Kurdistan Flag Row Goes to Federal Supreme Court

Kurds celebrating in Erbil, Iraq September 22, 2017.(File Photo: Reuters)
Kurds celebrating in Erbil, Iraq September 22, 2017.(File Photo: Reuters)
TT

Kurdistan Flag Row Goes to Federal Supreme Court

Kurds celebrating in Erbil, Iraq September 22, 2017.(File Photo: Reuters)
Kurds celebrating in Erbil, Iraq September 22, 2017.(File Photo: Reuters)

A number of Kurdish members of Iraqi parliament representing Kirkuk province filed a complaint with the Federal Supreme Court in Baghdad, against governor of Kirkuk and MP Rakan Saeed al-Jabouri, following his objection to hoist Kurdistan region’s flag over the headquarters of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK).

A PUK MP Rebwar Taha explained that the complaint contains two parts: the first against Jabouri, as he instructed the security forces to use force to take Kurdistan flag down from the party’s headquarters, and the second is related to the interpretation of the constitutional and legal provisions of areas constitutionally named “disputed areas”.

Article 140 of the Iraqi Constitution calls for the normalization of areas it refers to as disputed, to be followed by a referendum on whether or not those regions want to be part of the Kurdistan Region.

“The responsibility placed upon the executive branch of the Iraqi Transitional Government stipulated in Article 58 of the Transitional Administrative Law shall extend and continue to the executive authority elected in accordance with this Constitution, provided that it accomplishes completely (normalization and census and concludes with a referendum in Kirkuk and other disputed territories to determine the will of their citizens)," Article 140 reads.

Taha told Asharq Al-Awsat that the flags of Kurdistan will remain hoisted over PUK’s offices and headquarters until the Federal Court gives its verdict.

He asserted that the party believes and respects the judicial authority which “we hope will be legal and constitutional, especially that Kirkuk is one of the most important disputed areas.”

PUK MP Bestoon Adil, told Asharq Al-Awsat that Kurdish flags were raised in Kirkuk before ISIS entered the region, and the Federal authorities in Kirkuk did not object at the time, confirming that the matter is legal and constitutional, but “some officials are politicizing the issue to achieve certain goals.”

“We discussed the matter in details with the Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi, who preferred to refer the case to the Federal Court,” he indicated.

He pointed out that all Kurdish parliamentary blocs support this demand, but the complaint was only submitted by PUK.

The MP reported that several complaints, backed by Kurdish MPs, had been filed by Kurdish residents in Kurdish areas against decisions taken by the governor.

Asharq Al-Awsat tried to reach Kirkuk governor for a response, but he did not take our repeated calls.



Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
TT

Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)

Politicians in Beirut said they have not received any credible information about Washington resuming its mediation efforts towards reaching a ceasefire in Lebanon despite reports to the contrary.

Efforts came to a halt after US envoy Amos Hochstein’s last visit to Beirut three weeks ago.

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri dismissed the reports as media fodder, saying nothing official has been received.

Lebanon is awaiting tangible proposals on which it can build its position, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The only credible proposal on the table is United Nations Security Council resolution 1701, whose articles must be implemented in full by Lebanon and Israel, “not just Lebanon alone,” he stressed.

Resolution 1701 was issued to end the 2006 July war between Hezbollah and Israel and calls for removing all weapons from southern Lebanon and that the only armed presence there be restricted to the army and UN peacekeepers.

Western diplomatic sources in Beirut told Asharq Al-Awsat that Berri opposes one of the most important articles of the proposed solution to end the current conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.

He is opposed to the German and British participation in the proposed mechanism to monitor the implementation of resolution 1701. The other participants are the United States and France.

Other sources said Berri is opposed to the mechanism itself since one is already available and it is embodied in the UN peacekeepers, whom the US and France can join.

The sources revealed that the solution to the conflict has a foreign and internal aspect. The foreign one includes Israel, the US and Russia and seeks guarantees that would prevent Hezbollah from rearming itself. The second covers Lebanese guarantees on the implementation of resolution 1701.

Berri refused to comment on the media reports, but told Asharq Al-Awsat that this was the first time that discussions are being held about guarantees.

He added that “Israel is now in crisis because it has failed to achieve its military objectives, so it has resorted to more killing and destruction undeterred.”

He highlighted the “steadfastness of the UN peacekeepers in the South who have refused to leave their positions despite the repeated Israeli attacks.”