Lebanon, Syria should not. No one should. This a moment for Lebanon to make decisions for itself,” he added.