Germany Investigates Chemical Material Exports to Syria

Man with a child are seen in hospital in the besieged town of Douma, Eastern Ghouta, Damascus, Syria February 25, 2018. (File Photo: Reuters)
Man with a child are seen in hospital in the besieged town of Douma, Eastern Ghouta, Damascus, Syria February 25, 2018. (File Photo: Reuters)
TT

Germany Investigates Chemical Material Exports to Syria

Man with a child are seen in hospital in the besieged town of Douma, Eastern Ghouta, Damascus, Syria February 25, 2018. (File Photo: Reuters)
Man with a child are seen in hospital in the besieged town of Douma, Eastern Ghouta, Damascus, Syria February 25, 2018. (File Photo: Reuters)

Authorities in Germany did not authorize chemical material exports by German companies to Syria, which were believed to have been used by the Syrian regime to carry out chemical attacks against civilians, a source at the German Foreign Ministry told Asharq Al-Awsat. 

The source said the public prosecutor in the western German city of Essen opened an investigation into whether the companies that sent the materials to associates of the Assad regime had broken European sanctions.

The German authorities remain vigilant about this type of exports and are well aware of the risks associated with the use of chemical weapons in Syria, so the export of dual-use chemicals is subject to European sanctions, explained the source.

German newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung has revealed that a number of German companies sold substances to a company in Syria that could go into chemical weapons.

The newspaper named in its report the world’s largest chemicals distributor, Germany’s Brenntag, saying it sold chemical raw materials to a Syrian pharmaceutical company.

The report stated that through a Swiss subsidiary, Brenntag supplied chemicals diethylamine and isopropanol in 2014 to Syrian drugmaker Mediterranean Pharmaceutical Industries (MPI) to produce a pain killer.

Although these materials can be used in manufacturing drugs, they are also used in producing chemical weapons such as sarin gas which the Syrian regime used in Khan Sheikhoun in 2017, killing dozens.

The United Nations has counted 32 chemical attacks by the Syrian regime against civilians.

Prosecutors in Essen, where Brenntag is headquartered, announced they have initiated legal proceedings and are considering to open a formal investigation.

Shares in Brenntag fell about 6 percent on Wednesday after the report that the company sold products to a firm in Syria.

Traders cited concern about the risk of political repercussions in the United States for the German group, which has a global workforce of more than 16,600 people, according to Reuters.

Brenntag implicated a Swiss pharmaceutical company without naming it when it said in a statement that the Syrian company, which bought the chemicals, was making painkillers under license for “a well-known Swiss pharmaceutical manufacturer”.

Swiss drug-maker Novartis said it had granted MPI contract manufacturing and local distribution rights for products such as pain relief skin gel Voltaren.

Reuters said Novartis noted that while it supplied the active ingredient for the product in 2014, it was MPI’s responsibility to procure other ingredients such as isopropanol or diethylamine and that the Swiss group played no role in that.

Prosecutors in Essen confirmed they had received a complaint about the company from three non-governmental organizations including Berlin-based Syrian Archive established by Hadi al-Khatib in 2011.

Brenntag confirmed to Sueddeutsche Zeitung that isopropanol and diethylamine were delivered to Syria via its subsidiary Brenntag Schweizerhall AG, "in accordance with applicable law".

“Delivery of both products was made in accordance with applicable law,” Brenntag said in its statement.

Formal authorization has been required since 2012 for exports of diethylamine, and since 2013 for isopropanol, meaning the permit requirements were issued when the company exported the chemicals to Syria.

Germany’s Federal Office of Economics and Export Control, which is responsible for approving such exports, said that it had not issued any permits for those chemicals during the period in question.



Iran Says Could Abandon Nuclear Weapons But Has Conditions

A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
TT

Iran Says Could Abandon Nuclear Weapons But Has Conditions

A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)

Iran on Saturday hinted it would be willing to negotiate on a nuclear agreement with the upcoming administration of US President-elect Donald Trump, but that it has conditions.
Last Thursday, the UN atomic watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors passed a resolution ordering Iran to urgently improve cooperation with the agency and requesting a “comprehensive” report aimed at pressuring Iran into fresh nuclear talks.
Ali Larijani, advisor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said Iran and the US are now in a new position concerning the nuclear file.
In a post on X, he said, “If the current US administration say they are only against Iran’s nuclear weapons, they must accept Iran’s conditions and provide compensation for the damages caused.”

He added, “The US should accept the necessary conditions... so that a new agreement can be reached.”
Larijani stated that Washington withdrew from the JCPOA, thus causing damage to Iran, adding that his country started increasing its production of 60% enriched uranium.
The Iran nuclear accord, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), was reached to limit the Iranian nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.
The deal began unraveling in 2018, when Washington, under Trump’s first administration, unilaterally withdrew from the accord and re-imposed a sanction regime of “maximum pressure” on Tehran.
In retaliation, Iran has rapidly ramped up its nuclear activities, including by increasing its stockpiles of enriched uranium to 60% — close to the 90% threshold required to develop a nuclear bomb.
It also began gradually rolling back some of its commitments by increasing its uranium stockpiles and enriching beyond the 3.67% purity -- enough for nuclear power stations -- permitted under the deal.
Since 2021, Tehran has significantly decreased its cooperation with the IAEA by deactivating surveillance devices to monitor the nuclear program and barring UN inspectors.
Most recently, Iran escalated its confrontations with the Agency by announcing it would launch a series of “new and advanced” centrifuges. Its move came in response to a resolution adopted by the United Nations nuclear watchdog that censures Tehran for what the agency called lack of cooperation.
Centrifuges are the machines that enrich uranium transformed into gas by rotating it at very high speed, increasing the proportion of fissile isotope material (U-235).
Shortly after the IAEA passed its resolution last Thursday, Tehran spoke about the “dual role” of IAEA’s chief, Raphael Grossi.
Chairman of the Iranian Parliamentary National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, Ebrahim Azizi said, “The statements made by Grossi in Tehran do not match his actions in Vienna.”
And contrary to the statements of Azizi, who denied his country’s plans to build nuclear weapons, Tehran did not originally want to freeze its uranium stockpile enriched to 60%
According to the IAEA’s definition, around 42 kg of uranium enriched to 60% is the amount at which creating one atomic weapon is theoretically possible. The 60% purity is just a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
Spokesperson and deputy head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, Behrouz Kamalvandi, said on Friday that IAEA inspectors were scheduled to come immediately after the meeting of the Board of Governors to evaluate Iran’s capacity, “with those capacities remaining for a month without any interruption in enrichment at 60% purity.”
Iran’s news agency, Tasnim, quoted Kamalvandi as saying that “the pressures resulting from the IAEA resolution are counterproductive, meaning that they increase our ability to enrich.”
He added: “Currently, not only have we not stopped enrichment, but we have orders to increase the speed, and we are gradually working on that."